UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

Filed by the Registrantx                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

AT&T Inc.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

          

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

  

 

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

 

 

  

 

 (5) Total fee paid:
  
  

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

  

 

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

  

 

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 

 

  

 

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 

 

  

 

 

 

 


LOGO

AT&T INC.

Notice of

2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

and

Proxy Statement

LOGO

 

 


LOGO

AT&T Inc.

One AT&T Plaza

Whitacre Tower

208 S. Akard Street

Dallas, TX 75202

NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING

OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

LOGO

To the holders of Common Stock of AT&T Inc.:

The 2013 Annual Meeting2016 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders of AT&T Inc. will be held as shown below.follows:

 

LOGO

When:

  

9:009.00 a.m., local time, Friday, April 26, 201329, 2016

Where:

Northern Hotel

Grand Ballroom

19 North Broadway

Billings, MT 59101

The purpose of the annual meeting is to consider and take action on the following:

 

Little America Hotel & Resort

2800 West Lincolnway

Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009

•  
1.Election of 13 Directors

•  
2.Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors

•  
3.Advisory approval of executive compensation

•  
4.Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral2016 Incentive Plan

•  Such
5.Any other matters, including certain stockholder proposals, asbusiness that may properly come before the meeting.

Holders of AT&T Inc. common stock of record at the close of business on February 27, 2013,meeting, including certain stockholder proposals.

Holders of AT&T Inc. common stock of record at the close of business on March 1, 2016, are entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment of the meeting. Please sign, date, and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

LOGO

Stacey Maris

Senior Vice President and Secretary

March 11, 2016

Your Vote is Important

 

Please sign, date and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

 

LOGO

Ann Effinger Meuleman

Senior Vice President and Secretary

March 11, 2013


PROXY STATEMENT

AT&T Inc.

One AT&T Plaza

Whitacre Tower

208 S. Akard Street

Dallas, Texas 75202

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for

the stockholder meeting to be held on April 26, 2013:

The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are

available at www.edocumentview.com/att.

Table of ContentsPage

Proxy Statement Summary

2

General Information

3

Board of Directors

5

Related Person Transactions

13

Common Stock Ownership

13

Matters To Be Voted Upon

15

Item 1.      Election of Directors

16

Item 2.      Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young as Independent Auditors

24

Item 3.      Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

24

Item 4.      Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

25

Items 5-8. Stockholder Proposals

27

Audit Committee

35

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

37

Executive Compensation Tables

60

Equity Compensation Plan Information

77

Other Business

78

Appendix – Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

A-1

 

LOGOPlease sign, date and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through

Attending the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person.

Meeting

 

AT&T – Page 1


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all information you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Time and Date:

9:00 a.m., local time, Friday, April 26, 2013

Place:

Little America Hotel & Resort, 2800 West Lincolnway, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009

Record Date:

February 27, 2013

Voting:

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote.

Attendance:

If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please vote your proxy and bring the admission ticket (attached to the proxy card or the Annual Meeting Notice) to the Annual Meeting. If you do not have an admission ticket or if you hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker, or other institution, you may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting proof of your ownership of AT&T stock as of February 27, 2013March 1, 2016 (the record date).

Agenda and Voting Recommendations

  

  
Item  Description  Board Recommendation    Page 

1

  Election of 13 Directors  FOR each nominee     16  

2

  Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for 2013  FOR     24  

3

  Advisory approval of executive compensation  FOR     24  

4

  Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan  FOR     25  

5

  Stockholder Proposal – Political Contributions Report  AGAINST     28  

6

  Stockholder Proposal – Lead Batteries Report  AGAINST     29  

7

  Stockholder Proposal – Compensation Packages  AGAINST     31  

8

  Stockholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman  AGAINST     34  

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on April 29, 2016:

The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are available at www.edocumentview.com/att

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | Current Board Membersi |


 

Information About the Meeting and Voting

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on April 29, 2016:

The following table provides summary information about each Director. proxy statement and annual report to security holders

are available at www.edocumentview.com/att.

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement Summary2
Information About the Meeting and Voting3
Related Person Transactions6
Board of Directors7
Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon15

Item 1.

Election of Directors

16

Item 2.

Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP

as Independent Auditors

23

Item 3.

Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

23

Item 4.

Approve 2016 Incentive Plan

24

Item 5.

Stockholder Proposal

27

Item 6.

Stockholder Proposal

29

Item 7.

Stockholder Proposal

31

Audit Committee

34

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

36

Executive Compensation Tables

61

Other Information

75

Appendix A – 2016 Incentive Plan

A-1

LOGOPlease sign, date and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 1 |


Proxy Statement Summary

Proxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all the information you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Attending the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please vote your proxy and bring the admission ticket (attached to the proxy card or the Annual Meeting Notice) to the Annual Meeting. If you do not have an admission ticket or if you hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker, or other institution, you may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting proof of your ownership of AT&T stock as of March 1, 2016 (the record date).

Agenda and Voting Recommendations
Item Description  Board Recommendation Page
1 

Election of Directors

  FOR each nominee 16
2 

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for 2016

  FOR 23
3 

Advisory approval of executive compensation

  FOR 23
4 

Approve 2016 Incentive Plan

  FOR 24
5 

Stockholder Proposal: Political Spending Report

  AGAINST 27
6 

Stockholder Proposal: Lobbying Report

  AGAINST 29
7 

Stockholder Proposal: Independent Board Chairman

  AGAINST 31

Current Board Members*
Name Age 

Director

Since

 Principal Occupation Committees

Randall L. Stephenson

 55 2005 Chairman, CEO, and President, AT&T Inc. Executive

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

 65 2015 Retired Global Chief Exec. Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers Int. Limited Audit

Richard W. Fisher

 66 2015 Former President and Chief Exec. Officer of Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Corp. Dev. and Finance

Scott T. Ford

 53 2012 Member and Chief Executive Officer, Westrock Group, LLC Corp. Dev. and Finance, Executive, Human Resources

Glenn H. Hutchins

 60 2014 Co-Founder, Silver Lake Corp. Dev. and Finance, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

William E. Kennard

 59 2014 Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the FCC Corp. Gov. and Nominating, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

Jon C. Madonna**

 72 2005 Retired Chairman and CEO, KPMG Audit, Corp. Gov. and Nominating, Executive

Michael B. McCallister

 63 2013 Retired Chairman and CEO, Humana Inc. Audit, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

John B. McCoy**

 72 1999 Retired Chairman and CEO, Bank One Corporation 

Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

Executive, Human Resources

Beth E. Mooney

 61 2013 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, KeyCorp Corp. Dev. and Finance, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

Joyce M. Roché

 68 1998 Retired President and CEO, Girls Inc. 

Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

Executive, Human Resources

Matthew K. Rose

 56 2010 Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC 

Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

Human Resources

Cynthia B. Taylor

 54 2013 President and CEO, Oil States International, Inc. Audit, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

 68 1999 Professor of Business Admin. and Econ., Haas School of Business, Univ. of California at Berkeley Audit, Executive, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

*Each Director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast. All of the Directors are Director nominees for 2013. All non-employee Directors are independent.
Nominee Age 

Director

Since

 Principal Occupation Committees

Randall L. Stephenson

 52 2005 Chairman, CEO, and President, AT&T Inc. Executive

Gilbert F. Amelio

 70 2001 Former Senior Partner, Sienna Ventures 

Executive, Corp. Dev. and

Finance, and Human Resources

Reuben V. Anderson

 70 2006 Senior Partner, Phelps Dunbar, LLP Executive, Corp. Gov. and
Nominating, and Public Policy and Corp.Reputation

James H. Blanchard

 71 2006 Chairman and Partner, Jordan- Blanchard Capital, LLC 

Corp. Dev. and Finance,

Executive, and Human Resources

Jaime Chico Pardo

 63 2008 Founder and CEO, ENESA Audit and Corp. Dev. and Finance

Scott T. Ford

 50 2012 Partner, Westrock Capital Partners, LLC Corp. Dev. and Finance and Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

James P. Kelly

 69 2006 Retired Chairman and CEO, United Parcel Service, Inc. 

Audit and Corp. Gov. and

Nominating

Jon C. Madonna

 69 2005 Retired Chairman and CEO, KPMG 

Audit, Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

and Executive

Michael B. McCallister

 60 2013 Chairman, Humana Inc. Audit

John B. McCoy

 69 1999 Retired Chairman and CEO, Bank One Corporation 

Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

Executive, and Human Resources

Joyce M. Roché

 65 1998 Retired President and CEO, Girls Inc. 

Corp. Gov. and Nominating,

Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

Matthew K. Rose

 53 2010 

Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern

Santa Fe, LLC

 

Corp. Dev. and Finance and

Human Resources

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

 65 1999 

S.K. and Angela Chan Professor of Global Mgmt., Haas School of Business,

Univ. of California at Berkeley

 Audit, Public Policy and Corp. Reputation

 

**Retiring effective April 29, 2016.

AT&T – Page 2

2 | www.att.com


2013 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS LOGO

Information About the Meeting and Voting

 

              General Information About the Meeting and Voting

General

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of AT&T Inc. ((AT&T, theCompany, orwe) for use at the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AT&T. The meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Friday, April 26, 2013,29, 2016, at Little Americathe Northern Hotel, & Resort, 2800 West Lincolnway, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009.Grand Ballroom, 19 North Broadway, Billings, MT 59101.

The purposes of the meeting are set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (see cover page)page i). This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are being sent or made available beginning March 11, 2013,2016, to stockholders who were record holders of AT&T’s common stock, $1.00 par value per share, at the close of business on February 27, 2013.March 1, 2016. These materials are also available at www.edocumentview.com/att. Each share entitles the registered holder to one vote. As of January 31, 2013,2016, there were 5,528,548,3526,148,501,788 shares of AT&T common stock outstanding.

To constitute a quorum to conduct business at the meeting, stockholders representing at least 40% of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting must be present or represented by proxy.

Voting

HowStockholders of Record

Stockholders whose shares are registered in their name on the Company records, “stockholders of record,” will receive either a proxy card by which they may indicate their voting instructions or a notice on how they may obtain a proxy. Instead of submitting a signed proxy card, stockholders may submit their proxies by telephone or through the Internet. Telephone and Internet proxies must be used in conjunction with, and will be subject to, Vote

Shares Held by You as the Record Holderinformation and terms contained on the form of proxy. Similar procedures may also be available to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian.

All shares represented by proxies will be voted by one or more of the persons designated on the form of proxy in accordance with the stockholders’ directions. If the proxy card is signed and returned or the proxy is submitted by telephone or through the Internet without specific directions with respect to the matters to be acted upon, the sharesit will be votedtreated as an instruction to vote such shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before the proxy is voted at the meeting by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of AT&T, by submitting a later-dated proxy, or by attending the meeting and voting in person. The Chairman of the Board will announce the closing of the polls during the Annual Meeting. Proxies must be received before the closing of the polls in order to be counted.

Instead of submitting a signed proxy card, stockholders may submit their proxies by telephone or through the Internet. Telephone and Internet proxies must be used in conjunction with, and will be subject to, the information and terms contained on the form of proxy. Similar procedures may also be available to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian.

A stockholder may designate a person or persons other than those persons designated on the form of proxy to act as the stockholder’s proxy by striking out the name(s) appearing on the proxy card, inserting the name(s) of another person(s) and delivering the signed card to that person(s). The person(s) designated by the stockholder must present the signed proxy card at the meeting in order for the shares to be voted.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 3 |


Information About the Meeting and Voting

 

AT&T – Page 3


Shares Held Through a Bank, Broker or Other Custodian

Where the stockholder is not the record holder, such as where the shares are held through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian, the stockholder must provide voting instructions to the record holder of the shares in accordance with the record holder’s requirements in order to ensure the shares are properly voted.

Shares Held on Your Behalf under Company Benefit Plans

The proxy card, or a proxy submitted by telephone or through the Internet, will also serve as voting instructions to the plan administrator or trustee for any shares held on behalf of a participant under any of the following employee benefit plans: the AT&T Savings and Security Plan, the AT&T Puerto Rico Retirement Savings Plan, the AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, and the BellSouth Savings and Security Plan, and the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan. Subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations, shares in each of the above employee benefit plans (excluding the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan) for which instructions are not received will not be voted; shares in the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan for which voting instructions are not received will notmay be voted.voted by the trustees in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees and/or administrators of the plans, your voting instructions must be received by April 23, 2013.26, 2016.

In addition, the proxy card or a proxy submitted by telephone or through the Internet will constitute voting instructions to the plan administrator under The DirectSERVICE Investment Program sponsored and administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (AT&T’s transfer agent) for shares held on behalf of plan participants.

If a stockholder participates in the plans listed above and/or maintains stockholder accounts under more than one name (including minor differences in registration, such as with or without a middle initial), the stockholder may receive more than one set of proxy materials. To ensure that all shares are voted, please submit proxies for all of the shares you own.

Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address

No more than one annual report and Proxy Statement are being sent to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless AT&T has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders at that address. Stockholders may request a separate copy of the most recent annual report and/or the Proxy Statement by writing the transfer agent at: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, or by calling (800) 351-7221. Stockholders calling from outside the United States may call (781) 575-4729. Requests will be responded to promptly. Stockholders sharing an address who desire to receive multiple copies, or who wish to receive only a single copy, of the annual report and/or the Proxy Statement may write or call the transfer agent at the above address or phone numbers to request a change.

Solicitation of Proxies

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by AT&T. Officers, agents and employees of AT&T and its subsidiaries and other solicitors retained by AT&T may, by letter, by telephone or in person, make additional requests for the return of proxies and may receive proxies on behalf of AT&T. Brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares and will be reimbursed for their expenses. AT&T has retained D. F. King & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $22,000, plus expenses.

AT&T – Page 4


Attending the Meeting

Only AT&T stockholders may attend the meeting, and you will need an admission ticket or other proof of stock ownership to be admitted to the meeting.

Registered Stockholders of Record(shares are registered in your name)

An admission ticket is attached to your proxy card or Annual Meeting Notice and Admission Ticket. If you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote your proxy but retain the admission ticket and bring it with you to the meeting. A stockholder of record who does not have an admission ticket will be admitted upon presentation of photo identification at the door.

Other Stockholders(your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other institution)

You may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting proof of your ownership of AT&T common stock. For example, you may bring your account statement or a letter from your bank or broker confirming that you owned AT&T stock on February 27, 2013, the record date for the meeting. To be able to vote at the meeting, you will need the bank, or broker, or record holder to give you a proxy.

Voting Results

The voting results of the annual meeting will be published no later than four business days after the annual meeting on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will be available in the investor relations area of our website at www.att.com.

 

4 | www.att.com


Information About the Meeting and Voting

Common Stock Ownership

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of each person holding more than 5% of AT&T’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2015 (based on a review of filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedules 13D and 13G).

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner    Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership         Percent of Class    

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10022

335,530,369 (1)5.5%

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

358,813,013 (2)5.83%

1.Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 10, 2016, which reported the following: sole voting power of 282,784,207 shares; shared voting power of 0 shares; sole dispositive power of 335,530,369 shares, and shared dispositive power of 0 shares.
2.Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 10, 2016, which reported the following: sole voting power of 11,382,521 shares; shared voting power of 614,990 shares; sole dispositive power of 346,738,556 shares, and shared dispositive power of 12,074,457 shares.

Directors and Officers

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of AT&T common stock and non-voting stock units as of December 31, 2015, held by each Director, nominee, and officer named in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 61. As of that date, each Director and officer listed below, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, owned less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. Except as noted below, the persons listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities indicated.

Name of Beneficial

Owner

 

Total AT&T
Beneficial

Ownership

(including

options) (1)

   

Non-Voting

Stock Units (2)

      

Name of Beneficial

Owner

 

Total AT&T

Beneficial

Ownership

(including

options) (1)

  

Non-Voting

Stock Units (2)

 

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

  26,790     27,187     

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

  0    106,176  

Richard W. Fisher

  0     0     

Randall L. Stephenson

  1,975,568    195,873  

Scott T. Ford

  66,319     20,579     

Rafael de la Vega

  539,485    247,213  

Glenn H. Hutchins

  103,322     8,212     

John J. Stephens

  466,860    65,952  

William E. Kennard

  0     4,450     

John T. Stankey

  462,500    49,058  

Jon C. Madonna

  14,573     55,287     

John Donovan

  221,545    9,489  

Michael B. McCallister

  28,048     13,578        

John B. McCoy

  31,584     192,544     All executive officers and Directors as a group (consisting of 23 persons, including those named above)  4,325,424    1,237,751  

Beth E. Mooney

  12,600     13,954        

Joyce M. Roché

  6,328     143,091        

Matthew K. Rose

  91,000     47,896        

Cynthia B. Taylor

  5,718     9,006              

1.The table above includes presently exercisable stock options and stock options that became exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. The following executive officers hold the following numbers of options: Mr. Stephenson—833,132, Mr. Donovan—4,406, Mr. de la Vega—66,685, Mr. Stankey—14,536, Mr. Stephens—160,378, and all executive officers—955,460. In addition, of the shares shown in the table above, the following persons share voting and investment power with other persons with respect to the following numbers of shares: Mr. Donovan—127,201, Mr. Hutchins—103,322, Mr. Madonna—14,573, Mr. McCallister—25,290, Ms. Mooney—12,600, Mr. Rose—91,000, Mr. Stephenson—1,016,696, Mr. Stankey—442,311, Mr. Stephens—237,836, and Ms. Taylor—196.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 5 |


Related Person Transactions

2.Represents number of vested stock units held by the Director or executive officer, where each stock unit is equal in value to one share of AT&T stock. The stock units are paid in stock or cash depending upon the plan and the election of the participant at times specified by the relevant plan. None of the stock units listed may be converted into common stock within 60 days of the date of this table. As noted under “Compensation of Directors,” AT&T’s plans permit non-employee Directors to acquire stock units (also referred to as deferred stock units) by deferring the receipt of fees and retainers into stock units and through a yearly grant of stock units. Officers may acquire stock units by participating in stock-based compensation deferral plans. Certain of the Directors also hold stock units issued by companies prior to their acquisition by AT&T that have been converted into AT&T stock units. Stock units carry no voting rights.

Related Person Transactions

Under the rules of the SEC, public issuers, such as AT&T, must disclose certain “Related Person Transactions.” These are transactions in which the Company is a participant where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Director, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of our common stock has a direct or indirect material interest.

AT&T has adopted a written policy requiring that each Director or executive officer involved in such a transaction notify the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and that each such transaction be approved or ratified by the Committee.

In determining whether to approve a Related Person Transaction, the Committee will consider the following factors, among others, to the extent relevant to the Related Person Transaction:

whether the terms of the Related Person Transaction are fair to the Company and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a related person,

whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into the Related Person Transaction,

whether the Related Person Transaction would impair the independence of an outside director, and

whether the Related Person Transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any of our Directors or executive officers, taking into account the size of the transaction, the overall financial position of the Director, executive officer or other related person, the direct or indirect nature of the Director’s, executive officer’s or other related person’s interest in the transaction and the ongoing nature of any proposed relationship, and any other factors the Committee deems relevant.

A Related Person Transaction entered into without the Committee’s pre-approval will not violate this policy, or be invalid or unenforceable, so long as the transaction is brought to the Committee as promptly as reasonably practical after it is entered into or after it becomes reasonably apparent that the transaction is covered by this policy. During 2015, no individual requested approval of a related party transaction.

6 | www.att.com


Board of Directors

Board of Directors

The Role of the Board

The Board of Directors is responsible for ouroversight of management and strategic direction and for establishing broad corporate policies. In addition, the Board of Directors and various committees of the Board regularly meet to receive and discuss operating and financial reports presented by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and other members of management as well as reports by experts and other advisors. Corporate review sessions are also offered to Directors to give them more detailed views of our businesses and matters that affect our businesses, corporate opportunities, technology, and operations.

Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the management of AT&T. The Board of Directors oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts. Annually, the Board reviews the Company’s strategic business plans, which includes evaluating the competitive, technological, economic and other risks associated with these plans.

In addition, under its charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. This includes, among other matters, evaluating risk in the context of financial policies, counterparty and credit risk, and the appropriate mitigation of risk, including through the use of insurance where appropriate. Members of the Company’s finance, internal audit and compliance organizations are responsible for managing risk in their areas and reporting regularly to the Audit Committee.

AT&T – Page 5


The Company’s Senior Vice President-Audit Servicessenior internal auditing executive and Chief Compliance Officer meets twiceeach meet annually in executive session with the Audit Committee. The Senior Vice President-Audit Servicessenior internal auditing executive and Chief Compliance Officer reviewsreview with the Audit Committee each year’s annual internal audit and compliance risk assessment, which is focused on significant financial, operating, regulatory and legal matters. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports on completed internal audits of these significant risk areas.

Members of the Board are expected to attend Board meetings in person, unless the meeting is held by teleconference. The Board held eight meetings in 2012.2015. All of the Directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Committees on which each served. Directors are also expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All Directors were present at the 20122015 Annual Meeting.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 7 |


Board of Directors

Board Leadership Structure

The non-management members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session (without management Directors or management personnel present) at least four times per year. The Lead Director, who is appointed for a two-year term, presides over these sessions. James H. BlanchardJoyce M. Roché currently serves as Lead Director; hisher term is scheduled to expire January 31, 2014.2017.

Responsibilities of the Lead Director include:

 

·

presiding at meetings of the Board at which the chairman is not present,

presiding at meetings of the Board at which the chairman is not present;

presiding at executive sessions of the non-management Directors;

preparing the agenda for the executive sessions of the non-management Directors;

acting as the principal liaison between the non-management Directors and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;

coordinating the activities of the non-management Directors when acting as a group;

approving the agenda for each Board meeting;

approving meeting schedules to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;
advising the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management, including the materials provided to Directors at Board meetings;

if requested by major stockholders, ensuring that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication and acting as a contact for other interested persons;

sharing with other Directors as he or she deems appropriate letters and other contacts that he or she receives; and

contacting management to obtain such additional information relating to contacts by interested persons as he or she may require from time to time.

·

presiding at executive sessions of the non-management Directors,

·

preparing the agenda for the executive sessions of the non-management Directors,

·

acting as the principal liaison between the non-management Directors and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,

·

coordinating the activities of the non-management Directors when acting as a group,

·

approving the agenda for each Board meeting,

·

approving meeting schedules to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items,

·

advising the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management, including the materials provided to Directors at Board meetings,

·

if requested by major stockholders, ensuring that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication and acting as a contact for other interested persons,

·

sharing with other Directors as he or she deems appropriate letters and other contacts that he or she receives, and

·

contacting management to obtain such additional information relating to contacts by interested persons as he or she may require from time to time.

In addition, the Lead Director may:

 

·

call meetings of the non-management Directors in addition to the quarterly meetings, and
require information relating to any matter be distributed to the Board.

·

require information relating to any matter be distributed to the Board.

Randall Stephenson currently serves as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that having Mr. Stephenson serve in both capacities is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders because it enhances communication between the Board and management and allows Mr. Stephenson to more effectively execute the Company’s strategic initiatives and business plans and confront its challenges. The Board believes that the appointment of a strong independent Lead Director and the use of regular executive sessions of the non-management Directors, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow it to maintain effective oversight of management.

AT&T – Page 6


Communicating with the Board

Interested persons may contact the Lead Director or the non-management Directors by sending written comments through the Office of the Secretary of AT&T Inc., 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 3241, Dallas, Texas 75202. The Office will either forward the original materials as addressed or provide Directors with summaries of the submissions, with the originals available for review at the Directors’ request.

8 | www.att.com


Board of Directors

Criteria and Process for Nominating Directors

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying candidates who are eligible under the qualification standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines to serve as members of the Board. The Committee is authorized to retain search firms and other consultants to assist it in identifying candidates and fulfilling its other duties. The Committee is not limited to any specific process in identifying candidates and will consider candidates whom stockholders suggest. Candidates are recommended to the Board after consultation with the Chairman of the Board.

In recommending Board candidates, the Committee considers a candidate’s:

 

·

general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in the current business environment,

·

understanding of our business, and

·

educational and professional background.

general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in the current business environment,

understanding of our business, and

educational and professional background.

The Committee also gives consideration to a candidate’s judgment, competence, anticipated participation in Board activities, experience, geographic location, and special talents or personal attributes. Although the Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it believes that diversity is an important factor in determining the composition of the Board. Stockholders who wish to suggest qualified candidates should write to the Senior Vice President and Secretary, AT&T Inc., 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 3241, Dallas, Texas 75202, stating in detail the qualifications of the persons proposed for consideration by the Committee.

Composition of the Board

Under our Bylaws, the Board of Directors has the authority to determine the size of the Board and to fill vacancies. Currently, the Board is comprised of 1314 Directors, one of whom is an executive officer of AT&T. We have included biographical information about each continuing Director beginning on pages 17-23.page 17. Holdings of AT&T common stock by AT&T Directors are shown on the table on page 14.5. Under AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director will not be nominated for re-election if the Director would be 72 or older at the time of the election.

The Board of Directors has nominated the 1312 persons listed in this Proxy Statement, beginning on page 17,16, for election as Directors. Each of the nominees is an incumbent Director of AT&T recommended for re-election by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Under AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a DirectorJon C. Madonna and John B. McCoy will not be nominatedstand for re-election ifat the Director2016 Annual Meeting. The Board has reached age 72.voted to reduce its size to 12 Directors effective immediately before the meeting. There are no vacancies on the Board.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 9 |


Board of Directors

 

AT&T – Page 7


Board Committees

From time to time the Board establishes permanent standing committees and temporary special committees to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. The Board has established six standing committees of Directors, the principal responsibilities of which are described below. The charters for each of these committees may be found on our web sitewebsite at www.att.com.

 

Standing Committees
    Audit Corporate
Development
and Finance
  Corporate
Governance
and
Nominating
  Executive  Human
Resources
  Public Policy
and
Corporate
Reputation

Meetings in 2015

  12 5  7  0  8  3

Committee Member

                 

Randall L. Stephenson

       C     

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

   n          

Richard W. Fisher

            

Scott T. Ford

   C         

Glenn H. Hutchins

           

William E. Kennard

           

Jon C. Madonna*

  n          

Michael B. McCallister

           

John B. McCoy*

     C       

Beth E. Mooney

           

Joyce M. Roché

         C   

Matthew K. Rose

            

Cynthia B. Taylor

   n         

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

              C
*Retiringeffective April 29, 2016                                     n – Financial Expert                     – Member                    C – Chair

Current Committees

Primary Responsibilities and Additional Information

CommitteeMembersFunctions and Additional Information

Meetings

in 2012

Audit

Jon C. Madonna, Chair

Jaime Chico Pardo

James P. Kelly

Michael B. McCallister

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Consists of five independent Directors. Oversees the integrity of our financial statements, the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and the independent auditors, and our compliance with legal and regulatory matters, including environmental matters. Responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. The independent auditor audits the financial statements of AT&T and its subsidiaries.12

Corporate

Development

Executive

Consists of the Chairman of the Board and Finance (1)the chairmen of our five other standing committees. Established to assist the Board by acting upon matters when the Board is not in session. Has full power and authority of the Board to the extent permitted by law, including the power and authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance of common stock.

 James H. Blanchard,

ChairCorporate Development and Finance

Gilbert F. Amelio

Jaime Chico Pardo

Scott T. Ford

Matthew K. Rose

Consists of fivefour independent Directors. Assists the Board in its oversight of our finances, including recommending the payment of dividends and reviewing the management of our debt and investment of our cash reserves. Reviews mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and similar transactions; reviews corporate strategy and recommends or approves transactions and investments; reviews and makes recommendations about the capital structure of the Company and the evaluation, development and implementationimple-mentation of key technology decisions.5

Corporate

Governance

and Nominating

John B. McCoy,

ChairHuman Resources

Reuben V. Anderson

James P. Kelly

Jon C. Madonna

Joyce M. Roché

Consists of five independent Directors. Responsible for recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders, or to be appointed by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies, consistent with the criteria approved by the Board, and recommending committee assignments and the appointment of the Lead Director. Periodically assesses AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and makes recommendations to the Board for amendments and also recommends to the Board the compensation of Directors. Takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance and oversees an annual evaluation of the Board.4

Executive

Randall L. Stephenson,

Chair

Gilbert F. Amelio

Reuben V. Anderson

James H. Blanchard

Jon C. Madonna

John B. McCoy

Consists of the Chairman of the Board and the chairpersons of our five other standing committees. Established to assist the Board by acting upon matters when the Board is not in session. Has full power and authority of the Board to the extent permitted by law, including the power and authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance of common stock.0

Human

Resources

Gilbert F. Amelio, Chair

James H. Blanchard

John B. McCoy

Matthew K. Rose

Consists of four independent Directors. Oversees the compensation practices of AT&T, including the design and administration of employee benefit plans. Responsible for establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers, establishing stock ownership guidelines for officers and developing a management succession plan.6

Public Policy

and Corporate

Reputation (2)

 Reuben V. Anderson,
Chair

Scott T. FordCorporate Governance and Nominating

Joyce M. Roché

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Consists of fourfive independent Directors. Responsible for recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders, or to be appointed by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies, consistent with the criteria approved by the Board, and recommending committee assignments. Periodically assesses AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and makes recommendations to the Board for amendments and also recommends to the Board the compensation of Directors. Takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance and oversees an annual evaluation of the Board.

Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

Consists of six independent Directors. Assists the Board in its oversight of policies related to corporate social responsibility, as well as political and charitable contributions. Oversees the Company’s management of its brands and reputation.

4

 

1.10 | This committee was previously the Corporate Development Committee (CDC) and the Finance/Pension Committee (FPC), which were combined effective April 27, 2012. The CDC met twice and the FPC met once in 2012.www.att.com


2.

Known as the Public Policy Committee prior to April 27, 2012.Board of Directors

 

AT&T – Page 8


Independence of Directors

TheOur Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a substantial majority of our Board of Directors consist of independent Directors. In addition, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) prescribes independence standards for companies listed on the NYSE, including AT&T. These standardsListing Standards require a majority of the Board to be independent. They also requireand every member of the Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to be independent. AFor a Director is considered independent only ifto be “independent” under the NYSE standards, the Board of Directors “affirmatively determinesmust affirmatively determine that the Director has no material relationship with the listed company (eitherAT&T, either directly or as a partner, stockholdershareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company).”AT&T, other than in his or her capacity as a Director of AT&T. In addition, the Board of Directors has adoptedDirector must meet certain independence standards specified by the NYSE as well as the additional standards for determining the independence of its members. In accordance with the NYSE standards, a Director is not independent if:

·

The Director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of AT&T, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of AT&T;

·

The Director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from AT&T, other than Director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided the compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

·

(a) The Director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (b) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (c) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on our audit; or (d) the Director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or an employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that time period;

·

The Director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

·

The Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, is more than the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

Additional standards for determining independence of Directors have been established by our Board and are set forthreferenced in our Corporate Governance Guidelines which can be found on our web site(found at www.att.com. These additional standards are:www.att.com).

·

A Director who owns, together with any ownership interests held by members of the Director’s immediate family, 10% of another company that makes payments to or receives payments from us (together with our consolidated subsidiaries) for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, is more than the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, is not independent until three years after falling below such threshold.

·

A Director who is, or whose immediate family member is, a director, trustee or officer of a charitable organization, or holds a similar position with such an organization, and we (together with our consolidated subsidiaries) make contributions to the charitable organization in an amount which exceeds, in any single fiscal year, the greater of $1 million per year or at least 5% of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues, is not independent until three years after falling below such threshold.

AT&T – Page 9


The Board of Directors, usingUsing these standards for determining the independence of its members, the Board has determined that the following Directors are independent: Gilbert F. Amelio, Reuben V. Anderson, James H. Blanchard, Jaime Chico Pardo,Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Richard W. Fisher, Scott T. Ford, James P. Kelly,Glenn H. Hutchins, William E. Kennard, Jon C. Madonna, Michael B. McCallister, John B. McCoy, Beth E. Mooney, Joyce M. Roché, Matthew K. Rose, Cynthia B. Taylor, and Laura D’Andrea Tyson. EachIn addition, each member of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Human Resources Committee is independent.

In determining the independence of the Directors, the Board considered the following commercial relationships between AT&T and companies at which our Directors serve as officers: payments by AT&T for the use of rights of way and facilities at Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, where Mr. Rose serves as CEO; and interest paid from participation in a structured finance program through KeyCorp, where Ms. Mooney serves as CEO. In addition, each of the foregoing companies as well as each of the entities where Mr. Ford and Ms. Taylor serve as executive officers purchased communications services from subsidiaries of AT&T. In each case for the year 2015:

The relevant products and services were provided by AT&T or to AT&T on terms determined on an arm’s-length basis that were comparable to the terms provided to or by similarly situated customers or suppliers;

The transactions were made in the ordinary course of business of each company; and

The total payments by AT&T to the Director’s company (for rights of way or for interest) or to AT&T by the Director’s company (for communications services) were each substantially less than 1% of the consolidated gross revenues of each of AT&T and the other company. This level is significantly below the maximum amount permitted under the NYSE listing standards for director independence (i.e., 2% of consolidated gross revenues).

Compensation of Directors

The compensation of Directors is determined by the Board with the advice of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors. None of our employees serve on this Committee. The Committee’s current members are John B. McCoy (Chairperson)(Chairman), Reuben V. Anderson, James P. Kelly,William E. Kennard, Jon C. Madonna, and Joyce M. Roché., and Matthew K. Rose. Under its charter (available on our web sitewebsite at www.att.com), the Committee periodically, and at least every two years,annually reviews the compensation and benefits provided to Directors for their service and makes recommendations to the Board for changes. This includes not only Director retainers and fees, but also Director compensation and benefit plans.

The Committee’s charter authorizes the Committee to employ independent compensation and other consultants to assist in fulfilling its duties. From time to time, the Committee engages Total Rewards Strategies, LLC, an employee benefits anda compensation consulting firm (which also acts as a consultant to advise the Human Resources Committee on executive compensation matters),and to provide the Committee with information regarding director compensation paid

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 11 |


Board of Directors

by other public companies. In reviewing Director compensation,companies, which may be used by the Committee may use the consultant’s director compensation studies in connection with makingto make compensation recommendations to the Board. In addition, from time to time, the Chief Executive Officer may make recommendations to the Committee or the Board about types and amounts of appropriate compensation and benefits for Directors.

Directors who are employed by us or one of our subsidiaries receive no separate compensation for serving as Directors or as members of Board committees. Non-employee Directors receive an annual retainer of $95,000, ($85,000 in 2012), together with $2,000 for each Board meeting or corporate strategy session attended. Committee members receive $1,700 for each committee meeting attended, except that members of the Audit and Human Resources Committees receive $2,000 for each meeting attended in person. The ChairpersonChairman of each committee receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000, ($10,000 in 2012), except for the ChairpersonsChairmen of the Audit and Human Resources Committees, each of whom receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000. The Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000 ($30,000 in 2012). $60,000.

Under the AT&T Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan (theDirector Stock Purchase Plan), Directors may choose to invest all or half of their retainers in shares of AT&T common stock at fair market value.

Under the AT&T Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan, (thebeginning with grants in 2016, each non-employee Director Deferral Plan), Directors may choose to defer the receiptannually receives a grant of their fees and all or part of their retainers into either deferred stock units or intothat will have a cash deferral account.grant date value of $170,000 after reflecting an illiquidity discount. Each deferred stock unit is equivalent to a share of commonAT&T stock and earns dividend equivalents in the form of additional deferred stock units. Directors purchaseThe annual grants are fully earned and vested at issuance and are distributed beginning in the deferred stock units atcalendar year after the fair market value of AT&T common stock.Director leaves the Board. Deferred stock units are paid in cash in a lump sum or in up to 15 annual installments,installments. At distribution, the units are converted to cash based on the price of AT&T stock at that time.

Because of the Director’s election, afterdelay in the Director ceases service withdistribution of the Board. In addition, undervested deferred stock units, an illiquidity discount is applied to the Director Deferral Plan each non-employeevaluation of the units granted to Directors. To apply the discount and determine the number of units granted to a Director annually, receives $150,000we first calculate the nominal value of the award. The nominal value is the value of AT&T stock that after applying the illiquidity discount would result in a fair value of $170,000 using FASB ASC 718. We use the formaverage remaining tenure of the non-employee Directors as the discount period. We then divide the nominal value by the price of AT&T stock on the date of grant to determine the number of deferred stock units. The annualunits granted. For grants are fully earnedin 2015, we used a value of $150,000 to determine the number of deferred stock units issued to each Director without using an illiquidity discount.

Additionally, Directors may defer the receipt of their meeting fees and vestedall or part of their retainers into either additional deferred stock units or into a cash deferral account under the plan. Directors purchase the deferred stock units at issuance.

the fair market value of AT&T common stock. Deferrals into the cash deferral account under the Director Deferral Planplan earn interest during the calendar year at a rate equal to the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for September of the

AT&T – Page 10


preceding year (Moody’s Rate). To the extent these earnings exceed the interest rate specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for disclosure purposes, they are included in the “Director Compensation” table on page 12 under the heading “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.” Directors may annually choose to convert their cash deferral accounts into deferred stock units at the fair market value of our stock at the time of the conversion.

Upon our acquisition of Pacific Telesis Group(PTG) on April 1, 1997, certain of the former PTG Directors joined our Board. Asmay also use all or part of their service with PTG, these Directors previously received PTG Deferred Stock Units, which were issued in exchange for a waiver by the Directors of certain retirement benefits. The PTG Deferred Stock Units are fully vested, earn dividend equivalents and are paid out in the form of cash after the retirement of the Director. After the acquisition of PTG, the Deferred Stock Units were modified so that their value was based onretainers to purchase AT&T stock instead of PTG stock. Service as aat fair market value under the Non-Employee Director of AT&T is deemed service with PTG for these benefits. In addition, these Directors were allowed to continue their prior deferrals of PTG retainers and fees made before they joined the AT&T Board at the PTG rates. Under the PTG plans, deferrals earn a rate of interest equal to Moody’s Rate plus 4% for deferrals from 1985 through 1992, Moody’s Rate plus 2% for deferrals from 1993 through 1995, and the ten-year Treasury Note average for the month of September for the prior year plus 2% for deferrals after 1995.Stock Purchase Plan.

Similarly, uponUpon our acquisition of BellSouth Corporation on December 29, 2006, certain of the former BellSouth Directors joined our Board. (In 2015, Mr. Anderson and Mr. Kelly were the only remaining directors from BellSouth. Mr. Anderson and Mr. Kelly retired April 24, 2015). These Directors had previously made cash- and stock-based deferrals under the BellSouth Corporation Directors’ Compensation Deferral Plan, which was no longer offered after 2006. These deferrals are paid out in accordance with the Directors’ elections. Cash deferrals earn a rate of interest equal to Moody’s Monthly Average of Yields of AaAA Corporate Bonds for the previous July, while earnings on deferrals in the form of stock units are reinvested in additional deferred stock units at the fair market value of the underlying stock.

12 | www.att.com


Board of Directors

In addition, under the BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (which was offered to BellSouth Directors prior to its acquisition,acquisition), Directors were permitted to make up to five annual deferrals of up to 100% of their compensation. For deferrals made for the 1995 and 1996 plan years, the plan returned the original deferred amount in the 7th year after the deferral year. Interim distributions were not made with respect to deferrals in subsequent periods. For deferrals made for the 1995 through 1999 plan years, Directors received fixed interest rates of 16%, 12.7%, 12.8%, 12.4% and 11.8%, respectively. Distributions are made at times elected by the Directors. BellSouth discontinued offering new deferrals beginning in 2000.

To the extent earnings on cash deferrals under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan, the BellSouth Corporation Directors’ Compensation Deferral Plan or the BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan exceed the interest rate specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for disclosure purposes, they are included in the “Director Compensation” table on page 14 under the heading “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.”

Following our acquisition of DIRECTV on July 24, 2015, Mr. Di Piazza, a former DIRECTV Director, joined our Board. Mr. Di Piazza previously participated in the DIRECTV Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (which was offered to DIRECTV Directors prior to the acquisition). Under the plan, a Director could elect to contribute cash or stock compensation to the deferral plan. Mr. Di Piazza made cash contributions that converted into restricted stock units based on the closing market price of DIRECTV common stock on the date of contribution. Mr. Di Piazza’s restricted stock units were converted to a cash sum based on the fair market value of AT&T stock on the conversion date and paid out in January 2016.

Non-employee Directors may receive communications equipment and services pursuant to the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program. The equipment and services that may be provided to a Director, other than at his or her primary residence, may not exceed $25,000 per year. All concession services must be provided by AT&T affiliates, except that the Director may use another provider for the Director’s primary residence if it is not served by an AT&T affiliate.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 13 |


Board of Directors

 

AT&T – Page 11


The following table contains information regarding compensation provided to each person who served as a Director during 20122015 (excluding Mr. Stephenson, whose compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure).

 

Director CompensationDirector CompensationDirector Compensation 
Name   

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash (1)

($)

  

Stock Awards

(2) (3)

($)

  

Change in Pension

Value and Non-

Qualified Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (4)

($)

  

All Other

Compensation (5)

($)

  

Total

($)

  

Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash (1)

($)

   

Stock Awards
(2)

($)

   

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (3)

($)

   

All Other
Compensation (4)

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Gilbert F. Amelio

    149,600     150,000     83     5,831     305,513 

Reuben V. Anderson

    124,900     150,000     953     3,792     279,644 

James H. Blanchard

    163,500     150,000     115     8,640     322,255 

Jaime Chico Pardo

    131,400     150,000     0     15,102     296,502 

Reuben V. Anderson (5)

   62,767     0     83,129     250,034     395,930  

Jaime Chico Pardo (5)

   45,067     0     0     265,026     310,092  

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. (5)

   68,900     0     0     10,043     78,943  

Richard W. Fisher (5)

   74,817     0     0     51     74,868  

Scott T. Ford (6)

    71,783     150,000     0     51     221,834    149,600     150,000     0     102     299,702  

James P. Kelly

    126,000     150,000     0     3,419     279,419 

Glenn H. Hutchins

   124,900     150,000     0     33,034     307,934  

James P. Kelly (5)

   48,467     0     0     250,034     298,501  

William E. Kennard

   132,267     150,000     0     15,102     297,369  

Jon C. Madonna

    159,200     150,000     0     7,856     317,056    171,800     150,000     0     14,907     336,707  

Lynn M. Martin (6)

    37,067     0     0     254,536     291,603 

Michael B. McCallister

   140,000     150,000     0     102     290,102  

John B. McCoy

    132,900     150,000     0     23,746     306,646    155,000     150,000     0     10,102     315,102  

Beth E. Mooney

   126,600     150,000     0     15,102     291,702  

Joyce M. Roché

    116,600     150,000     0     19,352     285,952    217,700     150,000     0     15,098     382,798  

Matthew K. Rose

    124,600     150,000     0     4,239     278,839    140,000     150,000     0     11,100     301,100  

Cynthia B. Taylor

   141,700     150,000     0     102     291,802  

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

    123,700     150,000     1,640     7,739     283,080    148,650     150,000     4,842     102     303,594  

1.The following table shows the number of deferred stock units purchased in 20122015 by each Director with their Board fees and/or retainers under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan.Plan.

 

Director  

Deferred Stock Units

Purchased in 2012

  Director    

Deferred Stock Units

Purchased in 2012

  Deferred Stock Units
Purchased in 2015
    Director  Deferred Stock Units
Purchased in 2015
   

Gilbert F. Amelio

    4,339   John B. McCoy      3,993 

Reuben V. Anderson

    2,842   Joyce M. Roché      1,271   1,556  

John B. McCoy

  4,572  

Glenn H. Hutchins

  3,686  

Beth E. Mooney

  2,338  

James P. Kelly

    1,193   Matthew K. Rose      3,721   503   

Matthew K. Rose

  4,130  

 

    In addition, Mr. Chico purchased 1,265664 shares, Mr. McCallister purchased 1,397 shares, Ms. Roché purchased 2,566 shares, and Ms. Taylor purchased 2,797 shares of AT&T common stock in 20122015 with their retainers under the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan.

2.This represents an annual grant of deferred stock units that are immediately vested, valued using the grant date value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and deferred. The deferred stock units will be paid out in cash after the Director ceases his or her service with the Board at the times elected by the Director.

3.At The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2012, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Blanchard, and Mr. Kelly held 311 options, 22,656 options, and 23,813 options, respectively, that were originally granted by BellSouth Corporation while they served2015 for each Director can be found in the “Common Stock Ownership” section on the BellSouth Board before its 2006 acquisition by AT&T Inc.page 5.

4.3.Amounts shown represent the difference between market interest rates determined pursuant to SEC rules andexcess, if any, of the actual rates used to determine earnings on deferred compensation.compensation over the market interest rates determined pursuant to SEC rules.

5.4.UnderOther compensation includes charitable matching contributions of up to $15,000 made by the AT&T Foundation on behalf of Directors and employees under the AT&T Higher Education/Cultural Matching Gift Program, which covers AT&T employees as well as Directors, the AT&T Foundation matches charitableProgram. Charitable contributions ranging from $25 to $15,000 per year by active Directors. In 2012, a total of $42,450 was paid on behalf of active Directors under this program. The amounts reported in this column include matching contributionswere made on the Directors’ behalf under this program as follows: Mr. Chico—$15,000, Mr. Di Piazza—$10,000, Mr. Hutchins—$15,000, Mr. Kennard—$15,000, Mr. Madonna—$500,3,250, Mr. McCoy—$10,000, Ms. Mooney—$15,000, and Ms. Roché—$11,950. Also reported in this column is a14,996. In addition, charitable contributioncontributions of $250,000 that AT&Tper director were made in 2012 on behalf of Ms. MartinMr. Anderson, Mr. Chico and Mr. Kelly to the charities of their choice in connection with hertheir retirement from the Board. Other compensation also includes up to $102 per Director in group life insurance premiums. This column also includes personal benefits for Directors that in the aggregate equal or exceed $10,000, which for 2015 consisted of communications equipment and services provided under the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program (described on page 13) and holiday gifts, as follows: Mr. Hutchins ($16,891 and $1,041, respectively), Mr. Madonna ($10,083 and $1,473, respectively), and Mr. Rose ($9,741 and $1,257, respectively).

6.5.Ms. MartinMr. Anderson, Mr. Chico, and Mr. Kelly retired from the Board in April 2012.2015. Mr. FordFisher joined the Board in June 2012.

AT&T – Page 12


              Related Person Transactions              

Under the rules of the SEC, public issuers, such as AT&T, must disclose certain “Related Person Transactions.” These are transactions in which the Company is a participant where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Director, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of our common stock has a direct or indirect material interest.

AT&T has adopted a written policy requiring that each Director or executive officer involved in such a transaction notify the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and that each such transaction be approved or ratified by the Committee.

In determining whether to approve a Related Person Transaction, the Committee will consider the following factors, among others, to the extent relevant to the Related Person Transaction:

·

whether2015. Mr. Di Piazza joined the terms of the Related Person Transaction are fair to the Company and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a related person,

Board in July 2015.

 

·14 |  

whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into the Related Person Transaction,

www.att.com


·
 

whether the Related Person Transaction would impair the independence of an outside director, and

·Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

whether the Related Person Transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any of our Directors or executive officers, taking into account the size of the transaction, the overall financial position of the Director, executive officer or other related person, the direct or indirect nature of the Director’s, executive officer’s or other related person’s interest in the transaction and the ongoing nature of any proposed relationship, and any other factors the Committee deems relevant.

A Related Person Transaction entered into without the Committee’s pre-approval will not violate this policy, or be invalid or unenforceable, so long as the transaction is brought to the Committee as promptly as reasonably practical after it is entered into or after it becomes reasonably apparent that the transaction is covered by this policy.

 

              Common Stock Ownership              

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of each person holding more than 5% of AT&T’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2012 (based on a review of filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedules 13D and 13G).

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Amount and Nature  of Beneficial Ownership   Percent of  Class 

BlackRock Inc.

40 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10022

   318,995,553     5.62

AT&T – Page 13


Directors and Officers

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of AT&T common stock and non-voting stock units as of December 31, 2012, held by each Director, nominee and officer named in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 60. As of that date, each Director and officer listed below, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, owned less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. Except as noted below, the persons listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities indicated.

Name of    

Beneficial Owner    

 

Total AT&T
Beneficial
Ownership
(including

options)

(1)

  

Non-

Voting

Stock

Units

(2)

    

Name of    

Beneficial Owner    

  

Total AT&T
Beneficial
Ownership
(including

options)

(1)

   

Non-

Voting

Stock

Units

(2)

 

Gilbert F. Amelio

  3,106    121,219    Randall L. Stephenson   1,922,134     174,792  

Reuben V. Anderson

  31,680    49,663    John J. Stephens   388,626     42,329  

James H. Blanchard

  95,369    32,788    Rafael de la Vega   450,970     56,795  

Jaime Chico Pardo

  51,265    21,643    John T. Stankey   429,627     49,559  

Scott T. Ford

  55,000    0    Wayne Watts   149,537     27,756  

James P. Kelly

  31,466    41,722        

Jon C. Madonna

  14,573    35,637        

Michael B. McCallister

  290    0    

All executive officers and Directors as a group (consisting of 23 persons, including those named above)

   4,651,453     1,144,555  

John B. McCoy

  31,584    140,798        

Joyce M. Roché

  2,041    109,216        

Matthew K. Rose

  83,000    18,407        

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

  0    77,825               

1.The table above includes presently exercisable stock options and stock options that became exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. The following Directors and executive officers hold the following numbers of options: Mr. Anderson—311, Mr. Blanchard—22,656, Mr. Kelly—23,813, Mr. Stephenson—1,063,023, Mr. de la Vega—149,661, Mr. Stankey—31,790, Mr. Stephens—222,962, and Mr. Watts—32,440, and all executive officers and Directors as a group—1,808,291. In addition, of the shares shown in the table above, the following persons share voting and investment power with other persons with respect to the following numbers of shares: Dr. Amelio—3,084, Mr. Blanchard—390, Mr. Chico Pardo—50,000, Mr. Madonna—14,573, Mr. McCallister—290, Mr. Rose—83,000, Mr. Stephenson—856,128, Mr. Stankey—240,818, Mr. Stephens—163,061, and Mr. Watts—109,623.

2.Represents number of vested stock units held by the Director or executive officer, where each stock unit is equal in value to one share of AT&T stock. The stock units are paid in stock or cash depending upon the plan and the election of the participant at times specified by the relevant plan. None of the stock units listed may be converted into common stock within 60 days of the date of this table. As noted under “Compensation of Directors,” AT&T’s plans permit non-employee Directors to acquire stock units (also referred to as deferred stock units) by deferring the receipt of fees and retainers into stock units and through a yearly grant of stock units. Officers may acquire stock units by participating in stock-based compensation deferral plans. Certain of the Directors also hold stock units issued by companies prior to their acquisition by AT&T that have been converted into AT&T stock units. Stock units carry no voting rights.

 

AT&T – Page 14


              Matters to beAgenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Each share of AT&T common stock represented at the Annual Meeting is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting. All matters, except as provided below, are determined by a majority of the votes cast, unless a greater number is required by law or theour Certificate of Incorporation for the action proposed. A majority of votes cast means the number of shares votedvotes cast “for” a matter exceeds the number of votes cast “against” such matter.

Election of Directors:In the election of Directors, each Director is elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to that Director’s election. Under our Bylaws, if a nominee for Director is not elected and the nominee is an existing Director standing for re-election (orincumbent Director), the Director must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, subject to the Board’s acceptance. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the tendered resignation, taking into account the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose (by a press release, a filing with the SEC or other broadly disseminated means of communication) its decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in making its recommendation and the Board of Directors in making its decision may each consider any factors or other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. Any Director who tenders his or her resignation as described above will not participate in the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the decision of the Board of Directors with respect to his or her resignation.

If the number of persons nominated for election as Directors as of ten days before the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at such meeting shall exceed the number of Directors to be elected, then the Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Because no persons other than the incumbent Directors have been nominated for election at the 20132016 Annual Meeting, each nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast for that nominee to be elected to the Board.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation:The advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, and the preference of the stockholders will be determined by the choice receiving the greatest number of votes.

Approval of 2016 Incentive Plan: NYSE listing standards require listed companies to seek stockholder approval of plans that provide for the distribution of company stock to employees. When such approval is sought, the standards require that abstentions count as votes against approval of the proposal. These NYSE listing standards apply only to approval of the 2016 Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting.

All Other Matters:All other matters at the 20132016 Annual Meeting will be determined by a majority of the votes cast. Shares represented by proxies marked “abstain” with respect to the proposals described on the proxy card and by proxies marked to deny discretionary authority on other matters will not be counted in determining the vote obtained on such matters. If the proxy is submitted and no voting instructions are given, the person or persons designated on the card will vote the shares for the election of the Board of Directors’ nominees and in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors on the other subjects listed on the proxy card and at their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.

Broker Non-Votes:Under the rules of the NYSE, on certain routine matters, brokers may, at their discretion, vote shares they hold in “street name” on behalf of beneficial owners who have not

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 15 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

returned voting instructions to the brokers. On all other matters, brokers are prohibited from voting uninstructed shares. In instances where brokers are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority (so-calledbroker non-votes), the shares they hold are not included in the vote totals.

At the 20132016 Annual Meeting, brokers will be prohibited from exercising discretionary authority with respect to each of the matters submitted, other than the ratification of the auditors. As a result, for each of the matters upon which the brokers are prohibited from voting, the broker non-votes will have no effect on the results.

AT&T – Page 15


The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that will be presented at the meeting for action on the part of stockholders other than those described in this Proxy Statement.

Management Proposals (Item Nos. 1 through 4)

Item 1.            Election of Directors (Item No. 1)

The following persons, each of whom is currently a Director of AT&T, have been nominated by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for election to one-year terms of office that would expire at the 20142017 Annual Meeting. In making these nominations, the Board reviewed the background of the nominees (each nominee’s biography is set out below) and determined to nominate each of the current Directors for re-election.re-election, other than the retiring Directors.

The Board believes that each nominee has valuable individual skills and experiences that, taken together, provide us with the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and vision necessary to provide effective oversight of a large and varied enterprise like AT&T. As indicated in the following biographies, the nominees have significant leadership skills and extensive experience in a variety of fields, including telecommunications, technology, public accounting, health care, education, economics, financial services, law, consumer marketing, transportation and logistics, government service, public policy, academic research, and consulting and nonprofit organizations, each of which the Board believes provides valuable knowledge about important elements of AT&T’s business. A number of the nominees also have extensive experience in international business and affairs, which the Board believes affords it an important global perspective in its deliberations.

All the nominees have significant experience in the oversight of large public companies due to their service as directors of AT&T and other companies. In addition, many of our Directors served on the boards of Ameritech Corporation, AT&T Corp., BellSouth Corporation, Pacific Telesis Group, and Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation, all large, publicly traded telecommunications companies that we acquired. These Directors provide historical perspective on the acquired companies, facilitate integration and continuity, and provide direction for the combined businesses. The Board believes that these skills and experiences qualify each nominee to serve as a Director of AT&T.

If one or more of the nominees should at the time of the meeting be unavailable or unable to serve as a Director, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted to elect the remaining nominees and any substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board. The Board knows of no reason why any of the nominees would be unavailable or unable to serve.

AT&T – Page 16


The Board recommends you voteFOR each of the following candidates:

 

16 | www.att.com


LOGO

Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the following candidates:

LOGO

  

RANDALLRandall L. STEPHENSON,age 52, is Stephenson

Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and

President of AT&T Inc.

Age: 55
Director since:2005
Committees:
- Executive (Chair)

Qualifications: Mr. Stephenson’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his more than 30 years of experience in the telecommunications industry, his intimate knowledge of our Company and its history, his expertise in finance and operations management, and his years of executive leadership experience across various divisions of our organization, including serving as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Senior Vice President of Consumer Marketing.

Background:Mr. Stephenson has served in thisthe above capacity since June 2007. Mr. StephensonHe has held a variety of high-level finance, operational, and marketing positions with AT&T, including serving as Chief Operating Officer from 2004 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in 2007 and as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He began his career with the Company in 1982. Mr. Stephenson received his B.S. in accounting from Central State University (now known as the University of Central Oklahoma) and earned his Master of Accountancy degree from the University of Oklahoma. He is the Chairperson of the Executive Committee. He has been a Director of AT&T since 2005. Mr. Stephenson is a Director of

Other Directorships: The Boeing Company; Emerson Electric Co. Mr. Stephenson’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his 30 years of experience in the telecommunications industry, his intimate knowledge of our company and its history, his expertise in finance and operations management, and his years of executive leadership experience across various divisions of our organization, including serving as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Senior Vice President of Consumer Marketing.

LOGO

GILBERT F. AMELIO, age 70, who began his career at AT&T Bell Laboratories, was Senior Partner of Sienna Ventures (a privately-held venture capital firm in Sausalito, California) from 2001 until January 2012. Dr. Amelio was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jazz Technologies, Inc. (an analog-intensive mixed-signal semiconductor foundry solutions company) from 2005 until 2008 (at which time he was named Chairman Emeritus). Dr. Amelio was Principal of Aircraft Ventures, LLC from 1997 to 2004. Prior to that, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Computer Inc. from 1996 to 1997 and National Semiconductor Corporation from 1991 to 1996. Dr. Amelio is responsible for a number of patents. He previously served as a Director of Jazz Technologies, Inc. (2005-2008). In 2008, Acquicor Management LLC (a former shareholder of Jazz Technologies, Inc.), where Dr. Amelio had served as the sole managing member since 2005, declared bankruptcy. In 2003, AmTech, LLC (a technology investments and consulting services firm), where Dr. Amelio served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to 2004, declared bankruptcy. Dr. Amelio graduated from Georgia Institute of Technology where he earned his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in physics. He has been a Director of AT&T since 2001 and had previously served as an Advisory Director of AT&T from 1997 to 2001. He served as a Director of Pacific Telesis Group from 1995 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1997. He is the Chairperson of the Human Resources Committee and a member of the Corporate Development and Finance Committee and the Executive Committee. He is a Director of Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (formerly known as Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and InterDigital, Inc. Dr. Amelio’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive leadership experience in the oversight of other large publicly traded companies, his prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired, his technical background and expertise, and his experience and expertise in venture capital. These attributes are valuable particularly for a technology and innovation driven company like AT&T.

AT&T – Page 17


LOGO

LOGO

  

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

Retired Global Chief Executive
Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited

(an international professional
services firm)

Age: 65
REUBEN V. ANDERSON, age 70, is a senior partner in the law firm of Phelps Dunbar, LLP in Jackson, Mississippi, where he has served as a partner since 1991. He practices in the areas of commercial and tort litigation and regulatory and governance matters. Prior to that, Mr. Anderson served as a judge in Mississippi for 15 years, including serving as a Mississippi Supreme Court Justice from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Anderson received his B.A. from Tougaloo College and his J.D. from University of Mississippi School of Law. Mr. Anderson has been a Director of AT&T since 2006. He served as a Director of BellSouth Corporation from 1994 until the company was acquired by AT&T in 2006. He is the Chairperson of the Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Executive Committee. Mr. Anderson is a Director of The Kroger Co. He previously served as a Director of Trustmark Corporation (1978-2009). Mr. Anderson’s extensive knowledge and judgment in litigation matters and his legal expertise in regulatory and governance matters are important qualifications given the regulatory and legal issues faced by AT&T and our industry. His qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of service as a judge, including on the Mississippi Supreme Court, and his extensive service on the boards of other public companies. His qualifications also include his 12 years of service on the board of a telecommunications company that we acquired.since:July 2015


Committees:
- Audit

LOGO

JAMES H. BLANCHARD, age 71, is Chairman of the Board and Partner of Jordan-Blanchard Capital, LLC (a private equity alternative asset management firm in Columbus, Georgia) and has served in this capacity since August 2011. He was Chairman of the Board of Synovus Financial Corp. (a diversified financial services holding company) from 2005 to 2006, and prior to that served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1971 to 2005. Mr. Blanchard has over 35 years of finance and banking experience and in 2005 received recognition by US Banker Magazine as one of the “25 Most Influential People in Financial Services.” Mr. Blanchard received his B.B.A. in business administration and his law degree from the University of Georgia. Mr. Blanchard has been a Director of AT&T since 2006. He served as a Director of BellSouth Corporation from 1994 until the company was acquired by AT&T in 2006. He previously served as a Director of BellSouth Telecommunications Inc. from 1988 to 1994. He is the Chairperson of the Corporate Development and Finance Committee and a member of the Executive Committee and the Human Resources Committee. Mr. Blanchard is a Director of Total System Services, Inc. He previously served as a Director of Synovus Financial Corp. (1970-2012). Mr. Blanchard’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his long-standing service in executive leadership positions and his decades of experience in the financial services industry, all of which enable him to provide valuable insight to a large, publicly traded company like AT&T. His qualifications also include his 18 years of service as a director of telecommunications companies that we acquired.

AT&T – Page 18


LOGO

JAIME CHICO PARDO,Qualifications: age 63, is Founder and Chief Executive Officer of ENESA (a private fund investing in the energy and health care sectors in Mexico) and has served in this capacity since 2010. He was Co-Chairman of the Board of Teléfonos de México, S.A.B. de C.V. (Telmex) (a telecommunications company based in Mexico City) from 2009 to 2010, and previously served as its Chairman from 2006 until 2009 and its Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 until 2006. He was Co-Chairman of IDEAL (Impulsora del Desarrollo y el Empleo en América Latina, S.A. de C.V., a publicly listed company in Mexico in the business of investing and managing infrastructure assets in Latin America) from 2006 to 2010 and served as Chairman of Carso Global Telecom, S.A. de C.V. (a telecommunications holding company) from 1996 to 2010. Mr. Chico has spent a number of years in the international and investment banking business. He holds a B.A. in industrial engineering from Universidad Iberoamericana and earned his M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Mr. Chico has been a Director of AT&T since 2008. He is a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Development and Finance Committee. Mr. Chico is a Director of Honeywell International Inc. He previously served as a Director of certain American Funds (2011-2013) as well as Grupo Carso, S.A. de C.V. (1991-2010) and the following of its affiliates: América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (2001-2009); Carso Global Telecom, S.A. de C.V. (1996-2010); CICSA (Carso Infraestructura y Construccíon) (2008-2011); IDEAL (2006-2013); Telmex (1991-2010); and Telmex Internacional, S.A.B. de C.V. (2008-2010). Mr. Chico’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his leadership experience in the oversight of large, publicly traded companies and his significant understanding of the telecommunications industry. In addition, his background in and knowledge of international business and finance are particularly beneficial to a global company like AT&T.

LOGO

SCOTT T. FORD, age 50, has been a partner with Westrock Capital Partners, LLC (a privately-held investment firm in Little Rock, Arkansas) and Westrock Coffee Holdings, LLC (a producer and worldwide distributor of coffee in Little Rock, Arkansas) since 2009. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alltel Corporation (a provider of wireless voice and data communications services) from 2002 to 2009, and prior to that, he served as its President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2002. During Mr. Ford’s tenure with Alltel Corporation, he led the company through several major business transformations, culminating with the sale of the company to Verizon Wireless in 2009. Mr. Ford received his B.S. in finance from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. He was elected a Director of AT&T in June 2012. He is a member of the Corporate Development and Finance Committee and the Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee. Mr. Ford is a Director of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. He previously served as a Director of Alltel Corporation (1996-2009) and Tyson Foods, Inc. (2005-2008). Mr. Ford’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience and expertise in the telecommunications industry, his strong strategic focus, his leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company, as well as his service as a director of other publicly traded companies, all of which bring valuable contributions to AT&T’s strategic planning and industry competiveness.

AT&T – Page 19


LOGO

JAMES P. KELLY, age 69, was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc. (a global express carrier and package distribution logistics company in Atlanta, Georgia) from 1997 until his retirement in 2002, where he continued to serve as a Director until 2008. During Mr. Kelly’s tenure as Chairman of United Parcel Service, the company grew beyond its core package delivery business to become a global supply chain management concern. Mr. Kelly received his B.A. in business from Rutgers University. Mr. Kelly has been a Director of AT&T since 2006. He served as a Director of BellSouth Corporation from 2000 until the company was acquired by AT&T in 2006. He is a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. He previously served as a Director of Dana Corporation (2002-2008). Mr. Kelly’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience in the executive oversight of a complex, multinational organization and his vast experience in strategic planning, logistics, and consumer marketing, all issues that AT&T faces as a large, international company. His qualifications also include his six years of service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.

LOGO

JON C. MADONNA, age 69, was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KPMG (an international accounting and consulting firm in New York, New York) from 1990 until his retirement in 1996. He was with KPMG for 28 years where he held numerous senior leadership positions. Subsequent to his retirement from KPMG, Mr. Madonna served as Vice Chairman of Travelers Group, Inc. from 1997 to 1998 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlson Wagonlit Corporate Travel, Inc. from 1999 to 2000. He was Chief Executive Officer of DigitalThink, Inc. (an e-commerce company) from 2001 to 2002 and served as its Chairman from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Madonna received his B.S. in accounting from the University of San Francisco. Mr. Madonna has been a Director of AT&T since 2005. He served as a Director of AT&T Corp. from 2002 until the company was acquired by AT&T Inc. (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 2005. Mr. Madonna is the Chairperson of the Audit Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Executive Committee. He is a Director of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and Tidewater Inc. He previously served as a Director of Jazz Technologies, Inc. (2007-2008). Mr. Madonna’sDi Piazza’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive leadership skills, his vast experience in public accounting with a major accounting firm, and his experience in international business and affairs, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T. His qualifications also include his prior service as a director across diverse, publicly traded companies, including his prior service on the board of DIRECTV, a telecommunicationscommunications company that we acquired.

Background:Mr. Di Piazza served as Global Chief Executive Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited from 2002 until his retirement in 2009. Mr. Di Piazza began his 36-year career with PricewaterhouseCoopers (then Coopers & Lybrand) in 1973 and was named Partner in 1979 and Senior Partner in 2000. From 1979 to 2002, Mr. Di Piazza held various regional leadership positions with PricewaterhouseCoopers (and its predecessor firm). After his retirement from PricewaterhouseCoopers, Mr. Di Piazza joined Citigroup where he served as Vice Chairman of the Global Corporate and Investment Bank from 2011 until 2014. Since 2010, Mr. Di Piazza has served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The Mayo Clinic. He received his B.S. in accounting from the University of Alabama and earned his M.S. in tax accounting from the University of Houston. He served as a Director of DIRECTV from 2010 until the company was acquired by AT&T Inc. in July 2015.

Other Directorships: ProAssurance Corporation; Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

Past Directorships: Apollo Group, Inc. (2009-2011); DIRECTV (2010-2015)

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 17 |

AT&T – Page 20


LOGO

Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

 

LOGO

MICHAEL B. McCALLISTER, age 60, is Chairman of the Board of Humana Inc. (a leading health care company in Louisville, Kentucky)Richard W. Fisher

Former President and has served in this capacity since 2010, having also served as Chief Executive Officer of Humana Inc.the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

(Dallas, TX)

Age: 66

Director since: June 2015

Committees:

- Corporate Development and

Finance

Qualifications: Mr. Fisher’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive financial, trade and regulatory expertise, and a deep understanding of Mexico and Latin America, all of which enable him to provide valuable financial and strategic insight to AT&T.

Background:Mr. Fisher served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 20002005 until his retirement in December 2012. DuringMarch 2015. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. McCallister’s tenure,Fisher was Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of Kissinger McLarty Associates (a strategic advisory firm). From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Fisher served as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative with the rank of Ambassador. Previously, he led the company through significant expansionserved as Managing Partner of Fisher Capital Management and growth, nearly quadrupling its annual revenues between 2000Fisher Ewing Partners LP (investment advisory firms) and 2012, and leading the company in becoming a FORTUNE 100 company.prior to that was Senior Manager of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (a private banking firm). Mr. McCallisterFisher received his B.S.B.A. in accountingeconomics from Louisiana TechHarvard University and earned his M.B.A. from PepperdineStanford University.

Other Directorships: PepsiCo, Inc.

LOGO

Scott T. Ford

Member and Chief Executive Officer of Westrock Group, LLC

(a private investment firm in Little Rock, AR)

Age: 53

Director since: 2012

Committees:

- Corporate Development and

Finance (Chair)

- Executive

- Human Resources

Qualifications: Mr. Ford’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience and expertise in the telecommunications industry, his strong strategic focus and his leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company, all of which bring valuable contributions to AT&T’s strategic planning and industry competitiveness.

Background:Mr. Ford founded Westrock Group in 2013 and has served in the above capacity since its inception. Westrock Group operates Westrock Coffee Company, LLC (a vertically-integrated coffee company), founded by Mr. Ford in 2009 and Westrock Asset Management, LLC (a global alternative investment firm), founded by Mr. Ford in 2014. Mr. Ford serves as Chief Executive Officer of Westrock Coffee Company, LLC and as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Westrock Asset Management, LLC. Mr. Ford previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alltel Corporation (a provider of wireless voice and data communications services) from 2002 to 2009, and served as an executive member of Alltel Corporation’s board of directors from 1996 to 2009. He was elected also served as Alltel Corporation’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Ford led Alltel through several major business transformations, culminating with the sale of the company to Verizon Wireless in 2009. Mr.Ford received his B.S. in finance from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

Other Directorships: Bear State Financial, Inc.

18 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

LOGO

Glenn H. Hutchins

Co-Founder of Silver Lake

(a technology investment firm based in New York, NY and Menlo Park, CA)

Age: 60

Director since: 2014

Committees:

- Corporate Development and

Finance

- Public Policy and Corporate

Reputation

Qualifications: Mr. Hutchins’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience and expertise in the technology and financial sectors, his public policy experience, and his strong strategic focus, all of which enable him to provide valuable financial and strategic insight to AT&T.

Background:Mr. Hutchins is a Co-Founder and former Co-CEO of Silver Lake and served as Managing Director of AT&T in February 2013. He is a memberSilver Lake from 1999 to 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Hutchins was Senior Managing Director at The Blackstone Group (a global investment firm) from 1994 to 1999. Mr. Hutchins served as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. McCallisterBoard of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (a software and technology services company) from 2005 until 2015. He is a Director of Fifth Third Bancorp; Humana Inc.;the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Zoetis Inc. In 2008,Vice Chairman of the Brookings Institution. Mr. McCallisterHutchins is a Director of the Harvard Management Company, which is responsible for Harvard University’s endowment. Previously, Mr. Hutchins served as a Special Advisor in the White House on economic and health-care policy from 1993 to 1994 and as Senior Advisor on the transition of the Administration from 1992 to 1993. He holds an A.B. from Harvard College, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

Other Directorships: Nasdaq, Inc.

LOGO

William E. Kennard

Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

Age: 59

Director since: 2014

Committees:

- Corporate Governance and

Nominating

- Public Policy and Corporate

Reputation

Qualifications: Mr. Kennard’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his expertise in the telecommunications industry, his understanding of public policy, and his international perspective, as well as his background and experience in law and regulatory matters, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T.

Background:Mr. Kennard served as the United States Ambassador to the European Union from 2009 to 2013. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Kennard was Managing Director of National City CorporationThe Carlyle Group, a global private equity firm, where he led investments in the telecommunications and media sectors. Mr. Kennard served as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission from 1997 to 2001. Before his appointment as FCC Chairman, he served as the FCC’s General Counsel from 1993 until its merger with The PNC Financial Services Group,1997. Mr. Kennard joined the FCC from the law firm of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and Hand (now DLA Piper) where he was a partner and member of the firm’s board of directors. Mr. Kennard received his B.A. in communications from Stanford University and earned his law degree from Yale Law School.

Other Directorships: Duke Energy Corporation; Ford Motor Company; MetLife, Inc. on December 31, 2008.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 19 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

LOGO

Michael B. McCallister

Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Humana Inc.

(a health care company in Louisville, KY)

Age: 63

Director since: 2013

Committees:

- Audit

- Public Policy and Corporate

Reputation

Qualifications: Mr. McCallister’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company and his depth of experience in the health care sector.

sector, which is of increasing importance to a company like AT&T.

LOGO

JOHN B. McCOY,Background: age 69, wasMr. McCallister served as Chairman from 1999 and2010 to 2013, having also served as Chief Executive Officer of Humana from 1998 of Bank One Corporation (a commercial and consumer bank based in Chicago, Illinois)2000 until his retirement in 1999. He was Chairman2012. During Mr. McCallister’s tenure, he led Humana through significant expansion and Chief Executive Officer ofgrowth, nearly quadrupling its predecessor, Banc One Corporation, from 1987annual revenues between 2000 and 2012, and led the company to 1998 and prior to that served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1987 and as President from 1977 to 1984.become a FORTUNE 100 company. Mr. McCoyMcCallister received his B.A.B.S. in historyaccounting from Williams CollegeLouisiana Tech University and earned his M.B.A. in finance from Stanford University’s Graduate SchoolPepperdine University.

Other Directorships: Fifth Third Bancorp; Zoetis Inc.

Past Directorships: Humana Inc. (2000-2013)

LOGO

Beth E. Mooney

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Business. Mr. McCoy has been KeyCorp

(a bank holding company in Cleveland, OH)

Age: 61

Director of AT&T since 1999. He served as a Director of Ameritech Corporation from 1991 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1999. He is the Chairperson of thesince: 2013

Committees:

- Corporate GovernanceDevelopment and Nominating Committee

Finance

- Public Policy and a member of the Executive Committee and the Human Resources Committee. He is a Director of Onex Corporation. He previously served as a Director of Cardinal Health, Inc. (1987-2009) and ChoicePoint Inc. (2003-2008). Mr. McCoy’sCorporate

Reputation

Qualifications: Ms. Mooney’s qualifications to serve on the Board include hisher executive leadership skills in the oversight of a large, publicly traded and highly-regulated company and her more than 30 years of experience in overseeing large organizations and his vast knowledge of consumerthe banking and financial services all ofindustry, which enable him to providebring valuable financial and strategic insight to a large, publicly traded company like AT&T. His qualifications also include his experience serving

Background:Ms. Mooney has served in the above capacity since 2011. She previously served as KeyCorp’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to 2011. Ms. Mooney joined KeyCorp in 2006 as a directorVice Chair and head of other publicly traded companies, including his eight yearsKey Community Bank. Prior to joining KeyCorp, beginning in 2000 she served as Senior Executive Vice President at AmSouth Bancorporation (now Regions Financial Corporation), where she also became Chief Financial Officer in 2004. Prior to joining AmSouth Bancorporation, Ms. Mooney completed line assignments of service onincreasing responsibility at Bank One Corporation, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., Hall Financial Group and Republic Bank of Texas/First Republic. She received her B.A. in history from the boardUniversity of a telecommunications company that we acquired.Texas at Austin and earned her M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.

Other Directorships: KeyCorp

 

AT&T – Page 21

20 | www.att.com


LOGO

Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

LOGO

  

JOYCEJoyce M. ROCHÉ,age 65, wasRoché

Author and Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Girls Incorporated (a

(a national nonprofit research, education, and advocacy organization in New York, New York)NY)

Age: 68

Director since: 1998

Committees:

- Corporate Governance and

Nominating

- Executive

- Human Resources (Chair)

Qualifications: Ms. Roché’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her executive leadership experience and operations management skills in dealing with complex organizational issues. Her expertise in general management and consumer marketing are key benefits to AT&T. Her qualifications also include her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.

Background:Ms. Roché served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Girls Incorporated from 2000 until her retirement in 2010. Ms. Roché was an independent marketing consultant from 1998 to 2000. She was President and Chief Operating Officer of Carson, Inc. from 1996 to 1998 and Executive Vice President of Global Marketing of Carson, Inc. from 1995 to 1996. Prior to that, Ms. Roché held various senior marketing positions, including Vice President of Global Marketing for Avon Products, Inc. from 1993 to 1994. Ms. Roché received her B.A. in math education from Dillard University and earned her M.B.A. in marketing from Columbia University. Ms. Roché has been a Director of AT&T since 1998. She served as a Director of Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation from 1997 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1998. She is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee. She is a Director of

Other Directorships: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.; Macy’s, Inc.; and Tupperware Brands Corporation. She previously served as Corporation

LOGO

Matthew K. Rose

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC

(a freight rail system based in Fort Worth, TX)

Age: 56

Director of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (1998-2008). Ms. Roche’ssince: 2010

Committees:

- Corporate Governance and

Nominating

- Human Resources

Qualifications: Mr. Rose’s qualifications to serve on the Board include herhis extensive experience in the executive leadershipoversight of a large, complex and highly-regulated organization, his considerable knowledge of operations management and logistics, and his experience and operations management skillsskill in dealing withmanaging complex organizational issues. Her expertise in general managementregulatory and consumer marketing are key benefitslabor issues comparable to those faced by AT&T. Her qualifications also include her experience serving as a director of a number of other publicly traded companies, including her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.

LOGO

MATTHEW K. ROSE,Background: age 53, is Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMr. Rose has served in the above capacity since 2002, having also served as President of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and, formerly known as Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation) (one of the largest freight rail systems in North America) and has served in this capacity since 2002, having also served as President until 2010. Before serving as its Chairman, Mr. Rose held several leadership positions there and at its predecessors, including President and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2002, President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2000, and Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from 1997 to 1999. Since 2002, Mr. Rose has also beenserves as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BNSF Railway Company (a subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC), having also served as President until 2010.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2002 to 2013. He earned his B.S. in marketing from the University of Missouri. Mr. Rose has been a Director of AT&T since 2010. He is a member of the Corporate Development and Finance Committee and the Human Resources Committee. He is a Director of AMR Corporation;

Other Directorships: BNSF Railway Company; and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC. He previously served asLLC; Fluor Corporation

Past Directorships: AMR Corporation(2004-2013)

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 21 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

LOGO

Cynthia B. Taylor

President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Centex Corporation (2006-2009). Mr. Rose’sOil States International, Inc.

(a diversified solutions provider for the oil and gas industry in Houston, TX)

Age: 54

Director since: 2013

Committees:

- Audit

- Public Policy and Corporate

Reputation

Qualifications: Ms. Taylor’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experienceher executive leadership skills in the executive oversight of a large, complex and highly-regulated organization, his considerable knowledge of operations management and logistics, and his experience and skill in managing complex regulatory and labor issues comparable to those faced by AT&T. His qualifications also include his experience serving as a director of several other publicly traded companies.company, her vast experience in finance and public accounting, and her experience in international business and affairs, all of which bring a broad spectrum of management experience to our Board.

Background:Ms. Taylor has served in the above capacity since 2007. She previously served as Oil States International, Inc.’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007 and as its Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2006. Ms. Taylor was Chief Financial Officer of L.E. Simmons & Associates, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and Vice President-Controller of Cliffs Drilling Company from 1992 to 1999, and prior to that, held various management positions with Ernst & Young LLP, a public accounting firm. She received her B.B.A. in accounting from Texas A&M University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Other Directorships: Oil States International, Inc.; Tidewater Inc.

AT&T – Page 22


LOGO

LOGO

  

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Professor of Business Administration and Economics at the Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley

LAURA D’ANDREA TYSON,Age:age 65, is 68

Director since: 1999

Committees:

- Audit

- Executive

- Public Policy and Corporate

Reputation (Chair)

Qualifications: Dr. Tyson’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her expertise in economics and public policy, her experience as an advisor in various business and political arenas, and her vast knowledge of international business and affairs, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T. Her qualifications also include her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.

Background:Dr. Tyson has served in the above capacity since 2007. She was S. K. and Angela Chan Professor of Global Management at the Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, from 2008 until 2013 and has served in this capacity since 2008. Dr. Tyson has also been Professor of Business Administration and Economics at the Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, since 2007. She was Dean of London Business School, London, England, from 2002 until 2006 and2006. She previously served as Dean of the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley from 1998 to 2001. She served as Professor of Economics and Business Administration at the University of California at Berkeley from 1997 to 1998. Since 2011, Dr. Tyson has beenserved as a member of the Secretary of State Foreign Affairs Policy Board.Board from 2011 to 2013. She served as a member of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness for the President of the United States from 2011 until February 2013 and as a member of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board to the President of the United States from 2009 until 2011. She also served as National Economic Adviser to the President of the United States from 1995 to 1996 and as Chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 1993 to 1995. Since 2008, Dr. Tyson has served as an adviser and faculty member of the World Economic Forum and co-chairas a member of the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on the Gender Gap.Women’s Empowerment. Dr. Tyson received her B.A. in economics from Smith College and earned her Ph.D. in economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She has been a Director of AT&T since 1999. SheDr. Tyson served as a Director of Ameritech Corporation from 1997 until the company was acquired by AT&T (then known as SBC Communications Inc.) in 1999. She is a member of the Audit Committee and the Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee. Dr. Tyson is a Director of

Other Directorships: CBRE Group, Inc. and; Morgan Stanley. She previously served as a Director ofStanley; Silver Spring Networks, Inc.

Past Directorships: Eastman Kodak Company(1997-2011). Dr. Tyson’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her expertise in economics and public policy, her experience as an advisor in various business and political arenas, and her vast knowledge of international business and affairs, all strong attributes for the Board of AT&T. Her qualifications also include her experience serving as a director of several publicly traded companies, as well as her prior service as a director of a telecommunications company that we acquired.

22 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

 

AT&T – Page 23


Item 2.            Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP

as Independent Auditors (Item No. 2)

This proposal would ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent auditors of AT&T for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.2016. The Audit Committee’s decision to re-appoint our independent auditor was based on the following considerations:

quality and performance of the lead audit partner and the overall engagement team,

knowledge of the telecommunications industry and company operations,

global capabilities and technical expertise,

auditor independence and objectivity, and

the potential impact of rotating to another independent audit firm.

Based on these considerations, the Audit Committee believes that the selection of Ernst & Young LLP has been our independent auditors for more than 25 years.is in the best interest of the company and its stockholders. Therefore, the Audit Committee recommends that stockholders ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. If stockholders do not ratify the appointment, of Ernst & Young LLP, the Committee will reconsider the appointment.its decision. One or more members of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be able to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board recommends you voteFOR this proposal.

The Board recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Item 3.            Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation (Item No. 3)

This proposal would approve the compensation of executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative disclosures (see pages 3736 through 76)74). These sections describe our executive compensation program and recent updates to the program.

The Human Resources Committee is responsible for executive compensation and works to structure a balanced program that addresses the dynamic, global marketplace in which AT&T competes for talent. The Committee believes this program includes pay-for-performance, equity-based incentive programs, and rewards executives for results that are consistent with stockholder interests. The Committee asks that our stockholders approve the program.

AT&T has implemented a number of changes to its compensation and benefits program in recent years to better serve its stockholders. Many of thesestockholders and is implementing additional changes are reflectedin its 2016 program. For more information on the 2016 changes and our best practices, please see pages 40 to 41 in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginningAnalysis.

Guiding Pay Principles (discussed in detail on page 37.44)

Competitive and Market Based: Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate comparator company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T.

Guiding Pay Principles

Pay for Performance: Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of Company and business unit goals as well as recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to the Company’s success.

Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus: Ensure that compensation programs and packages provide an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigation of risk.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 23 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Our guiding pay principles (which are discussed in more detail on pages 42 and 43) are:

Competitive and Market Based: Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate comparator company practices to ensure we are able to attract, retain, and provide appropriate incentives for officers in a highly competitive talent market.

Pay for Performance: Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of Company and business unit goals as well as recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to the Company’s success.

Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus: Ensure that compensation programs and packages provide an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business.

Alignment with Stockholders: Set performance targets and provide compensation elements that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders. To further align our programs with stockholders, we pay dividend equivalents only on earned performance shares, and we do not pay tax reimbursements on company benefits. In addition, executive officers are required to hold 25% of their stock-based incentive awards and net option exercises until one year after they leave the Company.

 

AT&T – Page 24

Alignment with Stockholders: Set performance targets and provide compensation elements that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders. For example, performance shares make up nearly 33% of target compensation for the CEO and the Named Executive Officers and are tied to multi-year Company performance and the Company’s stock price. In addition, AT&T has executive stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements, as described on page 58. Each of the Named Executive Officers exceeds the minimum stock ownership guidelines.


Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches: Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.

Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches: Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.

AT&T submits this proposal to stockholders on an annual basis. While this is a non-binding, advisory vote, the Committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. AT&T is providing this vote as required pursuant to sectionSection 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.

The Board recommends you vote

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Item 4.            Approval of 2016 Incentive Plan

Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (Item No. 4)

The Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (thePlan) offers mid-level and above management employees the opportunity to defer income through the purchase of deferred shares of AT&T common stock (AT&T Stock) with payroll deductions. The shares are distributed in the years elected by the participants. Based on the number of shares purchased, participants also receive limited matching employer contributions in the form of additional deferred shares. The Plan is designed to encourage managers to invest in AT&T Stock and, thereby, give these managers an even greater interest in the continued success of the Company.

The Plan is administered by the Human Resources Committee (theCommittee) of theYour Board of Directors has adopted the 2016 Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) for the purpose of replacing the 2011 Incentive Plan, previously approved by our stockholders in 2011. The Incentive Plan, like the prior plan, permits AT&T to compensate eligible managers with equity and cash awards. New awards will not be made under the Incentive Plan until stockholder approval is entirely composed of independent Directors. The Committee has authority to amendobtained for the Plan and adopt rules for its operation.Plan.

The Incentive Plan was approved by stockholders in 2005, replacingprovides your Directors with the flexibility to compensate managers through a similar program originally adopted in 1991. The Company has made several changesvariety of possible awards. These awards may be tied to the Plan, including adding certain “loyalty provisions”financial or operational performance of the Company as well as to the Plan. In exchange for being permitted to participateperformance of the stock. Because of the key role the Incentive Plan plays in the Plan, officer level employees and senior managers agree thatcompensation of your executives, your Directors urge you to vote for two years after termination of employment they will refrain from engaging in certain activities that are competitive with or “disloyal” to AT&T, including, among other things, competing with AT&T, soliciting its customers or interfering in its relationships with vendors, or improperly disclosing certain confidential information. Other changes include revisions to comply with changes in tax regulations, modifying the contribution and distribution provisions, and removing a requirement that a participant must have been employed for three years to vest in matching shares (almost all participants have three years of service), among other changes.

Most recently, the Board has increased the number of shares that may be acquired under the Plan through deferrals (including employee contributions, matching contributions and reinvested dividend equivalents) from 21 million to 46 million, subject to stockholder approval of the Plan. The number of shares that may be issued pursuant to options remains unchanged at 34 million. Under New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards, material amendments to theIncentive Plan, including increases in the number of authorized shares must be submitted to stockholders for approval.its performance standards.

The terms of the Incentive Plan are summarized below. In addition, the full text of the Incentive Plan is set forth in the Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, and theStatement. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Incentive Plan.

Summary of the Incentive Plan

Performance Awards. The Incentive Plan allows certain committees of your Directors (each, aPlan SummaryCommittee

The Plan is offered) to mid-levelissue “performance shares” and above management employees, which currently total approximately 6,800 managers, including 11 executive officers.

AT&T – Page 25


Each year, a participant may elect to establish a Share Deferral Account to purchase share units through payroll deductions during an upcoming year. The purchase price of a share unit is equal“performance units.” These are contingent incentive awards that are converted into stock and/or cash and paid out to the priceparticipant only if specific performance goals are achieved over performance periods of not less than one year. If the performance goals are not achieved, the awards are forfeited or reduced. Performance shares are each equivalent in value to a share of AT&T Stock at the time of purchase. Each share unit is converted into a share of AT&T Stock at distribution. Share units earn dividend equivalents at the same rate as common stock and(payable in cash and/or stock), while performance units are reinvested in additional share units. AT&T may refuse or terminate, in whole or in part,equal to a specific amount of cash. In any election to participate in the Plan.

In the annual enrollment, acalendar year, no participant may elect to contribute from 6% to 30% of the participant’s annual Base Compensation, which includes base salary and annual bonus. The Committee has authority to add or subtract different types of compensation to or from the definition of “Base Compensation.”

Share units are credited toreceive performance shares having a participant’s account based upon the closing price of AT&T Stock as of the last day of the month in which the contributions are credited. The share units are distributed up to five calendar years after a Share Deferral Account commences, as elected by the participant. A distribution may be further deferred by an employee for additional five-year periods, so long as each election is made while the participant is still an employee. In the event of the death of a participant, all unpaid deferrals of the participant under the Plan are promptly distributed.

In order (1) to generally offset the loss of Company match in the 401(k) plan caused by participation in the Plan or by participation in the Company’s Cash Deferral Plan (described on page 73) and (2) to provide match on compensation that exceeds Federal compensation limits for 401(k) plans, the Company provides “Makeup” matching contributionspotential payout (whether in the form of additional deferredcash and/or stock) exceeding 1% of the shares approved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Similarly, no participant may receive performance units having a potential payout exceeding an amount equivalent to 1% of the approved shares as of the date of the grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Plan Committee, participants receive dividend equivalents on performance shares.

24 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Performance Goals. The “Makeup Match” is an 80% match on contributions fromperformance goals set by the first 6% of base salary and annual bonus (the same rate asPlan Committee include payout tables, formulas or other standards to be used in determining the 401(k) plan)extent to which the performance goals are met and, if met, the number of performance shares and/or performance units that would be converted into stock and/or cash (or the rate of such conversion) and distributed to participants. The performance goals may include, or be offset by, any of the following criteria or any combination thereof:

Financial performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis),reduced of one or more of its Subsidiaries (as that term is defined in the Incentive Plan), and/or a division of any of the foregoing. Such financial performance may be based on net income, Value Added (after- tax cash operating profit less depreciation and less a capital charge), EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), revenues, sales, expenses, costs, gross margin, operating margin, profit margin, pre-tax profit, market share, volumes of a particular product or service or category thereof, including but not limited to the product’s life cycle (for example, products introduced in the last two years), number of customers or subscribers, number of items in service, including but not limited to every category of access or network connections, return on net assets, return on assets, return on capital, return on invested capital, cash flow, free cash flow, operating cash flow, operating revenues, operating expenses, and/or operating income.

Service performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries, and/or of a division of any of the foregoing. Such service performance may be based upon measured customer perceptions of service quality (which may include measurements of the customer’s likelihood to recommend the Company, its products or services, among other things), employee satisfaction, employee retention, product development, completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction, completion of an identified special project, and effectiveness of management.

The Company’s stock price, return on stockholders’ equity, total stockholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends, assuming the reinvestment of dividends), and/or earnings per share.

Impacts of acquisitions, dispositions, or restructurings, on any of the foregoing.

Except to the extent otherwise provided by the amountPlan Committee, if the matters making up one of matching contributions an employee would have been eligiblethe following categories exceeds certain limits, the category (as well as any related effects on cash flow, if applicable) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to receivewhich performance goals are met: (1) changes in accounting principles; (2) changes in Federal tax law; (3) changes in the 401(k) plan (regardlesstax laws of whether the employee actually participates or is eligiblestates; (4) expenses caused by natural disasters, including but not limited to participatefloods, hurricanes, and earthquakes; (5) expenses resulting from intentionally caused damage to property of the business; (6) and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets, and fixed assets. A category shall be disregarded if the net impact of matters in the 401(k) plan). Officer level employees docategory on net income, after taxes and available and collectible insurance, exceed $500 million. In addition, where the net impact of matters in a category (calculated as in the above) exceed $200 million but not receive$500 million, then each such category shall also be excluded but only if the combined net effect of events in all such categories exceeds $500 million.

Gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension plans and other post- retirement benefit plans (and any associated tax effects) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which a Makeup Match on the contribution of their short-term awards (discussed below).performance goal has been met.

Participants (typically officer level employees) who receive an annual cash bonus under the Short Term Incentive Plan or a successor plan and/or another cash award so designatedUnless otherwise provided by the Committee (collectively,STIP Award) may makeat any time, no such adjustment shall be made for a separate election to contribute up to 95% of their STIP Awardcurrent or former executive officer to the Plan and purchase share units. The STIP Award is not considered Base Compensation and is not eligible forextent such adjustment would cause an award to fail to satisfy the Makeup Match.

In accordance with the termsperformance based exemption of Section 162(m) of the Code.

Stock Options. The Incentive Plan beginning with 2010 contributions of salary and 2011 contributions of annual bonus,permits the Company contributed a Bonus Match (in additionPlan Committee to the Makeup Match) to participant accounts in the form of additional deferred shares. The Bonus Match equals 20% of the participant’s contributions. However, the Bonus Match is not paid on employee contributions of STIP Awards in excess of the target award.

Previously, instead of the Bonus Match, AT&T issuedissue nonqualified stock options based on participation into managers, which directly link their financial success to that of AT&T’s stockholders. Incentive Stock Options, which are more costly for a company to issue, are not permitted under the Incentive Plan. The Plan permits the Company to issue two nonqualified stock options for each share unit purchased by a participant. The Committee may only offer the Bonus Match if it reducesshall determine the number of options issued for each share unit purchased. As noted above, beginning with 2010 salary and 2011 annual bonus contributions, the Company stopped offering stockshares subject to options and replaced them withall other terms and

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 25 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

conditions of the 20% Bonus Match. At this timeoptions, including vesting requirements. In no event, however, may the Company does not intend to resume the issuance of options under the Plan but may do so in the future.

Each option permits the holder to purchase one share of AT&T Stock with an exercise price equal toof a stock option be less than 100% of the fair market value of AT&T Stock atcommon stock on the timedate of the issuancestock option’s grant, nor may any option have a term of more than ten years. During any calendar year, no single employee may receive options on shares representing more than 1% of the option. (Reinvestmentsshares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Except for adjustments based on changes in the corporate structure or as otherwise provided in the Incentive Plan, the terms of an Option may not be amended to reduce the exercise price nor may Options be cancelled or exchanged for cash, other awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options.

Restricted Stock. The Incentive Plan also permits the Plan Committee to grant restricted stock awards. Each share of restricted stock shall be subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations, if any, as the Plan Committee deems appropriate, including, but not by way of limitation, restrictions on transferability and continued employment. Holders of shares of restricted stock may vote the shares and receive dividends on such shares. In order to qualify a restricted stock grant under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan Committee may condition vesting of the award on the attainment of performance goals, using the same performance criteria as that used for performance shares and units. The vesting period for restricted stock shall be determined by the Committee, which may accelerate the vesting of any such award. The Plan Committee may also grant restricted stock units, which have substantially the same terms as restricted stock, except that units have no voting rights, may or may not receive dividend equivalents, derived from participant-purchased shareand may be paid in cash or stock. The Plan Committee may also grant unrestricted stock under this provision. No manager may receive in any calendar year restricted stock (including restricted stock units whereand stock without restrictions) representing more than 1% of the reinvestmentsshares authorized to be issued under the Incentive Plan.

Eligible for Participation. Management employees of AT&T or its Subsidiaries are made duringeligible to be selected to participate in the

Incentive Plan. Currently, there are approximately 103,000 managers who are eligible to participate in the plan; however, the Company expects participation to be generally limited to 7,000 mid-level and above managers. Actual selection of any eligible manager to participate in the Incentive Plan is within the sole discretion of the Plan Committee.

AT&T – Page 26


first 13 monthsAvailable Shares. The Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance, over a 10-year period, of up to 90 million shares of common stock to participants, net of lapsed awards. In the event of a Share Deferral Account, also earn stock options). Stock optionssplit, stock dividend, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company, as described in the Plan, affecting the shares that may be issued under the Plan, may notan adjustment shall be re-priced. When offered, stock options are issued twice a year and are exercisable no earlier than one year (or upon termination of employment, if earlier), and no later than 10 years, after issuance. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee,made in the event the employee terminates employment, the options expire on the earliernumber and class of the regular expiration date or as follows: retirement–five years, death or disability–three years, other termination-one year. Stock options are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and are exercisable during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee.

The Committeeshares which may permit an employee to purchase share units with amounts other than Base Compensation or STIP Awards from time to time; however, these purchases may not earn matching contributions or stock options.

Previous issuances of optionsbe delivered under the Plan (including but not limited to individual grant limits) as may be determined by the Named Executive Officers are shown in the Outstanding Equity Awards Table, beginning on page 63, and are marked with an asterisk. No optionsHuman Resources Committee.

After April 30, 2026, no further awards may be issued under the Plan have been exercised byIncentive Plan.

Federal Income Tax Matters Relating to Stock Options. The following is a summary of the Named Executive Officers to date.

AT&T believes that, under present law, the following are theprincipal U.S. Federal income tax consequences under present law of the issuance and exercise of stock options issuedgranted under the Plan asIncentive Plan. This summary is not intended to the recipientbe exhaustive and, AT&T. among other things, does not describe state or local tax consequences.

A participant will not be deemed to have received any income subject to tax at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted, nor will AT&T be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. WhenHowever, when a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the participant will recognize compensationbe deemed to have received an amount of ordinary income equal to the amount by whichexcess of the fair market value of the shares acquired exceedof common stock purchased over the exercise price. Subject to the satisfaction of applicable tax withholding requirements, AT&T will be allowed a tax deduction in the year the options areoption is exercised in an amount equal to the compensationordinary income recognizedwhich the participant is deemed to have received.

Other Information. The Incentive Plan may be amended in whole or in part by the participant.

As noted above,Board of Directors or the Company has amended the Plan to increase the number of shares of AT&T Stock that may be distributed as a result of deferrals (including employee and matching employer contributions and reinvested dividend equivalents) from 21 million to 46 million shares, subject to stockholder approval of the Plan. Shares withheld for taxes in connection with a distribution are returned to authorized status and may be reissued. All matching contributions are immediately vested. As of December 31, 2012, the number of shares issued under the Plan as a result of deferrals or represented by undistributed share units was 13,211,160, leaving 7,788,840 shares available before the increase in authorized shares.

The Plan also provides for the issuance of up to 34 million additional shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options, which was not changed by the Company. As of December 31, 2012, 5,052,400 options had been exercised and 12,248,186 options were outstanding, leaving 16,704,709 shares available for the exercise of options.Human Resources Committee. In the event of a stock optionChange in Control (as defined in the Incentive Plan), the payout of performance units and performance shares shall be determined exclusively by the

26 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

attainment of the performance goals established by the Plan Committee, which may not be modified after the Change in Control, and AT&T shall not have the right to reduce the awards for any other reason unless the holder of the award is canceled, expiresterminated for Cause.

For certain high level employees, the receipt of an award under the Incentive Plan will constitute an agreement that they will not participate in activities that would constitute engaging in competition with AT&T or otherwise terminates, it is returnedengaging in conduct disloyal to authorized status andAT&T. These provisions, including definitions of terms, are contained in Section 10.3 of the Plan.

In addition, a recipient of an award shall be required to repay the Company for any amount received under an award or an award may be reissued. When offered, no participant may receive more than 400,000cancelled, in each case to the extent required under any policy adopted by the Company at any time pursuant to any applicable stock options during a calendar year.exchange listing standards established under Section 10D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This does not limit the Company’s right to seek recovery or cancellation of an award for any other reason including but not limited to misconduct.

AsThe closing price of February 15, 2013, AT&T&T’s common stock closed at $35.36.reported on the New York Stock Exchange for February 1, 2016, was $36.18 per share.

The Board recommends you voteFOR this proposal.

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Stockholder Proposals (Item Nos. 5 thru 8)through 7)

Certain stockholders have advised the Company that they intend to introduce at the 20132016 Annual Meeting the proposals set forth below. The names and addresses of, and the number of shares owned by, each such stockholder will be provided upon request to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T.

AT&T – Page 27


Item 5.            Stockholder Proposal (Item No. 5)

Political ContributionsSpending Report

Resolved, that the shareholders of AT&T (“Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually,semi-annually, disclosing the Company’s:

Indirect monetary and non-monetary expenditures used for political purposes, i.e., to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and used in any attempt to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections.

The report shall include:

1.Policies and procedures for political contributions and expenditures (both direct and indirect) made with corporate funds.

2.Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and used in any attempt to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections or referenda. The report shall include:
a.An accounting through an itemized report that includes the identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each recipient of the Company’s funds that are used for political contributions or expenditures as described above; and
b.The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible forwho participated in making the decision(s)decisions to make the political contributionscontribution or expenditures.expenditure.

This proposal does not encompass payments used for lobbying.

The report shall be presented to the board of directorsdirectors’ audit committee or other relevant board oversight committee and posted on the Company’s website.

Stockholder

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 27 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders of AT&T shareholders, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. These include any activities considered intervention in any political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect political contributions to candidates, political parties, or political organizations; independent expenditures; or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state or local candidates.

Disclosure is consistent with sound public policy, in the best interest of the companyCompany and its shareholders, and critical for compliance with federal ethics laws. Moreover,shareholders. Indeed, the Supreme Court’sCourt said in its 2010Citizens Uniteddecision recognized the importance of political spending disclosure for shareholders when it saiddecision: “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.” Gaps in transparency

Our Company discloses a policy on corporate political spending and accountability may exposeits contributions to state-level candidates, parties and committees on its website. We believe this is deficient, however, because AT&T will not disclose the company to reputational and business risks that could threaten long-term shareholder value.

AT&T disclosed that it allocated $6.5 millionfollowing expenditures made for the political purposes in 2012 alone,defined above:

A list of trade associations to which it belongs and how much it gave to each;
Payments to other third-party organizations, including an additional $13.5 million in contributions or expenditures relating to the 2012 presidential nominating conventions and inaugural activities.

Publicly available data does not provide a complete picturethose organized under of the Company’sInternal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4); and

Electioneering communication expenditures made by the Company in support or opposition to a candidate for public office. These expenditures were legalized by the Citizens United decision, so long as they are not coordinated with a candidate. Our company’s disclosures do not cover these particularly risky expenditures.

Information on indirect political spending. For example, AT&T’s payments that are used for political activities byengagement through trade associations and other political active organizations are undisclosed and unknown. In some cases, even management does not know how these501(c)(4) groups use their company’s money politically. The proposal askscannot be obtained by shareholders unless the Company to disclosediscloses it. Disclosure of all of itsAT&T’s indirect political spending including payments to trade associations and other tax exempt organizations used for political purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies, including Exelon, MerckMicrosoft, CenturyLink and MicrosoftQualcomm that present this information on their websites. Forty one percent of the S&P 500 (204 companies) currently disclose some level of payments to trade associations, or say they instruct trade associations not to use these payments on election-related activities (CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability).

The Company’s BoardIndirect political spending presents unique risks that are not addressed by AT&T’s current policies. Opacity allows trade associations and its shareholders need comprehensive disclosureother tax exempt entities to be able to fully evaluate the political use of corporate assets. We urge your supportAT&T funds for this critical governance reform.

purposes that may conflict with AT&T’s policies and best interests. Disclosure permits oversight and accountability.

 

AT&T – Page 28


The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board recommends you voteAGAINSTbelieves that the reports requested in this proposal are duplicative of the Company’s existing practices and are unnecessary. AT&T received a nearly identical proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately three fourths of the following reasons:votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

Political contributions, where permitted, are an important part of the regulatory and legislative process. AT&T is in a highly regulated industry, and the Company’sits operations are significantly affected by the actions of elected officials at the local, state and national levels, including rates it can charge customers, its profitability and even how it must provide services to competitors. It is important that yourthe Company actively participate in the electoral and legislative processes in order to protect your interests as stockholders. In addition, we have dramatically increasedThe Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee of the levelBoard, composed entirely of disclosures relating to political contributions. We publicly disclose the maximum amount ofindependent directors, reviews corporate political contributions authorized by your Board each year. For 2013, this amount is $6.2 million. AT&T recently publishedand Company-sponsored political action committees (PACs).

Additionally, as discussed in the AT&T Political Engagement Report. This report contains an itemized list of corporate contributions and AT&T employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. The report provides details on contributions made on behalf of candidates broken down by candidates with dollar amount of contributions. This reportReport, which is available on ourthe Company’s website (at http://www.att.com/gen/corporate-citizenship?pid=23761)about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ATT_Political EngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June 2012. We will updateof 2015. The Company participates in various industry associations to further its business interests. These memberships not only provide valuable industry expertise, but they also advocate positions on behalf of the report semiannually.communications industry or that impact the communications and other industries. These industry associations include, for example, the United States Telecom Association, the Cellular Telephone Industry Association and the Future of Privacy Forum.

28 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website in the Corporate Governance section (available at http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726). In making political contributions AT&Tthe Company is committed to complying with campaign finance laws, including the laws requiring public disclosure of political contributions. The amount of AT&T’sthe Company’s political expenditures is an insignificant portion of its total annual expenses. Each year, yourthe Board of Directors authorizes a maximum amount of political contributions that can be made by yourthe Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, for the purposes of supporting or opposing any party, committee, candidate for public office, or ballot measure, or for any other political purpose. For 2015, this amount is $6.0 million. Also, for calendar years 2015-2016, the Board authorized contributions or expenditures by the Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, relating to the 2016 presidential nominating conventions and ensuing inaugural activities, in the amount of $24.4 million. This amount includes in-kind services. These contributions also provide valuable advertising opportunities for the Company’s services and products.

Except for contributions for ballot measures, no expenditure over $1,000 may be made unless approved by the Chief Executive Officer (lesser amounts may be approved by delegates). Prior to submission to and approval by the Chief Executive Officer,Officer. Additionally, expenditures must be submitted to the Company’s attorneys to confirm that each contribution is lawful.

AT&T already publicly discloses its participation in the legislative process. AT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report, referenced above, semiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. Federal political activity is subject to comprehensive regulation by the federal government, including detailed disclosure requirements. AT&T’s federal PACs file regular reports of receipts and disbursements with the Federal Election Commission (the “FEC”) which are disclosed to the public in the reports filed with the FEC and include identification of all individuals who contributed $200 or more as well as all candidates or committees that received a political contribution. AT&T complies with all obligations with regard to its state and local political activities, including reporting and disclosure requirements. Additionally, under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended, the Company files semi-annual reports with the Secretary of the U.S. Senate (available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm) and Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives (available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx).

The Board believes that spending further corporate funds to generate additional reports would not be a productive use of corporate resources. The Board therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal.

Item 6.            Stockholder Proposal

Whereas, we believe in full disclosure of our company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our company’s lobbying is consistent with AT&T’s expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders.

Resolved, the shareholders of AT&T request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing;

1.Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by AT&T used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.AT&T’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 29 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

4.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which AT&T is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant Board oversight committees and posted on AT&T’s website.

Supporting Statement

As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in AT&T’s use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation, both directly and indirectly. AT&T spent $30.1 million in 2013 and 2014 on federal lobbying activities (opensecrets.org). This figure does not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation in states where AT&T also lobbies, but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, AT&T spent $1.6 million lobbying in California in 2014 (http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/).

AT&T sits on the board of the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent over $1 billion on lobbying since 1998. AT&T does not disclose its memberships in, or payments to, trade associations, or the portions of such amounts used for lobbying. Absent a system of accountability, company assets could be used for objectives contrary to AT&T’s long-term interests. For example, AT&T recognizes climate change is a serious concern that warrants meaningful action, yet the Chamber is publicly attacking the EPA on its new Clean Power Plan addressing climate change.

And AT&T does not disclose its membership in tax-exempt organizations that write and endorse model legislation, such as AT&T’s sitting on Private Enterprise Council of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC has promoted legislation to repeal state renewable energy standards and undermine the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. AT&T’s ALEC membership has drawn press scrutiny that may affect the company’s reputation adversely (“T-Mobile Ditches ALEC,”The Hill, Apr. 8, 2015). More than 100 companies, including Emerson Electric, General Electric, Google, Sprint, and T-Mobile, have publicly left ALEC.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the rigor of the Company’s current practices provides its shareholders and the public with ample transparency and accountability with respect to lobbying activities and that the preparation and publication of the report called for by this proposal is neither necessary nor an efficient use of the Company’s resources. AT&T received a nearly identical shareholder proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately two-thirds of the votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

AT&T is in a highly regulated industry; therefore, public policy decisions at the local, state, and national levels significantly affect the Company’s operations, strategy, and stockholder value. Accordingly, the Company exercises its responsibility to actively participate in the legislative processes in order to protect and further stockholders’ interests by contributing prudently to lobbying organizations that constructively advocate positions which advance the Company’s business objectives and stockholders’ interests. Similarly, the Company belongs to industry associations and coalitions, where it benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide.

30 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website and can be foundin the Corporate Governance section (available at http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726.7726).

BecauseAT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report contains detailed information on AT&T’ssemiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC political contributions to candidates and wecandidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. This report is available on the Company’s website (athttp://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ ATT_PoliticalEngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June 2015).

In addition to the AT&T Political Engagement Report, the Company is required to file other reports with various state and federal agencies. Pursuant to the federal Lobby Disclosure Act, the Company files federal lobbying reports quarterly with the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Secretary of the U.S. Senate. These reports are publicly available and disclose corporate expenditures related to lobbying and issues lobbied. Publicly available contribution and lobbying data can be found at the maximum amountbelow sources:

Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US Senate: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm;
Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US House of Representatives: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx;
Federal Lobbying Contribution Report: Search Organization Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/lc/lcsearch.aspx;
Federal Election Commission: Search: AT&T; available athttp://www.fec.gov/index.shtml California State Lobbying Report: Search: AT&T; available athttp://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Lobbying/Employers/

AT&T has a robust review process for contributions to industry associations and coalitions. The proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of political contributionslobbying expenditures. AT&T fully complies with all disclosure requirements pertaining to lobbying expenditures under federal, state, and local laws. The proposal would impose requirements on the Company that mayare not dictated by law and that are not standard among other companies. Any new requirements should be made in any year as approvedaddressed by thelawmakers and uniformly imposed on all entities.

The Board the Board believesis confident that the report requested byCompany’s lobbying activities are aligned with its stockholders’ long-term interests. As described above, the proposal is unnecessaryCompany already makes available information concerning its political and would be duplicative oflobbying activities to its stockholders and the Political Engagement Report.

Stockholder Proposal (Item No. 6)

Reducing Health Hazards from Manufacturing and Recycling Lead Batteries

Whereas, the neurotoxic and developmental impacts of lead have been well-established for decades, leading to global action to eliminate lead in paint and gasoline;

Whereas lead battery production accounts for over 80 percent of global lead consumption and almost all used lead batteries are recycled, regardless of whether they are used in the United States or elsewhere around the globe;

Whereas theNew York Times reported in December 2011 high levels of community and occupational exposures around lead battery recycling plants in Mexico and Mexico receives 20% of the United States’ used batteries;1

1

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/science/earth/recycled-battery-lead-puts-mexicans-indanger.html?pagewanted=all

AT&T – Page 29


Whereas the North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation (CEC) under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) framework initiated an independent investigation “Environmental Hazards of the Transboundary Movement and Recycling of Spent Lead-Acid Batteries” in January 2012;2

Whereas AT&T uses large numbers of lead batteries to support its data center operations, communication towers and in other operations;

Whereas, lead battery recycling outside the United States endangers public health in part because of a lack of rigorous government controls in those countries. In contrast, new regulations in the US have prompted companies to reduce emissions from led battery recycling;

Whereas proponents believe that poor management of batteries in our company’s supply chain can pose reputational and legal risks to our company; and

Whereas proponents believe it is in our company’s interest to track the fate of used lead batteries generated from operations and to ensure that batteries are properly recycled in appropriately licensed facilities that meet stringent environmental and occupational safety standards.

Therefore be it resolved:

Shareholders request the Board of Directors report to shareholders, by November 1, 2013, on options for policies and practices AT&T can adopt to reduce the occupational and community health hazards from manufacturing and recycling lead batteries in the company’s supply chain. Such a report would be prepared at reasonable cost and omit confidential information such as proprietary or legally prejudicial data.

Supporting Statement. Proponents believe that a report should address such questions as how the company tracks shipments of used batteries to recycling facilities; how to ensure that used batteries are not being shipped to recycling facilities with pollution and occupational safety controls that are less strict than those that would be applicable in the United States; and what mechanisms are used by the company (such as company auditors, or third-party auditors or certifications) to assess supplier/recycler performance against such environmental and occupational performance standards.

2

http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=751&SiteNodel0=1075

The Board recommends you voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

At AT&T, we are deeply committed to environmental sustainability and are dedicated to taking meaningful steps to minimize harmful environmental impacts.AT&T’s Environment, Health, and Safety Policy (found at www.att.com/csr under “frequently requested information/policies”) contains a commitment to promoting pollution prevention through recycling. We follow the most stringent environmental compliance laws applicable to our operations. It is our policy to properly recycle, reuse or reclaim lead batteries used in our operations, and we manage this through AT&T-approved suppliers.

AT&T’s supplier principles (found at www.attsuppliers.com) outline the expectation that suppliers apply robust environment, health and safety policies and practices in their operations and implement necessary procedures that reduce the environmental impact of their products and services.

It is our practice to require our battery suppliers to be in compliance with all applicable Federal, state, county and local rules, statutes, laws, ordinances, regulations and codes. Additionally, it is our practice that new domestic service contracts (including lead battery recycling services contracts) contain a clause prohibiting any activity outside the U.S. without our specific approval. AT&T also requires its battery-removal vendors to provide a certificate of recycling or a hazardous waste manifest from the receiving facility.

AT&T – Page 30


This proposal calls for AT&T to report to stockholders on policies and practices AT&T could adopt relating to lead batteries in its supply chain.public. The Board believes that this proposalan additional report beyond the Company’s current disclosures is unnecessary because AT&T has already undertaken a comprehensive review of its lead battery practices. We are developing a policy related to ourneither necessary nor an efficient use of lead batteries, andCompany resources.

For these reasons, the Company intends to adopt and publish a lead battery policy.

We expect to adopt and publishBoard recommends that you vote against this policy by year end 2013. Because we already have a robust system in place to manage lead battery use and intend to adopt a lead battery policy, we believe this proposal is unnecessary.proposal.

Item 7.            Stockholder Proposal (Item No. 7)

Shareholder Ratification of Executive Severance PackagesProposal 7 — Independent Board Chairman

RESOLVED: The shareholders of AT&T urgeShareholders request our Board of Directors to seek shareholder approvaladopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require the Chair of any senior executive officer’s future severance or termination payments with an estimated total value exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base salary plus target short-term bonus.

“Severance or termination payments” include any cash, equity or other compensation that is paid out or vests due to a senior executive’s termination for any reason. Payments include those provided under employment agreements, severance plans, change-in-control clauses in long-term equity or other compensation plans, and agreements renewing, modifying or extending any such agreement or plan.

“Total value” of these payments includes: lump-sum payments; payments offsetting tax liabilities; perquisites or benefits that are not vested under a plan generally available to management employees; post-employment consulting fees or office expense; and equity awards as to which the executive’s vesting is accelerated, or a performance condition waived, due to termination.

The Board shall retain the option to seek shareholder approval after material terms are agreed upon and shall revise compensation agreements to comply with a shareholder vote only in a manner that does not breach pre-existing contracts or otherwise violate the company’s legal obligations.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

We believe that requiring shareholder ratification of “golden parachute” severance packages with a total cost exceeding 2.99 times an executive’s base salary plus target bonus will provide valuable feedback, encourage restraint, and strengthen the hand of the Board’s compensation committee.

Unlike many large companies, including peers Verizon and CenturyLink, our Company has no policy requiring shareholder approval of “golden parachutes” and other severance arrangements that exceed three times an executive’s base salary plus bonus.

According to the 2012 Proxy (page 69), if CEO Randall Stephenson is terminated without cause after a change in control, or resigns for “good reason,” he could receive an estimated $34.1 million, more thanfive times his 2011 base salary plus target bonus.

Similarly, senior executives Rafael de la Vega and John Stankey could have received an estimated $18.02 and $18.04 million, respectively, more thanseven times their base salary plus target bonus as of the end of 2011 (2012 proxy, page 69).

These estimated payouts to Stephenson, de la Vega, and Stankey are in addition to qualified pension and non-pension and deferred compensation plans, which pay millions more.

AT&T – Page 31


Although AT&T’s Change in Control Severance Plan limits the lump sum cash payout to 2.99 times base salary plus target bonus, the proxy reveals that change-in-control termination payments include millions more from the accelerated vesting of long-term equity.

Most of these additional payouts result from the accelerated vesting of Performance Shares and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). This practice effectively waives the performance conditions that justify AT&T’s annual grants of “performance-based” long-term equity awards to senior executives, in our view.

For example, in the event of termination due to death or disability, Stephenson would have received nearly $28.5 million in unvested performance shares and restricted stock, which pays out at 100% of target (page 64).

We believe that AT&T’s policy on shareholder ratification of executive severance should include the full cost of termination payments.

Please VOTE FOR this proposal.

The Board recommends you voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

The proposal is an extraordinarily broad and unclear proposal that purports to address “severance or termination” payments. A careful reading of the proposal however, shows that the proposal as written actually impacts much more. Because the payments covered by the proposal do not exclude deferred compensation plans, retirement benefits, disability benefits, death benefits, and other benefits payable at retirement or termination for any other reason, all of these (except for benefits applicable to all managers) may be captured by the proposal. Because these amounts could be aggregated in determining whether the payments exceeded the limits of the proposal, it would have the effect of prohibiting payments that are made in connection with a retirement or other termination, whether the amounts were previously earned and deferred or are paid as a result of termination for any reason including, for example, the payment of a death benefit.

Although the proposal purports to permit the Company to seek stockholder approval of each payment made in connection with a termination, this is not practical. The proposal’s unusual focus on “payments” could include all of the programs available to an employee and not be limited to traditional severance payments. The proposal is simply incapable of being applied in a practical or consistent manner as written, and your board believes it is not in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

Moreover, in 2007, the Company submitted to stockholders the following severance policy that was adopted by 91% of the votes cast. Included in this Severance Policy are the following provisions:

AT&T will not enter into any future severance agreement or future employment agreement with any executive officer that provides for severance benefits in an amount that exceeds 2.99 times the executive’s annual base salary plus target bonus, unless such future agreement receives prior shareholder approval or is ratified by shareholders at a regularly scheduled annual meeting within the following 15 months. All other future severance agreements and future employment agreements with executive officers will not be subject to shareholder approval or ratification under the Policy.

An “executive officer” is any person who, at the time the agreement is entered into, is identified by the company as an executive officer as that term is defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

AT&T – Page 32


“Future employment agreement” means an agreement between AT&T and an executive officer, entered into after the effective date of the Policy, pursuant to which such executive renders services to AT&T or one of its affiliates as an employee. “Future severance agreement” means an agreement between AT&T and an executive officer, entered into after the effective date of the Policy, which relates to such executive’s termination of employment with AT&T.

“Severance benefits” means (i) cash payments made by AT&T to the executive officer in connection with and directly related to his or her termination of employment and (ii) the present value of benefits or perquisites provided for periods after the termination of employment. This includes lump-sum payments and the estimated present value of any periodic payments to be made or benefits or perquisites provided following the date of termination that are accrued and paid as a direct result of such termination. “Severance benefits,” however, does not include: (i) payments of salary, bonus or performance award amounts that had accrued at the time of termination or had been previously earned and deferred; (ii) payments of accrued compensation or benefits under qualified and nonqualified deferred compensation plans, savings plans, retirement plans, and health and welfare plans; (iii) amounts paid to offset excise tax liability to the extent the excise taxes are incurred because of a prior deferral of income; (iv) any benefits or perquisites provided under plans or programs applicable to managers generally; (v) amounts paid as part of any agreement intended to “make-whole” any loss or forfeiture of benefits from a prior employer; (vi) amounts paid for post-termination consulting services pursuant to a reasonable consulting agreement; (vii) amounts paid for post-termination covenants, such as a covenant not to compete; or (viii) any payment that the Board of Directors, determines in good faith to be a reasonable settlement of any claim made against AT&T. In the event of termination of employment by the company following a change in control (as that term is defined in AT&T’s Change in Control Severance Plan, as amended from time to time), “severance benefits” will not include the cash payments made in lieu of the accelerated vesting of options or outstanding equity-based awards or to compensate for the cancellation of such awards.

In the change in control situation, the Company makes certain provisions with regard to its awards. Restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock options vest upon an employee’s involuntary termination of employment, reduction in position or compensation or significant transfer following a change in control (the Company does not issue options at this time). Because many of these employees would lose their positions, be assigned diminished responsibilities or transferred in the event of a change in control, the Company wants to provide these already partially earned benefits to employees. These provisions are particularly important in the event of a change in control to insure that employees remain focused on the operations of the business and on creating stockholder value while a potentially protracted regulatory approval process is underway. Moreover, performance shares do not vest in connection with a change in control but are paid only in accordance with the achievement of pre-determined performance goals. In addition, the Company has a Change-in-Control Severance Plan that provides that officer level employees may receive 2.99 times salary and bonus in the event they are terminated within two years after a change in control. Your Board believes these are reasonable terms that would only apply in the most extraordinary of situations and insure that potentially affected employees continue to focus on critical operational matters. In light of the existence of a plan, already approved by stockholders that limits the application of change in control payments and the limited provision for change in control payments consistent with this plan, along with the extraordinarily broad and unclear language of this proposal, the Board believes this proposal is unnecessary.

AT&T – Page 33


Stockholder Proposal (Item No. 8)

Proposal 8 – Independent Board Chairman

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that our board of directors adopt a policy that, whenever possible, the chairman of our board of directors shallto be an independent director. Anmember of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next CEO transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement. If the Board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 31 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is a director who has not previously servedavailable and willing to serve as an executive officer of our Company.Chair. This policy shouldproposal requests that all the necessary steps be implemented so as nottaken to violate any contractual obligations in effect when this resolution is adopted. The policy should also specify how to select a new independent chairman if a current chairman ceases to be independent between annual shareholder meetings. To foster flexibility, this proposal givesaccomplish the option of being phased in and implemented when our next CEO is chosen.above.

When our CEO is our board chairman, this arrangement can hinder our board’s ability to monitor our CEO’s performance. Many companies already have an independent Chairman. An independent Chairman is the prevailing practice in the United Kingdom and many international markets. This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at three5 major U.S. companiesCompanies in 20122013 including 55%73%-support at Sempra Energy.Netflix. It also won 43% support at our company.

Shareholder support for 2012 AT&T shareholder proposals was arguably understated because our directors hidIt is the namesresponsibility of the proponentsBoard of Directors to protect shareholders’ long-term interests by providing independent oversight of management. By setting agendas, priorities and made itprocedures, the Chairman is critical in shaping the work of the Board.

A board of directors is less likely to provide rigorous independent oversight of management if the Chairman is the CEO, as is the case with our Company. Having a board chairman who is independent of the Company and its management is a practice that will promote greater management accountability to shareholders and lead to a more difficultobjective evaluation of management.

According to votethe Millstein Center for shareholder proposals than to vote against them.

This proposal should also be evaluatedCorporate Governance and Performance (Yale School of Management), ‘The independent chair curbs conflicts of interest, promotes oversight of risk, manages the relationship between the board and CEO, serves as a conduit for regular communication with shareowners, and is a logical next step in the contextdevelopment of our Company’s overall corporate governance as reported in 2012:

GMI/The Corporate Library, an independent investment research firm, had rated our company “D” continuously since 20I0board.” (Chairing the Board: The Case for Independent Leadership in Corporate North America, 2009).

An NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Directors’ Professionalism recommended that an independent director should be charged with “High Governance Risk.“organizing the board’s evaluation of the CEO and provide ongoing feedback; chairing executive sessions of the board; setting the agenda and leading the board in anticipating and responding to crises.“GMI also expressed “High Concern” for Executive Pay -$29 million for our CEO Randall Stephenson.A blue-ribbon report from The Conference Board echoed that position.

Mr. Stephenson was given a $3.3 million annual increase for his pension and a $19 million pension increase over the past three years. Plus Mr. Stephenson was given $555,000 in “all other compensation” which included $169,000 to pay for his life insurance. GMIA number of institutional investors said that since such payments are not tied to performance, they are difficult to justify in termsa strong, objective board leader can best provide the necessary oversight of shareholder value.

Regarding annual incentive pay, “the [Human Resources] Committee did not applymanagement. Thus, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Global Principles of Accountable Corporate Governance recommends that a fixed formulaic approach to determining final payouts” so that annual payouts were ultimately subjective. Subjective factors like this could undermine incentive pay. Our highest paid executives continued to receive equity pay that simply vested after time without performance-contingent requirements and could also get performance shares that payout partly even if our company underperformed 80%company’s board should be chaired by an independent director, as does the Council of its peers.Institutional Investors.

An independent Chairman policydirector serving as chairman can strengthenhelp ensure the integrityfunctioning of our Board.an effective board. Please encourage our boardvote to respond positively to this proposal to protectenhance shareholder value:

Independent Board Chairman – Proposal 87

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board recommends you voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

Your Board of Directors believes that AT&Tthe Company and its stockholders are best served by having Mr. Stephenson serveone person serving as both Chairman and CEO. The Board has taken several steps to ensureCEO, and it therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal. This issue was considered by stockholders most recently at the Board effectively carries out its responsibility for the oversight of management. The Board has appointedCompany’s 2013 Annual Meeting, when stockholders rejected a Lead Director (currently, James H. Blanchard, an independent membersimilar proposal with approximately three quarters of the Board) who presides over regular executive sessions ofvotes cast being against the non-management members of the Board. Members of management do not attend these sessions. The Lead Director is also responsible for approving the agenda for each Board meeting, presiding at Board meetings at which the Chairman is not present, and acting as the principal

proposal.

AT&T – Page 34


liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the non-management Directors, among other things. For a complete description of the Lead Director’s responsibilities, please see page 6. In recognition of the significant role assigned to the Lead Director, the Board has recently increased the additional annual retainer for the Lead Director from $30,000 to $60,000. The appointment of a strong Lead Director and the use of executive sessions of the Board, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow the Board to maintain effective oversight of management.

Your Board also notes that Mr. Stephenson is the only Director who is a member of management. In addition, each committee, other than the Executive Committee, is made up solely of independent Directors.

Your Board believes that a single person, acting in the capacities of Chairman and CEO, serves as a bridge between the Board and management and provides critical leadership for carrying out yourthe Company’s strategic initiatives and confronting its challenges. In short, the Board believes that the Company can more effectively execute its strategy and business plans to maximize stockholder value if the Chairman of the Board is also a member of the management team.

In addition, the Board has taken several steps to ensure that the Board effectively carries out its responsibility for the oversight of management. The Board has appointed a Lead Director (currently, Joyce M. Roché, an independent member of the Board) who presides over regular executive sessions of the non-management members of the Board. Members of management do not attend these

32 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

sessions. The Lead Director is also responsible for approving the agenda for each Board meeting, presiding at Board meetings at which the Chairman is not present, and acting as the principal liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the non-management Directors, among other things. For a complete description of the Lead Director’s responsibilities, please see page 8. In recognition of the significant role assigned to the Lead Director, the Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000. The appointment of a strong Lead Director and the use of executive sessions of the Board, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow the Board to maintain effective oversight of management.

Finally, the Board notes that Mr. Stephenson is the only Director who is a member of management. In addition, each committee, other than the Executive Committee, is made up solely of independent Directors.

For these reasons, the Board believes that the adoption of a policy requiring that the Chairman of the Board be an independent Director is not in the best interests of AT&T’s stockholders.the Company’s stockholders and therefore recommends that you vote against the proposal.

 

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 33 |


Audit Committee Report

Audit Committee

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed with management AT&T’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (4) discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

February 11, 2016The Audit Committee
Jon C. Madonna, ChairmanCynthia B. Taylor
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Michael B. McCallister

AT&T has a separately designated standing Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of AT&T’s financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors, and AT&T’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters, including environmental matters. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Madonna (Chairperson)(Chairman), Mr. Chico,Di Piazza, Mr. Kelly, Mr. McCallister, Ms. Taylor, and Dr. Tyson, each of whom was appointed by the Board of Directors.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed on the Company’s web site at www.att.com. The Audit Committee performs a review and reassessment of its charter annually. The Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and AT&T. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Di Piazza, Mr. Madonna, and Mr. KellyMs. Taylor are “audit committee financial experts” and are independent as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and in accordance with AT&T’s additional standards. Although the Board of Directors has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes defined under the rules of the SEC, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other Audit Committee members. They are not AT&T’s auditors or accountants, do not perform “field work” and are not full-time employees. The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be

34 | www.att.com


Audit Committee Report

deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management in the preparation of AT&T’s financial statements and financial disclosures. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AT&T’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate. AT&T’s Audit Committee charter provides that these are the responsibility of management and the independent auditors.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Ernst & Young LLP acts as AT&T’s principal auditor and also provides certain audit-related, tax and other services. The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy for services to be performed by

AT&T – Page 35


Ernst & Young. Under this policy, the Audit Committee approves specific engagements when the engagements have been presented in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee before services are undertaken.

This policy also allows for the approval of certain services in advance of the Audit Committee being presented details concerning the specific service to be undertaken. These services must meet service definitions and fee limitations previously established by the Audit Committee. Additionally, engagements exceeding $500,000 must receive advance concurrence from the Audit Committee Chairperson.Chairman. After an auditor is engaged under this authority, the services must be described in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee at the next meeting.

All pre-approved services must commence, if at all, within 14 months of the approval.

The fees for services provided by Ernst & Young (all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee) to AT&T in 20122015 and 20112014 are shown below.

 

Principal Accountant Fees(dollars in millions)Principal Accountant Fees(dollars in millions) Principal Accountant Fees(dollars in millions) 
Item  2012     2011   2015     2014 

Audit Fees (1)

  $21.8      $23.3    $29.6      $23.3  

Audit Related Fees (2)

   2.6       2.4     5.2       4.4  

Tax Fees (3)

   6.4       6.2     10.5       8.0  

All Other Fees (4)

   0.1       0.0     0.0       0.0  

 

1.Included in this category are fees for the annual financial statement audit, quarterly financial statement reviews, audits required by Federal and state regulatory bodies, statutory audits, and comfort letters. The year-over-year increase in fees was primarily due to the acquisitions of DIRECTV and Mexico wireless operations during 2015.

2.These fees, which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit Fees, include chargesfees for employee benefit plan audits, due diligence associated with acquisition and disposition activity, control reviews of AT&T service organizations, governmental grant-related attestations, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and reviews of internal controls and processes.sustainability reporting compliance.

3.These fees include charges for various Federal, state, local and international tax compliance and research projects, as well as tax services for AT&T employees working in foreign countries.
4.No fees were incurred in 2015 or 2014 for services other than audit, audit related and tax.

 

4.
AT&T 2016 Proxy StatementIn 2012, fees for assistance with developing a Federal government grant application. | 35 |

Report of the Audit Committee


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed with management AT&T’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (4) discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Compensation Committee Report

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

February 12, 201311, 2016The Human Resources Committee
Joyce M. Roché, ChairmanJohn B. McCoy

Scott T. Ford

    Matthew K. Rose

Quick Reference Guide

The Audit Committee:Executive Summary

 37

The Human Resources Committee and Its Role

44

Guiding Pay Principles

44

Compensation Design

45

2015 Compensation

47

Benefits

56

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

58

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

59

Clawback Policy

59

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

59

Compensation Consultant

60

36 | www.att.com


 

Jon C. Madonna, Chairman

Jaime Chico PardoCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Michael B. McCallister

James P. Kelly

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

 

AT&T – Page 36


              Compensation Discussion and Analysis              

Executive Summary

AT&T’s mission is to connect people with their world everywhere they live and work, and do it better than anyone else. We’re fulfilling this vision by creating new solutions for consumers and businesses and by driving innovation in the communications and entertainment industry. Our success in meeting these goals depends on our ability to attract, retain, and motivate world-class talent, beginning with our executive officers.

The Human Resources Committee (Committee) has taken significanttakes great care in the development and refinement of an executive compensation program that not only recognizes its stewardship responsibility to AT&T’s stockholders while simultaneously ensuring the skillavailability of our leadership team and the complexity of runningtalent to lead an organization the magnitudesize and scopecomplexity of AT&T, but also aligns executive pay with performance and stockholder interests.&T.

During 2012,2015, we continued to execute on our strategic goals strengthenedas shown below. We believe our balance sheet, and expanded our 4G network. AT&T delivered record performance of $127.4 billion in revenues and $19.4 billion in free cash flow (as defined on page 38), which allowed us to meet or exceed all of our short-term incentive targets. We also exceeded the goals for our long-term program, delivering 43.0% in total stockholder return over the three-year period ending December 31, 2012, outperforming the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Standard & Poor’s 100 and 500 for that period. As you will see in the following material, consistent with oursenior leaders’ pay for performance philosophy, the pay of the Company’s executives reflects this strong performance and closely aligns the interests of our management with those of stockholders.

Compensation Philosophy and Best Practices

AT&T’s executive compensation philosophy serves as the starting point for the development and evaluation of our pay programs. The foundational elements of this philosophy, as established by the Human Resources Committee, include paying for performance, ensuring that our programs are competitive and market-based, balancing focus on both short- and long-term goals, and aligning executive officer compensation with both stockholder interests and competitive approaches in the marketplace.

Over the past few years, the Committee has reviewed and adjusted our compensation and benefits program to ensure alignment with current market practices. By designing our program around the following best practices, the Committee has shown its commitment to paying for performance and aligning executive pay with stockholder interests.

AT&T Compensation and Benefits Best Practices

üPay for Performance – 92% of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and, on average, 87% of other Named Executive Officer compensation is tied to Company performance, including stock price.

üStock Ownership Guidelines– All executive officers meet or exceed the guidelines, which count only vested shares. Mr. Stephenson holds shares and deferred shares valued in excess of 22 times his salary; well above his required 6 times multiple.

üHold Until Retirement – Executive officers must now hold 25% of the shares they receive from incentive, equity, and option awards, net of taxes, until one year after they leave the Company.

üMitigate Risk in Compensation Programs – The Committee reviews a risk analysis of our incentive-based compensation programs annually and believes that our programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company.

üDividend Equivalents Payable at the End of the Performance Period and Only on Earned Performance Shares.

AT&T – Page 37


AT&T Compensation and Benefits Best Practices(continued)

üNo Tax Reimbursements – We do not provide tax reimbursements to our executive officers except for certain non-deductible costs in the event of relocation.

üNo SERPs for Post-2008 Officers – The Committee froze AT&T SERP participation at the end of 2008. New officers appointed after January 1, 2009, do not participate in the AT&T SERP.

üClawback in Case of Misconduct– The Company intends, in appropriate circumstances, to seek restitution of any bonus, commission, or other compensation received by an employee as a result of such employee’s intentional or knowing fraudulent or illegal conduct, including the making of a material misrepresentation contained in the Company’s financial statements.

üNon-Compete and Company Protection Provisions in Certain Nonqualified Plans– To better protect stockholder interests, certain nonqualified compensation and benefit plans for senior management, including executive officers, include non-compete provisions, prohibitions on the disclosure of proprietary information, and provisions prohibiting the solicitation of customers and employees.

üNo Repricing or Buyout of Underwater Stock Options.

üNo Hedging or Short Sales Involving AT&T Stock.

üExecutive Officers Pay for Incremental Cost of Using Corporate Aircraft for Personal Use– Beginning in 2013, the CEO will pay for the incremental cost of his or her personal use of corporate aircraft, where permitted by law. This same policy applies to other executive officers unless, on a case-by-case basis, the CEO provides otherwise.

üNo Country Club Fees – Executive officers are required to pay all fees associated with any country club membership, with the exception of initiation fees and transfer fees for corporate-owned memberships. In addition, no new individual memberships are provided by the Company.

Key Fiscal 20122015 Business Results

Our executive officers make decisions every day that shape the future of our Company. The impact of these decisions can be seen both in our current results as well as in our long-term performance. Some

AT&T is investing to be the premier integrated communications company in the world, delivering on our mission to connect people with their world everywhere they live, work and play — and do it better than anyone else.

Strategic Execution

In 2015, AT&T focused on building a strategic advantage by investing in three key areas. The Company closed the acquisition of DIRECTV, allowing it to offer unique integrated video, mobile and broadband solutions across the United States. It also expanded into Mexico with plans to create a North American Mobile Service Area covering 400 million people and businesses. And AT&T continued to invest in its networks — through the acquisition of a near nationwide block of high-quality wireless spectrum to support mobile video growth, global leadership in the transition to software-defined networks and the introduction of innovative new services. We financed our DIRECTV and spectrum purchases at very attractive rates. As a result, we exited 2015 with a strong balance sheet and dividend coverage that is consistent with our historical norms. Highlights for the year include:

DIRECTV Acquisition – With the DIRECTV addition, AT&T is the largest pay-TV provider in the United States and the world with:

Unparalleled video content distribution scale in the U.S. giving AT&T an unequaled opportunity to deliver integrated solutions across video, mobile and broadband services
Expectations that the acquisition will contribute to earnings per share in 2016 and for significant synergies expected to reach an annual run rate of $2.5 billion or better by the end of 2018

International Expansion – Following the combination of Iusacell and Nextel Mexico, AT&T is expanding high speed mobile Internet across Mexico while significantly enhancing the customer experience for wireless customers there. In Mexico, AT&T:

Has committed to invest $3 billion to upgrade its mobile Internet network by the end of 2018
Is on a path to deliver a one-of-a-kind wireless network experience for 400 million consumers and businesses in the United States and Mexico
Covered about 44 million people with high speed 4G LTE at the end of 2015 and expects to reach a total of 100 million people across Mexico by the end of 2018
In addition, AT&T acquired DIRECTV Latin America, which is a leading provider of pay-TV services in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and parts of the critical decisions our executive officers routinely make include choosingCaribbean; DIRECTV Latin America also has an approximately 41% stake in Sky Mexico

Network Excellence – AT&T expanded its network leadership position as it completed one of the proper investment strategies, investinglargest network build cycles in Company history, invested $18 billion to acquire a near-nationwide

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 37 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

block of spectrum in the development of new productsAWS-3 auction and technologies, making wise capital expenditures, exploring new offers and markets, and reducing operating expenses. Our successes in these areas and in meeting our strategic goals for 2012 are highlighted below:led the transformation to software-defined networks. AT&T’s network:

Stockholder Returns

Delivers high-speed broadband connectivity to customers through:
 ·¡ 

17.5% total stockholder return – outperformingA 4G LTE mobile broadband network reaching 355 million people and businesses in the Dow Jones Industrial AverageU.S. and the Standard & Poor’s 100 and 500

Mexico
 ·¡ 

Returned $23 billion in cashHigh-speed wired Internet covering more than 57 million people with a commitment to stockholders, including dividends paid of $10.2 billion and share buybacks of $12.8 billion

reach 14 million additional customer locations with fiber
 ·¡ 

Increased the quarterly dividend for the 29th consecutive year

An expanded fiber network covering an additional 1 million business locations

Financial Performance & Strength

Carries more than 100 petabytes of data traffic — to nearly every country on the globe — on an average business day
Utilizes highly efficient satellites capable of delivering HD and UltraHD to nearly 1 billion people throughout the U.S. and Latin America
Leads the industry in the transformation from proprietary hardware-based networks to software-defined networks, which offer a better cost structure for the Company along with faster network upgrades and reduced provisioning cycle times for customers
 ·¡ 

Record $127.4 billionAT&T expects to transform 75% of its network architecture by 2020

Supports innovative new services for Business Solutions customers, including:
¡AT&T’s Network on Demand platform, which lets customers add or change services in consolidated revenues

near real time. AT&T Switched Ethernet on Demand is available in more than 170 cities in the United States, and we have signed more than 500 customers to date. Managed Internet Service on Demand is currently available in select cities and the Company plans to expand it in 2016
 ·¡ 

Approximately 80%AT&T NetBond®, the Company’s highly secure cloud security service; the NetBond ecosystem includes 13 cloud providers, and the Company has signed several hundred NetBond deals

Business Results

While investing in the future, AT&T’s executives also drove strong results in the Company’s four business segments.

Business Solutions – AT&T is the premier business services provider in the United States. The Company provides services to more than 3.5 million businesses — including virtually all of the Fortune 1000 — and operates on six continents. In 2015:

Business Solutions revenues, including wireless and wireline services, were $71.1 billion
AT&T expanded its global leadership in the Internet of Things — everything from connected cars and homes to wearables to machine-to-machine applications — with a total of 26.2 million connected devices, including 5.2 million added in 2015
AT&T’s revenues from fixed strategic business services — including security, VPN, cloud, Ethernet and other advanced services — grew 12.9% to an annualized revenue stream of $11 billion

Entertainment Group – AT&T significantly enhanced its entertainment business with the acquisition of DIRECTV and the creation of the AT&T Entertainment Group. In 2015, AT&T:

Grew Entertainment Group revenues to $35.3 billion, a 58.7% increase over 2014, largely driven by the acquisition of DIRECTV
Added 240,000 satellite TV subscribers after the close of DIRECTV
Ended the year with 13.3 million IP broadband subscribers including business customers, a year-over-year increase of more than 1 million
Expanded the availability of revenues from ongoing operationsits AT&T GigaPowerSM service to more than 1 million homes in 2012 came from our growth drivers – wireless, wireline data and managed IT services – growing nearly 6%

20 markets with plans to enter an additional 36 markets
Led the industry in delivering video however and whenever customers want it:
¡AT&T has 25 million pay-TV subscribers, more than anyone in the United States
 ·¡ 

Record $39.2 billionAbout one-third of DIRECTV and AT&T U-verse TV customers used our mobile apps, website or third-party authentication to stream content in cash from operations, #1 in the industry

2015
 ·¡ 

Record $19.4 billionAT&T’s Otter Media joint venture with The Chernin Group is a global leader in free cash flow (cash from operations of $39.2 billion minus constructionover-the-top video; it is the largest independent creator network worldwide and capital expenditures of $19.7 billion), which is oneoperates two of the factors we usetop 20 streaming video on demand services globally

38 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Consumer Mobility – Despite intense competition, AT&T delivered solid wireless performance in 2015, including best-ever full-year EBITDA service margins across the total wireless business. In addition, in 2015, AT&T’s Consumer Mobility segment:

Increased its EBITDA service margins as cost efficiencies and AT&T Next offset pressure from popular Mobile Share Value Plans
Added 1.8 million branded (postpaid and prepaid) subscribers
Executed a turnaround in prepaid, driven by its Cricket and GoPhone services, with an industry leading 1.4 million net adds for the year, up from a decline of 311,000 in 2014

International – AT&T entered the wireless market in Mexico in early 2015 and has turned around operations that were previously losing subscribers and revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2015, AT&T added 593,000 subscribers in Mexico — reflecting significant progress in customer adoption and retention.

Financial Performance and Stockholder Returns

Impressive market performance and a relentless focus on operating efficiencies translated to solid financial performance and stockholder returns in 2015 with:

A 1-year total stockholder return, including reinvested dividends, of 8.3%, almost six times what the S&P 500 returned during the same period

1-Year Total Stockholder Returns

AT&T

 DJIA S&P 500 S&P 100

8.3%

 0.2% 1.4% 2.6%

10.8% revenue growth
An industry-leading 32nd consecutive annual increase in determining our short-term incentive awards for executive officers

the Company’s quarterly dividend
 ·¡ 

Invested approximately $20 billion in capital expenditures and spectrum purchases to expand and upgrade our network capabilities for customers in the United States and around the globe

AT&T increased its quarterly dividend by 2.1%
Free cash flow (cash from operating activities minus capital expenditures) of $15.9 billion, up 60% year over year even with $20 billion in capital expenditures, or $20.7 billion when including purchases in Mexico with favorable payment terms
Significant improvement in free cash flow dividend coverage with 64% of free cash flow paid in dividends versus 96% in 2014

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement  | ·39 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy and Best Practices

AT&T’s executive compensation philosophy serves as the starting point for the development and evaluation of our pay programs. The foundational elements of this philosophy, as established by the Committee, include paying for performance, ensuring that our programs are competitive, balancing focus on both short- and long-term goals, and aligning executive officer compensation with both stockholder interests and competitive approaches in the marketplace.

The Committee periodically reviews and adjusts our compensation and benefits program to ensure alignment with current market practices. By continuing to evaluate and modify our programs as necessary and by designing our program around the following best practices, the Committee has shown its commitment to paying for performance and aligning executive pay with stockholder interests.

What We Do

—     The vast majority of executive officer compensation is tied to performance metrics and/or stock price performance.

—     Multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting time frames limit unnecessary short-term risk-taking.

—     Robust stock ownership guidelines for all officers.

—     Annual discussions with large stockholders.

—     Executive officers required to hold 25% of shares received until one year after they leave the Company.

—     Dividend equivalents paid at the end of performance period on earned performance shares.

—     Clawback policy.

—     Severance policy limiting payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus.

What We Don’t Do

—     No “single trigger” provisions for accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards following a change in control.

—     No accelerated vesting of performance shares following a Change in Control.

—     No credit for unvested shares when determining stock ownership guideline compliance.

—     No repricing or buy-out of underwater stock options.

—     No hedging or short sales of AT&T stock.

—     No tax reimbursements, except in extenuating circumstances.

—     No supplemental executive retirement benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.

2016 Compensation Program Enhancements

Based on input from stockholders, we are further modifying our executive compensation plans effective beginning in 2016. This chart describes those enhancements, and how they align with stockholder interests.

40 |  www.att.com


Refinanced $12 billion in debt to take advantage of historically low interest rates

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

AT&T – Page 38


Growth Metrics

 

·2016 Executive

Compensation Enhancements

How Enhancements Align

with Stockholder Interests

SHORT-TERM AWARDS
Payouts will beformula-driven – based on the achievement of specific, objective performance goals each year, consistent with those applied to other corporate managers. The Committee may make adjustments to this formula-driven payout to recognize individual performance.  

MobilityThis formula-based approach enables stockholders to quickly and easily assess the Company’s commitment to paying the CEO and NEOs for performance, and is more consistent with the Company’s comparator companies.

For 2016, payout will be based on earnings per share (70%) and free cash flow (30%)

¡  

Nearly 70% of post-paid phone subscribers

LONG-TERM AWARDS
For the most recently completed three-year performance period, we will report our ROIC performance goal and our attainment against that goal. For information on smartphones

¡our most recent ROIC attainment, please see page 43.  

Added 3.7 million net wireless subscribersDisclosing ROIC goals and results gives stockholders a clearer view of the Company’s commitment to reach 107 million

paying for performance.
¡With respect to the Total Stockholder Return (TSR) metric for Performance Share Grants, we will use a new peer group against which to measure relative TSR attainment. The new peer group will be comprised of combined Comparator, Top 25 Market Capitalization, and Telecom groups (shown on page 46 for 2015) used to determine target compensation.  

Increased smartphone customers 7.7 millionAligns companies used to reach a record 47 million

determine target compensation with those used to determine award payouts.
¡

We will change the payout table for the relative TSR performance measure:

•     30th percentile performance required for threshold payout.

•     Median performance required for 100% payout.

•     90th percentile performance required for 200% payout.

  

Grew mobile data revenues nearly 18% to a $27 billion annualized revenue stream

¡

Increased connected devices by 1.2 million to 14.3 million

¡

Led the U.S. wireless industry in average revenues per contract user

¡

Led the U.S. wireless industry in widely recognized best-in-class 4G LTE experience

¡

Led the U.S. wireless industry with the largest 4G network

This adjustment further aligns pay and performance. See new payout table immediately below.

 

Total Stockholder Return
·3-Year Target (2016-2018)
AT&T Return vs. TSR Peer Group  

Business SolutionsPayout %

¡

Level 1 (90th percentile or above)

  

Despite a slow economy and weak government and business spending, showed quarterly sequential wireline business revenue growth by year-end

200%
¡

Level 2 (75th – 89.99th percentile)

  2.2x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Increased strategic business services (Ethernet, Virtual Private Networking, hosting, IP conferencing, and application services) revenues 13% to a $6.5 billion annualized revenue streamLevel 3 (60th – 74.99th percentile)

2.1x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 4 (45th – 59.99th percentile)

2.0x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 5 (30th – 44.99th percentile)

1.8x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 6 (<30th percentile)

0%

Payouts are capped at 90% of the target award if absolute AT&T TSR is negative,

regardless of relative performance.

 

·
AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement 

Home Solutions | 

41 |


¡Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Posted the largest annual increase in total AT&T U-verse TV and broadband subscribers in our history to reach a total of 8 million; or a $10 billion annualized revenue stream growing 38% per year

¡

Increased wireline consumer revenues 1.9%, the second consecutive year of growth

Strategic Achievements

·

Increased average nationwide wireless spectrum depth by more than 30% through 48 agreements

·

Expanded our network to offer 4G service to 288 million people, more than doubled 4G LTE coverage extending availability to over 170 million people

·

Announced strategic network expansion, Project Velocity IP (Project VIP), to provide high-speed broadband connectivity to nearly all customers – through wireless, wireline or both – by end-of-year 2015

¡

Expand 4G LTE to 300 million people by end-of-year 2014

¡

Bring fiber to 1 million additional business customer locations by end-of-year 2015

¡

Expand the availability of IP broadband, including U-verse, to approximately 75% of customer locations in our wireline service area by end-of-year 2015

·

Improved overall revenue growth profile with sale of majority ownership interest in AT&T Ad Solutions (Yellow Pages)

Impact of Performance Results on Executive Officer Compensation

Our executive compensation program is founded onIn order to further its pay-for-performance goal, the philosophy that executive pay should be strongly aligned with Company, business unit, and individual performance. Our mixCommittee delivers a significant portion of pay, which is heavily weighted towards short- and long-term incentives, is designed to focus executive officer performance overcompensation as performance-based compensation, including both short- and long-term time horizonsincentives. The following charts depict how the Committee targets each element of compensation for the CEO and reward themcollectively for delivering results and building sustainable value for our stockholders. Conversely, we provide lower incentive payouts when performance targets are not fully met (or no award payouts if certain performance thresholds are not met)the other Named Executive Officers (NEOs).

2015 Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

When designing compensation programs,these incentives, the Committee usesemploys a variety of metrics to ensure a strong link between executive compensation and performance. Metrics such asThese metrics include earnings per share, free cash flow, revenue, and return on invested capital, which connect compensation to Company performance while total stockholder returns alignreturn aligns executive pay with performance relative to key Company peers.

peer companies.

AT&T – Page 39


Following is anAn explanation of the individual pay elements of our executive officer compensation program and the impact of performance on each element.element is provided below. We believe that the greatest pay opportunities should exist for executives who demonstrate high levels of performance over a sustained period of time.

A discussion of each named executive officer’s 2015 performance may be found on pages 5149 through 53.51.

Base Salary

When determining whether or not to grant ana base salary increase, the Committee considers the executive’sexecutive officer’s individual performance and business results for the prior year, as well as his or her base salary compared to the market value for his or her job. The amount of an executive officer’s salary reflects the fact that he/she isExecutive officers’ salaries are set based on past and expected to, and has consistently contributedfuture contributions to the Company’s long-term success. For more information on the base pay component of compensation, please see page 47.

2012 Base Salary Increases

For 2012, Named Executive Officers (excluding the Chief Executive Officer) received, on average, a pay increase of 2.4% based on performance and actual salary compared to market.

Short-Term IncentivesAlignment with Stockholders

At the beginning: Set performance targets and provide compensation elements that closely align executives’ interests with those of thestockholders. For example, performance period, the Committee establishes three Company performance metrics, which serve as a threshold trigger to qualify executive officersshares make up nearly 33% of target compensation for the payment of any short-term awards. The qualification criteriaCEO and the Named Executive Officers and are tied to overallmulti-year Company performance because the Committee believes that each executive officer is ultimately responsible for attainment ofand the Company’s strategic objectives.

If any of the established performance thresholds are met, the Committee then conducts an assessment of additional qualitative and quantitative factors, as they determine appropriate for each executive officer, in order to determine specific award payouts. These factors may include an assessment of the executive’s ongoing individual performance; his or her contribution to overall Company results; and attainment of business unit goals, including financial, customer service, and growth targets. The Committee also considers intangible factors such as vision, innovation, ability to grow the business, and leadership.

2012 Short-Term Award Payouts

As described beginning on page 50, for 2012, the Committee established performance targets in the form of ranges for Revenue, Earnings per Share, and Free Cash Flow. The Committee chose these performance metrics because they are the key short-term financial metrics for the operation of our business and represent the metrics our stockholders rely on.stock price. In addition, these metrics are commonly used in the marketplace as annual performance indicators that drive long-term sustainability. AT&T performed within the target ranges for revenuehas executive stock ownership guidelines and earnings per share and exceeded the target range for free cash flow.

Based on Company, business unit, and individual performance, the Committee determined to pay executive officer short-term awards for 2012 above target award levelsretention requirements, as described on page 53.58. Each of the Named Executive Officers exceeds the minimum stock ownership guidelines.

Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches: Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.

AT&T submits this proposal to stockholders on an annual basis. While this is a non-binding, advisory vote, the Committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. AT&T is providing this vote as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Item 4.            Approval of 2016 Incentive Plan

Your Board of Directors has adopted the 2016 Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) for the purpose of replacing the 2011 Incentive Plan, previously approved by our stockholders in 2011. The Incentive Plan, like the prior plan, permits AT&T to compensate eligible managers with equity and cash awards. New awards will not be made under the Incentive Plan until stockholder approval is obtained for the Plan.

The Incentive Plan provides your Directors with the flexibility to compensate managers through a variety of possible awards. These awards may be tied to the financial or operational performance of the Company as well as to the performance of the stock. Because of the key role the Incentive Plan plays in the compensation of your executives, your Directors urge you to vote for approval of the Incentive Plan, including its performance standards.

The terms of the Incentive Plan are summarized below. In addition, the full text of the Incentive Plan is set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Incentive Plan.

Summary of the Incentive Plan

Performance Awards. The Incentive Plan allows certain committees of your Directors (each, aPlan Committee) to issue “performance shares” and “performance units.” These are contingent incentive awards that are converted into stock and/or cash and paid out to the participant only if specific performance goals are achieved over performance periods of not less than one year. If the performance goals are not achieved, the awards are forfeited or reduced. Performance shares are each equivalent in value to a share of common stock (payable in cash and/or stock), while performance units are equal to a specific amount of cash. In any calendar year, no participant may receive performance shares having a potential payout (whether in the form of cash and/or stock) exceeding 1% of the shares approved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Similarly, no participant may receive performance units having a potential payout exceeding an amount equivalent to 1% of the approved shares as of the date of the grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Plan Committee, participants receive dividend equivalents on performance shares.

24 | www.att.com


Long-Term IncentivesAgenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Performance Goals. The performance goals set by the Plan Committee include payout tables, formulas or other standards to be used in determining the extent to which the performance goals are met and, if met, the number of performance shares and/or performance units that would be converted into stock and/or cash (or the rate of such conversion) and distributed to participants. The performance goals may include, or be offset by, any of the following criteria or any combination thereof:

Financial performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries (as that term is defined in the Incentive Plan), and/or a division of any of the foregoing. Such financial performance may be based on net income, Value Added (after- tax cash operating profit less depreciation and less a capital charge), EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), revenues, sales, expenses, costs, gross margin, operating margin, profit margin, pre-tax profit, market share, volumes of a particular product or service or category thereof, including but not limited to the product’s life cycle (for example, products introduced in the last two years), number of customers or subscribers, number of items in service, including but not limited to every category of access or network connections, return on net assets, return on assets, return on capital, return on invested capital, cash flow, free cash flow, operating cash flow, operating revenues, operating expenses, and/or operating income.

Service performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries, and/or of a division of any of the foregoing. Such service performance may be based upon measured customer perceptions of service quality (which may include measurements of the customer’s likelihood to recommend the Company, its products or services, among other things), employee satisfaction, employee retention, product development, completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction, completion of an identified special project, and effectiveness of management.

The Company’s stock price, return on stockholders’ equity, total stockholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends, assuming the reinvestment of dividends), and/or earnings per share.

Impacts of acquisitions, dispositions, or restructurings, on any of the foregoing.

Except to the extent otherwise provided by the Plan Committee, if the matters making up one of the following categories exceeds certain limits, the category (as well as any related effects on cash flow, if applicable) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which performance goals are met: (1) changes in accounting principles; (2) changes in Federal tax law; (3) changes in the tax laws of the states; (4) expenses caused by natural disasters, including but not limited to floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes; (5) expenses resulting from intentionally caused damage to property of the business; (6) and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets, and fixed assets. A category shall be disregarded if the net impact of matters in the category on net income, after taxes and available and collectible insurance, exceed $500 million. In addition, where the net impact of matters in a category (calculated as in the above) exceed $200 million but not $500 million, then each such category shall also be excluded but only if the combined net effect of events in all such categories exceeds $500 million.

Gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension plans and other post- retirement benefit plans (and any associated tax effects) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which a performance goal has been met.

Unless otherwise provided by the Committee at any time, no such adjustment shall be made for a current or former executive officer to the extent such adjustment would cause an award to fail to satisfy the performance based exemption of Section 162(m) of the Code.

Stock Options. The Incentive Plan permits the Plan Committee to issue nonqualified stock options to managers, which directly link their financial success to that of AT&T’s stockholders. Incentive Stock Options, which are more costly for a company to issue, are not permitted under the Incentive Plan. The Plan Committee shall determine the number of shares subject to options and all other terms and

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 25 |


Agenda Items To appropriately focus our executives’ attentionBe Voted Upon

conditions of the options, including vesting requirements. In no event, however, may the exercise price of a stock option be less than 100% of the fair market value of AT&T common stock on the date of the stock option’s grant, nor may any option have a term of more than ten years. During any calendar year, no single employee may receive options on shares representing more than 1% of the shares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Except for adjustments based on changes in the corporate structure or as otherwise provided in the Incentive Plan, the terms of an Option may not be amended to reduce the exercise price nor may Options be cancelled or exchanged for cash, other awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options.

Restricted Stock. The Incentive Plan also permits the Plan Committee to grant restricted stock awards. Each share of restricted stock shall be subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations, if any, as the Plan Committee deems appropriate, including, but not by way of limitation, restrictions on transferability and continued employment. Holders of shares of restricted stock may vote the shares and receive dividends on such shares. In order to qualify a restricted stock grant under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan Committee may condition vesting of the award on the attainment of performance goals, using the same performance criteria as that used for performance shares and units. The vesting period for restricted stock shall be determined by the Committee, which may accelerate the vesting of any such award. The Plan Committee may also grant restricted stock units, which have substantially the same terms as restricted stock, except that units have no voting rights, may or may not receive dividend equivalents, and may be paid in cash or stock. The Plan Committee may also grant unrestricted stock under this provision. No manager may receive in any calendar year restricted stock (including restricted stock units and stock without restrictions) representing more than 1% of the shares authorized to be issued under the Incentive Plan.

Eligible for Participation. Management employees of AT&T or its Subsidiaries are eligible to be selected to participate in the Incentive Plan. Currently, there are approximately 103,000 managers who are eligible to participate in the plan; however, the Company expects participation to be generally limited to 7,000 mid-level and above managers. Actual selection of any eligible manager to participate in the Incentive Plan is within the sole discretion of the Plan Committee.

Available Shares. The Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance, over a 10-year period, of up to 90 million shares of common stock to participants, net of lapsed awards. In the event of a stock split, stock dividend, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company, as described in the Plan, affecting the shares that may be issued under the Plan, an adjustment shall be made in the number and class of shares which may be delivered under the Plan (including but not limited to individual grant limits) as may be determined by the Human Resources Committee.

After April 30, 2026, no further awards may be issued under the Incentive Plan.

Federal Income Tax Matters Relating to Stock Options. The following is a summary of the principal U.S. Federal income tax consequences under present law of the issuance and exercise of stock options granted under the Incentive Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state or local tax consequences.

A participant will not be deemed to have received any income subject to tax at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted, nor will AT&T be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. However, when a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the participant will be deemed to have received an amount of ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock purchased over the exercise price. AT&T will be allowed a tax deduction in the year the option is exercised in an amount equal to the ordinary income which the participant is deemed to have received.

Other Information. The Incentive Plan may be amended in whole or in part by the Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the Incentive Plan), the payout of performance units and performance shares shall be determined exclusively by the

26 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

attainment of the performance goals established by the Plan Committee, which may not be modified after the Change in Control, and AT&T shall not have the right to reduce the awards for any other reason unless the holder of the award is terminated for Cause.

For certain high level employees, the receipt of an award under the Incentive Plan will constitute an agreement that they will not participate in activities that would constitute engaging in competition with AT&T or engaging in conduct disloyal to AT&T. These provisions, including definitions of terms, are contained in Section 10.3 of the Plan.

In addition, a recipient of an award shall be required to repay the Company for any amount received under an award or an award may be cancelled, in each case to the extent required under any policy adopted by the Company at any time pursuant to any applicable stock exchange listing standards established under Section 10D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This does not limit the Company’s right to seek recovery or cancellation of an award for any other reason including but not limited to misconduct.

The closing price of AT&T’s common stock reported on the New York Stock Exchange for February 1, 2016, was $36.18 per share.

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Stockholder Proposals (Item Nos. 5 through 7)

Certain stockholders have advised the Company that they intend to introduce at the 2016 Annual Meeting the proposals set forth below. The names and addresses of, and the number of shares owned by, each such stockholder will be provided upon request to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T.

Item 5.            Stockholder Proposal

Political Spending Report

Resolved, that the shareholders of AT&T (“Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semi-annually, disclosing the Company’s:

Indirect monetary and non-monetary expenditures used for political purposes, i.e., to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and used in any attempt to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections.

The report shall include:

a.An accounting through an itemized report that includes the long-term impacts of their decisions and to more closely align their interests with our stockholders, the majority of our executive compensation package consists of long-term incentives. These long-term incentives take the form of 50% performance shares and 50% restricted stock units. For more information on our long-term compensation program, please refer to the section beginning on page 53.

The actual payout value of performance shares is based on two criteria: the attainment of predetermined performance criteria (which determines how manyidentity of the sharesrecipient as well as the amount paid to each recipient of the Company’s funds that are actually payable)used for political contributions or expenditures as described above; and

b.The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company who participated in making the decisions to make the political contribution or expenditure.

This proposal does not encompass payments used for lobbying.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors’ audit committee or other relevant oversight committee and posted on the Company’s website.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 27 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Supporting Statement

As long-term AT&T shareholders, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. Disclosure is consistent with the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Indeed, the Supreme Court said in its 2010 Citizens Uniteddecision: “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

Our Company discloses a policy on corporate political spending and its contributions to state-level candidates, parties and committees on its website. We believe this is deficient, however, because AT&T will not disclose the following expenditures made for the political purposes defined above:

A list of trade associations to which it belongs and how much it gave to each;
Payments to other third-party organizations, including those organized under of the Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4); and
Electioneering communication expenditures made by the Company in support or opposition to a candidate for public office. These expenditures were legalized by the Citizens United decision, so long as they are not coordinated with a candidate. Our company’s disclosures do not cover these particularly risky expenditures.

Information on indirect political engagement through trade associations and 501(c)(4) groups cannot be obtained by shareholders unless the Company discloses it. Disclosure of all of AT&T’s indirect political spending would bring our Company in line with leading companies, including Microsoft, CenturyLink and Qualcomm that present this information on their websites. Forty one percent of the S&P 500 (204 companies) currently disclose some level of payments to trade associations, or say they instruct trade associations not to use these payments on election-related activities (CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability).

Indirect political spending presents unique risks that are not addressed by AT&T’s current policies. Opacity allows trade associations and other tax exempt entities to use AT&T funds for purposes that may conflict with AT&T’s policies and best interests. Disclosure permits oversight and accountability.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the reports requested in this proposal are duplicative of the Company’s existing practices and are unnecessary. AT&T received a nearly identical proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately three fourths of the votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

Political contributions, where permitted, are an important part of the regulatory and legislative process. AT&T is in a highly regulated industry, and its operations are significantly affected by the actions of elected officials at the local, state and national levels, including rates it can charge customers, its profitability and even how it must provide services to competitors. It is important that the Company actively participate in the electoral and legislative processes in order to protect your interests as stockholders. The Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee of the Board, composed entirely of independent directors, reviews corporate political contributions and Company-sponsored political action committees (PACs).

Additionally, as discussed in the AT&T Political Engagement Report, which is available on the Company’s website (at http://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ATT_Political EngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June of 2015. The Company participates in various industry associations to further its business interests. These memberships not only provide valuable industry expertise, but they also advocate positions on behalf of the communications industry or that impact the communications and other industries. These industry associations include, for example, the United States Telecom Association, the Cellular Telephone Industry Association and the Future of Privacy Forum.

28 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website in the Corporate Governance section (available at http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726). In making political contributions the Company is committed to complying with campaign finance laws, including the laws requiring public disclosure of political contributions. The amount of the Company’s political expenditures is an insignificant portion of its total annual expenses. Each year, the Board authorizes a maximum amount of political contributions that can be made by the Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, for the purposes of supporting or opposing any party, committee, candidate for public office, or ballot measure, or for any other political purpose. For 2015, this amount is $6.0 million. Also, for calendar years 2015-2016, the Board authorized contributions or expenditures by the Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, relating to the 2016 presidential nominating conventions and ensuing inaugural activities, in the amount of $24.4 million. This amount includes in-kind services. These contributions also provide valuable advertising opportunities for the Company’s services and products.

Except for contributions for ballot measures, no expenditure over $1,000 may be made unless approved by the Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, expenditures must be submitted to the Company’s attorneys to confirm that each contribution is lawful.

AT&T already publicly discloses its participation in the legislative process. AT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report, referenced above, semiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. Federal political activity is subject to comprehensive regulation by the federal government, including detailed disclosure requirements. AT&T’s federal PACs file regular reports of receipts and disbursements with the Federal Election Commission (the “FEC”) which are disclosed to the public in the reports filed with the FEC and include identification of all individuals who contributed $200 or more as well as all candidates or committees that received a political contribution. AT&T complies with all obligations with regard to its state and local political activities, including reporting and disclosure requirements. Additionally, under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended, the Company files semi-annual reports with the Secretary of the U.S. Senate (available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm) and Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives (available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx).

The Board believes that spending further corporate funds to generate additional reports would not be a productive use of corporate resources. The Board therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal.

Item 6.            Stockholder Proposal

Whereas, we believe in full disclosure of our company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our company’s lobbying is consistent with AT&T’s expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders.

Resolved, the shareholders of AT&T request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing;

1.Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by AT&T used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.AT&T’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 29 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

4.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which AT&T is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant Board oversight committees and posted on AT&T’s website.

Supporting Statement

As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in AT&T’s use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation, both directly and indirectly. AT&T spent $30.1 million in 2013 and 2014 on federal lobbying activities (opensecrets.org). This figure does not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation in states where AT&T also lobbies, but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, AT&T spent $1.6 million lobbying in California in 2014 (http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/).

AT&T sits on the board of the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent over $1 billion on lobbying since 1998. AT&T does not disclose its memberships in, or payments to, trade associations, or the portions of such amounts used for lobbying. Absent a system of accountability, company assets could be used for objectives contrary to AT&T’s long-term interests. For example, AT&T recognizes climate change is a serious concern that warrants meaningful action, yet the Chamber is publicly attacking the EPA on its new Clean Power Plan addressing climate change.

And AT&T does not disclose its membership in tax-exempt organizations that write and endorse model legislation, such as AT&T’s sitting on Private Enterprise Council of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC has promoted legislation to repeal state renewable energy standards and undermine the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. AT&T’s ALEC membership has drawn press scrutiny that may affect the company’s reputation adversely (“T-Mobile Ditches ALEC,”The Hill, Apr. 8, 2015). More than 100 companies, including Emerson Electric, General Electric, Google, Sprint, and T-Mobile, have publicly left ALEC.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the rigor of the Company’s current practices provides its shareholders and the public with ample transparency and accountability with respect to lobbying activities and that the preparation and publication of the report called for by this proposal is neither necessary nor an efficient use of the Company’s resources. AT&T received a nearly identical shareholder proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately two-thirds of the votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

AT&T is in a highly regulated industry; therefore, public policy decisions at the local, state, and national levels significantly affect the Company’s operations, strategy, and stockholder value. Accordingly, the Company exercises its responsibility to actively participate in the legislative processes in order to protect and further stockholders’ interests by contributing prudently to lobbying organizations that constructively advocate positions which advance the Company’s business objectives and stockholders’ interests. Similarly, the Company belongs to industry associations and coalitions, where it benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide.

30 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website in the Corporate Governance section (available atwww.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726).

AT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report semiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. This report is available on the Company’s website (athttp://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ ATT_PoliticalEngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June 2015).

In addition to the AT&T Political Engagement Report, the Company is required to file other reports with various state and federal agencies. Pursuant to the federal Lobby Disclosure Act, the Company files federal lobbying reports quarterly with the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Secretary of the U.S. Senate. These reports are publicly available and disclose corporate expenditures related to lobbying and issues lobbied. Publicly available contribution and lobbying data can be found at the below sources:

Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US Senate: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm;
Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US House of Representatives: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx;
Federal Lobbying Contribution Report: Search Organization Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/lc/lcsearch.aspx;
Federal Election Commission: Search: AT&T; available athttp://www.fec.gov/index.shtml California State Lobbying Report: Search: AT&T; available athttp://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Lobbying/Employers/

AT&T has a robust review process for contributions to industry associations and coalitions. The proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. AT&T fully complies with all disclosure requirements pertaining to lobbying expenditures under federal, state, and local laws. The proposal would impose requirements on the Company that are not dictated by law and that are not standard among other companies. Any new requirements should be addressed by lawmakers and uniformly imposed on all entities.

The Board is confident that the Company’s lobbying activities are aligned with its stockholders’ long-term interests. As described above, the Company already makes available information concerning its political and lobbying activities to its stockholders and the public. The Board believes that an additional report beyond the Company’s current disclosures is neither necessary nor an efficient use of Company resources.

For these reasons, the Board recommends that you vote against this proposal.

Item 7.            Stockholder Proposal

Proposal 7 — Independent Board Chairman

Shareholders request our Board of Directors to adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next CEO transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement. If the Board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 31 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above.

This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. Companies in 2013 including 73%-support at Netflix. It also won 43% support at our company.

It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to protect shareholders’ long-term interests by providing independent oversight of management. By setting agendas, priorities and procedures, the Chairman is critical in shaping the work of the Board.

A board of directors is less likely to provide rigorous independent oversight of management if the Chairman is the CEO, as is the case with our Company. Having a board chairman who is independent of the Company and its management is a practice that will promote greater management accountability to shareholders and lead to a more objective evaluation of management.

According to the Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance (Yale School of Management), ‘The independent chair curbs conflicts of interest, promotes oversight of risk, manages the relationship between the board and CEO, serves as a conduit for regular communication with shareowners, and is a logical next step in the development of an independent board.” (Chairing the Board: The Case for Independent Leadership in Corporate North America, 2009).

An NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Directors’ Professionalism recommended that an independent director should be charged with “organizing the board’s evaluation of the CEO and provide ongoing feedback; chairing executive sessions of the board; setting the agenda and leading the board in anticipating and responding to crises.” A blue-ribbon report from The Conference Board echoed that position.

A number of institutional investors said that a strong, objective board leader can best provide the necessary oversight of management. Thus, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Global Principles of Accountable Corporate Governance recommends that a company’s board should be chaired by an independent director, as does the Council of Institutional Investors.

An independent director serving as chairman can help ensure the functioning of an effective board. Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Independent Board Chairman – Proposal 7

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by one person serving as both Chairman and CEO, and it therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal. This issue was considered by stockholders most recently at the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting, when stockholders rejected a similar proposal with approximately three quarters of the votes cast being against the proposal.

The Board believes that a single person, acting in the capacities of Chairman and CEO, serves as a bridge between the Board and management and provides critical leadership for carrying out the Company’s strategic initiatives and confronting its challenges. In short, the Board believes that the Company can more effectively execute its strategy and business plans to maximize stockholder value if the Chairman of the Board is also a member of the management team.

In addition, the Board has taken several steps to ensure that the Board effectively carries out its responsibility for the oversight of management. The Board has appointed a Lead Director (currently, Joyce M. Roché, an independent member of the Board) who presides over regular executive sessions of the non-management members of the Board. Members of management do not attend these

32 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

sessions. The Lead Director is also responsible for approving the agenda for each Board meeting, presiding at Board meetings at which the Chairman is not present, and acting as the principal liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the non-management Directors, among other things. For a complete description of the Lead Director’s responsibilities, please see page 8. In recognition of the significant role assigned to the Lead Director, the Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000. The appointment of a strong Lead Director and the use of executive sessions of the Board, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow the Board to maintain effective oversight of management.

Finally, the Board notes that Mr. Stephenson is the only Director who is a member of management. In addition, each committee, other than the Executive Committee, is made up solely of independent Directors.

For these reasons, the Board believes the adoption of a policy requiring that the Chairman of the Board be an independent Director is not in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and therefore recommends that you vote against the proposal.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 33 |


Audit Committee Report

Audit Committee

Audit Committee Report

 

AT&T – Page 40


The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and our stock price (executives are focused ondiscussed with management AT&T’s audited financial statements for the stock price throughout the performance period since the value of performance shares fluctuateyear ended December 31, 2015; (2) discussed with the stock price). Similarly,independent auditors the actual payout value of restricted stock units is based on our stock price at distribution.

Performance Share Payouts

Formatters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees; (3) received the 2010-2012 performance period, executive officer performance was measured against AT&T’s Return on Invested Capital (ROIC –written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable to 75%requirements of the award)Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and Total Stockholder Return against a peer group of companies (TSR – applicable to 25% of(4) discussed with the award).auditors the auditors’ independence.

 

·

ROIC

¡

The Committee chose ROIC as a long-term performance metric because AT&T competes in a capital-intensive industry. ROIC measures the effectiveness of our executive officers at employing capital.

¡

For the 2010-2012 performance period, ROIC attainment resulted in a 113% payout of the performance shares tied to this performance metric.

¡

The ROIC payout was reduced to 113% to include the T-Mobile acquisition costs incurred in 2011 even though these costs qualify for exclusion per the terms of the grant. This action reduced Mr. Stephenson’s performance share award payout for the 2010-2012 performance period by approximately $434,000. Other executive officer awards were similarly impacted. These transaction costs will also be considered in determining the payouts of executive officer performance share awards for the 2011-2013 performance period.

·

TSR

¡

In order to more closely tie the compensation of our executive officers to the interests of our stockholders, the Committee also applied a relative TSR performance metric to the determination of performance share payouts.

¡

AT&T’s TSR performance was in the 3rd quintile of its peers resulting in 100% payout of the performance shares tied to this performance metric.

Restricted Stock Unit Payouts

Restricted Stock Units were first granted as part of officer long-term compensation in 2010.

·

50% of the units granted in 2010 have been distributed.

·

50% of the units granted in 2010 are not eligible for distribution until 2014.

·

The value of these awards increases as AT&T’s stock price increases, creating direct value for stockholders.

Conclusion

Based on the information presentedreview and discussions referred to above, we believethe Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our executive officer compensation program is competitivethe audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and supports our stockholders’ interests in the largest telecommunications company in the nation.Exchange Commission.

February 11, 2016The Audit Committee
Jon C. Madonna, ChairmanCynthia B. Taylor
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Michael B. McCallister

 

AT&T has a separately designated standing Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of AT&T’s financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors, and AT&T’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Madonna (Chairman), Mr. Di Piazza, Mr. McCallister, Ms. Taylor, and Dr. Tyson, each of whom was appointed by the Board of Directors.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed on the Company’s web site at www.att.com. The Audit Committee performs a review and reassessment of its charter annually. The Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and AT&T. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Di Piazza, Mr. Madonna, and Ms. Taylor are “audit committee financial experts” and are independent as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and in accordance with AT&T’s additional standards. Although the Board of Directors has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes defined under the rules of the SEC, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other Audit Committee members. They are not AT&T’s auditors or accountants, do not perform “field work” and are not full-time employees. The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be

34 | www.att.com


Audit Committee Report

deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management in the preparation of AT&T’s financial statements and financial disclosures. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AT&T’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate. AT&T’s Audit Committee charter provides that these are the responsibility of management and the independent auditors.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Ernst & Young LLP acts as AT&T’s principal auditor and also provides certain audit-related, tax and other services. The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy for services to be performed by Ernst & Young. Under this policy, the Audit Committee approves specific engagements when the engagements have been presented in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee before services are undertaken.

This policy also allows for the approval of certain services in advance of the Audit Committee being presented details concerning the specific service to be undertaken. These services must meet service definitions and fee limitations previously established by the Audit Committee. Additionally, engagements exceeding $500,000 must receive advance concurrence from the Audit Committee Chairman. After an auditor is engaged under this authority, the services must be described in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee at the next meeting.

All pre-approved services must commence, if at all, within 14 months of the approval.

The fees for services provided by Ernst & Young (all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee) to AT&T in 2015 and 2014 are shown below.

Principal Accountant Fees(dollars in millions) 
Item  2015     2014 

Audit Fees (1)

  $29.6      $23.3  

Audit Related Fees (2)

   5.2       4.4  

Tax Fees (3)

   10.5       8.0  

All Other Fees (4)

   0.0       0.0  

1.Included in this category are fees for the annual financial statement audit, quarterly financial statement reviews, audits required by Federal and state regulatory bodies, statutory audits, and comfort letters. The year-over-year increase in fees was primarily due to the acquisitions of DIRECTV and Mexico wireless operations during 2015.
2.These fees, which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit Fees, include fees for employee benefit plan audits, due diligence associated with acquisition and disposition activity, control reviews of AT&T – Page 41service organizations, governmental grant-related attestations, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and reviews of sustainability reporting compliance.
3.These fees include charges for various Federal, state, local and international tax compliance and research projects, as well as tax services for AT&T employees working in foreign countries.
4.No fees were incurred in 2015 or 2014 for services other than audit, audit related and tax.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 35 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis Index

 

Section Page 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Committee Report

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

The Human Resources Committee and Its Role

 42

Guiding Pay Principles

42

Compensation Design

43

2012 Compensation

50

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

58

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

58

Clawback Policy

58

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

59

Compensation Committee Report

59 
February 11, 2016The Human Resources Committee
Joyce M. Roché, ChairmanJohn B. McCoy

Scott T. Ford

Matthew K. Rose

Quick Reference Guide

Executive Summary

37

The Human Resources Committee and itsIts Role

44

Guiding Pay Principles

44

Compensation Design

45

2015 Compensation

47

Benefits

56

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

58

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

59

Clawback Policy

59

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

59

Compensation Consultant

60

36 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

AT&T’s Human Resources Committee (Committee) takes great care in the development and refinement of an executive compensation program that recognizes its stewardship responsibility to AT&T’s stockholders while simultaneously ensuring the availability of talent to lead an organization the size and complexity of AT&T.

During 2015, we continued to execute on our strategic goals as shown below. We believe our senior leaders’ pay reflects this strong performance and closely aligns the interests of our management with those of stockholders.

Key Fiscal 2015 Business Results

Our executive officers make decisions every day that shape the future of our Company. The impact of these decisions can be seen both in our current results as well as in our long-term performance.

AT&T is investing to be the premier integrated communications company in the world, delivering on our mission to connect people with their world everywhere they live, work and play — and do it better than anyone else.

Strategic Execution

In 2015, AT&T focused on building a strategic advantage by investing in three key areas. The Company closed the acquisition of DIRECTV, allowing it to offer unique integrated video, mobile and broadband solutions across the United States. It also expanded into Mexico with plans to create a North American Mobile Service Area covering 400 million people and businesses. And AT&T continued to invest in its networks — through the acquisition of a near nationwide block of high-quality wireless spectrum to support mobile video growth, global leadership in the transition to software-defined networks and the introduction of innovative new services. We financed our DIRECTV and spectrum purchases at very attractive rates. As a result, we exited 2015 with a strong balance sheet and dividend coverage that is consistent with our historical norms. Highlights for the year include:

DIRECTV Acquisition – With the DIRECTV addition, AT&T is the largest pay-TV provider in the United States and the world with:

Unparalleled video content distribution scale in the U.S. giving AT&T an unequaled opportunity to deliver integrated solutions across video, mobile and broadband services
Expectations that the acquisition will contribute to earnings per share in 2016 and for significant synergies expected to reach an annual run rate of $2.5 billion or better by the end of 2018

International Expansion – Following the combination of Iusacell and Nextel Mexico, AT&T is expanding high speed mobile Internet across Mexico while significantly enhancing the customer experience for wireless customers there. In Mexico, AT&T:

Has committed to invest $3 billion to upgrade its mobile Internet network by the end of 2018
Is on a path to deliver a one-of-a-kind wireless network experience for 400 million consumers and businesses in the United States and Mexico
Covered about 44 million people with high speed 4G LTE at the end of 2015 and expects to reach a total of 100 million people across Mexico by the end of 2018
In addition, AT&T acquired DIRECTV Latin America, which is a leading provider of pay-TV services in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and parts of the Caribbean; DIRECTV Latin America also has an approximately 41% stake in Sky Mexico

Network Excellence – AT&T expanded its network leadership position as it completed one of the largest network build cycles in Company history, invested $18 billion to acquire a near-nationwide

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 37 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

block of spectrum in the AWS-3 auction and led the transformation to software-defined networks. AT&T’s network:

Delivers high-speed broadband connectivity to customers through:
¡A 4G LTE mobile broadband network reaching 355 million people and businesses in the U.S. and Mexico
¡High-speed wired Internet covering more than 57 million people with a commitment to reach 14 million additional customer locations with fiber
¡An expanded fiber network covering an additional 1 million business locations
Carries more than 100 petabytes of data traffic — to nearly every country on the globe — on an average business day
Utilizes highly efficient satellites capable of delivering HD and UltraHD to nearly 1 billion people throughout the U.S. and Latin America
Leads the industry in the transformation from proprietary hardware-based networks to software-defined networks, which offer a better cost structure for the Company along with faster network upgrades and reduced provisioning cycle times for customers
¡AT&T expects to transform 75% of its network architecture by 2020
Supports innovative new services for Business Solutions customers, including:
¡AT&T’s Network on Demand platform, which lets customers add or change services in near real time. AT&T Switched Ethernet on Demand is available in more than 170 cities in the United States, and we have signed more than 500 customers to date. Managed Internet Service on Demand is currently available in select cities and the Company plans to expand it in 2016
¡AT&T NetBond®, the Company’s highly secure cloud security service; the NetBond ecosystem includes 13 cloud providers, and the Company has signed several hundred NetBond deals

Business Results

While investing in the future, AT&T’s executives also drove strong results in the Company’s four business segments.

Business Solutions – AT&T is the premier business services provider in the United States. The Company provides services to more than 3.5 million businesses — including virtually all of the Fortune 1000 — and operates on six continents. In 2015:

Business Solutions revenues, including wireless and wireline services, were $71.1 billion
AT&T expanded its global leadership in the Internet of Things — everything from connected cars and homes to wearables to machine-to-machine applications — with a total of 26.2 million connected devices, including 5.2 million added in 2015
AT&T’s revenues from fixed strategic business services — including security, VPN, cloud, Ethernet and other advanced services — grew 12.9% to an annualized revenue stream of $11 billion

Entertainment Group – AT&T significantly enhanced its entertainment business with the acquisition of DIRECTV and the creation of the AT&T Entertainment Group. In 2015, AT&T:

Grew Entertainment Group revenues to $35.3 billion, a 58.7% increase over 2014, largely driven by the acquisition of DIRECTV
Added 240,000 satellite TV subscribers after the close of DIRECTV
Ended the year with 13.3 million IP broadband subscribers including business customers, a year-over-year increase of more than 1 million
Expanded the availability of its AT&T GigaPowerSM service to more than 1 million homes in 20 markets with plans to enter an additional 36 markets
Led the industry in delivering video however and whenever customers want it:
¡AT&T has 25 million pay-TV subscribers, more than anyone in the United States
¡About one-third of DIRECTV and AT&T U-verse TV customers used our mobile apps, website or third-party authentication to stream content in 2015
¡AT&T’s Otter Media joint venture with The Chernin Group is a global leader in over-the-top video; it is the largest independent creator network worldwide and operates two of the top 20 streaming video on demand services globally

38 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Consumer Mobility – Despite intense competition, AT&T delivered solid wireless performance in 2015, including best-ever full-year EBITDA service margins across the total wireless business. In addition, in 2015, AT&T’s Consumer Mobility segment:

Increased its EBITDA service margins as cost efficiencies and AT&T Next offset pressure from popular Mobile Share Value Plans
Added 1.8 million branded (postpaid and prepaid) subscribers
Executed a turnaround in prepaid, driven by its Cricket and GoPhone services, with an industry leading 1.4 million net adds for the year, up from a decline of 311,000 in 2014

International – AT&T entered the wireless market in Mexico in early 2015 and has turned around operations that were previously losing subscribers and revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2015, AT&T added 593,000 subscribers in Mexico — reflecting significant progress in customer adoption and retention.

Financial Performance and Stockholder Returns

Impressive market performance and a relentless focus on operating efficiencies translated to solid financial performance and stockholder returns in 2015 with:

A 1-year total stockholder return, including reinvested dividends, of 8.3%, almost six times what the S&P 500 returned during the same period

1-Year Total Stockholder Returns

AT&T

 DJIA S&P 500 S&P 100

8.3%

 0.2% 1.4% 2.6%

10.8% revenue growth
An industry-leading 32nd consecutive annual increase in the Company’s quarterly dividend
¡AT&T increased its quarterly dividend by 2.1%
Free cash flow (cash from operating activities minus capital expenditures) of $15.9 billion, up 60% year over year even with $20 billion in capital expenditures, or $20.7 billion when including purchases in Mexico with favorable payment terms
Significant improvement in free cash flow dividend coverage with 64% of free cash flow paid in dividends versus 96% in 2014

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 39 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy and Best Practices

AT&T’s executive compensation philosophy serves as the starting point for the development and evaluation of our pay programs. The foundational elements of this philosophy, as established by the Committee, include paying for performance, ensuring that our programs are competitive, balancing focus on both short- and long-term goals, and aligning executive officer compensation with both stockholder interests and competitive approaches in the marketplace.

The Committee periodically reviews and adjusts our compensation and benefits program to ensure alignment with current market practices. By continuing to evaluate and modify our programs as necessary and by designing our program around the following best practices, the Committee has shown its commitment to paying for performance and aligning executive pay with stockholder interests.

What We Do

—     The vast majority of executive officer compensation is tied to performance metrics and/or stock price performance.

—     Multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting time frames limit unnecessary short-term risk-taking.

—     Robust stock ownership guidelines for all officers.

—     Annual discussions with large stockholders.

—     Executive officers required to hold 25% of shares received until one year after they leave the Company.

—     Dividend equivalents paid at the end of performance period on earned performance shares.

—     Clawback policy.

—     Severance policy limiting payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus.

What We Don’t Do

—     No “single trigger” provisions for accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards following a change in control.

—     No accelerated vesting of performance shares following a Change in Control.

—     No credit for unvested shares when determining stock ownership guideline compliance.

—     No repricing or buy-out of underwater stock options.

—     No hedging or short sales of AT&T stock.

—     No tax reimbursements, except in extenuating circumstances.

—     No supplemental executive retirement benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.

2016 Compensation Program Enhancements

Based on input from stockholders, we are further modifying our executive compensation plans effective beginning in 2016. This chart describes those enhancements, and how they align with stockholder interests.

40 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2016 Executive

Compensation Enhancements

How Enhancements Align

with Stockholder Interests

SHORT-TERM AWARDS
Payouts will beformula-driven – based on the achievement of specific, objective performance goals each year, consistent with those applied to other corporate managers. The Committee may make adjustments to this formula-driven payout to recognize individual performance.

This formula-based approach enables stockholders to quickly and easily assess the Company’s commitment to paying the CEO and NEOs for performance, and is responsible for overseeingmore consistent with the Company’s comparator companies.

For 2016, payout will be based on earnings per share (70%) and free cash flow (30%)

LONG-TERM AWARDS
For the most recently completed three-year performance period, we will report our management compensation practicesROIC performance goal and determining the compensation of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. Annually, the Committee approves the base salaries, short-term incentive targets,attainment against that goal. For information on our most recent ROIC attainment, please see page 43.Disclosing ROIC goals and long-term incentive grant levels as well as short- and long-term award payouts for executive officers. The Committee recommends new benefit plans to the Board and acts as the administrator of certainresults gives stockholders a clearer view of the Company’s commitment to paying for performance.
With respect to the Total Stockholder Return (TSR) metric for Performance Share Grants, we will use a new peer group against which to measure relative TSR attainment. The new peer group will be comprised of combined Comparator, Top 25 Market Capitalization, and Telecom groups (shown on page 46 for 2015) used to determine target compensation.Aligns companies used to determine target compensation with those used to determine award payouts.

We will change the payout table for the relative TSR performance measure:

•     30th percentile performance required for threshold payout.

•     Median performance required for 100% payout.

•     90th percentile performance required for 200% payout.

This adjustment further aligns pay and benefit plans. You may find the Committee’s charter on our web site at www.att.com. No performance. See new payout table immediately below.

Total Stockholder Return
3-Year Target (2016-2018)
AT&T employee serves on this Committee, which is composed entirely of independent Directors. The current members of the Committee are: Dr. Amelio (Chairman), Mr. Blanchard, Mr. McCoy, and Mr. Rose.Return vs. TSR Peer GroupPayout %

Level 1 (90th percentile or above)

200%

Level 2 (75th – 89.99th percentile)

2.2x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 3 (60th – 74.99th percentile)

2.1x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 4 (45th – 59.99th percentile)

2.0x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 5 (30th – 44.99th percentile)

1.8x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 6 (<30th percentile)

0%

Payouts are capped at 90% of the target award if absolute AT&T TSR is negative,

regardless of relative performance.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 41 |


Guiding Pay PrinciplesCompensation Discussion and Analysis

The Committee continually evaluates AT&T’s compensation and benefits program in light of market and governance trends. AT&T generally supports the Conference Board’s principles on executive compensation, strongly aligning in many key areas such as paying for performance, setting compensation targets consistent with the market, aligning executive and stockholder interests, and focusing on long-term incentive compensation to reduce risk. The Committee believes the Conference Board principles, which discourage a single “check the box” approach and emphasizes the adoption of compensation programs that fit the specific circumstances of each company, are sound guidance. As part of this process, the Committee uses the services of an independent compensation consultant, who performs no services for management.

Recognizing market trends, the need to attract and retain talent, and with a focus on delivering value for our stockholders, the Committee has designed AT&T’s executive compensation program around the following guiding pay principles:

Competitive and Market Based

Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate comparator company practices to ensure we are able to attract, retain, and provide appropriate incentives for officers in a highly competitive talent market. Comparator company data provides information on market trends and may lead to changes in our approach and practices.

Impact of Performance Results on Executive Officer Compensation

In order to further its pay-for-performance goal, the Committee delivers a significant portion of executive officer compensation as performance-based compensation, including both short- and long-term incentives. The following charts depict how the Committee targets each element of compensation for the CEO and collectively for the other Named Executive Officers (NEOs).

 

AT&T – Page 42
2015 Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

When designing these incentives, the Committee employs a variety of metrics to ensure a strong link between executive compensation and performance. These metrics include earnings per share, free cash flow, revenue, and return on invested capital, which connect compensation to Company performance while total stockholder return aligns executive pay with performance relative to peer companies.

An explanation of the individual pay elements of our executive officer compensation program and the impact of performance on each element is provided below. We believe that the greatest pay opportunities should exist for executives who demonstrate high levels of performance over a sustained period of time. A discussion of each named executive officer’s 2015 performance may be found on pages 49 through 51.

Base Salary

When determining whether or not to grant a base salary increase, the Committee considers the executive officer’s individual performance and business results for the prior year, as well as his or her base salary compared to the market value for his or her job. Executive officers’ salaries are set based on past and expected future contributions to the Company’s long-term success. For more information on the base pay component of compensation, please see page 47.


Pay-for-Performance

Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of Company and business unit goals as well as recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to the Company’s success. For example, in 2012, 92% of the CEO’s target compensation (and, on average, 87% for other Named Executive Officers) was tied to short- and long-term performance incentives, including stock price performance.

Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus

Ensure that compensation programs and packages provide an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business.

Alignment with Stockholders

Set performance targets and provide compensation elements that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders. For example, performance shares which make up nearly 33% of target compensation for the CEO and the Named Executive Officers and are tied to multi-year Company performance and the Company’s stock price. In addition, AT&T has executive stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements, as described on page 58. Each of the Named Executive Officers meets or exceeds the minimum stock ownership guidelines.

Alignment with Generally Accepted ApproachesApproaches:

Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.

AT&T submits this proposal to stockholders on an annual basis. While this is a non-binding, advisory vote, the Committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. AT&T is providing this vote as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Item 4.            Approval of 2016 Incentive Plan

Your Board of Directors has adopted the 2016 Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) for the purpose of replacing the 2011 Incentive Plan, previously approved by our stockholders in 2011. The Incentive Plan, like the prior plan, permits AT&T to compensate eligible managers with equity and cash awards. New awards will not be made under the Incentive Plan until stockholder approval is obtained for the Plan.

The Incentive Plan provides your Directors with the flexibility to compensate managers through a variety of possible awards. These awards may be tied to the financial or operational performance of the Company as well as to the performance of the stock. Because of the key role the Incentive Plan plays in the compensation of your executives, your Directors urge you to vote for approval of the Incentive Plan, including its performance standards.

The terms of the Incentive Plan are summarized below. In addition, the full text of the Incentive Plan is set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Incentive Plan.

Summary of the Incentive Plan

Performance Awards. The Incentive Plan allows certain committees of your Directors (each, aPlan Committee) to issue “performance shares” and “performance units.” These are contingent incentive awards that are converted into stock and/or cash and paid out to the participant only if specific performance goals are achieved over performance periods of not less than one year. If the performance goals are not achieved, the awards are forfeited or reduced. Performance shares are each equivalent in value to a share of common stock (payable in cash and/or stock), while performance units are equal to a specific amount of cash. In any calendar year, no participant may receive performance shares having a potential payout (whether in the form of cash and/or stock) exceeding 1% of the shares approved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Similarly, no participant may receive performance units having a potential payout exceeding an amount equivalent to 1% of the approved shares as of the date of the grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Plan Committee, participants receive dividend equivalents on performance shares.

24 | www.att.com


AtAgenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Performance Goals. The performance goals set by the Plan Committee include payout tables, formulas or other standards to be used in determining the extent to which the performance goals are met and, if met, the number of performance shares and/or performance units that would be converted into stock and/or cash (or the rate of such conversion) and distributed to participants. The performance goals may include, or be offset by, any of the following criteria or any combination thereof:

Financial performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries (as that term is defined in the Incentive Plan), and/or a division of any of the foregoing. Such financial performance may be based on net income, Value Added (after- tax cash operating profit less depreciation and less a capital charge), EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), revenues, sales, expenses, costs, gross margin, operating margin, profit margin, pre-tax profit, market share, volumes of a particular product or service or category thereof, including but not limited to the product’s life cycle (for example, products introduced in the last two years), number of customers or subscribers, number of items in service, including but not limited to every category of access or network connections, return on net assets, return on assets, return on capital, return on invested capital, cash flow, free cash flow, operating cash flow, operating revenues, operating expenses, and/or operating income.

Service performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries, and/or of a division of any of the foregoing. Such service performance may be based upon measured customer perceptions of service quality (which may include measurements of the customer’s likelihood to recommend the Company, its products or services, among other things), employee satisfaction, employee retention, product development, completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction, completion of an identified special project, and effectiveness of management.

The Company’s stock price, return on stockholders’ equity, total stockholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends, assuming the reinvestment of dividends), and/or earnings per share.

Impacts of acquisitions, dispositions, or restructurings, on any of the foregoing.

Except to the extent otherwise provided by the Plan Committee, if the matters making up one of the following categories exceeds certain limits, the category (as well as any related effects on cash flow, if applicable) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which performance goals are met: (1) changes in accounting principles; (2) changes in Federal tax law; (3) changes in the tax laws of the states; (4) expenses caused by natural disasters, including but not limited to floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes; (5) expenses resulting from intentionally caused damage to property of the business; (6) and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets, and fixed assets. A category shall be disregarded if the net impact of matters in the category on net income, after taxes and available and collectible insurance, exceed $500 million. In addition, where the net impact of matters in a category (calculated as in the above) exceed $200 million but not $500 million, then each such category shall also be excluded but only if the combined net effect of events in all such categories exceeds $500 million.

Gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension plans and other post- retirement benefit plans (and any associated tax effects) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which a performance goal has been met.

Unless otherwise provided by the Committee at any time, no such adjustment shall be made for a current or former executive officer to the extent such adjustment would cause an award to fail to satisfy the performance based exemption of Section 162(m) of the Code.

Stock Options. The Incentive Plan permits the Plan Committee to issue nonqualified stock options to managers, which directly link their financial success to that of AT&T’s stockholders. Incentive Stock Options, which are more costly for a company to issue, are not permitted under the Incentive Plan. The Plan Committee shall determine the number of shares subject to options and all other terms and

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 25 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

conditions of the options, including vesting requirements. In no event, however, may the exercise price of a stock option be less than 100% of the fair market value of AT&T common stock on the date of the stock option’s grant, nor may any option have a term of more than ten years. During any calendar year, no single employee may receive options on shares representing more than 1% of the shares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan. Except for adjustments based on changes in the corporate structure or as otherwise provided in the Incentive Plan, the terms of an Option may not be amended to reduce the exercise price nor may Options be cancelled or exchanged for cash, other awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options.

Restricted Stock. The Incentive Plan also permits the Plan Committee to grant restricted stock awards. Each share of restricted stock shall be subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations, if any, as the Plan Committee deems appropriate, including, but not by way of limitation, restrictions on transferability and continued employment. Holders of shares of restricted stock may vote the shares and receive dividends on such shares. In order to qualify a restricted stock grant under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan Committee may condition vesting of the award on the attainment of performance goals, using the same performance criteria as that used for performance shares and units. The vesting period for restricted stock shall be determined by the Committee, which may accelerate the vesting of any such award. The Plan Committee may also grant restricted stock units, which have substantially the same terms as restricted stock, except that units have no voting rights, may or may not receive dividend equivalents, and may be paid in cash or stock. The Plan Committee may also grant unrestricted stock under this provision. No manager may receive in any calendar year restricted stock (including restricted stock units and stock without restrictions) representing more than 1% of the shares authorized to be issued under the Incentive Plan.

Eligible for Participation. Management employees of AT&T or its Subsidiaries are eligible to be selected to participate in the Incentive Plan. Currently, there are approximately 103,000 managers who are eligible to participate in the plan; however, the Company expects participation to be generally limited to 7,000 mid-level and above managers. Actual selection of any eligible manager to participate in the Incentive Plan is within the sole discretion of the Plan Committee.

Available Shares. The Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance, over a 10-year period, of up to 90 million shares of common stock to participants, net of lapsed awards. In the event of a stock split, stock dividend, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company, as described in the Plan, affecting the shares that may be issued under the Plan, an adjustment shall be made in the number and class of shares which may be delivered under the Plan (including but not limited to individual grant limits) as may be determined by the Human Resources Committee.

After April 30, 2026, no further awards may be issued under the Incentive Plan.

Federal Income Tax Matters Relating to Stock Options. The following is a summary of the principal U.S. Federal income tax consequences under present law of the issuance and exercise of stock options granted under the Incentive Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state or local tax consequences.

A participant will not be deemed to have received any income subject to tax at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted, nor will AT&T be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. However, when a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the participant will be deemed to have received an amount of ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock purchased over the exercise price. AT&T will be allowed a tax deduction in the year the option is exercised in an amount equal to the ordinary income which the participant is deemed to have received.

Other Information. The Incentive Plan may be amended in whole or in part by the Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the Incentive Plan), the payout of performance units and performance shares shall be determined exclusively by the

26 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

attainment of the performance goals established by the Plan Committee, which may not be modified after the Change in Control, and AT&T shall not have the right to reduce the awards for any other reason unless the holder of the award is terminated for Cause.

For certain high level employees, the receipt of an award under the Incentive Plan will constitute an agreement that they will not participate in activities that would constitute engaging in competition with AT&T or engaging in conduct disloyal to AT&T. These provisions, including definitions of terms, are contained in Section 10.3 of the Plan.

In addition, a recipient of an award shall be required to repay the Company for any amount received under an award or an award may be cancelled, in each case to the extent required under any policy adopted by the Company at any time pursuant to any applicable stock exchange listing standards established under Section 10D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This does not limit the Company’s right to seek recovery or cancellation of an award for any other reason including but not limited to misconduct.

The closing price of AT&T’s common stock reported on the New York Stock Exchange for February 1, 2016, was $36.18 per share.

The Board Recommends you vote FOR this proposal.

Stockholder Proposals (Item Nos. 5 through 7)

Certain stockholders have advised the Company that they intend to introduce at the 2016 Annual Meeting the proposals set forth below. The names and addresses of, and the number of shares owned by, each such stockholder will be provided upon request to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T.

Item 5.            Stockholder Proposal

Political Spending Report

Resolved, that the shareholders of AT&T (“Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semi-annually, disclosing the Company’s:

Indirect monetary and non-monetary expenditures used for political purposes, i.e., to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and used in any attempt to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections.

The report shall include:

a.An accounting through an itemized report that includes the 2012 Annual Meeting, stockholders voted on the Company’s compensation policies and programs with over 93%identity of the votes being cast in favor. The Committee reviewed these results and intends to continue following these guiding pay principles.

Compensation Design

Executive Compensation Program

We recognize that our long-term success depends on the talent and efforts of our employees and the leadership and performance of our executives. Because the relationship with any employee begins with the compensation and benefits program, it is in the stockholders’ long-term interest that the program be structured in a way that makes attraction, retention, and motivation of the highest quality talent a reality. With that goal in mind, AT&T’s executive compensation and benefits program includes a number of different elements, from fixed compensation (base salaries) to performance-based variable compensation (short- and long-term incentives), as well as key personal benefits which minimize distractions and allow our executives to focus on the success of the Company. Each of the elements shown below is designed for a specific purpose, with an overarching goal to encourage a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future.

AT&T – Page 43


Compensation
Element
ObjectiveKey Features

Base

Salary

Provides fixed compensation to assume the day-to-day responsibilities of the position

   Salary level recognizes an executive officer’s experience, skill, and performance, with the goal of being market-competitive.

   Adjustments may be made based on individual performance, pay relative to other AT&T officers, and the employee’s pay relative to the market.

   Represents 8% for the CEO and, on average, 13% for other executive officers of total target compensation, in line with our objective to have the majority of pay at risk and tied to Company performance.

   This element is payable in cash. The executive officers have the option to defer a portion into Company stock.

Annual

Short-Term Incentive

To motivate and reward the achievement of short-term Company performance

   Aligns executive officers’ interests with our short-term corporate strategy, and aligns pay with the achievement of short-term Company and/or business unit objectives. These objectives support the accomplishment of long-term Company goals.

   To qualify for a payout, executive officers must achieve at least one of the predetermined performance thresholds. Actual payouts are based on these performance results along with other Company, business unit, and individual results.

   This element is payable in cash. The executive officers have the option to defer a portion into Company stock.

Long-Term IncentivesTo motivate and reward the achievement of long-term Company performance and retain key leaders

   Long-term awards for executive officers and other officers consist of restricted stock units and performance shares, each representing approximately 50% of the grant value of long-term compensation. The goal of our long-term program is to align executive and stockholder interests.

   Performance Shares

¡   We structure officer performance shares to be paid in cash at the end of a 3-year performance period to the extent applicable performance goals are met.

¡   Awards pay out at target if performance goals are met, below target or not at all if the goals are not met, and above target if the goals are exceeded. Each performance share is equal in value to a share of stock, which causes the award to fluctuate in value directly with changes in our stock price over the performance period, aligning managers’ interests directly with stockholders’ interests. The cash payment value of the performance shares is determined using the stock price on the date any earned award is approved.

¡   For officers, dividend equivalents are paid at the end of the performance period, based on the number of performance shares earned.

   Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

¡   We structure RSUs to be paid in stock at the end of a retention period. RSUs vest 100% after 4 years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier. In the case of retirement, RSUs are not paid until the scheduled vesting dates.

¡   Through stock price and dividends, RSUs directly tie our officers’ interests to the long-term interests of our stockholders and make our officer long-term compensation package more retentive in nature.

¡   Although RSUs have value at grant, in order for them to retain value or increase in value, officers must execute at a high level to drive stockholder returns.

AT&T – Page 44


Pay for Performance

AT&T’s compensation program is designed with the following pay-for-performance features:

Base Salary

Although base salaries are fixed and are intended to provide executives regular income to compensate them for performing the day-to-day responsibilities of the job, increases to base salary are based both on the market value of the executive’s job and individual performance.

Annual Short-Term Incentive

Performance ranges are established for Revenue, Earnings Per Share, and Free Cash Flow. Actual award payouts consider performance against these and other Company and business unit metrics as well as individual performance.

Long-Term Incentives

·

Performance Shares: Fifty percent of executive officer long-term incentive awards are made in the form of performance shares. Seventy-five percent of the performance shares are tied to our Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) achievement over a three-year performance period. The remaining 25% is tied to AT&T’s Total Stockholder Return performance compared to the Standard & Poor’s 100 Index, which replaced the Telecommunications Peer Group in 2012. The number of shares granted is adjusted for performance against these two metrics and are paid based on the stock price on the date that the award payout is approved. Because performance share grants are based on a three-year performance period, they maximize the leverage of both short- and long-term performance. The impact of a single year’s performance is felt in each of the three performance share grants that are outstanding at any given time, so that strong performance must be sustained every year in order to provide favorable payouts.

·

Restricted Stock Units: The other 50% of executive officer long-term awards is made in the form of restricted stock units.

Since performance shares and restricted stock units are tied to AT&T’s stock price over a three- and four-year time horizon, respectively, they directly tie executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. The value of any distribution is dependent upon the stock price at payout.

Total Target Compensation

Total target compensation is the value of the compensation package that the Committee intends to deliver based on performance against predefined goals. Actual compensation will depend on the applicable performance achievement and, for long-term incentive awards, the price of AT&T stock.

The following charts show the weighting of each element of total target compensation for the CEO and collectively for the other Named Executive Officers. AT&T’s short- and long-term incentive targets comprise the majority of total target compensation.

AT&T – Page 45


2012 Target Compensation Mix

LOGO  

Total target compensation is detailed for each Named Executive Officer in the following table. This table outlines the compensation elements, their values, relative weightings, and the percentage of the officer’s total target compensation package that is performance-related (performance-related compensation includes both short- and long-term incentives).

2012 NEO Target Compensation
(Excludes Change in Pension and All Other Compensation)
 
Name Cash-Based Compensation  Stock-Based Long-
Term Award (1)
  

Total Target

Comp.

$

  

%

Performance
Related (2)

 
 Base Salary  Short-Term
Incentive
  - Restricted Stock
Units Vesting 2016

- Performance Shares
2012–14 Period
   
 $  % of
Total
  $  % of
Total
  $  % of
Total
   

CEO

  

Stephenson

  1,550,000    8%    5,050,000    26%    12,750,000    66%    19,350,000    92%  

Other NEOs

  

Stephens

  680,000    13%    1,375,000    25%    3,320,000    62%    5,375,000    87%  

de la Vega

  875,000    13%    1,645,000    23%    4,475,000    64%    6,995,000    87%  

Stankey

  875,000    13%    1,645,000    23%    4,475,000    64%    6,995,000    87%  

Watts

  765,000    14%    1,315,000    24%    3,450,000    62%    5,530,000    86%  

Avg Other NEOs

  798,750    13%    1,495,000    24%    3,930,000    63%    6,223,750    87%  

1.Long-term grants of performance shares are paid out, subject to meeting performance objectives, in cash based on the stock price on the date the award payout is approved. Restricted Stock Units are distributed in shares. Each represents 50% of the target award.
2.Total of Short-Term Incentive and Stock-Based Long-Term Award divided by Total Target Compensation.

AT&T – Page 46


Incentive Compensation – A Balanced Approach to Manage Risk to Stockholders

As previously stated, the Committee believes it is important that compensation aligns the interests of management with both the short- and long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders while incenting our key managers to remain with the Company. In order to attain these objectives, we balance incentive compensation between the accomplishment of short- and long-term corporate objectives. In addition, one of the Committee’s key objectives is mitigating potential risk in the compensation package by ensuring that a significant portion of compensation is based on the long-term performance of the Company. In doing so, the Company intentionally reduces the risk that executives will place too much focus on short-term achievements to the detriment of the long-term sustainability of the Company. Further, we structure the short-term incentive compensation so that the accomplishment of short-term corporate and business unit goals supports the achievement of long-term corporate goals. Both of these elements work together for the benefit of the Company and its stockholders.

Finally, each year, the Committee reviews an analysis, prepared by management, of the Company’s compensation policies and practices to determine if they may have a material adverse effect on the Company. This analysis includes steps AT&T takes to mitigate risk in our compensation plans, including the use of multiple metrics in determining award payouts; the use of payout tables, caps and/or budget maximums; cross-functional department review and/or approval of all payouts (as well as Committee approval of all officer payouts). In addition, all award recipients are subject to our internal code of business conduct. Based on this analysis, for 2012, the Committee determined that the Company’s compensation policies and practices were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect.

The following chart details how performance-related compensation is allocated between short- and long-term compensation targets for the CEO and collectively for the other Named Executive Officers:

2012 Performance-Related Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

AT&T – Page 47


Personal Benefits

As aFortune 25 company, personal benefits are an important tool in our overall compensation package. Even though many of the underlying individual benefits are not financially significant, AT&T provides these elements to its executive officers for three main reasons:

To effectively compete for talent.

The majority of companies against which AT&T competes for talent provide personal benefits to their executive officers. Because the foundation of the employee-employer relationship is the compensation and benefits program, AT&T must have a program that is robust and competitive enough to attract and retain key talent.

To support executive officers in meeting the needs of the business.

Managing aFortune 25 company that provides industry leading services to its customers 24 hours a day requires the around-the-clock commitment and availability of our executive officers. We provide benefits that allow the Company to have greater access to our executive officers. These benefits should not be measured solely in terms of any incremental financial cost, but rather the value they bring to the Company through maximized productivity and availability.

To provide for the safety, security and personal health of executives.

Employees are the Company’s greatest asset. Our executive officers are charged to care for the long-term health of the Company. In order to do so, we provide certain personal benefits to provide for their safety and personal health.

Our executive benefits are outlined on page 57. We continue to evaluate personal benefits based on needs of the business and market practices and trends.

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Human Resources Committee is authorized by its charter to employ independent compensation consultants and other advisors. The Committee has selected Michael Lackey, Managing Director of Total Rewards Strategies, to serve as the Committee’s independent consultant, and, from time to time, he is engaged by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to provide advice on director compensation. Total Rewards Strategies and Michael Lackey provide no other services to AT&T. Mr. Lackey has served as the Human Resources Committee’s consultant since 2002.

The consultant reports directly to the Human Resources Committee, who reviews the fees paid to Total Rewards Strategies and sets the consulting budget. The consultant’s relationship with management is one of receiving the necessary information to conduct analyses and providing information and recommendations to be distributed to the Committee.

Following is a description of the consultant’s duties:

·

Attends all Human Resources Committee meetings;

·

Provides information, research, and analysis pertaining to executive compensation and benefits;

·

Regularly updates the Committee on market trends, changing practices, and legislation pertaining to compensation and benefits;

·

Reviews the Company’s executive compensation strategy and program to ensure appropriateness and market-competitiveness;

·

Makes recommendations on the design of the compensation program and the balance of pay-for-performance elements;

·

Reviews market data and makes recommendations for establishing the market rates for jobs held by senior leaders;

AT&T – Page 48


·

Analyzes compensation from other companies’ proxy and financial statements for the Committee’s review when making compensation decisions;

·

Assists the Committee in making pay determinations for the Chief Executive Officer; and

·

Advises the Committee on the appropriate comparator groups for compensation and benefits as well as the appropriate peer group against which to measure long-term performance.

Determining Competitive Pay Levels

AT&T has a market-based compensation program, and we believe that a job’s value is determined by what we have to pay to remain competitive based on publicly-available compensation data for like positions at companies with which we compete for talent.

Since we have a market-based compensation program, the starting point for determining compensation levels begins with an evaluation of market data. Market data for key officers is derived from proxy compensation data and third-party compensation survey databases. The consultant compiles both proxy and compensation survey data for the comparator companies (approved by the Committee, and discussed below). The use of multiple sources of information and comparator groups ensures the availability of sufficient data to accurately reflect the competitive market and provides for the annual development of reliable market values by the consultant.

Following are the 2012 comparator groups used by the consultant in making market value recommendations for officer positions. These companies are selected based on similarity to AT&T in terms of size and/or industry, ability of the company to compete with AT&T for talent, and similarity to jobs at AT&T in terms of complexity and scope of officer positions.

2012 Comparator Groups Used by Compensation Consultant

Type of GroupCompanies in Group
A comparator group of 20 companies in the technology, telecommunications and entertainment industries selected by the consultant in consultation with the CommitteeApple, Boeing, Cisco Systems, Comcast, Dell, General Electric, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, Intel, IBM, Johnson Controls, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, News Corp, Oracle, Time Warner Inc., United Technologies, Verizon Communications, Walt Disney
Top 25 companies included in theFortune 500 index, adjusted to eliminate AT&T and investment banking, investment holding/management and privately owned companiesAmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Costco Wholesale, CVS Caremark, Exxon Mobil, Ford Motor, General Electric, General Motors, Hewlett-Packard, Home Depot, IBM, Kroger, Marathon Oil, McKesson, Medco Health Solutions, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Target, UnitedHealth Group, Valero Energy, Verizon Communications, Wal-Mart Stores, Walgreen
Telecommunications and cable companiesComcast, Motorola Solutions, Century Link, Sprint Nextel, Time Warner Inc., Verizon Communications

Executive officers’ base salaries are targeted to the market 50th percentile, total target cash compensation (the sum of base pay and short-term incentive target) and long-term grants are targeted to the market 62nd percentile, with the support of the Committee’s consultant. These pay targets emphasize our pay-for-performance strategy and are consistent with our market leadership position as the nation’s largest telecommunications company based on our revenue and position as the 11th largest company in America according to theFortune 500 ratings.

In making the market value recommendations to present to the Committee, the consultant reviews both the proxy and the survey compensation data at the percentiles of the market assigned by the Committee. The

AT&T – Page 49


consultant applies his judgment and experience to this data in order to determine preliminary market value recommendations for each executive officer position. Prior to presenting the market values to the Committee, the consultant obtains input from members of management and the CEO (for officers other than the CEO) to obtain their views on the relative value of each position at AT&T and differences in responsibilities between AT&T jobs and those in the comparator groups. Based on this detailed analysis, AT&T-specific market values (AT&T Market Values) are presented to the Committee for each executive officer position. The AT&T Market Values are used as a reference point for the Committee’s determination of actual compensation levels. They include components for base salary and short- and long-term incentive target awards.

Determining Target Compensation Levels

Annually, the Committee meets to set base salary and target short- and long-term incentive compensation levels for officers, including the Named Executive Officers, with the advice of the consultant. In setting compensation levels, the Committee reviews the AT&T Market Values provided by the consultant along with the CEO’s compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. The CEO bases his compensation recommendations on his judgment of the skills, experience, responsibilities, and achievements of each executive officer,recipient as well as the officer’s current compensation relativeamount paid to the AT&T Market Value of his or her job. The Committee believes that input from both the CEO and the consultant provides necessary information and points of view to assist them in determining the appropriate target levels of pay. Once the Committee has received this input, they apply their judgment and experience to set compensation for the coming year. The Committee may determine that executives with significant experience and responsibilities, who demonstrate exemplary performance, have higher target compensation, while less experienced executives may have lower target compensation. To determine the compensation for the CEO, the Committee again uses its judgment of his skills, experience, responsibilities, achievements, and current compensation, along with the consultant’s AT&T Market Value recommendation. The Committee utilizes total compensation analysis sheets to confirm the appropriateness of the compensation program.

2012 Compensation

Base Salaries

In 2012, the Named Executive Officers (other than the CEO) received a salary increase of 2.4%, on average, based on individual performance and actual pay relative to market.

Short-Term Incentives

2012 Targets

Each year, the Committee establishes a target award for each executive officer based on the AT&T Market Values provided by the consultant and on recommendations from the CEO (other than for his own compensation). The short-term program emphasizes overall results of the Company by establishing one set of performance targets for our executive officers. The Committee believes it is important to focus the executive officers on the key objectives of the Company (other officers are measured, in part, on the success of their individual business units). Under this program, potential payouts range from 0% to 200% of the target award. The key performance objectives adopted by the Committee include three performance metrics and related target ranges that the executives are expected to achieve, which are shown in the table on the following page. The Company must achieve results in at least one of the ranges for the executive officers to receive any portion of the target awards.

AT&T – Page 50


2012 Metric

Target ($)

Target Range  ($)

Achievement  ($)

Consolidated Revenues

127.0 billion108.0 – 146.1 billion127.4 billion

Earnings Per Share

2.21 per share1.77 – 2.65 per share2.32 per share (2)

Free Cash Flow (1)

15.8 billion12.6 – 18.9 billion19.4 billion

1.Cash from operations minus construction and capital expenditures.
2.In accordance with grant terms, EPS results were increased by $1.07 per share over reported EPS to remove the non-cash effects of gains and losses related to assets and liabilities of pension and medical plans.

In determining the final payouts for short-term awards, the Committee gives weight to the achievement of the performance ranges, the overall performance of the Company, business unit performance, and the individual performance of each executive officer. In evaluating executive officers that report to the CEO, the Committee will also give weight to the CEO’s recommendations. In order to limit the potential for unintended consequences, both favorable and unfavorable, the Committee does not apply a fixed formulaic approach to determining final payouts.

2012 Payouts

The Committee determined that in 2012 the Company achieved or exceeded the target ranges for each of the 2012 performance metrics, permitting payout of the short-term awards. The Committee then reviewed the Company’s overall performance as well as the individual achievements of each of the Named Executive Officers, as described below:

·

Randall L. Stephenson

Under Mr. Stephenson’s leadership, AT&T led the industry in key growth metrics, further improved operating performance, strengthened its overall financial position, and delivered superior stockholder returns above the major market indexes. Wireless subscribers increased to 107 million, and mobile data revenues grew 18% to end the year as a $27 billion revenue stream. AT&T led all U.S. wireless providers in iPhone activations and average monthly revenue per postpaid subscriber. The Company expanded its network to offer 4G service to 288 million people, more than doubled its 4G LTE coverage extending its availability to over 170 million people, delivered best-in-class data performance, and improved overall wireless network quality with a 32% reduction in dropped calls. Despite a slow economy, revenues for strategic business services increased 13%, led by double-digit gains in Virtual Private Network and Ethernet connections. AT&T U-verse posted its best-ever growth in connections, with total subscribers up 45% and revenues up 39%, driving an annualized revenue stream of more than $10 billion by year-end. These strong growth metrics were supported by continued operational excellence, which drove improved operating income margins and a 59% increase in the Company’s overall net promoter score.

AT&T generated more than $39 billion in cash from operating activities in 2012, up 13% from the prior year and a Company record. We used this strong cash flow to invest more than $20 billion in capital and acquisitions to improve operations and expand our growth platforms. For several years, AT&T has invested more capital in the United States than any other publicly traded company. AT&T returned $23 billion to stockholders in 2012 – the highest total in Company history – as it repurchased 6% of its total shares outstanding and paid more than $10 billion in dividends. In the fourth quarter, we announced a quarterly dividend increase for the 29th consecutive year.

During 2012, Mr. Stephenson and his executive team positioned AT&T for continued expansion in key growth businesses, to move away from legacy lines of business while expanding its leadership position in high-speed broadband connectivity, both mobile and fixed line. AT&T executed 48 agreements to secure critical spectrum for mobile internet growth, increasing our average spectrum depth by over 30%. AT&T also launched Project VIP a comprehensive, organic growth plan that will expand its growth

AT&T – Page 51


platforms to millions more customers, improve the Company’s competitive position in broadband and video services, and reduce ongoing operating expenses.

·

John J. Stephens

Under Mr. Stephens’ leadership, in 2012 AT&T generated record cash from operating activities, returned $23 billion to stockholders through dividends and stock repurchases, and further strengthened the Company’s overall financial profile by refinancing debt. In 2012, AT&T grew revenues to a Company-record $127.4 billion, despite a lingering lackluster economy. Mr. Stephens worked closely with operations leaders to implement cash management strategies that produced $39 billion in cash from operations, a Company record, and free cash flow of $19 billion, more than $3 billion above our expectations. At the same time, under Mr. Stephens’ direction, AT&T strengthened its balance sheet by refinancing $12 billion in debt at significantly reduced interest rates, taking advantage of historically low interest rates to reduce future interest expenses by over $300 million annually. The Company increased the quarterly dividend for the 29th consecutive year and, as a result of the repurchase of 6% of its outstanding shares, reduced annualized dividend payments by approximately $670 million. With progress in all of these areas, AT&T delivered superior stockholder returns. The Company’s 2012 total stockholder return of 17.5% exceeded major market indices including the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard & Poor’s 100 and 500. AT&T’s three-year total stockholder returns of 43.0% also outperformed these key indices.

·

John T. Stankey

Under Mr. Stankey’s direction, AT&T divested its advertising and publishing business, dramatically improved its wireless spectrum position to support continued mobile broadband growth, and successfully launched Project VIP, the Company’s most comprehensive, organic growth initiative in several decades. During the course of the year, Mr. Stankey’s organization negotiated 48 spectrum agreements, increasing the Company’s nationwide average spectrum depth by over 30% and reducing our spectrum cost structure to industry leading levels. This effort involved identifying Wireless Communications Service spectrum to support wireless broadband growth even though it had not previously been considered useful for that purpose, negotiating for its acquisition, and working through a range of technical and regulatory steps to make it usable in mobile communication for the first time. This new spectrum will provide a critical foundation for Project VIP. This broad-ranging set of initiatives includes plans for AT&T to deploy its 4G LTE wireless network to cover more than 300 million people in the United States by then end of 2014, a 50 million increase over previous plans. In addition, we plan to expand our AT&T U-verse platform, deploying IP broadband connectivity to approximately 57 million customer locations by the end of 2015, and we plan to proactively turn up fiber optic network connectivity to an additional one million business locations over the next three years. The Company plans to accompany these network upgrades and expansions with a transition from legacy network technologies to an IP only plus wireless meshed architecture, which promises over the next several years to deliver greater flexibility in terms of introducing new services while driving significant operating efficiencies.

·

Rafael de la Vega

With responsibility for AT&T Mobility, Mr. de la Vega successfully drove AT&T to industry leading positions in smartphone penetration, average revenues per contract user and wireless data growth. The number of postpaid smartphones on our network increased nearly 20%, and the number of tablets and other branded computer devices served grew more than 40%. This growth coupled with strong adoption of shared data plans drove impressive growth in wireless data revenues – up nearly 18%, or nearly $4 billion, to $25.9 billion. The Company posted its 16th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth in average revenue per postpaid subscriber, and total wireless revenues increased 5.6% to $66.8 billion. In addition, Mr. de la Vega led the successful deployment of a number of new services that layer onto AT&T’s broad wireless capabilities. These include launchrecipient of the Company’s mobile-wallet joint venture, ISIS; developmentfunds that are used for political contributions or expenditures as described above; and

b.The title(s) of Digital Life, the person(s) in the Company who participated in making the decisions to make the political contribution or expenditure.

This proposal does not encompass payments used for lobbying.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors’ audit committee or other relevant oversight committee and posted on the Company’s website.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 27 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

Supporting Statement

As long-term AT&T shareholders, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. Disclosure is consistent with the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Indeed, the Supreme Court said in its 2010 Citizens Uniteddecision: “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

Our Company discloses a policy on corporate political spending and its contributions to state-level candidates, parties and committees on its website. We believe this is deficient, however, because AT&T will not disclose the following expenditures made for the political purposes defined above:

A list of trade associations to which it belongs and how much it gave to each;
Payments to other third-party organizations, including those organized under of the Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4); and
Electioneering communication expenditures made by the Company in support or opposition to a candidate for public office. These expenditures were legalized by the Citizens United decision, so long as they are not coordinated with a candidate. Our company’s disclosures do not cover these particularly risky expenditures.

Information on indirect political engagement through trade associations and 501(c)(4) groups cannot be obtained by shareholders unless the Company discloses it. Disclosure of all of AT&T’s indirect political spending would bring our Company in line with leading companies, including Microsoft, CenturyLink and Qualcomm that present this information on their websites. Forty one percent of the S&P 500 (204 companies) currently disclose some level of payments to trade associations, or say they instruct trade associations not to use these payments on election-related activities (CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability).

Indirect political spending presents unique risks that are not addressed by AT&T’s current policies. Opacity allows trade associations and other tax exempt entities to use AT&T funds for purposes that may conflict with AT&T’s policies and best interests. Disclosure permits oversight and accountability.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the reports requested in this proposal are duplicative of the Company’s existing practices and are unnecessary. AT&T received a nearly identical proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately three fourths of the votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

Political contributions, where permitted, are an important part of the regulatory and legislative process. AT&T is in a highly regulated industry, and its operations are significantly affected by the actions of elected officials at the local, state and national levels, including rates it can charge customers, its profitability and even how it must provide services to competitors. It is important that the Company actively participate in the electoral and legislative processes in order to protect your interests as stockholders. The Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee of the Board, composed entirely of independent directors, reviews corporate political contributions and Company-sponsored political action committees (PACs).

Additionally, as discussed in the AT&T Political Engagement Report, which is available on the Company’s website (at http://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ATT_Political EngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June of 2015. The Company participates in various industry associations to further its business interests. These memberships not only provide valuable industry expertise, but they also advocate positions on behalf of the communications industry or that impact the communications and other industries. These industry associations include, for example, the United States Telecom Association, the Cellular Telephone Industry Association and the Future of Privacy Forum.

28 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website in the Corporate Governance section (available at http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726). In making political contributions the Company is committed to complying with campaign finance laws, including the laws requiring public disclosure of political contributions. The amount of the Company’s political expenditures is an insignificant portion of its total annual expenses. Each year, the Board authorizes a maximum amount of political contributions that can be made by the Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, for the purposes of supporting or opposing any party, committee, candidate for public office, or ballot measure, or for any other political purpose. For 2015, this amount is $6.0 million. Also, for calendar years 2015-2016, the Board authorized contributions or expenditures by the Company, as permitted by, and in strict compliance with, applicable law, relating to the 2016 presidential nominating conventions and ensuing inaugural activities, in the amount of $24.4 million. This amount includes in-kind services. These contributions also provide valuable advertising opportunities for the Company’s services and products.

Except for contributions for ballot measures, no expenditure over $1,000 may be made unless approved by the Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, expenditures must be submitted to the Company’s attorneys to confirm that each contribution is lawful.

AT&T already publicly discloses its participation in the legislative process. AT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report, referenced above, semiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. Federal political activity is subject to comprehensive regulation by the federal government, including detailed disclosure requirements. AT&T’s federal PACs file regular reports of receipts and disbursements with the Federal Election Commission (the “FEC”) which are disclosed to the public in the reports filed with the FEC and include identification of all individuals who contributed $200 or more as well as all candidates or committees that received a political contribution. AT&T complies with all obligations with regard to its state and local political activities, including reporting and disclosure requirements. Additionally, under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended, the Company files semi-annual reports with the Secretary of the U.S. Senate (available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm) and Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives (available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx).

The Board believes that spending further corporate funds to generate additional reports would not be a productive use of corporate resources. The Board therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal.

Item 6.            Stockholder Proposal

Whereas, we believe in full disclosure of our company’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our company’s lobbying is consistent with AT&T’s expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders.

Resolved, the shareholders of AT&T request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing;

1.Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by AT&T used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.AT&T’s new wireless home security/homemembership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 29 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

4.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which AT&T is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant Board oversight committees and posted on AT&T’s website.

Supporting Statement

As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in AT&T’s use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation, both directly and indirectly. AT&T spent $30.1 million in 2013 and 2014 on federal lobbying activities (opensecrets.org). This figure does not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation in states where AT&T also lobbies, but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, AT&T spent $1.6 million lobbying in California in 2014 (http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/).

AT&T sits on the board of the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent over $1 billion on lobbying since 1998. AT&T does not disclose its memberships in, or payments to, trade associations, or the portions of such amounts used for lobbying. Absent a system of accountability, company assets could be used for objectives contrary to AT&T’s long-term interests. For example, AT&T recognizes climate change is a serious concern that warrants meaningful action, yet the Chamber is publicly attacking the EPA on its new Clean Power Plan addressing climate change.

And AT&T does not disclose its membership in tax-exempt organizations that write and endorse model legislation, such as AT&T’s sitting on Private Enterprise Council of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC has promoted legislation to repeal state renewable energy standards and undermine the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. AT&T’s ALEC membership has drawn press scrutiny that may affect the company’s reputation adversely (“T-Mobile Ditches ALEC,”The Hill, Apr. 8, 2015). More than 100 companies, including Emerson Electric, General Electric, Google, Sprint, and T-Mobile, have publicly left ALEC.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the rigor of the Company’s current practices provides its shareholders and the public with ample transparency and accountability with respect to lobbying activities and that the preparation and publication of the report called for by this proposal is neither necessary nor an efficient use of the Company’s resources. AT&T received a nearly identical shareholder proposal for its 2015 Annual Meeting, and approximately two-thirds of the votes cast at the meeting were against the proposal.

AT&T is in a highly regulated industry; therefore, public policy decisions at the local, state, and national levels significantly affect the Company’s operations, strategy, and stockholder value. Accordingly, the Company exercises its responsibility to actively participate in the legislative processes in order to protect and further stockholders’ interests by contributing prudently to lobbying organizations that constructively advocate positions which advance the Company’s business objectives and stockholders’ interests. Similarly, the Company belongs to industry associations and coalitions, where it benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide.

30 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

AT&T is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards when engaging in any political activities. AT&T’s policies and procedures with respect to political contributions are clearly set forth on the Company’s website in the Corporate Governance section (available atwww.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=7726).

AT&T publishes the AT&T Political Engagement Report semiannually; it is an itemized list of corporate contributions and employee PAC contributions to candidates and candidate committees; national, state, and local party committees and other groups; and PACs and other committees. This report is available on the Company’s website (athttp://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/PoliticalEngagementReports/ ATT_PoliticalEngagementReport_2015_Jan-Jun.pdf) and currently covers January through June 2015).

In addition to the AT&T Political Engagement Report, the Company is required to file other reports with various state and federal agencies. Pursuant to the federal Lobby Disclosure Act, the Company files federal lobbying reports quarterly with the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Secretary of the U.S. Senate. These reports are publicly available and disclose corporate expenditures related to lobbying and issues lobbied. Publicly available contribution and lobbying data can be found at the below sources:

Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US Senate: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm;
Federal Lobbying Disclosure Report, US House of Representatives: Search Registrant Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx;
Federal Lobbying Contribution Report: Search Organization Name: AT&T; available athttp://disclosures.house.gov/lc/lcsearch.aspx;
Federal Election Commission: Search: AT&T; available athttp://www.fec.gov/index.shtml California State Lobbying Report: Search: AT&T; available athttp://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Lobbying/Employers/

AT&T has a robust review process for contributions to industry associations and coalitions. The proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. AT&T fully complies with all disclosure requirements pertaining to lobbying expenditures under federal, state, and local laws. The proposal would impose requirements on the Company that are not dictated by law and that are not standard among other companies. Any new requirements should be addressed by lawmakers and uniformly imposed on all entities.

The Board is confident that the Company’s lobbying activities are aligned with its stockholders’ long-term interests. As described above, the Company already makes available information concerning its political and lobbying activities to its stockholders and the public. The Board believes that an additional report beyond the Company’s current disclosures is neither necessary nor an efficient use of Company resources.

For these reasons, the Board recommends that you vote against this proposal.

Item 7.            Stockholder Proposal

Proposal 7 — Independent Board Chairman

Shareholders request our Board of Directors to adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next CEO transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement. If the Board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 31 |


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above.

This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. Companies in 2013 including 73%-support at Netflix. It also won 43% support at our company.

It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to protect shareholders’ long-term interests by providing independent oversight of management. By setting agendas, priorities and procedures, the Chairman is critical in shaping the work of the Board.

A board of directors is less likely to provide rigorous independent oversight of management if the Chairman is the CEO, as is the case with our Company. Having a board chairman who is independent of the Company and its management is a practice that will promote greater management accountability to shareholders and lead to a more objective evaluation of management.

According to the Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance (Yale School of Management), ‘The independent chair curbs conflicts of interest, promotes oversight of risk, manages the relationship between the board and CEO, serves as a conduit for regular communication with shareowners, and is a logical next step in the development of an independent board.” (Chairing the Board: The Case for Independent Leadership in Corporate North America, 2009).

An NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Directors’ Professionalism recommended that an independent director should be charged with “organizing the board’s evaluation of the CEO and provide ongoing feedback; chairing executive sessions of the board; setting the agenda and leading the board in anticipating and responding to crises.” A blue-ribbon report from The Conference Board echoed that position.

A number of institutional investors said that a strong, objective board leader can best provide the necessary oversight of management. Thus, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Global Principles of Accountable Corporate Governance recommends that a company’s board should be chaired by an independent director, as does the Council of Institutional Investors.

An independent director serving as chairman can help ensure the functioning of an effective board. Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Independent Board Chairman – Proposal 7

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

For the reasons discussed below, the Board believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by one person serving as both Chairman and CEO, and it therefore recommends that you vote against this proposal. This issue was considered by stockholders most recently at the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting, when stockholders rejected a similar proposal with approximately three quarters of the votes cast being against the proposal.

The Board believes that a single person, acting in the capacities of Chairman and CEO, serves as a bridge between the Board and management and provides critical leadership for carrying out the Company’s strategic initiatives and confronting its challenges. In short, the Board believes that the Company can more effectively execute its strategy and business plans to maximize stockholder value if the Chairman of the Board is also a member of the management team.

In addition, the Board has taken several steps to ensure that the Board effectively carries out its responsibility for the oversight of management. The Board has appointed a Lead Director (currently, Joyce M. Roché, an independent member of the Board) who presides over regular executive sessions of the non-management members of the Board. Members of management do not attend these

32 | www.att.com


Agenda Items To Be Voted Upon

sessions. The Lead Director is also responsible for approving the agenda for each Board meeting, presiding at Board meetings at which the Chairman is not present, and acting as the principal liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the non-management Directors, among other things. For a complete description of the Lead Director’s responsibilities, please see page 8. In recognition of the significant role assigned to the Lead Director, the Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000. The appointment of a strong Lead Director and the use of executive sessions of the Board, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent Directors, allow the Board to maintain effective oversight of management.

Finally, the Board notes that Mr. Stephenson is the only Director who is a member of management. In addition, each committee, other than the Executive Committee, is made up solely of independent Directors.

For these reasons, the Board believes the adoption of a policy requiring that the Chairman of the Board be an independent Director is not in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and therefore recommends that you vote against the proposal.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 33 |


Audit Committee Report

Audit Committee

Audit Committee Report

 

AT&T – Page 52


The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed with management service; expansionAT&T’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Company’s wirelessly connected automobile solutions;Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and introduction of a new Mobile Premise solution. Combined, these new initiatives represent(4) discussed with the potential for multi-billion dollars in new revenue overauditors the next few years.auditors’ independence.

 

·

Wayne Watts

With responsibility for all legal matters affecting AT&T, Mr. Watts effectively guided the Company’s litigation, regulatory filings, and compliance matters before various judicial and regulatory agencies in addition to providing support for the Company’s day-to-day operations including thousands of commercial agreements, labor agreements, and day-to-day legal advice. In 2012, Mr. Watts and his team successfully managed thousands of litigation matters involving AT&T, including 179 appeals to various Federal and State Courts of Appeal and eight appeals to the United States Supreme Court. Under Mr. Watts’ direction, the Company effectively advanced its positions before Federal and state regulators designed to generate a fair regulatory and working environment for our Internet, wireless and wireline operations. Mr. Watts and his team directly supported the Company’s execution of 63 transactions in support of its strategic initiatives and objectives. These efforts include the divestiture of AT&T’s Ad Solutions business unit for approximately $940 million and a 47% equity interest in the new entity, YP Holdings, LLC, and 48 wireless spectrum deals that help address the Company’s near- and mid-term spectrum needs.

Based on the Company achievementsreview and discussions referred to above, the above accomplishments,Audit Committee recommended to the Committee determined to pay Named Executive Officers 120% - 122%Board of their respective target awards. Payouts of 2012 awards are as follows:Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

February 11, 2016The Audit Committee
Jon C. Madonna, ChairmanCynthia B. Taylor
Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Michael B. McCallister

 

2012 Short-Term Payouts

                Name  Target Award ($)   Actual Award ($) 

Randall Stephenson

   5,050,000     6,060,000  

John Stephens

   1,375,000     1,650,000  

Rafael de la Vega

   1,645,000     1,974,000  

John Stankey

   1,645,000     2,000,000  

Wayne Watts

   1,315,000     1,578,000  

Long-Term Incentives

As noted in the Conference Board report, to put “[t]oo much focus on the short-term in the wrong business model can lead to reward for current performance, but fail to promote the Company’s business strategy over the long-term.” Because AT&T values long-term performance, and to ensure that our compensation program does not incent executives to take excessive risks in pursuit of short-term results, long-term incentives are a significant part of an officer’s compensation package. Long-term awards directly link the interests of officers to those of stockholders, since the awards are tied to the performance of AT&T stock. More than one form of long-term compensation is used in order to balance the risk of the long-term program.

2012 Grants

In 2012, the Committee granted the Named Executive Officers long-term incentives in the form of 50% performance shares and 50% restricted stock units. Target grant values were set using the AT&T Market Values as a guideline. Specifics of the long-term grants are described on the following page.

·

Performance Shares

Each performance share is equal in value to one share of our common stock and is paid out at the end of the performance period (three years) based on the extent to which the performance goals are met.

AT&T – Page 53


Awards made in 2012 earn dividend equivalents equal to the dividends on our common stock, paid only after the end of the performance period and only on the number of performance shares actually earned based on the Company’s performance.

The value of performance shares fluctuates directly with changes in the price of our common stock, which aligns managers’ interests directly with stockholders’ interests. Performance shares are paid out only to the extent that specific financial, operational, and/or stockholder return objectives are achieved, and no payout is made if minimum objectives are not met. Payouts are made in cash, which minimizes dilution. Performance shares are valued at the closing price of a share of AT&T common stock on the date the award payout is approved.

Unless the Committee provides otherwise, performance shares will be forfeited by non-retirement eligible executive officers in the event of their voluntary termination of employment (except for death and disability) and retiring officers will be eligible to receive a prorated performance share award.

The performance shares granted in 2012 are for the 2012-2014 performance period. The Committee determined that the performance measure for 75% of the Performance Shares would be Return On Invested Capital (ROIC) and the measure for the remaining 25% would be based on a comparison of AT&T’s Total Stockholder Return (TSR) compared to the Standard and Poor’s 100 Index (S&P 100).

2012 Performance Share Grants

(2012 to 2014 Performance Period)

Name

Target Grant Values ($)

(amounts are rounded)

Performance Measure

Return on

Invested Capital

Total Stockholder Return

vs. S&P 100

Randall Stephenson

6,375,00075% of Grant25% of Grant

John Stephens

1,660,000   

Rafael de la Vega

AT&T has a separately designated standing Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of AT&T’s financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors, and AT&T’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Madonna (Chairman), Mr. Di Piazza, Mr. McCallister, Ms. Taylor, and Dr. Tyson, each of whom was appointed by the Board of Directors.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed on the Company’s web site at www.att.com. The Audit Committee performs a review and reassessment of its charter annually. The Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and AT&T. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Di Piazza, Mr. Madonna, and Ms. Taylor are “audit committee financial experts” and are independent as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and in accordance with AT&T’s additional standards. Although the Board of Directors has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes defined under the rules of the SEC, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other Audit Committee members. They are not AT&T’s auditors or accountants, do not perform “field work” and are not full-time employees. The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be

2,237,500
34 |  www.att.com


Audit Committee Report

deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management in the preparation of AT&T’s financial statements and financial disclosures. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AT&T’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate. AT&T’s Audit Committee charter provides that these are the responsibility of management and the independent auditors.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Ernst & Young LLP acts as AT&T’s principal auditor and also provides certain audit-related, tax and other services. The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy for services to be performed by Ernst & Young. Under this policy, the Audit Committee approves specific engagements when the engagements have been presented in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee before services are undertaken.

This policy also allows for the approval of certain services in advance of the Audit Committee being presented details concerning the specific service to be undertaken. These services must meet service definitions and fee limitations previously established by the Audit Committee. Additionally, engagements exceeding $500,000 must receive advance concurrence from the Audit Committee Chairman. After an auditor is engaged under this authority, the services must be described in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee at the next meeting.

All pre-approved services must commence, if at all, within 14 months of the approval.

The fees for services provided by Ernst & Young (all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee) to AT&T in 2015 and 2014 are shown below.

Principal Accountant Fees(dollars in millions) 
Item  2015     2014 

Audit Fees (1)

  $29.6      $23.3  

Audit Related Fees (2)

   5.2       4.4  

Tax Fees (3)

   10.5       8.0  

All Other Fees (4)

   0.0       0.0  

1.Included in this category are fees for the annual financial statement audit, quarterly financial statement reviews, audits required by Federal and state regulatory bodies, statutory audits, and comfort letters. The year-over-year increase in fees was primarily due to the acquisitions of DIRECTV and Mexico wireless operations during 2015.
2.These fees, which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit Fees, include fees for employee benefit plan audits, due diligence associated with acquisition and disposition activity, control reviews of AT&T service organizations, governmental grant-related attestations, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and reviews of sustainability reporting compliance.
3.These fees include charges for various Federal, state, local and international tax compliance and research projects, as well as tax services for AT&T employees working in foreign countries.
4.No fees were incurred in 2015 or 2014 for services other than audit, audit related and tax.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 35 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  

John Stankey

2,237,500

Wayne Watts

1,725,000

We calculate ROIC by averaging over the three-year performance period: (1) our annual net income before extraordinary items plus after-tax interest expense, divided by (2) the total of the average debt and average stockholder equity for the relevant year. For mergers and acquisitions over $2 billion, we exclude the dilutive impacts of intangible amortization, asset write-offs, accelerated depreciation, and transaction and restructuring costs so that the impact of certain significant transactions, including those which may not have been contemplated in the determination of a performance measure, will not have an impact on the performance results. We also exclude the following if the collective net impact, after taxes and available collectible insurance, exceeds certain limits in a calendar year: changes in tax laws and/or accounting principles, certain unusual events, expenses caused by natural disasters or intentionally caused damage to the Company’s property, and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill or other intangible assets. Additionally, we disregard gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension and other post-retirement benefit plans (and associated tax effects). We chose ROIC as the appropriate measure because it is widely used by comparator companies and encourages our managers to focus not only on net income, but also to ensure that the Company’s capital is invested effectively and stockholder value is created.

At the end of the performance period, the number of performance shares to be paid out, if any, is determined by comparing the actual performance of the Company against the predetermined performance objectives, which are set forth as a range of results. The ROIC target range for the 2012-

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

AT&T – Page 54


2014 performance period was set above our cost of capital; a target that we believe may be challenging, but attainable. For performance above or below the performance target range, the number of performance shares are increased or reduced, respectively. Potential payouts range from 0% to 150% of the target number of performance shares granted.

The TSR measure compares the total stockholder return (stock appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends) of AT&T to that of companies in the S&P 100.

The following chart shows the potential payouts based on total stockholder return of AT&T as compared to companies in the S&P 100. In order to align our executive officer pay with stockholder interests, if AT&T’s total stockholder return is negative, the payout percentage is capped at 90% (applies to performance at the 40th percentile or higher).

AT&T Total Stockholder Return Compared to the S&P 100

(2012 – 2014 Performance Period)

            RankingPayout Percentage

AT&T is the top company

200%

AT&T in 80 - 99th percentile

150%

AT&T in 60 - 79.99th percentile

125%

AT&T in 40 - 59.99th percentile

100%

AT&T in 20 - 39.99th percentile

50%

AT&T is below the 20th percentile

0%

·

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units granted in 2012 vest 100% after four years, or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier, but do not pay out until the scheduled distribution date. These units receive quarterly dividend equivalents, paid in cash at the time regular dividends are paid on AT&T’s stock. Restricted stock units pay 100% in stock to further tie executive and stockholder interests.

The following table shows restricted stock unit grants made to the Named Executive Officers in 2012:

2012 Restricted Stock Unit Grants

            Name

Grant Date Values ($)

(amounts are rounded)

Randall Stephenson

6,375,000

John Stephens

1,660,000

Rafael de la Vega

2,237,500

John Stankey

2,237,500

Wayne Watts

1,725,000

Results for the 2010-2012 Performance Period (Performance Shares)

The performance measure applicable to 75% of performance share awards is ROIC. The performance measure for the other 25% of the award is AT&T’s TSR, measured against the AT&T Telecommunications Peer Group, comprised of the following companies: América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., BCE Inc., BT Group plc, Comcast Corporation, Deutsche Telekom AG, DirecTV Group Inc., Telefónica S.A., Time Warner Cable, Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., Vodafone Group plc, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

 

AT&T – Page 55


For the 2010-2012 performance period the Committee set the ROIC target range with our cost of capital appearing at the bottom of the target range, which represented an aggressive, yet achievable, target. After conclusion of the performance period, the Committee determined, using the payout table established at the beginning of the performance period that the Company’s results were above the ROIC target range and directed that 113% of the related performance shares be distributed. In accordance with the plan, the Committee excluded the impact of a change relating to pension accounting and the effects of a change in tax laws resulting from the healthcare reform legislation in determining the achievement of the target range. Although costs incurred in large merger transactions (such as T-Mobile) are to be excluded in calculating final performance attainment, the Committee determined to include the T-Mobile transaction costs in determining payouts for all outstanding executive officer performance share awards, resulting inreduced final award payouts.

In accordance with the predetermined payout table, for performance shares tied to the TSR target, the Committee determined that the Company was in the 3rd quintile of the index, which resulted in a 100% payout of the performance shares tied to this metric.

As shown below, the number of performance shares actually paid was 110% of the target number of shares, based on performance results for both ROIC and TSR. The realized value of executive officer long-term compensation also includes the impact of changes in stock price (which also impacts our stockholders), making their final performance share payout 150% of the target grant values, as shown below.

2010 Performance Share Grant and Payout Values

(Half of the Long-Term Grants Awarded to Executive Officers in 2010)

Name 

Performance

Measure(s)

 Value at
Grant ($)
  

Performance

Payout %

 

% Change in

Stock Price (1)

 

Value at

Payout ($)

  

Approx. % of Grant

Value Realized

Stephenson

 75% ROIC

25% TSR

  6,375,000   110% 36%  9,552,249   150%

de la Vega

   2,000,000      2,996,807   

Stankey

   2,175,000      3,259,026   

Watts

   2,000,000      2,996,807   

Stephens (2)

 100% ROIC  380,000   113% 36%  584,934   154%
1.From the date of grant (January 28, 2010) through the date the distribution is approved (January 31, 2013).
2.Mr. Stephens’ 2010-2012 grant was made prior to his being appointed an executive officer and 100% of his shares was subject to the ROIC metric.

Deferral Opportunities, Pensions and Other Benefits

Deferral Opportunities

We believe that in order to remain competitive in the employment market, it is appropriate to offer deferral plans and other benefits. Our tax-qualified 401(k) plans offer substantially all employees the opportunity to defer income and, at the same time, invest in AT&T stock. We match 80% of the employee contributions, limited to the first 6% of compensation (only base salary is matched for officers).

Our nonqualified deferral plans provide retention incentives by allowing mid-level and above managers the opportunity for tax-advantaged savings. We use our deferral plans as a way to encourage our managers to invest in and hold AT&T stock on a tax-deferred basis.

Our principal nonqualified deferral program is the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan. Under that plan, mid-level managers and above may annually elect to defer, through payroll deductions, up to 30% of their salary and annual bonus (officers, including the Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 95% of their short-term award, which is similar to, and paid in lieu of, the annual bonus paid to other

AT&T – Page 56


management employees) to purchase AT&T deferred share units at fair market value on a tax-deferred basis. Participants receive a 20% match on their deferrals in the form of additional deferred share units. Participants also receive makeup matching deferred share units to replace the match that would not be available in the 401(k) because of their participation in AT&T’s nonqualified deferral plans or because they exceeded the IRS compensation limits for 401(k) plans. Officers do not receive the make-up match on the contribution of their short-term awards. For salary deferrals prior to 2011 and bonus deferrals prior to 2012, in lieu of the 20% match, participants received two stock options for each share unit acquired. The stock options had an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock at grant.

Eligible managers may also defer cash compensation in the form of salaries and bonuses through the Cash Deferral Plan. The Cash Deferral Plan pays interest at the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average, reset annually, which is a common index used by companies for deferral plans. The SEC requires disclosure in the “Summary Compensation Table” of any earnings on deferred compensation that exceed an amount set by the SEC.

These plans are described more fully under the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table, on page 72.

Personal Benefits

We provide our executive officers with personal benefits, including an automobile allowance and maintenance, which is an important recruiting and retention tool; club memberships (we allow Company-owned memberships, but do not pay country club fees and dues for executive officers), which afford our executives the opportunity to conduct business in a more informal environment; home security for the safety and security of our executives; tax preparation, estate planning, and financial counseling, which allow our executives to focus more on business responsibilities; and executive disability benefits. The financial counseling benefit provides financial counselors to executives, which helps the Company by ensuring that our executives understand and comply with plan requirements. We provide our executives communications, broadband/TV and related products and services, which are offered by AT&T at little or no incremental cost. We permit our executives to use Company aircraft for personal reasons, which allows for the efficient use of their time and for them to privately conduct Company business at any time. However, beginning in 2013, the CEO will be required to reimburse the incremental Company cost of all such personal usage. Other Executive Officers are also required to reimburse the incremental cost of their personal usage unless the CEO decides otherwise on a case-by-case basis. Reimbursements will not be made where prohibited by law. We also provide executive death benefits. More information on death benefits may be found on pages 70 and 71 in the narrative following the “Pension Benefits” table.

Officers promoted or hired after March 23, 2010, are eligible for an annual executive physical, subject to certain limits. We provide other officers, including our current executive officers with a supplemental health plan for which they pay a portion of the premiums. The plan acts in conjunction with the Company’s management health plan, a consumer-driven plan that encourages all employees to be cost-conscious consumers of health care services.

Certain of these benefits are also offered as post-retirement benefits to persons who meet age and service requirements. Additional information on these post-retirement benefits can be found on pages 70 and 71, in the narrative following the “Pension Benefits” table.

Pensions

We offer a tax-qualified group pension plan to substantially all employees. We also provide supplemental retirement benefits under nonqualified pension plans to a frozen group of officers, including our current executive officers. We believe these benefits act as retention tools. Additional information on these pension benefits may be found beginning on page 67, in the narrative following the “Pension Benefits” table.

AT&T – Page 57


Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for the CEO, other executive officers, and all other officers. The guideline for the CEO is a minimum ownership requirement of six times base salary. The guidelines are the lesser of three times base salary or 50,000 shares for other executive officers and the lesser of one times base salary or 25,000 shares for all other officers. Newly appointed officers are expected to be in compliance with the ownership guidelines within five years of their appointments. We also include vested shares held in Company benefit plans. Holdings of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2012, can be found in the “Common Stock Ownership” section on page 13.

Retention of Awards

Executive officers are required to hold 25% of the AT&T shares they receive (after taxes and exercise costs) from an incentive, equity, or option award granted to them after January 1, 2012, until one year after they leave the Company.

Hedging Policy

Executive officers are prohibited from hedging their AT&T stock and awards. The prohibition will continue to apply to stock issued from Company awards for one year after they leave the Company.

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

Federal income tax law prohibits publicly held companies, such as AT&T, from deducting certain compensation paid to a Named Executive Officer that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. To the extent that compensation is based upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Committee pursuant to plans approved by the stockholders, the compensation is not included in the limit. The Committee intends, to the extent feasible and where it believes it is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders, to attempt to qualify executive compensation as tax deductible where it does not adversely affect the Committee’s development and execution of effective compensation plans. For example, to enable short- and long-term compensation to be deductible, the Committee strives to make these awards under stockholder-approved incentive plans.

Similarly, gains on stock option exercises may be deductible if granted under a stockholder-approved plan since they are tied to the performance of the Company’s stock price. Salaries and other compensation that are not tied to performance are not deductible to the extent they exceed the $1 million limit.

Clawback Policy

The Company intends, in appropriate circumstances, to seek restitution of any bonus, commission, or other compensation received by an employee as a result of such employee’s intentional or knowing fraudulent or illegal conduct, including the making of a material misrepresentation contained in the Company’s financial statements.

AT&T – Page 58


Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

We have an employment contract with Mr. de la Vega. The material provisions of this contract are discussed following the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table, on page 62.

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the Change in Control Severance Plan, which is more fully described on page 74. We believe this type of plan is necessary to ensure that participants receive certain double-trigger benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company, and to allow the participating officers to focus on their duties during an acquisition. The plan is not intended to replace other compensation elements.

Compensation Committee Report

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

February 11, 2016The Human Resources Committee
Joyce M. Roché, ChairmanJohn B. McCoy

Scott T. Ford

 

February 11, 2013

    The Human Resources Committee:
Gilbert F. Amelio, Chairman

John B. McCoy

James H. Blanchard

Matthew K. Rose

Quick Reference Guide

Executive Summary

37

The Human Resources Committee and Its Role

44

Guiding Pay Principles

44

Compensation Design

45

2015 Compensation

47

Benefits

56

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

58

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

59

Clawback Policy

59

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

59

Compensation Consultant

60

36 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

AT&T’s Human Resources Committee (Committee) takes great care in the development and refinement of an executive compensation program that recognizes its stewardship responsibility to AT&T’s stockholders while simultaneously ensuring the availability of talent to lead an organization the size and complexity of AT&T.

During 2015, we continued to execute on our strategic goals as shown below. We believe our senior leaders’ pay reflects this strong performance and closely aligns the interests of our management with those of stockholders.

Key Fiscal 2015 Business Results

Our executive officers make decisions every day that shape the future of our Company. The impact of these decisions can be seen both in our current results as well as in our long-term performance.

AT&T is investing to be the premier integrated communications company in the world, delivering on our mission to connect people with their world everywhere they live, work and play — and do it better than anyone else.

Strategic Execution

In 2015, AT&T focused on building a strategic advantage by investing in three key areas. The Company closed the acquisition of DIRECTV, allowing it to offer unique integrated video, mobile and broadband solutions across the United States. It also expanded into Mexico with plans to create a North American Mobile Service Area covering 400 million people and businesses. And AT&T continued to invest in its networks — through the acquisition of a near nationwide block of high-quality wireless spectrum to support mobile video growth, global leadership in the transition to software-defined networks and the introduction of innovative new services. We financed our DIRECTV and spectrum purchases at very attractive rates. As a result, we exited 2015 with a strong balance sheet and dividend coverage that is consistent with our historical norms. Highlights for the year include:

DIRECTV Acquisition – With the DIRECTV addition, AT&T is the largest pay-TV provider in the United States and the world with:

Unparalleled video content distribution scale in the U.S. giving AT&T an unequaled opportunity to deliver integrated solutions across video, mobile and broadband services
Expectations that the acquisition will contribute to earnings per share in 2016 and for significant synergies expected to reach an annual run rate of $2.5 billion or better by the end of 2018

International Expansion – Following the combination of Iusacell and Nextel Mexico, AT&T is expanding high speed mobile Internet across Mexico while significantly enhancing the customer experience for wireless customers there. In Mexico, AT&T:

Has committed to invest $3 billion to upgrade its mobile Internet network by the end of 2018
Is on a path to deliver a one-of-a-kind wireless network experience for 400 million consumers and businesses in the United States and Mexico
Covered about 44 million people with high speed 4G LTE at the end of 2015 and expects to reach a total of 100 million people across Mexico by the end of 2018
In addition, AT&T acquired DIRECTV Latin America, which is a leading provider of pay-TV services in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and parts of the Caribbean; DIRECTV Latin America also has an approximately 41% stake in Sky Mexico

Network Excellence – AT&T expanded its network leadership position as it completed one of the largest network build cycles in Company history, invested $18 billion to acquire a near-nationwide

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 37 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

block of spectrum in the AWS-3 auction and led the transformation to software-defined networks. AT&T’s network:

Delivers high-speed broadband connectivity to customers through:
¡A 4G LTE mobile broadband network reaching 355 million people and businesses in the U.S. and Mexico
¡High-speed wired Internet covering more than 57 million people with a commitment to reach 14 million additional customer locations with fiber
¡An expanded fiber network covering an additional 1 million business locations
Carries more than 100 petabytes of data traffic — to nearly every country on the globe — on an average business day
Utilizes highly efficient satellites capable of delivering HD and UltraHD to nearly 1 billion people throughout the U.S. and Latin America
Leads the industry in the transformation from proprietary hardware-based networks to software-defined networks, which offer a better cost structure for the Company along with faster network upgrades and reduced provisioning cycle times for customers
¡AT&T expects to transform 75% of its network architecture by 2020
Supports innovative new services for Business Solutions customers, including:
¡AT&T’s Network on Demand platform, which lets customers add or change services in near real time. AT&T Switched Ethernet on Demand is available in more than 170 cities in the United States, and we have signed more than 500 customers to date. Managed Internet Service on Demand is currently available in select cities and the Company plans to expand it in 2016
¡AT&T NetBond®, the Company’s highly secure cloud security service; the NetBond ecosystem includes 13 cloud providers, and the Company has signed several hundred NetBond deals

Business Results

While investing in the future, AT&T’s executives also drove strong results in the Company’s four business segments.

Business Solutions – AT&T is the premier business services provider in the United States. The Company provides services to more than 3.5 million businesses — including virtually all of the Fortune 1000 — and operates on six continents. In 2015:

Business Solutions revenues, including wireless and wireline services, were $71.1 billion
AT&T expanded its global leadership in the Internet of Things — everything from connected cars and homes to wearables to machine-to-machine applications — with a total of 26.2 million connected devices, including 5.2 million added in 2015
AT&T’s revenues from fixed strategic business services — including security, VPN, cloud, Ethernet and other advanced services — grew 12.9% to an annualized revenue stream of $11 billion

Entertainment Group – AT&T significantly enhanced its entertainment business with the acquisition of DIRECTV and the creation of the AT&T Entertainment Group. In 2015, AT&T:

Grew Entertainment Group revenues to $35.3 billion, a 58.7% increase over 2014, largely driven by the acquisition of DIRECTV
Added 240,000 satellite TV subscribers after the close of DIRECTV
Ended the year with 13.3 million IP broadband subscribers including business customers, a year-over-year increase of more than 1 million
Expanded the availability of its AT&T GigaPowerSM service to more than 1 million homes in 20 markets with plans to enter an additional 36 markets
Led the industry in delivering video however and whenever customers want it:
¡AT&T has 25 million pay-TV subscribers, more than anyone in the United States
¡About one-third of DIRECTV and AT&T U-verse TV customers used our mobile apps, website or third-party authentication to stream content in 2015
¡AT&T’s Otter Media joint venture with The Chernin Group is a global leader in over-the-top video; it is the largest independent creator network worldwide and operates two of the top 20 streaming video on demand services globally

38 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Consumer Mobility – Despite intense competition, AT&T delivered solid wireless performance in 2015, including best-ever full-year EBITDA service margins across the total wireless business. In addition, in 2015, AT&T’s Consumer Mobility segment:

Increased its EBITDA service margins as cost efficiencies and AT&T Next offset pressure from popular Mobile Share Value Plans
Added 1.8 million branded (postpaid and prepaid) subscribers
Executed a turnaround in prepaid, driven by its Cricket and GoPhone services, with an industry leading 1.4 million net adds for the year, up from a decline of 311,000 in 2014

International – AT&T entered the wireless market in Mexico in early 2015 and has turned around operations that were previously losing subscribers and revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2015, AT&T added 593,000 subscribers in Mexico — reflecting significant progress in customer adoption and retention.

Financial Performance and Stockholder Returns

Impressive market performance and a relentless focus on operating efficiencies translated to solid financial performance and stockholder returns in 2015 with:

A 1-year total stockholder return, including reinvested dividends, of 8.3%, almost six times what the S&P 500 returned during the same period

1-Year Total Stockholder Returns

AT&T

 DJIA S&P 500 S&P 100

8.3%

 0.2% 1.4% 2.6%

10.8% revenue growth
An industry-leading 32nd consecutive annual increase in the Company’s quarterly dividend
¡AT&T increased its quarterly dividend by 2.1%
Free cash flow (cash from operating activities minus capital expenditures) of $15.9 billion, up 60% year over year even with $20 billion in capital expenditures, or $20.7 billion when including purchases in Mexico with favorable payment terms
Significant improvement in free cash flow dividend coverage with 64% of free cash flow paid in dividends versus 96% in 2014

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 39 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy and Best Practices

AT&T’s executive compensation philosophy serves as the starting point for the development and evaluation of our pay programs. The foundational elements of this philosophy, as established by the Committee, include paying for performance, ensuring that our programs are competitive, balancing focus on both short- and long-term goals, and aligning executive officer compensation with both stockholder interests and competitive approaches in the marketplace.

The Committee periodically reviews and adjusts our compensation and benefits program to ensure alignment with current market practices. By continuing to evaluate and modify our programs as necessary and by designing our program around the following best practices, the Committee has shown its commitment to paying for performance and aligning executive pay with stockholder interests.

What We Do

—     The vast majority of executive officer compensation is tied to performance metrics and/or stock price performance.

—     Multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting time frames limit unnecessary short-term risk-taking.

—     Robust stock ownership guidelines for all officers.

—     Annual discussions with large stockholders.

—     Executive officers required to hold 25% of shares received until one year after they leave the Company.

—     Dividend equivalents paid at the end of performance period on earned performance shares.

—     Clawback policy.

—     Severance policy limiting payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus.

What We Don’t Do

—     No “single trigger” provisions for accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards following a change in control.

—     No accelerated vesting of performance shares following a Change in Control.

—     No credit for unvested shares when determining stock ownership guideline compliance.

—     No repricing or buy-out of underwater stock options.

—     No hedging or short sales of AT&T stock.

—     No tax reimbursements, except in extenuating circumstances.

—     No supplemental executive retirement benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.

2016 Compensation Program Enhancements

Based on input from stockholders, we are further modifying our executive compensation plans effective beginning in 2016. This chart describes those enhancements, and how they align with stockholder interests.

40 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2016 Executive

Compensation Enhancements

How Enhancements Align

with Stockholder Interests

SHORT-TERM AWARDS
Payouts will beformula-driven – based on the achievement of specific, objective performance goals each year, consistent with those applied to other corporate managers. The Committee may make adjustments to this formula-driven payout to recognize individual performance.

This formula-based approach enables stockholders to quickly and easily assess the Company’s commitment to paying the CEO and NEOs for performance, and is more consistent with the Company’s comparator companies.

 

For 2016, payout will be based on earnings per share (70%) and free cash flow (30%)

LONG-TERM AWARDS
For the most recently completed three-year performance period, we will report our ROIC performance goal and our attainment against that goal. For information on our most recent ROIC attainment, please see page 43.Disclosing ROIC goals and results gives stockholders a clearer view of the Company’s commitment to paying for performance.
With respect to the Total Stockholder Return (TSR) metric for Performance Share Grants, we will use a new peer group against which to measure relative TSR attainment. The new peer group will be comprised of combined Comparator, Top 25 Market Capitalization, and Telecom groups (shown on page 46 for 2015) used to determine target compensation.Aligns companies used to determine target compensation with those used to determine award payouts.

We will change the payout table for the relative TSR performance measure:

•     30th percentile performance required for threshold payout.

•     Median performance required for 100% payout.

•     90th percentile performance required for 200% payout.

This adjustment further aligns pay and performance. See new payout table immediately below.

Total Stockholder Return
3-Year Target (2016-2018)
AT&T Return vs. TSR Peer GroupPayout %

Level 1 (90th percentile or above)

200%

Level 2 (75th Page 5989.99th percentile)

2.2x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 3 (60th – 74.99th percentile)

2.1x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 4 (45th – 59.99th percentile)

2.0x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 5 (30th – 44.99th percentile)

1.8x AT&T Percentile Ranking

Level 6 (<30th percentile)

0%

Payouts are capped at 90% of the target award if absolute AT&T TSR is negative,

regardless of relative performance.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 41 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Impact of Performance Results on Executive Officer Compensation

In order to further its pay-for-performance goal, the Committee delivers a significant portion of executive officer compensation as performance-based compensation, including both short- and long-term incentives. The following charts depict how the Committee targets each element of compensation for the CEO and collectively for the other Named Executive Officers (NEOs).

2015 Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

When designing these incentives, the Committee employs a variety of metrics to ensure a strong link between executive compensation and performance. These metrics include earnings per share, free cash flow, revenue, and return on invested capital, which connect compensation to Company performance while total stockholder return aligns executive pay with performance relative to peer companies.

An explanation of the individual pay elements of our executive officer compensation program and the impact of performance on each element is provided below. We believe that the greatest pay opportunities should exist for executives who demonstrate high levels of performance over a sustained period of time. A discussion of each named executive officer’s 2015 performance may be found on pages 49 through 51.

Base Salary

When determining whether or not to grant a base salary increase, the Committee considers the executive officer’s individual performance and business results for the prior year, as well as his or her base salary compared to the market value for his or her job. Executive officers’ salaries are set based on past and expected future contributions to the Company’s long-term success. For more information on the base pay component of compensation, please see page 47.

Short-Term Incentives

At the beginning of the 2015 annual performance period, the Committee established three Company performance metrics, which serve as a threshold trigger to qualify executive officers for the payment of any short-term awards. The qualification criteria are tied to overall Company performance because the Committee believes that each executive officer is ultimately responsible for attainment of the Company’s strategic objectives.

42 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

If any of the established performance thresholds are met, the Committee then conducts an assessment of additional qualitative and quantitative factors, as they determine appropriate for each executive officer, in order to determine specific award payouts, which will not exceed a maximum amount approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance period. These factors may include an assessment of the executive’s ongoing individual performance; his or her contribution to overall Company results; and attainment of business unit goals, including financial, customer service, and growth targets. The Committee also considers other factors such as innovation, ability to grow the business, and leadership.

2015 Short-Term Award Payouts

As described beginning on page 47, the Committee established performance targets in the form of ranges for revenue, earnings per share, and free cash flow. The Committee chose these performance metrics because they are the key short-term financial metrics for the operation of our business and represent important key metrics to our stockholders. In addition, these metrics are commonly used in the marketplace as annual performance indicators that drive long-term sustainability. For 2015, AT&T performed above or within the target ranges for all three metrics.

As a result of Company, business unit, and individual performance, the Committee determined to pay named executive officer short-term awards as described on page 52.

Long-Term Incentives

To appropriately focus our executives’ attention on the long-term impacts of their decisions and to more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders, the majority of our executive compensation package is in the form of long-term incentives, which are comprised of 50% performance shares and 50% restricted stock units. For more information on our long-term compensation program, please refer to the section beginning on page 52.

The actual cash payout value for performance shares is based on two criteria: the attainment of predetermined performance metrics (which determines how many of the shares are actually payable) and our stock price. Restricted stock units are paid in stock.

Performance Share Payouts

For the 2013-2015 performance period, executive officer performance was measured against AT&T’s Return on Invested Capital (ROIC – applicable to 75% of the award) and Total Stockholder Return against the S&P 100 companies (TSR – applicable to 25% of the award).

ROIC: The Committee uses ROIC as a long-term performance metric because it encourages our executive officers to focus not only on net income, but also on effectively employing capital and creating stockholder value. Because AT&T is a capital-intensive company, the Committee believes that it is necessary to hold our executive officers accountable for using capital prudently. For the 2013-2015 performance period, ROIC attainment of 9.1%, which is 310 basis points above the cost of capital we establish based on input from banks, resulted in a 109% payout of the performance shares tied to this performance metric. See pages 54 to 55 for further information.

TSR: In order to more closely tie the compensation of our executive officers to the interests of our stockholders, the Committee chose to use a relative TSR performance metric. While AT&T’s TSR results were strong, at 19.7% over the 2013-2015 performance period, payout nonetheless was 0% given relative performance to the S&P 100 Peer Group. AT&T’s 1-year Total Stockholder Return for 2015 was 8.3%, compared to 0.2% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 2.6% for the S&P 100, and 1.4% for the S&P 500.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 43 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The narrative on the following pages more fully describes how the Committee, with the input of its consultant, has designed AT&T’s executive officer compensation and benefits program using the Committee’s guiding pay principles as the pillars of the program. The narrative also outlines how we establish pay targets and how actual executive officer pay is determined. Finally, we provide a description of our benefits including personal benefits.

The Human Resources Committee and Its Role

The Committee is responsible for overseeing our management compensation practices. Annually, the Committee approves the base salaries, short-term incentive targets, and long-term incentive grant levels as well as short- and long-term award payouts for the Named Executive Officers. The Committee recommends new benefit plans to the Board and acts as the administrator of certain of the Company’s compensation and benefit plans. The Committee’s charter is available on our web site at www.att.com. No AT&T employee serves on this Committee, which is composed entirely of independent Directors. The current members of the Committee are: Ms. Roché (Chairman), Mr. Ford, Mr. McCoy, and Mr. Rose.

Guiding Pay Principles

The Committee continually evaluates AT&T’s compensation and benefits program in light of market and governance trends. Balancing these trends, the need to attract and retain talent, and with a focus on delivering value for our stockholders, the Committee has designed AT&T’s executive compensation program around the following guiding pay principles:

Competitive and Market Based
Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate comparator company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T.
Pay-for-Performance
Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of Company and business unit goals as well as recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to the Company’s success. For example, in 2015, 92% of the CEO’s target compensation (and, on average, 88% for other Named Executive Officers) was variable and tied to short- and long-term performance incentives, including stock price performance.
Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus
Ensure that compensation programs and packages provide an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigation of risk.
Alignment with Stockholders
Set performance targets and provide compensation elements that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders. For example, performance shares make up nearly 33% of target compensation for the CEO and the Named Executive Officers, and are tied to multi-year Company performance and the Company’s stock price. In addition, AT&T has executive stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements, as described on page 58. Each of the Named Executive Officers exceeds the minimum stock ownership guidelines.
Alignment with Generally Accepted Approaches
Provide policies and programs that fit within the framework of generally accepted approaches adopted by leading major U.S. companies.

44 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Committee has reviewed the Company’s say on pay vote results and will continue engaging in dialogues with stockholders to understand their viewpoints on pay. The Committee will continue to review our compensation programs in light of this feedback.

Compensation Design

Executive Compensation Program

It is in the stockholders’ long-term interest that the program be structured in a way that makes attraction, retention, and motivation of the highest quality talent a reality. With that goal in mind, AT&T’s executive compensation and benefits program includes a number of different elements, from fixed compensation (base salaries) to performance-based variable compensation (short- and long-term incentives), as well as key personal benefits which minimize distractions and allow our executives to focus on the success of the Company. Each of the elements shown below is designed for a specific purpose, with an overarching goal to encourage a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future:

Current Year Performance

+

Multi-Year Performance

+

Attraction & Retention
Salary and Short-Term IncentivesLong-Term Incentives (Performance Shares and Restricted Stock Units)

Retirement,

Deferral/Savings Plans, Benefits, and Personal Benefits

Incentive Compensation – A Balanced Approach to Manage Risk to Stockholders

We believe in balancing incentive compensation so that officers focus on the attainment of both short- and long-term corporate objectives. By ensuring that a significant portion of compensation is based on the long-term performance of the Company, we reduce the risk that executives will place too much focus on short-term achievements to the detriment of the long-term sustainability of the Company. Further, we structure short-term incentive compensation so that the accomplishment of short-term corporate and business unit goals supports the achievement of long-term corporate goals. Both of these elements work together for the benefit of the Company and its stockholders.

Each year, the Committee also reviews an analysis prepared by management of the Company’s compensation policies and practices in order to evaluate whether they create unintended risks. This analysis includes the steps AT&T takes to mitigate risk in our compensation plans, including: the use of multiple metrics in determining award payouts; the use of payout tables to provide partial payouts for partial performance attainment, payout caps, and/or budget maximums; and cross-functional department review and/or approval of all payouts (which includes Committee approval of all executive officer payouts). The Compensation Consultant has also reviewed our programs and advised the Committee that the programs did not encourage risk-taking reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on AT&T. Based on this analysis, for 2015, the Committee determined that the Company’s compensation policies and practices were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Evaluation of Market to Determine Competitive Pay Levels

The starting point for determining Executive Officer compensation levels begins with an evaluation of market data. The consultant compiles both proxy and compensation survey data from third party sources for companies in the comparator groups (selected by the Committee and discussed below). The use of multiple sources of information and comparator groups ensures the availability of sufficient data to accurately reflect the competitive market and provides for the annual development of reliable market values by the consultant.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 45 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our comparator companies are selected based on:

similarity to AT&T in terms of size and/or industry,
similar organizational and business complexity,
global scope of operations and/or diversified product lines,
ability of the company to compete with AT&T for talent, and
similarity to jobs at AT&T in terms of complexity and scope of officer positions.

Following are the comparator groups used by the consultant in making 2015 market value recommendations for officer positions.

Comparator Groups Used by Compensation Consultant for 2015 Compensation
Type of GroupCompanies in Group
A comparator group of 20 companies in the technology, telecommunications and entertainment industries selected by the consultant in consultation with the CommitteeApple, Boeing, Cisco Systems, Comcast, General Electric, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, IBM, Intel, Johnson Controls, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Oracle, Qualcomm, Time Warner Inc., Twenty-First Century Fox, United Technologies, Verizon Communications, Walt Disney

Largest 25 U.S. companies based on market capitalization, adjusted to eliminate AT&T as well as investment banking, investment holding/

management and privately owned companies

Amazon.com, Apple, Chevron, Coca-Cola, Comcast, Exxon Mobil, Facebook, General Electric, Gilead Sciences, Google, IBM, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Microsoft, Oracle, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Philip Morris International, Procter & Gamble, Qualcomm, Schlumberger, Verizon Communications, Wal-Mart, Walt Disney
Telecommunications and cable companiesCenturyLink, Comcast, Motorola Solutions, Sprint, Time Warner Inc., Verizon Communications

Executive officers’ base salaries are generally targeted to the market 50th percentile. With the support of the Committee’s consultant, total target cash compensation (the sum of base pay and short-term incentive target) and long-term grants are targeted to the market 62nd percentile. These pay targets emphasize our pay-for-performance strategy and are consistent with our market leadership position as one of the nation’s largest companies based on revenue and market capitalization.

In making the market value recommendations to present to the Committee, the consultant reviews both the proxy and the survey compensation data. The consultant applies his judgment and experience to this data in order to determine preliminary market value recommendations for each executive officer position. Prior to presenting the market values to the Committee, the consultant obtains input from members of management and the CEO (for officers other than the CEO) to obtain their views on the relative value of each position at AT&T and differences in responsibilities between AT&T jobs and those in the comparator groups. Based on this detailed analysis, AT&T-specific market values(AT&T Market Values) are presented to the Committee for each executive officer position. The AT&T Market Values are used as a reference point for the Committee’s determination of actual compensation levels and include components for base salary and short- and long-term incentive target awards.

Determining Target Compensation Levels

Annually, the Committee meets to set base salary and target short- and long-term incentive compensation levels for Executive Officers, with the advice of the consultant. In setting compensation levels, the Committee reviews the AT&T Market Values provided by the consultant along with the CEO’s compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. Once the Committee has received this input, they apply their judgment and experience to set compensation for the coming year. The Committee may determine that executives with significant experience and responsibilities, who demonstrate exemplary performance, have higher target compensation, while less experienced executives may have lower target compensation. To determine the compensation for the CEO, the Committee again uses its judgment of his skills, experience, responsibilities, achievements, and current compensation, along with the consultant’s AT&T Market Value recommendation.

46 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2015 Compensation

Base Salaries

ObjectiveKey Features and Pay for Performance
Provides fixed compensation to assume the day-to-day responsibilities of the position

•  Salary level recognizes an executive officer’s experience, skill, and performance, with the goal of being market-competitive.

•  Adjustments may be made based on individual performance, pay relative to other AT&T officers, and the employee’s pay relative to the market.

•  Represents 8% for the CEO and, on average, 12% for other executive officers’ total target compensation, in line with our objective to have the majority of pay at risk and tied to Company performance.

•  This element is payable in cash. The executive officers have the option to defer a portion into Company stock.

In 2015, the Named Executive Officers received a salary increase of 5.5%, on average.

Short-Term Incentives

ObjectiveKey Features and Pay for Performance
Motivates and rewards the achievement of short-term Company performance

•  Aligns executive officers’ interests with our short-term corporate strategy, and aligns pay with the achievement of short-term Company and/or business unit objectives.

•  To qualify for a payout, executive officers must achieve at least one of the predetermined performance thresholds, as shown below. These objectives support the accomplishment of long-term Company goals and emphasize overall results of the Company by establishing one set of performance targets.

•  Actual award payouts consider performance against these and other Company and business unit metrics as well as individual performance.

•  This element is payable in cash. The executive officers have the option to defer a portion into Company stock.

2015 Targets

Each year the Committee establishes a short-term target award for each executive officer. The key performance objectives adopted by the Committee include the three performance metrics and related target ranges shown in the following table. The Company must achieve results in at least one of the ranges for the executive officers to receive any portion of the target awards.

2015 MetricTarget ($)Target Range ($)Achievement ($) (2)
Consolidated Revenues161.0 billion120.8 – 185.2 billion147.1 billion
Earnings Per Share2.62 per share2.10 – 3.14 per share2.58 per share
Free Cash Flow (1)13.4 billion10.0 – 15.4 billion15.96 billion

1.Net cash from operating activities minus construction and capital expenditures.
2.In accordance with terms of the grant, results were adjusted as follows:
Consolidated Revenue results were increased by $314 million to remove the effect of a change in accounting principles;
EPS results were increased by $0.21 per share to remove the effect of gains and losses related to assets and liabilities of pension and medical plans, changes in accounting principles, as well as the dilutive impacts of merger and acquisition activity; and
Free Cash Flow results were increased by $90 million to remove the effects of merger and acquisition activity.

In determining the final payouts for short-term awards, the Committee considers the achievement of the three metrics, the overall performance of the Company, business unit performance, and the

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 47 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

individual performance of each executive officer. Under this program, payouts may range from 0% to 200% of the target award. In evaluating executive officers that report to the CEO, the Committee also gives weight to the CEO’s recommendations.

The following table compares short-term award payouts for the CEO to corporate formula-based awards paid to other employees for the award years 2008 – 2014. The Committee has historically tempered the CEO’s payout relative to payouts for other employees. On average, the CEO has received a payout that is 17 percentage points less than other employees in the past 8 years.

Award Year  CEO Payout  Non-Officer Corporate
Formula-Based  Payouts

2015

  100%  123%

2014

    82%    86%

2013

    94%    96%

2012

  120%  122%

2011

    75%  112%

2010

  100%  125%

2009

  121%  120%

2008

      0%    45%

Average:

    87%  104%

48 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2015 Payouts

The Committee determined that in 2015 the Company’s results were above or within the target ranges for each of the 2015 performance metrics, permitting payout of the short-term awards. The Committee then reviewed the Company’s accomplishments as shown on pages 37 to 39, business unit performance, and the individual achievements of each of the Named Executive Officers, as described below:

LOGO

RANDALL L. STEPHENSON

Chairman, CEO, and President, AT&T Inc.

2015 Accomplishments:

• Through key acquisitions and continued network investments, established AT&T’s leadership as the premier integrated communications company in the world – able to deliver growth through a unique set of assets across networks, geographies, products, and revenue streams

• Acquired DIRECTV, making AT&T the largest pay-TV provider in the U.S. and the world; combined with AT&T’s nationwide mobility business and high-speed Internet service to 57 million U.S. locations, DIRECTV gives AT&T assets like no one else and the opportunity to provide customers unique integrated video, mobile and broadband solutions

• Acquired Iusacell and Nextel Mexico, giving AT&T access to the Mexican wireless market and the ability to build a unique, seamless, cross-border North American 4G LTE wireless network covering 355 million people and businesses in the U.S. and Mexico

• Acquired a near-nationwide block of spectrum in the U.S. government’s auction of wireless airwaves, enhancing AT&T’s industry-best portfolio of this valuable resource

• Launched some of the industry’s most innovative security and on-demand bandwidth products for businesses—AT&T’s largest customer segment—and expanded the Company’s global leadership in connecting the Internet of Things

• Achieved low postpaid churn and best-ever, full-year wireless EBITDA service margins, and added prepaid mobility customers faster than any competitor

• Led the transformation of the network from hardware-based to a more efficient and flexible software-based platform, moving AT&T toward an industry-leading cost structure

• Grew revenues, expanded margins and increased earnings in one of the most transformative years in our Company’s history, all contributing to the Company’s 32nd consecutive annual quarterly dividend increase

• Achieved a 1-year Total Stockholder Return for 2015 of 8.3%, compared to 0.2% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 2.6% for the S&P 100, and 1.4% for the S&P 500

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 49 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

LOGO

JOHN J. STEPHENS

Senior Executive Vice President and CFO, AT&T Inc.

2015 Accomplishments:

• Through a relentless focus on operating efficiencies and growth, delivered a solid financial performance as the Company transformed its business, including:

¡   Growing revenues, expanding margins and increasing earnings

¡   Increased cash from operations helping drive free cash flow (cash from operating activities minus capital expenditures) of $15.9 billion, up 60% year over year even with $20 billion in capital expenditures, or $20.7 billion when including purchases in Mexico with favorable payment terms

• Achieved strong return to stockholders with a 1-year total stockholder return of 8.3%, almost six times the total return of the S&P 500

• Returned $10.2 billion to stockholders in 2015 through quarterly dividends; the Company increased its quarterly dividend 2.1% for an industry-leading 32nd consecutive annual increase

• Effectively managed AT&T’s capital structure through the closing of more than $67 billion of strategic M&A including DIRECTV, Iusacell, and Nextel Mexico, and the $18.2 billion purchase of a near-nationwide block of AWS spectrum in the U.S. Government’s auction of wireless airwaves

• Successfully managed the sale of more than $34 billion in long term-debt during the year, including a $17.5 billion issuance, which was the third largest corporate bond issuance on record

• Expanded the successful AT&T Next receivables securitization program to better balance working capital needs

• Streamlined internal operations and helped drive efficiencies through Project Agile, reducing cycle times and call volumes into customer care

LOGO

RAFAEL DE LA VEGA

Vice Chairman; AT&T Inc. and CEO, AT&T Business Solutions and AT&T International, LLC

2015 Accomplishments:

• Successfully combined AT&T Mobility and Business Solutions into one organization to deliver business customers integrated solutions that are first and foremost mobile, but also highly secure, reliable and effortless

• Launched some of the industry’s most innovative security and on-demand bandwidth products for businesses—AT&T’s largest segment—growing revenues from fixed strategic business services 12.9% year over year to an $11 billion annualized revenue stream

¡   Launched Network on Demand, the first commercial software-defined network platform, which lets customers add or change services in near real-time. AT&T Switched Ethernet on Demand is available in more than 170 cities in the United States and is used by more than 500 business customers around the world

¡   Expanded the highly secure AT&T NetBond cloud security service; the NetBond ecosystem includes 13 cloud providers with several hundred customer deals signed

• Delivered best-ever full-year wireless EBITDA service margins and retained AT&T’s high-value customers, delivering 1.09% total postpaid churn

¡   Ended 2015 with 129 million total U.S. wireless subscribers and net wireless customer additions including 1.7 million postpaid, 1.4 million prepaid, and 5.2 million connected devices (driven by 3.9 million connected cars)

• Successfully integrated Cricket, including freeing up wireless spectrum by shutting down its legacy CDMA network; led the wireless industry in prepaid net adds delivering 11.5 million subscribers and 1.4 million net adds

• Built AT&T’s global leadership position in the Internet of Things. AT&T now has a total of 26.2 million devices connected to its network

50 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

LOGO

JOHN DONOVAN

Chief Strategy Officer and Group President—AT&T Technology & Operations, AT&T Inc.

2015 Accomplishments:

• Completed one of the largest network build cycles in our Company’s history. AT&T’s Network now delivers high-speed broadband connectivity to customers through:

¡   An LTE network now covering 355 million people and businesses in North America with expectations to hit the 385 million mark by the end of 2016

¡   High-speed wired Internet covering more than 57 million people with a commitment to reach 14 million additional customer locations with fiber

¡   Continued the build for the AT&T GigaPowerSM footprint; now delivering speeds of up to 1 gig to over 1 million customer locations in 20 markets with plans to enter an additional 36 markets

• Managed ongoing operations for AT&T’s Network which carries more than 100 petabytes of data traffic—to nearly every country on the globe—on an average business day; AT&T also has highly efficient satellites capable of delivering HD and UltraHD to nearly 1 billion people throughout the U.S. and Latin America

• Led the industry in the transformation from proprietary hardware-based networks to software-defined networks, which offer a better cost structure for the Company along with faster network upgrades and reduced provisioning cycle times for customers

¡   AT&T expects to transform 75% of its network architecture by 2020

• Provided VoLTE coverage to 295 million Americans including more than 27 million active users

• Launched Wi-Fi Calling, Advanced Messaging, Video Calling and NumberSync—which allows subscribers to use one phone number across all their connected devices

• Deployed AT&T Integrated Cloud technology to 74 physical locations at which AT&T runs virtual network functions within its software-defined network architecture

LOGO

JOHN T. STANKEY

CEO—AT&T Entertainment Group, AT&T Services, Inc.

2015 Accomplishments:

• Acquired DIRECTV, making AT&T the largest pay-TV provider in the U.S. and the world with unparalleled video content distribution scale in the U.S. giving AT&T an unequaled opportunity to deliver integrated solutions across video, mobile, and broadband services

• In addition, AT&T acquired DIRECTV Latin America, which is a leading provider of pay-TV services in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, and parts of the Caribbean with approximately 19.6 million satellite subscribers including the Company’s interest in Sky Mexico

• Following the close of the DIRECTV acquisition, built the AT&T Entertainment Group organization, a $50 billion run rate business

¡   Introduced new integrated offers to market, and ensured that the Company is on track to meet or beat its $2.5 billion synergy target

• Led the industry in delivering video however and whenever customers want it with 25 million US video customers and 13.3 million IP broadband subscribers including business customers

¡   About one third of DIRECTV and AT&T U-verse TV customers used the Company’s mobile apps, website, or third party authentication to stream content in 2015

• Acquired Iusacell and Nextel Mexico, giving AT&T access to the Mexican wireless market and the ability to build a unique, seamless, cross-border North American wireless network covering 355 million people and businesses in the U.S. and Mexico.

• Began the turnaround of AT&T’s Mexico wireless business by developing a single set of products that extend throughout North America with a new level of sales and service quality; added 593,000 subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2015—reflecting significant progress in customer adoption and retention

• Acquired a near-nationwide block of spectrum in the U.S. Government’s auction of wireless airwaves, enhancing AT&T’s industry-best portfolio of this valuable resource

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 51 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on the Company achievements and the above accomplishments, the Committee determined to pay Named Executive Officers 100% – 132% of their respective target awards. Payouts of 2015 awards were as follows:

2015 Short-Term Payouts 
Name  Target Award ($)       Actual Award ($)     

Randall Stephenson

   5,500,000     5,500,000  

John Stephens

   1,740,000     2,100,000  

Rafael de la Vega

   1,820,000     2,100,000  

John Donovan

   1,520,000     2,000,000  

John Stankey

   1,830,000     2,100,000  

Long-Term Incentives

ObjectiveKey Features and Pay-for-Performance

Motivates and

rewards the achievement of

long-term Company performance

•The goal of our long-term program is to align executive and stockholder interests.

•Awards for all officers consist of restricted stock units and performance shares, each representing approximately 50% of the grant value of long-term compensation.

Performance Shares

•Paid in cash at the end of a three-year performance period to the extent applicable performance goals are met.

•Awards pay out at target if performance goals are met, below target or not at all if the goals are not met, and above target if the goals are exceeded.

•Each performance share is equal in value to a share of stock, which causes the value of the award to fluctuate directly with changes in our stock price over the performance period.

•The cash payment value of the performance shares is based on AT&T’s stock price on the date an award payout is approved.

•Because awards are based on a three-year performance period, they maximize the leverage of both short- and long-term performance. The impact of a single year’s performance is felt in each of the three performance share grants that are outstanding at any given time, so that strong performance must be sustained every year in order to provide favorable payouts.

•Dividend equivalents are paid at the end of the performance period, based on the number of performance shares earned.

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

•We structure RSUs to be paid in stock at the end of a retention period, regardless of when they vest. RSUs vest 100% after four years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier.

•Through stock price and dividends, RSUs directly tie our officers’ interests to the long-term interests of our stockholders.

•Although RSUs have value at grant, in order for them to retain value or increase in value, officers must execute at a high level to drive stockholder returns.

Because AT&T values long-term performance, and to ensure that our compensation program does not incent executives to take excessive risks in pursuit of short-term results, long-term incentives are a significant part of an officer’s compensation package.

52 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2015 Grants

In 2015, the Committee granted the Named Executive Officers long-term incentives in the form of 50% performance shares and 50% restricted stock units. Target grant values were set using the AT&T Market Values as a guideline. Following is more detail on our 2015 long-term grants.

Performance Shares

The performance shares granted in 2015 are for the 2015-2017 performance period. The Committee determined that the performance measure for 75% of the Performance Shares would be Return on Invested Capital and the measure for the remaining 25% would be based on a comparison of AT&T’s Total Stockholder Return to the Standard and Poor’s 100 Index (S&P 100).

2015 Performance Share Grants

(2015 to 2017 Performance Period)

Performance Measure
Name

Target Grant Values ($)

(amounts are rounded)

AT&T Return on

Invested Capital

AT&T Total

Stockholder Return

vs. S&P 100

Randall Stephenson

7,375,000

John Stephens

2,350,000

Rafael de la Vega

2,662,50075% of Grant25% of Grant

John Donovan

1,950,000

John Stankey

2,662,500

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Performance Measure

We chose ROIC as the primary performance metric applicable to performance share grants for a number of reasons, including the fact that it is a prevalent market practice that encourages our managers to focus not only on net income but also on effectively employing capital and creating stockholder value.

We calculate ROIC by averaging over the three-year performance period: (1) our annual net income plus after-tax interest expense, divided by (2) the total of the average debt and average stockholder equity for the relevant year. For mergers and acquisitions over $2.0 billion, we exclude the dilutive impacts of intangible amortization, asset write-offs, accelerated depreciation, and transaction and restructuring costs so that the impact of certain significant transactions, including those which may not have been contemplated in the determination of a performance metric, will not have an impact on the performance results. We also exclude the net impact of certain of the following items after taxes and available collectible insurance, if they exceed $500 million in a calendar year and satisfy other conditions: changes in tax laws, changes in accounting principles, expenses caused by natural disasters or intentionally caused damage to the Company’s property, and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets and fixed assets. Additionally, we disregard the net dilutive impact of mandatory changes resulting from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 as well as gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans (and associated tax effects).

At the end of the performance period, the number of performance shares to be paid out, if any, will be determined by comparing the actual performance of the Company against the predetermined performance objectives, which are set forth as a range of results. The ROIC target range for the 2015-2017 performance period was set above our cost of capital; a target that we believe to be challenging, but attainable. For performance above or below the performance target range, the number of performance shares are increased or reduced, respectively. Potential payouts range from 0% to 150% of the number of performance shares granted.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 53 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Total Stockholder Return (TSR) Performance Measure

The TSR measure compares AT&T’s TSR (stock appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends) to that of companies in the S&P 100. We believe that TSR is an important measure because it helps ensure that our executives remain focused on the value they are delivering to our stockholders.

The following chart shows the potential payouts based on AT&T’s TSR relative to companies in the S&P 100. In order to further align our executive officer pay with stockholder interests, if AT&T’s TSR is negative, the payout percentage is capped at 90%.

AT&T Total Stockholder Return Compared to the S&P 100

(2015 – 2017 Performance Period)

RankingPayout Percentage

AT&T is the top company

200%

AT&T in 82 – 99.99th percentile

150%

AT&T in 63 – 81.99th percentile

125%

AT&T in 44 – 62.99th percentile

100%

AT&T in 25 – 43.99th percentile

  50%

AT&T is below the 25th percentile

    0%

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units granted in 2015 vest 100% after four years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier, but do not pay out until the scheduled distribution date. These units receive quarterly dividend equivalents, paid in cash at the time regular dividends are paid on AT&T’s stock. Restricted stock units pay 100% in stock to further tie executive and stockholder interests.

The following table shows restricted stock unit grants made to the Named Executive Officers in 2015:

2015 Restricted Stock Unit Grants
Name

Grant Date Values ($)

(amounts are rounded)

Randall Stephenson

7,375,000

John Stephens

2,350,000

Rafael de la Vega

2,662,500

John Donovan

1,950,000

John Stankey

2,662,500

Performance Share Payouts – Realized Pay for the 2013-2015 Performance Period

The performance measure applicable to 75% of the 2013 performance share grants was ROIC. The performance measure for the other 25% of the grant was AT&T’s TSR, measured against the 100 companies that comprise the S&P 100 Index at the end of the performance period.

Return on Invested Capital Performance Metric

For the 2013-2015 performance period, the Committee established ROIC performance objectives, with the target range (which would result in a 100% payout) set at 6.75% to 8.25%. The threshold for the target range was set so that it exceeded our cost of capital by 75 basis points that we determined based on input from banks, ensuring a reasonable return is delivered to stockholders before executive officers are eligible for the target award. The number of performance shares tied to the ROIC performance metric are paid out at the target award level if the Company performs within the performance goal range. Achievement above the target range provides for higher levels of award payout, up to a maximum payout of 150% of the performance

54 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

shares granted. Achievement below the target range results in decreasing levels of award payout, down to 0% of the performance shares granted if less than 67% of the low end of the ROIC target range is achieved.

Total Stockholder Return Performance Metric

For the 2013-2015 performance period, the Committee established the following relative TSR payout table:

AT&T Total Stockholder Return Compared to the S&P 100

(2013 – 2015 Performance Period)

RankingPayout Percentage

AT&T is the top company

200%

AT&T in 82 – 99.99th percentile

150%

AT&T in 63 – 81.99th percentile

125%

AT&T in 44 – 62.99th percentile

100%

AT&T in 25 – 43.99th percentile

50%

AT&T is below the 25th percentile

0%

The payout of the performance shares that are subject to TSR will be capped at 90% if AT&T’s TSR is negative (applies to performance at the 44th percentile or higher).

Performance Attainment

After conclusion of the performance period, the Committee determined, using the payout table established at the beginning of the performance period that the Company achieved a 9.1% return on invested capital, which was above the ROIC target range, and 310 basis points above the cost of capital we establish based on input from banks, and directed that 109% of the related performance shares be distributed. In accordance with the terms of the grant, the following items were excluded: merger related non-cash activities, the impacts from the implementation of federal health care reform legislation, non-cash accounting writedowns of goodwill and other intangible assets, losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans.

Using the TSR payout table, the Committee determined that AT&T’s relative TSR performance did not qualify for a payout for the portion of the awards tied to TSR.

As shown below, the number of performance shares actually paid was 82% of the target number of shares, based on combined performance results for ROIC and TSR. The realized value of executive officer long-term compensation also includes the impact of changes in stock price (which also impacts our stockholders), making the final value of the performance share payout equal to 84% of the target grant value.

2013 Performance Share Grant and Payout Values

(Half of the Long-Term Granted to Executive Officers in 2013)

Name 

   Performance   

Measure(s)

 Value at
   Grant ($)   
 

   Performance   

Payout %

 % Change in
   Stock Price (1)   
 

Value at

   Payout ($)   

     Approx. % of Grant   
Value Realized

Stephenson

 

75% ROIC

25% TSR

 6,825,000 82% 2%  5,715,538   84%

Stephens

  1,910,000    1,599,519   

de la Vega

  2,362,500    1,978,443   

Donovan

  1,250,000    1,046,806   

Stankey

  2,362,500    1,978,443   

1.From the date of grant (January 31, 2013) through the date the distribution was approved (January 28, 2016).

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 55 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following table compares performance share award payouts for the CEO to awards paid to other employees for the award years 2008-2013. As the results show, the NEOs (including the CEO) have received, on average, award payouts that are 21 percentage points lower than other performance share recipients.

Grant Year  NEO Payout (ROIC and
Relative TSR)
  Other Employee Payout
(ROIC Only)

2013 (paid 2016)

  82%  109%

2012 (paid 2015)

  85%  113%

2011 (paid 2014)

  75%  100%

2010 (paid 2013)

  110%  120%

2009 (paid 2012)

  96%  119%

2008 (paid 2011)

  88%  100%

Average

  89%  110%

Restricted Stock Unit Payouts

The restricted stock units that were granted to executive officers in 2012 vested in 2016 (or at the executive officer’s earlier retirement eligibility). These restricted stock units paid out in stock in January of 2016.

Benefits

Benefits are an important tool to maintain the market competitiveness of our overall compensation package. AT&T provides personal benefits to its executive officers for three main reasons:

1.To effectively compete for talent: The majority of companies against which AT&T competes for talent provide benefits to their executive officers. AT&T must have a program that is robust and competitive enough to attract and retain key talent.

2.To support executive officers in meeting the needs of the business: We require the around-the-clock commitment and availability of our executive officers. Therefore, we provide benefits that allow the Company to have greater access to our executive officers. These benefits should not be measured solely in terms of any incremental financial cost, but rather the value they bring to the Company through maximized productivity and availability of our executive officers.

3.To provide for the safety, security, and personal health of executives: Our executive officers are charged to care for the long-term health of the Company. In order to facilitate them doing so, we provide certain personal benefits to provide for their safety and personal health.

These benefits are outlined below. We continue to evaluate our benefits based on needs of the business and market practices/trends.

Deferral Opportunities

Tax-qualified 401(k) Plans

Our plans offer substantially all employees, including each of the Named Executive Officers, the opportunity to defer income and, at the same time, invest in AT&T stock. We match 80% of employee contributions, limited to the first 6% of compensation (only base salary is matched for officers). DIRECTV employees are covered by the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan, which is substantially equivalent to the AT&T plans in the aggregate. Employees hired on or after January 1, 2015, (other than DIRECTV employees), do not receive a pension, and to account for the lack of a pension benefit, we match 100% of the eligible contributions for these employees.

56 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Nonqualified Plans

We provide mid-level and above managers the opportunity for tax-advantaged savings through nonqualified plans. We use our principal nonqualified deferral plan as a way to encourage our managers to invest in and hold AT&T stock on a tax-deferred basis.

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan: This is our principal nonqualified deferral program. Under this plan, mid-level managers and above may annually elect to defer, through payroll deductions, up to 30% of their salary and annual bonus (officers, including the Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 95% of their short-term award, which is similar to, and paid in lieu of, the annual bonus paid to other management employees) to purchase AT&T deferred share units at fair market value on a tax-deferred basis. Participants receive a 20% match on their deferrals in the form of additional deferred share units. Participants also receive “makeup” matching deferred share units to replace the match that is not available in the 401(k) because of their participation in AT&T’s nonqualified deferral plans or because they exceeded the IRS compensation limits for 401(k) plans. Officers do not receive the makeup match on the contribution of their short-term awards.

Cash Deferral Plan: Through this plan, eligible managers may also defer cash compensation in the form of salaries and bonuses. The plan pays interest at the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average, reset annually, which is a common index used by companies for deferral plans. The SEC requires disclosure in the “Summary Compensation Table” of any earnings on deferred compensation that exceed an amount set by the SEC.

These plans are described more fully on page 72.

Pension Benefits

We offer a tax-qualified group pension plan to substantially all our managers. However, new management hires on or after January 1, 2015 (other than DIRECTV employees), who would otherwise be eligible to participate in the pension plan will instead receive an enhanced match in the 401(k) plan.

We also provide supplemental retirement benefits under nonqualified pension plans, or SERPs, to employees who became officers before 2009. Additional information on pension benefits, including these plans, maybe found beginning on page 67, following the “Pension Benefits” table.

Personal Benefits

We provide our executive officers with other limited and market-based personal benefits, including automobile benefits, which are a common recruiting and retention tool; Company-owned club memberships (in some cases we allow personal use, but do not pay country club fees or dues for executive officers), which afford our executives the opportunity to conduct business in a more informal environment; home security for the safety and security of our executives; tax preparation, estate planning, and financial counseling, which allow our executives to focus more on business responsibilities; and executive disability benefits. The financial counseling benefit provides financial counselors to executives, which helps the Company by ensuring that our executives understand and comply with plan requirements. We also provide our executives communications, broadband/TV and related products and services, which are offered by AT&T at little or no incremental cost.

The CEO is required to reimburse the incremental Company cost of personal usage of Company aircraft. Other executive officers are also required to reimburse the incremental cost of their personal usage unless the CEO decides otherwise on a case-by-case basis. Reimbursements will not be made where prohibited by law. We also provide executive death benefits. More information on death benefits may be found beginning on page 70.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 57 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Officers promoted or hired after March 23, 2010, are eligible for an annual executive physical, subject to certain limits. We provide other officers, including our current executive officers, with a supplemental health plan for which they pay a portion of the premiums. The plan acts in conjunction with the Company’s management health plan, a consumer-driven plan that encourages all employees to be cost-conscious consumers of health care services.

Certain of these benefits are also offered as post-retirement benefits to officers who meet age and service requirements. Additional information on these post-retirement benefits can be found beginning on page 70.

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for all officers, as follows. We include vested shares held in Company benefit plans in determining attainment of these guidelines.

LevelOwnership Guideline

CEO

6X Base Salary

Executive Officers

Lesser of 3X Base Salary or 50,000 Shares

Other Officers

Lesser of 1X Base Salary or 25,000 Shares

All Officers are given 5 years from assuming their position to achieve compliance.

Holdings of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2015, can be found in the “Common Stock Ownership” section on page 5. As of December 31, 2015, Randall Stephenson held 1,333,729 vested shares of AT&T stock, a multiple of 26 times his base salary, well exceeding his 6X requirement. In addition, Mr. Stephenson also holds 824,170 shares of vested Restricted Stock Units which are still subject to a retention period, making his total vested shares a multiple of 42 times his base pay.

Retention of Awards

Executive officers are required to hold 25% of the AT&T shares they receive (after taxes and exercise costs) from an incentive, equity, or option award granted to them after January 1, 2012, until one year after they leave the Company.

Hedging Policy

Executive officers are prohibited from hedging their AT&T stock and awards. The prohibition will continue to apply to stock issued from Company awards for one year after they leave the Company.

58 | www.att.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Limit on Deductibility of Certain Compensation

Federal income tax law prohibits publicly held companies, such as AT&T, from deducting certain compensation paid to a Named Executive Officer that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. To the extent that compensation is based upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Committee pursuant to plans approved by the stockholders, the compensation is not included in the limit. The Committee intends, to the extent feasible and where it believes it is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders, to attempt to qualify executive compensation as tax deductible where it does not adversely affect the Committee’s development and execution of effective compensation plans. For example, to enable short- and long-term compensation to be deductible, the Committee strives to make these awards under stockholder-approved incentive plans.

Similarly, gains on stock option exercises may be deductible if granted under a stockholder-approved plan since they are tied to the performance of the Company’s stock price. Salaries and other compensation that are not tied to performance are not deductible to the extent they exceed the $1 million limit.

Clawback Policy

The Company intends, in appropriate circumstances, to seek restitution of any bonus, commission, or other compensation received by an employee as a result of such employee’s intentional or knowing fraudulent or illegal conduct, including the making of a material misrepresentation contained in the Company’s financial statements.

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Severance Plan

We have employment contracts with Messrs. de la Vega and Stankey. The material provisions of these contracts are discussed on pages 65-66.

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the Change in Control Severance Plan, which is more fully described on pages 73-74. We believe this type of plan is necessary to ensure that participants receive certain double-trigger benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company, and to allow the participating officers to focus on their duties during an acquisition. The plan is not intended to replace other compensation elements.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 59 |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Consultant

The Committee is authorized by its charter to employ independent compensation consultants and other advisors. The Committee has selected Total Rewards Strategies to serve as its independent consultant. The consultant reports directly to the Committee. Total Rewards Strategies provides no other services to AT&T.

The Committee reviewed the following six independence factors, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, when evaluating the consultant’s independence:

Other services provided to the Company
Percentage of the consultant’s revenues paid by the Company
Consultant’s policies to prevent conflicts of interest
Other relationships with compensation committee members
Company stock owned by the consultant
Other relationships with executive officers

Based on its evaluation of the consultant and the six factors listed above, the Committee has determined that its consultant meets the criteria for independence.

Following is a description of the consultant’s duties:

Attends all Committee meetings;
Provides information, research, and analysis pertaining to executive compensation and benefits;
Regularly updates the Committee on market trends, changing practices, and legislation pertaining to executive compensation and benefits;
Reviews the Company’s executive compensation strategy and program to ensure appropriateness and market-competitiveness;
Makes recommendations on the design of the compensation program and the balance of pay-for-performance elements;
Reviews market data and makes recommendations for establishing the market rates for jobs held by senior leaders;
Analyzes compensation from other companies’ proxy and financial statements for the Committee’s review when making compensation decisions;
Assists the Committee in making pay determinations for the Chief Executive Officer; and
Advises the Committee on the appropriate comparator groups for compensation and benefits as well as the appropriate peer group against which to measure long-term performance.

60 | www.att.com


Executive Compensation Tables

Executive Compensation Tables

The table below contains information concerning the compensation provided to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of AT&T (theNamed Executive Officers). Compensation information is provided for the years each person in the table was a Named Executive Officer since 2010.2013.

 

Summary Compensation Table 
                            

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  

Salary (2)

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock

Awards (3)

($)

  

Option

Awards (3)

($)

  

Non-

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compen-

sation (2)

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (4)

($)

  

All Other

Compen-

sation
(5)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

R. Stephenson (1)

Chairman, CEO

and President

  2012    1,550,000    0    12,586,590    0    6,060,000    1,234,805    803,308    22,234,703  
  2011    1,550,000    0    12,749,979    45,543    3,787,500    3,329,959    555,353    22,018,334  
  2010    1,533,333    0    12,749,977    494,731    5,050,000    7,096,177    417,410    27,341,628  

J. Stephens

Sr. Exec. Vice

Pres. and CFO

  2012    675,000    0    3,277,459    2,769    1,650,000    3,156,095    307,415    9,068,738  
  2011    614,167    0    1,561,534    79,131    681,250    1,498,090    171,523    4,605,695  

R. de la Vega

Pres. and CEO,

AT&T Mobility

  2012    872,500    0    4,417,625    1,246    1,974,000    4,488,817    172,141    11,926,329  
  2011    854,167    0    4,350,023    39,438    1,600,000    2,925,527    129,387    9,898,542  
  2010    820,833    0    4,000,024    36,513    1,700,000    4,240,450    96,850    10,894,670  

J. Stankey

Group Pres. and

Chief Strategy Officer

  2012    872,500    0    4,417,625    0    2,000,000    5,470,375    221,508    12,982,008  
  2011    857,500    0    4,350,023    3,610    1,600,000    4,445,904    202,922    11,459,959  
  2010    842,500    0    4,350,024    5,596    1,475,000    2,439,970    387,242    9,500,332  

W. Watts

Sr. Exec. VP

and General

Counsel

  2012    762,500    0    3,405,785    0    1,578,000    1,679,803    254,260    7,680,348  
  2011    745,000    0    3,400,017    7,672    1,020,000    3,125,160    207,524    8,505,373  
  2010    706,667    0    4,000,024    10,996    1,570,000    2,748,351    208,776    9,244,814  
Summary Compensation Table 
Name and
Principal Position
 Year  

Salary (1)

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock

Awards (2)

($)

  

Option

Awards

($)

  

Non-

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compen-

sation (1)

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (3)

($)

  

All Other

Compen-

sation (4)

($)

   

Total

($)

 
R. Stephenson  2015    1,741,667    0    14,623,014    0    5,500,000    2,728,138    553,095     25,145,914  
Chairman, CEO      2014    1,691,667    0    14,248,893    0    4,350,000    3,206,277    487,478     23,984,315  
and President  2013    1,633,333    0    13,441,558    0    5,000,000    2,650,073    522,203     23,247,167  
J. Stephens  2015    837,500    0    4,659,568    0    2,100,000    1,565,671    435,942     9,598,681  
Sr. Exec. Vice  2014    765,833    0    4,294,312    0    1,425,000    3,733,775    492,177     10,711,097  
Pres. and CFO  2013    713,333    0    3,761,679    0    1,500,000    1,413,393    484,681     7,873,086  
R. de la Vega  2015    940,000    0    5,279,175    0    2,100,000    1,334,308    433,219     10,086,702  
Vice Chairman,  2014    911,667    0    7,099,287    0    1,425,000    178,814    459,479     10,074,247  
AT&T Inc. and  2013    891,667    0    4,652,818    0    1,560,000    1,193,413    506,210     8,804,108  
CEO, AT&T           
Business Solutions           
and AT&T           
International, LLC           
J. Donovan  2015    808,333    0    4,871,764    0    2,000,000    1,817,204    241,105     9,738,406  
Chief Strategy           
Officer and Group           
President-AT&T           
Technology &           

Operations

           
J. Stankey  2015    941,667    0    5,279,175    0    2,100,000    1,501,718    218,250     10,040,810  
CEO-AT&T  2014    920,000    0    5,085,374    0    1,665,000    2,301,109    218,680     10,190,163  
Entertainment  2013    891,667    0    4,652,818    0    1,695,000    183,197    239,898     7,662,580  
Group                                     

 

1.Mr. Stephenson did not receive a salary increase in 2011 or 2012. The difference in salaries for 2010 and 2011 results from Mr. Stephenson’s 2010 salary increase being effective March 1st. The 2010 amount represents 2 months of the 2009 salary rate and 10 months of the 2010 salary rate.

2.Each of the Named Executive Officers deferred portions of their 20122015 salary and/or non-equity incentive awards into the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan to make monthly purchases of Company stock in the form of stock units based on the price of the underlying AT&T stock as follows: Mr. Stephenson—$465,000,5,746,875, Mr. Stephens—$1,769,625,2,245,313, Mr. de la Vega—$2,136,863,2,101,625, Mr. Donovan—$241,250, Mr. Stankey—$52,313, and Mr. Watts—$114,281.56,450. Each unit that the employee purchases is paid out in the form of a share of AT&T stock at the time elected by the employee, along with certainapplicable matching shares. The value of the matching contributions made during the relevant year is included under “All Other Compensation.” A description of the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan may be found on pages 72 and 73.page 72.

3.2.RepresentsAmounts in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date valuationvalues of the awards underperformance shares, restricted stock, and restricted stock units granted in 2015. The grant date values were determined pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used for determining the value of the stock and option awards reported in these columns are set forth in the relevant AT&T Annual Report to Stockholders in Note 1213 to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Share-Based Payment.Payments. Options were issued under the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan in connection with reinvested dividends paid on 2011 share unit deferrals. Options are not currently offered under the plan. The plan is described on pages 72 and 73.

Included in the Stock Awards column are the grant date values of performance shares and restricted stock units granted in 2012. The grant date values of the performance shares (which approximate the target awards) included in the table for 20122015 were: Mr. Stephenson—$6,211,578,7,248,016, Mr. Stephens—$1,617,451,2,309,553, Mr. de la Vega—$2,180,131,2,616,666, Mr. Donovan—$1,916,437, and Mr. Stankey—$2,180,131, and Mr. Watts—$1,680,781.2,616,666. The number of performance shares distributed at the end of the performance period is dependent upon the achievement of performance goals. Depending upon such achievement, the potential payouts

AT&T – Page 60


run range from 0% of the target number of performance shares to a maximum payout of 162.5% of the target number of performance shares. The value of the awards (performance shares, restricted stock, and restricted stock)stock units) will be further affected by the price of AT&T stock at the time of distribution.

4.3.Under this column, we report earnings on deferrals of salary and incentive awards to the extent the earnings exceed a market rate specified by SEC rules. For the Named Executive Officers, these amounts are as follows for 2012:2015: Mr. Stephenson—$11,145,170,269, Mr. Stephens—$0, Mr. de la Vega—$87,684,162,571, Mr. Donovan—$24,505, and Mr. Stankey—$1,096, and Mr. Watts—$1,008. All other1,987. Other amounts reported under this heading represent an increase, if any, in pension actuarial value during the reporting period. We are required to calculate this amount by using the same discount rate assumption used for financial reporting purposes. A portion of the increase in pension actuarial values reported for 2012 in this column was the result of a reduction in the assumed discount rate from 5.3% to 4.3%. Approximately 13% of Mr. Stephenson’s increase, and from 15% to 52% of the other Named Executive Officers’ increases in pension value, resulted from this adjustment. The increase in pension actuarial value for each executive (and the corresponding estimated increase attributable to the reduction in the discount rate) was: Mr. Stephenson—$1,223,660 ($152,996), Mr. Stephens—$3,156,095 ($1,127,586), Mr. de la Vega—$4,401,133 ($183,655), Mr. Stankey—$5,469,279 ($2,847,503), and Mr. Watts—$1,678,795 ($151,824).

 

5.
AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 61 |


Executive Compensation Tables

4.This column includes personal benefits, Company-paid life insurance premiums, and Company matching contributions to deferral plans for 2012.2015. AT&T does not provide tax reimbursements to executive officers for these benefits. In valuing personal benefits, AT&T uses the incremental cost to the Company of the benefit. To determine the incremental cost of aircraft usage, we multiply the number of hours of personal flight usage (including “deadhead” flights) by the hourly cost of fuel (Company average) and the hourly cost of maintenance (where such cost is based on hours of use), and we add per flight fees such as landing, ramp and hangar fees, catering, and crew travel costs. Beginning with travel in 2013, Mr. Stephenson reimburses the Company for the incremental cost of any personal use of Company aircraft.

 

    The aggregate incremental cost of personal benefits in 20122015 provided to the Named Executive Officers was: Mr. Stephenson—$457,409,142,528, Mr. Stephens—$55,436,54,256, Mr. de la Vega—$44,813,61,084, Mr. Stankey—$87,141,74,269, and Mr. Watts—Donovan—$81,651.76,838. Included in the above personal benefits amounts are (1) financial counseling, including tax preparation and estate planning: Mr. Stephenson—$20,192,planning for each of Messrs. Stephens and Stankey—$24,000, and each of Messrs.Stephenson, de la Vega, Donovan and Watts—Stankey—$14,000, and for Mr. Stephens—$11,500; (2) auto benefits: Mr. Stephenson—$27,359,26,310, Mr. Stephens—$15,719,16,343, Mr. de la Vega—$14,723,19,366, Mr. Donovan—$14,412 and Mr. Stankey—$15,143, and Mr. Watts—$19,145,15,474; (3) personal use of companyCompany aircraft: Mr. Stephenson—$276,391, Mr. Stephens—$0, Mr.for each of Messrs. Stephenson, Stephens, and de la Vega—$0, Mr. Stankey—Donovan—$30,687,25,254, and Mr. Watts—Stankey—$5,882,16,759; (4) supplemental health insurance premiums: for each of Messrs. Stephenson and de la Vega—$12,936,22,416, and for each of Messrs. Stephens, StankeyDonovan, and Watts—Stankey—$12,300,21,468; (5) club memberships: Mr. Stephenson—$4,081, each of Messrs Stephens and de la Vega—$0, and2,767, for each of Messrs. StankeyStephens, de la Vega and Watts—Donovan—$2,533,0, and Mr. Stankey—$2,728; (6) communications: Mr. Stephenson—$14,527,19,229, Mr. Stephens—$937,2,368, Mr. de la Vega—$2,448,4,298, Mr. Donovan—$1,360, and Mr. Stankey—$1,751, and Mr. Watts—$20,369,2,502; and (7) home security: Mr. Stephenson—$101,923,57,806, Mr. Stephens—$2,480,2,427, Mr. de la Vega—$706,1,004, Mr. Donovan—$344, and Mr. Stankey—$727, and Mr. Watts—$7,422.888. Also included in the aggregate incremental cost of personal benefits is the value of sports and/or entertainment event tickets, if any, provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

    Company-paid premiums on supplemental life insurance in 20122015 were: Mr. Stephenson—$178,707,222,979, Mr. Stephens—$49,776,20,823, Mr. de la Vega—$13,965,0, Mr. Donovan—$77,738, Mr. Stankey—$82,215, and Mr. Watts—$113,512.87,531.

 

    The Company provides a matching contribution in the 401(k) plan and certain “makeup” matching contributions in the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan, the latter plan is discussed in detail on pages 72 and 73.page 72. Total matching contributions in 20122015 were: Mr. Stephenson—$167,192,187,588, Mr. Stephens—$202,203,360,863, Mr. de la Vega—$113,363,372,135, Mr. Donovan—$86,529, Mr. Stankey—$52,152, and Mr. Watts—$59,097.56,450.

 

AT&T – Page 61


Grants of Plan-Based AwardsGrants of Plan-Based Awards Grants of Plan-Based Awards 
                       
Name 

Grant

Date

  

Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (2)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

         Grant Date   Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (1)

  

  

  

  

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (2)

  

  

  

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(3)

(#)

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  

 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)

 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  

 

 

 
 

 

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option
Awards

($)

  

  

  

  
  

  

 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

  

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(3)

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(4)

(#)

  

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards

($)

   

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

     

Stephenson

  1/26/12    0    5,050,000    10,100,000    108,235    216,469    351,762    216,469            12,586,590    01/29/2015   0  5,500,000    11,000,000    111,878    223,756    363,604    223,756        14,623,014  

Stephens

  1/26/12    0    1,375,000    2,750,000    28,184    56,367    91,596    56,367            3,277,459    01/29/2015   0  1,740,000    3,480,000    35,650    71,299    115,861    71,299       4,659,568  
  2/15/12                                2,373    29.87    2,769  

de la Vega

  1/26/12    0    1,645,000    3,290,000    37,988    75,976    123,461    75,976            4,417,625    01/29/2015   0  1,820,000    3,640,000    40,390    80,780    131,268    80,780       5,279,175  

Donovan

  01/29/2015   0  1,520,000    3,040,000    29,582    59,163    96,140    59,163       3,866,450  
  2/15/12                                1,068    29.87    1,246    12/17/2015             29,542(4)      1,005,314  

Stankey

  1/26/12    0    1,645,000    3,290,000    37,988    75,976    123,461    75,976            4,417,625    01/29/2015   0  1,830,000    3,660,000    40,390    80,780    131,268    80,780        5,279,175  

Watts

  1/26/12    0    1,315,000    2,630,000    29,287    58,574    95,183    58,574            3,405,785  

 

1.Under these awards (discussed beginning on page 50)47), the Committee establishes a target award together with a maximum award equaling 200% of the target award. If the performance conditionrequirement is met, the Committee reviews the overall performance of the Company (including the three key measures), business unit results, and the individual performance of each officer to determine the appropriate payouts, not to exceed the maximum award. If the performance conditionrequirement is not met, no award may be paid.

2.Represents performance share awards, discussed beginning on page 54.53.

3.RepresentsUnless otherwise noted, represents restricted stock unit grants, discussed beginning on page 55.54. The 20122015 units are scheduled to vest and distribute in January 2016. Additionally, units2019. Units will also vest upon an employee becoming retirement eligible, but doeligible; however, they are not distributedistributed until the establishedscheduled distribution date. Messrs. Stephenson, de la Vega, Stephens and WattsStankey were retirement eligible as of the grant date. Mr. StankeyDonovan became retirement eligible on September 22, 2015.
4.Represents a restricted stock grant that vests in December 19, 2012. Mr. Stephens is not retirement eligible.2020.

 

4.62 | www.att.com


RepresentsExecutive Compensation Tables

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015 
   Option Awards (1)  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexer-

cisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not

Vested

(2)

(#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(2)

($)

  

Equity
Incentive

Plans
Awards:

Number
of

Unearned

Shares,
Units

or Other
Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

(3)

(#)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plans
Awards:
Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not

Vested

(3)

($)

 
Stephenson  15,102        37.23    2/15/17       
   98,764        40.28    6/15/17       
   14,720        37.88    2/15/18       
   230,102        36.17    6/16/18       
   30,472        23.22    2/17/19       
   14,627        24.63    6/15/19       
   20,664        25.32    2/16/20       
   379,336        25.54    6/15/20       
   29,345        28.24    2/15/21       
2014-2016 Perf. Shares              353,260    12,155,677  
2015-2017 Perf. Shares                          195,787    6,737,031  
Stephens  4,026        37.23    2/15/17       
   14,589        40.28    6/15/17       
   3,348        37.88    2/15/18       
   16,241        36.17    6/16/18       
   6,656        23.22    2/17/19       
   16,973        24.63    6/15/19       
   8,454        25.32    2/16/20       
   38,069        25.54    6/15/20       
   9,730        28.24    2/15/21       
   39,919        30.35    6/15/21       
   2,373        29.87    2/15/22       

2014-2016 Perf. Shares

              106,465    3,663,461  

2015-2017 Perf. Shares

                          62,387    2,146,737  
de la Vega  12,397        24.63    6/15/19       
   6,251        25.32    2/16/20       
   22,160        25.54    6/15/20       
   6,838        28.24    2/15/21       
   17,971        30.35    6/15/21       
   1,068        29.87    2/15/22       

2014-2016 Perf. Shares

              126,077    4,338,310  

2015-2017 Perf. Shares

              70,683    2,432,202  

2014 Restricted Stock

                  57,971    1,994,782          
Donovan  908        24.63    6/15/19       
   1,283        25.32    2/16/20       
   914        25.54    6/15/20       
   1,301        28.24    2/15/21       

2014-2016 Perf. Shares

              76,742    2,640,692  

2015-2017 Perf. Shares

              51,768    1,781,337  

2014 Restricted Stock

      56,673    1,950,118          

2015 Restricted Stock

                  29,542    1,016,540          

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 63 |


Executive Compensation Tables

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015 
   Option Awards (1)  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexer-

cisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not

Vested

(2)

(#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(2)

($)

  

Equity
Incentive

Plans
Awards:

Number
of

Unearned

Shares,
Units

or Other
Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

(3)

(#)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plans
Awards:
Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not

Vested

(3)

($)

 
Stankey  1,337        37.23    2/15/17       
   794        40.28    6/15/17       
   1,234        37.88    2/15/18       
   1,073        36.17    6/16/18       
   2,073        23.22    2/17/19       
   1,675        24.63    6/15/19       
   2,366        25.32    2/16/20       
   1,658        25.54    6/15/20       
   2,326        28.24    2/15/21       

2014-2016 Perf. Shares

              126,077    4,338,310  

2015-2017 Perf. Shares

                          70,683    2,432,202  

1.Stock options were granted based upon the amount of stock options grantedpurchased by mid-level and above managers under the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan, which is described in the narrative following the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table. Stock options are not currently offered under the plan. Company matching shares issued under that plan are reported inOptions were vested at issuance but were not exercisable until the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table and under “All Other Compensation” inearlier of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Employment Contracts

There are no employment agreements with anyfirst anniversary of the grant or the Named Executive Officers, except for the following:

Rafael de la Vega

Mr. de la Vega has an employment contract that provides for his continued participation in the BellSouth Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (BellSouth SERP) while he is employed by AT&T Mobility (formerly Cingular) and provides for certain benefits in the event of his termination of employment with AT&T Mobility. In connection with his transfer from BellSouth to what was then Cingular in 2003, BellSouth agreed to maintain Mr. de la Vega inof the BellSouth SERP (described on pages 69 and 70) while Mr. de la Vega was employed by Cingular. In addition, if Mr. de la Vega was terminated from Cingular for any reason, BellSouth would hire him back. If BellSouth failed to rehire Mr. de la Vega in a comparable position, or in the event Mr. de la Vega died or terminated employment because of disability before returning to BellSouth, Mr. de la Vega or his beneficiary, as applicable, would receive a lump sum payment equal to two times his salary and target bonus. See discussion on page 69 regarding his accrual of future benefits in the AT&T SERP.

AT&T – Page 62


Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2012

  Option Awards (1)  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexer-

cisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not

Vested (2)

(#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested (2)

($)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested (3)

(#)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Market or Payout

Value of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
(3)

($)

 
Stephenson  16,085        23.9200    1/30/15      
  89,320      24.0100    6/15/15      
  19,405      28.3200    2/15/16      
  105,081      27.7300    6/15/16      
  15,102      37.2300    2/15/17      
  98,764      40.2800    6/15/17      
  14,720      37.8800    2/15/18      
  230,102      36.1700    6/16/18      
  30,472      23.2200    2/17/19      
  14,627      24.6300    6/15/19      
  20,664      25.3200    2/16/20      
  379,336      25.5400    6/15/20      
  29,345      28.2400    2/15/21      
2011-2013 Perf. Sh.               226,626    7,639,562  
2012-2014 Perf. Sh.                          297,645    10,033,613  
Stephens  4,686        26.4600    1/31/14      
  12,478        23.7400    5/30/14      
  5,044        23.9200    1/30/15      
  17,378      24.0100    6/15/15      
  5,342      28.3200    2/15/16      
  17,656      27.7300    6/15/16      
  4,026      37.2300    2/15/17      
  14,589      40.2800    6/15/17      
  3,348      37.8800    2/15/18      
  16,241      36.1700    6/16/18      
  6,656      23.2200    2/17/19      
  16,973      24.6300    6/15/19      
  8,454      25.3200    2/16/20      
  38,069      25.5400    6/15/20      
  9,730      28.2400    2/15/21      
  39,919      30.3500    6/15/21      
   2,373    29.8700    2/15/22      
2011-2013 Perf. Sh.               13,509    455,388  
2011-2013 Perf. Sh.               14,042    473,356  
2012-2014 Perf. Sh.               77,505    2,612,694  

2010 Restricted

  Stock Units

       14,879    501,571          

2011 Restricted

  Stock Units

       13,509    455,388          

2011 Restricted

  Stock Units

       14,042    473,356          

2012 Restricted

  Stock Units

                  56,367    1,900,132          
*Stock Options issued under the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

AT&T – Page 63


Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2012

  Option Awards (1)  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexer-

cisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not

Vested (2)

(#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested (2)

($)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested (3)

(#)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Market or Payout

Value of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
(3)

($)

 
de la Vega  77,512        16.4200    3/3/13      
  5,464        18.3000    4/28/13      
  12,397      24.6300    6/15/19      
  6,251      25.3200    2/16/20      
  22,160      25.5400    6/15/20      
  6,838      28.2400    2/15/21      
  17,971      30.3500    6/15/21      
   1,068    29.8700    2/15/22      
2011-2013 Perf. Sh.               77,320    2,606,457  
2012-2014 Perf. Sh.                          104,467    3,521,583  
Stankey  1,439        26.4600    1/31/14      
  7,993        23.7400    5/30/14      
  4,168        23.9200    1/30/15      
  1,059      24.0100    6/15/15      
  1,661      28.3200    2/15/16      
  934      27.7300    6/15/16      
  1,337      37.2300    2/15/17      
  794      40.2800    6/15/17      
  1,234      37.8800    2/15/18      
  1,073      36.1700    6/16/18      
  2,073      23.2200    2/17/19      
  1,675      24.6300    6/15/19      
  2,366      25.3200    2/16/20      
  1,658      25.5400    6/15/20      
  2,326      28.2400    2/15/21      
2011-2013 Perf. Sh.               77,320    2,606,457  
2012-2014 Perf. Sh.               104,467    3,521,583  
2009 Restricted Stock                  153,198    5,164,305          
Watts  3,797        26.4600    1/31/14      
  437        23.7400    5/30/14      
  961        23.9200    1/30/15      
  4,648      24.0100    6/15/15      
  1,281      28.3200    2/15/16      
  564      27.7300    6/15/16      
  774      37.2300    2/15/17      
  470      40.2800    6/15/17      
  1,010      37.8800    2/15/18      
  803      36.1700    6/16/18      
  1,597      23.2200    2/17/19      
  3,228      24.6300    6/15/19      
  4,561      25.3200    2/16/20      
  3,366      25.5400    6/15/20      
  4,943      28.2400    2/15/21      

2011-2013 Perf. Sh.

               60,434    2,037,230  

2012-2014 Perf. Sh.

                          80,539    2,714,970  
*Stock Options issued under the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

AT&T – Page 64


1.option holder. Options expire ten years after the grant date; however, option terms may be shortened due to termination of employment of the holder. Options in the table vest as follows:

Option Expiration DateVesting
1/31/14, 5/30/14, 1/30/15, 6/15/15, 2/15/16, 6/15/16, 2/15/17, 6/15/17, 2/15/18, 6/16/18, 2/17/19, 6/15/19, 2/16/20, 6/15/20, 2/15/21, 6/15/21, 2/15/22These options are vested at issuance, but may not be exercised until the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant or the termination of employment of the option holder. These options are granted based upon the amount of stock purchased by mid-level and above managers in the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (described in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table”) and its predecessor plan, which has substantially the same terms.
4/28/13These options vested 6 months after the grant date.
3/3/13These options vested 3 years after the grant date.

2.Mr. Stankey’s 2009de la Vega’s 2014 restricted stock grant vests in 2014.2016. Mr. Stephens’ 2010, 2011Donovan’s 2014 and 2012 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)2015 restricted stock grants vest the earlier of his becoming retirement eligible or upon each award’s scheduled vesting dates as follows: 2010 RSUs—2013 (50% of the award)in 2019 and 2014 (50% of the award), 2011 RSUs—2015 and 2012 RSUs—2016. The Named Executive Officers become retirement eligible when they either (1) reach age 55 and have at least five years of service or (2) satisfy the “modified rule of 75,” which requires certain combinations of age and service that total at least 75. Only Mr. Stephens was not retirement eligible as of December 31, 2012. The 2012 RSU grants to the other Named Executive Officers are included in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table below.2020, respectively.

3.Performance shares are paid after the end of the performance period shown for each award. The actual number of shares paid out is dependent upon the achievement of the related performance objectives and approval of the Human Resources Committee. In this column, we report the number of outstanding performance shares and their theoretical value based on the price of AT&T stock on December 31, 2012.2015. In calculating the number of performance shares and their value, we are required by SEC rules to compare the Company’s performance through 20122015 under each outstanding performance share grant against the threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for the grant and report in this column the applicable potential payout amount. If the performance is between levels, we are required to report the potential payout at the next highest level. For example, if the previous fiscal year’s performance exceeded target, even if it is by a small amount and even if it is highly unlikely that we will pay the maximum amount, we are required by SEC rules to report the awards using the maximum potential payouts. For Mr. Stephens’ 2011 grant of 13,509 shares (made prior to his promotion to CFO), the performance measure is Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). For all other Named Executive Officer performance share grants, theThe performance measure for 75% of the shares in each grant is ROIC, and for the remaining 25%, the performance measure is Total Stockholder Return (TSR).TSR. As of the end of 2011, because both2015, the ROIC achievement and the TSR achievementwas at target level for the 20112014 grant were at theand above target level we reported these grants at their target award values. Forfor the 2012 grants, the ROIC and TSR achievements were above and at the target level, respectively,2015 grant, requiring the ROIC portion of these grants to be reported at their target and maximum award valuevalues, respectively. The TSR achievement was at threshold level for the 2014 grant and above target level for the 2015 grant, requiring the TSR portion of these grants to be reported at their targetthreshold and maximum award values.values, respectively.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2012

Name  Option Awards   Stock Awards (1) 
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2015 
 Option Awards  Stock Awards (1) 
Name

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)

  

  Number of Shares  

    Acquired on Exercise      

(#)

  

  Value Realized      

on Exercise  

($)  

  

Number of Shares  

  Acquired on Vesting    

(#)

  

  Value Realized    

on Vesting  

($)  

 
   288,702     2,900,842     491,038     15,927,261    213,806    1,692,436    384,621    13,090,536  

Stephens

   6,530     2,481     59,949     2,208,573    40,376    316,642    116,318    3,949,534  

de la Vega

   216,443     718,201     365,090     12,177,029    0    0    136,464    4,640,952  

Donovan

  0    0    227,671    7,456,656  

Stankey

   59,879     288,256     381,910     13,106,676    2,595    16,408    136,464    4,640,952  

Watts

   27,613     136,502     144,714     4,721,811  

 

1.

Included in the above amounts are restricted stock unit grants that vested in 20122015 but are not yet distributable. UnitsThese units vest at the earlier of the scheduled vesting date or upon the employee becoming retirement eligible; in each case,eligible. If the units are not distributed until the scheduled vesting dates. Restricted stock units that vested in 2012 butvest

64 | www.att.com


Executive Compensation Tables

because of retirement eligibility, they will still not be distributed until the scheduled vesting dates aredate. When Mr. Donovan became retirement eligible on September 22, 2015, he vested in restricted stock units that were not distributed until January 2016 (30,560), and other units that will not be distributed until January of 2017 (35,930), 2018 (47,226), and 2019 (59,163). The other Named Executive Officers received restricted stock units in 2015 that vested at grant because of their retirement eligibility but will not be distributed until 2019 as follows: Mr. Stephenson—216,469,223,756, Mr. Stephens—71,299, Mr. de la Vega—75,976,80,780, and Mr. Stankey—238,457, and Mr. Watts—58,574. Mr. Stephens was not retirement eligible as of December 31, 2012, and did not vest in the restricted stock units granted in 2012. Mr. Stankey became retirement eligible in 2012.80,780.

 

AT&T – Page 65


Pension Benefits (Estimated for 12/31/12)

Pension Benefits (Estimated for December 31, 2015)Pension Benefits (Estimated for December 31, 2015)
Name Plan Name 

Number of Years

Credited Service

(#)

 

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefits (1)

($)

 

Payments

During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

  Plan Name 

Number of Years

Credited Service

(#)

 

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefits (1)

($)

 

Payments

During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Stephenson

 Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program  30    1,226,482    0   Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program 33   1,522,264 0
 Pension Benefit Make Up Plan  30    7,607    0   Pension Benefit Make Up Plan 15          7,117 0
 SRIP  30    2,219,212    0   SRIP 22   2,326,681 0
 SERP  30    39,291,053    0   SERP 30 47,022,214 0

Stephens

 Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program  20    979,929    0   Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program 23   1,178,658 0
 Pension Benefit Make Up Plan  20    46,961    0   Pension Benefit Make Up Plan 8        51,508 0
 SRIP  20    301,744    0   SRIP 12      337,747 0
 SERP  20    6,442,081    0   SERP 23 12,915,641 0

de la Vega (2)

 Pension Benefit Plan—Mobility Program  38    118,959    0  

de la Vega

 Pension Benefit Plan—Mobility Program 12      177,301 0
 BellSouth SERP  38    17,106,072    0   BellSouth SERP 36 15,414,455 0
 SERP 40   8,170,212 0

Donovan

 Pension Benefit Plan—MCB Program 6      119,129 0
 SERP  38    5,988,642    0   SERP 7   9,068,112 0

Stankey

 Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program  27    1,045,806    0   Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program 30   1,317,852 0
 SRIP  27    407,368    0   SRIP 19      418,056 0
 SERP  27    20,076,884    0   SERP 30 23,770,119 0

Watts

 Pension Benefit Plan—Nonbargained Program  29    1,325,220    0  
 Pension Benefit Make Up Plan  29    195,271    0  
 SRIP  29    1,054,648    0  
 SERP  29    12,520,360    0  

 

1.Pension benefits reflected in the above table were determined using the methodology and material assumptions set forth in the 20122015 AT&T Annual Report to Stockholders in Note 1112 to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Pension and Postretirement Benefits,” except that, as required by SEC regulations, the assumed retirement age is the specified normal retirement age in the plan unless the plan provides a younger age at which benefits may be received without a discount based on age, in which case the younger age is used. For the Nonbargained Program under the Pension Benefit Plan and the Pension Benefit Make Up Plan, the assumed retirement age is the date a participant is at least age 55 and meets the “modified rule of 75,” which requires certain combinations of age and service that total at least 75. For the Mobility Program and the Management Cash Balance Program under the Pension Benefit Plan, (Mobility Program), the assumed retirement age for the cash balance formula is age 65. For the AT&T SRIP/SERP, the assumed retirement age is the earlier of the date the participant reaches age 60 or has 30 years of service (the age at which an employee may retire without discounts for age). For the BellSouth SERP, the assumed retirement age is the date the participant reaches age 62. If a participant has already surpassed the earlier of these dates, then the assumed retirement age used for purposes of this table is determined as of December 31, 2012.2015.

2.For each of the Named Executive Officers, SRIP/SERP benefits in the table have been reduced for benefits available under the qualified plans and by a specified amount that approximates benefits available under other nonqualified plans included in the table.

2.Mr. de la Vega took a totalVega’s SERP benefit was also reduced for distribution from the Southeast Program of his qualified benefit in the BellSouth Personal Retirement AccountPension Benefit Plan when he transferred to AT&T Mobility in 2003 (then known as Cingular) and began accruing benefits under what is now the Mobility Program. The benefit received under the BellSouth Personal Retirement Account and amounts in the Mobility Program offset amounts accrued under his BellSouth SERP benefit. Mr. de la Vega continued to earn benefits under theVega’s BellSouth SERP until March 1, 2011, when he became vestedhas been frozen in the form of a fixed lump sum benefit.

Employment Contracts

There are no employment agreements with any of the Named Executive Officers, except for the following:

Rafael de la Vega

Mr. de la Vega has an employment contract that provides for his continued participation in the BellSouth Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (BellSouth SERP) while he is employed by AT&T Mobility (formerly Cingular) and provides for certain benefits in the event of his termination of employment with AT&T Mobility. In connection with his transfer from BellSouth to what was then Cingular in 2003, BellSouth agreed to maintain Mr. de la Vega in the BellSouth SERP while

AT&T SERP. The AT&T SERP provides him with a nonqualified benefit equal to the greater of the AT&T SERP formula or the BellSouth SERP formula (excluding pay and service credits after March 1, 2011, but allowing the early retirement discount to decrease until age 62). His benefits under the AT&T SERP will be reduced for benefits available under the qualified pensions and by a specified amount that approximates benefits available under the BellSouth SERP.2016 Proxy Statement | 65 |


Executive Compensation Tables

 

Mr. de la Vega was employed by Cingular. In addition, if Mr. de la Vega was terminated from Cingular for any reason, BellSouth agreed to hire him back. If BellSouth failed to rehire Mr. de la Vega in a comparable position, or in the event Mr. de la Vega died or terminated employment because of disability before returning to BellSouth, Mr. de la Vega or his beneficiary, as applicable, would receive a lump sum payment equal to two times his salary and target bonus. Mr. de la Vega’s supplemental retirement benefits are discussed more fully beginning on page 68.

John Stankey

Following the acquisition of DIRECTV, AT&T – Page 66has entered into an agreement with Mr. Stankey, whose responsibilities include the oversight of DIRECTV operations. The Company agreed to reimburse him for state and local income taxes that he incurs while on business travel outside of Texas (Texas is his primary work location and residence) as well as the income taxes owed on the reimbursement of such state and local income taxes. Amounts reimbursed will be reported annually in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.


Qualified Pension Plan

We offer post-retirement benefits, in various forms, to nearly all our managers. The AT&T Pension Benefit Plan, a “qualified pension plan” under the Internal Revenue Code, covers nearly all of our employees andhired before 2015, including each of the Named Executive Officers. The applicable benefit accrual formula depends on the subsidiaries that have employed the participant. DIRECTV employees are covered by a separate plan, which is not included in the description below.

Nonbargained Program

Each of the Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. de la Vega and Mr. Donovan, is covered by the Nonbargained Program.Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan, which is offered to most of our pre-2007 management employees. Participants in the Nonbargained Program receive the greater of the benefit determined under the Career Average Minimum (CAM) formula or the cash balance formula, each of which is described below. Eligible managers employed by AT&T Corp. or BellSouth prior to January 1, 2007, or AT&T Mobility prior to January 1, 2006, are covered by cash balance formulas determined under their legacy pension programs, and after those dates, by an age graded cash balance formula under the Management Cash Balance Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Generally, managers hired or rehired on or after January 1, 2015, are not eligible for a pension under the plan but are eligible for an enhanced company match in the 401(k) plan.

CAM Formula

The CAM formula applicable toEach of the Named Executive Officers, (other thanexcept for Mr. de la Vega) covers AT&T managers other than persons that were employedVega and Mr. Donovan, are covered by AT&T Corp., BellSouth, or AT&T Mobility (and their respective subsidiaries) prior to our respective acquisitions of those companies. Thisthe CAM formula. The CAM formula provides an annual benefit equal to 1.6% of the participant’s average pension-eligible compensation (generally, base pay, commissions, and annual bonuses, but not officer bonuses paid to individuals promoted to officer level before January 1, 2009) for the five years ended December 31, 1999, multiplied by the number of years of service through the end of the December 31, 1999, averaging period, plus 1.6% of the participant’s pension-eligible compensation thereafter. Employees who meet the “modified rule of 75” and are at least age 55 are eligible to retire without age or service discounts. The “modified rule of 75” establishes retirement eligibility when certain combinations of age and service total at least 75.

Cash Balance Formula

The cash balance formula was frozen, except for interest credits, on January 14, 2005. The cash balance formula provided an accrual equal to 5% of pension-eligible compensation plus monthly interest credits on the participant’s cash balance account. The interest rate is reset quarterly and is

66 | www.att.com


Executive Compensation Tables

equal to the published average annual yield for the 30-year Treasury Bond as of the middle month of the preceding quarter.

The plan permits participants to take the benefit in various actuarially equivalent forms, including a regular annuity or, to a limited extent, a lump sum calculated as the present value of the annuity. For individuals hired on or after January 1, 2007 (January 1, 2006, for our principal wireless subsidiaries), the qualified pension benefits described above have been replaced by an age-graded cash balance formula. To the extent the Internal Revenue Code places limits on the amounts that may be earned under a qualified pension plan, these amounts are paid under the nonqualified Pension Benefit Make Up Plan but only for periods prior to the person becoming a participant in the SRIP/SERP below. The Pension Benefit Make Up Plan benefit is paid in the form of a 10-year annuity or in a lump sum if the value of the annuity is less than $50,000.

Mobility Program

Mr. de la Vega is covered by the Mobility Program, which is also part of the tax-qualified AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. This program covers employees of our principal wireless subsidiariesAT&T Mobility that were hired prior to 2006. The Mobility Program is the qualified pension plan previously offered by AT&T Mobility that was merged into the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Participants in the Mobility Program are generally entitled to receive a cash balance benefit equal to the monthly basic benefit credits of 5% of the participant’s pension-eligible compensation (generally, base pay, commissions, and group incentive awards, but not individual

AT&T – Page 67


awards) plus monthly interest credits on the participant’s cash balance account. The interest rate for cash balance credits is reset quarterly and is equal to the published average annual yield for the 30-year Treasury Bond as of the middle month of the preceding quarter. The plan permits participants to take the benefit in various actuarially equivalent forms, including an annuity or a lump sum calculated as the greater of the cash balance account balance, or the present value of the grandfathered pension benefit annuity.

Management Cash Balance Program

Mr. Donovan is covered by the Management Cash Balance (MCB) Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan, which is offered to our management employees hired on or after January 1, 2007 (January 1, 2006 for AT&T Mobility). This program was closed to new hires or rehires on or after January 1, 2015. After completing one year of service, participants in the MCB Program are entitled to receive a cash balance benefit equal to the monthly credit of an age graded basic credit formula ranging from 1.75% to 4% of the participant’s pension-eligible compensation and a 2% supplemental credit for eligible compensation in excess of Social Security Wage Base plus monthly interest credit at an effective annual rate of 4.5% to the participant’s cash balance account. This program permits participants to take the benefit in various actuarially equivalent forms, including an annuity or a lump sum.

Nonqualified Pension Plans

Employees are limited by tax law inTo the amount of benefit theyextent the Internal Revenue Code places limits on the amounts that may receivebe earned under a qualified pension plan. Weplan, managers instead receive these amounts under the nonqualified Pension Benefit Make Up Plan but only for periods prior to the person becoming a participant in the SRIP/SERP, described below. The Pension Benefit Make Up Plan benefit is paid in the form of a 10-year annuity or in a lump sum if the present value of the annuity is less than $50,000.

In addition, we offer our executive officers and other officers (who became officers prior to 2005) supplemental retirement benefits under the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP) and, for those serving as officers between 2005-2008, its successor, the 2005 Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP), as additional retention tools. As a result of changes in the tax laws, beginning December 31, 2004, participants ceased accruing benefits under the SRIP, the original supplemental plan. After December 31, 2004, benefits are earned under the SERP. Participants make separate distribution elections (annuity or lump sum) for benefits earned and vested before 2005 (under the SRIP) and for benefits accrued during and after 2005 (under the SERP). Elections for the portion of the pension that accrued in and after 2005, however, must have been made when the officer first participates

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 67 |


Executive Compensation Tables

participated in the SERP. Vesting in the SERP requires five years of service (including four years of participation in the SERP). Each of the Named Executive Officers is vested in the SERP. Regardless of the payment form, no benefits under the SERP are payable until six months after termination of employment. An officer’s benefits under these nonqualified pension plans are reduced by: (1) benefits due under qualified AT&T pension plans and (2) a specific amount that approximates the value of the officer’s benefit under other nonqualified pension plans, determined generally as of December 31, 2008.These supplemental benefits are neither funded by nor are a part of the qualified pension plan.

Each of the Named Executive Officers is eligible to receive these benefits.However, the Human Resources Committee has determined to no longer allow new officers to participate in these supplemental retirement benefits, but may do so if it deems it necessary to attract or retain key talent or for other appropriate business reasons. Instead, new officers may be granted restricted stock generally equal in value to one-year’s salary with a five year vesting period. If appropriate, new grants will be made during the officer’s employment.

Calculation of Benefit

Under the SRIP/SERP, the target annual retirement benefit is stated as a percentage of a participant’s annual salary and annual incentive bonus averaged over a specified period described below. The percentage is increased by 0.715% for each year of actual service in excess of, or decreased by 1.43% (0.715% for mid-career hires) for each year of actual service below, 30 years of service. In the event the participant retires before reaching age 60, a discount of 0.5% for each month remaining until the participant attains age 60 is applied to reduce the amount payable under this plan, except for officers who have 30 years or more of service at the time of retirement. Of the Named Executive Officers currently employed by the Company, only Messrs. Stephenson, and de la Vega, and Stankey are eligible to retire without either an age or service discount under this plan. These benefits are also reduced by any amounts participants receive under aAT&T qualified pension planplans and by a frozen, specific amount that approximates the amount they receive under our other nonqualified pension plans, calculated as if the benefits under these plans were paid in the form of an immediate annuity for life.

For all but Mr. Stephenson and Mr. de la Vega (see below), the salary and bonus used to determine their SRIP/SERP amount is the average of the participant’s salary and actual annual incentive bonuses earned during the

AT&T – Page 68


36-consecutive-month period that results in the highest average earnings that occurs during the 120 months preceding retirement. In some cases, the Human Resources Committee may require the use of the target bonus, or a portion of the actual or target bonus, if it believes the actual bonus is not appropriate. The target annual retirement percentage for the Chief Executive Officer is 60%, and for other Named Executive Officers the target percentage ranges from 50% to 60%. Beginning in 2006, the target percentage was limited to 50% for all new participants (see note above on limiting new participants after 2008). If a benefit payment under the plan is delayed by the Company to comply with Federal tax rules, the delayed amounts will earn interest at the rate the Company uses to accrue the present value of the liability, and the interest will be included in the appropriate column(s) in the “Pension Benefits” table.

Mr. Stephenson’s Benefit

Mr. Stephenson’s SERP benefit was modified in 2010. For purposes of calculating his SERP benefit, the Company froze his compensation as of June 30, 2010. He stopped accruing age and service credits as of December 31, 2012, at which time his benefit was determined as a lump sum amount, which thereafter earns interest. The discount rate for calculating the lump sum as well as the interest crediting rate is 5.8%.

Mr. de la Vega’s Benefit

In 2008, participants in the SERP nonqualified pension plan made elections to take their distributions either as an annuity or as a lump sum. In 2014, the Company permitted certain officers who had elected the lump sum option to freeze their benefit as if they had retired at the end of 2014. In

68 | www.att.com


Executive Compensation Tables

exchange, the electing officers gave up credits under the plan for all future compensation, service, and if applicable, age. The frozen benefit will earn a fixed rate of interest equal to 4.3% which represents the discount rate used to determine lump sum benefits for participants who retired in 2014. This change will, for the electing officers, eliminate the impact of fluctuations in the interest rate used to calculate the value of their lump sum benefit. Of the Named Executive Officers, Mr. de la Vega elected this option, effective December 30, 2014.

While Mr. de la Vega participates in the AT&T SERP, he is also a participant in the BellSouth SERP, which acts as an offset to his AT&T SERP benefit. Because his BellSouth SERP benefit will never exceed the AT&T SERP benefit, his total benefit is determined using the AT&T SERP calculation. Mr. de la Vega’s SERP benefit was also reduced for distribution from the Southeast Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan when he transferred to AT&T Mobility in 2003 (then known as Cingular) and began accruing benefits under what is now the Mobility Program.

In addition, the BellSouth SERP also provides a lump sum death benefit payable to the participant’s beneficiaries equal to his annual base pay rate as of December 31, 2005, plus two times his standard target bonus as of December 31, 2005. As a result, Mr. de la Vega’s death benefit will be paid in the amount of $1.86 million.

Forms of Payment

Annuity

Participants may receive benefits as an annuity payable for the greater of the life of the participant or ten years. If the participant dies within ten years after leaving the Company, then payments for the balance of the ten years will be paid to the participant’s beneficiary. Alternatively, the participant may elect to have the annuity payable for life with 100% or 50% payable upon his or her death to his or her beneficiary for the beneficiary’s life. The amounts paid under each alternative (and the lump sum alternative described below) are actuarially equivalent. As noted above, separate distribution elections are made for pre-2005 benefits and 2005 and later benefits.

Lump Sum

Participants may elect that upon retirement at age 55 or later to receive the actuarially determined net present value of the benefit as a lump sum, rather than in the form of an annuity. To determine the net present value, we use the discount rate used for determining the projected benefit obligation at December 31 of the second calendar year prior to the year of retirement. Participants may also elect to take all or part of the net present value over a fixed period of years elected by the participant, not to exceed 20 years, earning interest at the same discount rate. A participant is not permitted to receive more than 30% of the net present value of the benefit before the third anniversary of the termination of employment, unless he or she is at least 60 years old at termination, in which case the participant may receive 100% of the net present value of the benefit as early as six months after the termination of employment. Eligible participants electing to receive more than 30% of the net present value of the benefit within 36 months of their termination must enter into a written noncompetition agreement with us and agree to forfeit and repay the lump sum if they breach that agreement.

Randall Stephenson’s Benefit

Mr. Stephenson’s SERP benefit was modified in 2010. For purposes of calculating his SERP benefit, the Company froze his compensation as of June 30, 2010. He stopped accruing age and service credits as of December 31, 2012, at which time his benefit was determined as a lump sum amount, which thereafter earns interest. The discount rate for calculating the lump sum as well as the interest rate is 5.8%.

Rafael de la Vega’s Benefit

Mr. de la Vega vested in the AT&T SERP on March 1, 2011. At that time, benefits to be paid from the BellSouth SERP were frozen. The AT&T SERP benefit will be reduced by a specified amount that approximates his BellSouth SERP benefit. The AT&T SERP provides a nonqualified pension benefit equal to the greater of (1) the AT&T SERP formula applicable to other plan participants, or (2) the amount he would have received under the BellSouth SERP (excluding pay and service credits after March 1, 2011, but allowing the early retirement discount factor of the BellSouth SERP to decrease based on his age and service at retirement). The BellSouth SERP provides an annual benefit equal to a percentage of eligible

AT&T – Page 69


earnings under the BellSouth SERP, which earnings are determined by taking Mr. de la Vega’s annual average of the sum of his salary and bonuses paid during the 60-month period ending February 28, 2011. The applicable percentage is 2% for each year of service for the first 20 years of service, 1.5% for each of the next ten years, and 1% for each additional year of service. Mr. de la Vega’s BellSouth SERP benefit is reduced by his qualified pension benefits and primary Social Security benefits. For participants with more than 30 years of service, the applicable percentage is reduced 3% for each year benefits commence prior to age 62. (These benefits are reduced by 6% for each such year if the participant has less than 30 years of service.) Mr. de la Vega has more than 30 years of service, but is not yet age 62. Participants elect to receive benefits as an actuarially determined lump sum, life annuity or ten-year certain form of payment. For purposes of determining BellSouth SERP benefits, Mr. de la Vega’s service calculation will include his service with AT&T Mobility (as provided by his contract), where he currently is employed, as well as his service with BellSouth Corporation. In addition, under the BellSouth SERP, in the event of the death of a participant, the spouse would receive the same BellSouth SERP benefit the participant would have received had he survived and terminated employment on the date of death. The BellSouth SERP also provides a lump sum death benefit payable to the participant’s beneficiaries equal to his annual base pay rate as of December 31, 2005, plus two times his standard target bonus as of December 31, 2005. Mr. de la Vega’s death benefit will be paid in the amount of $1.86 million.

Other Post-Retirement Benefits

Named Executive Officers who retire after age 55 with at least five years of service or who are retirement-retirement eligible under the “modified rule of 75” continue to receive the benefits shown in the following table after retirement, except that only Mr. Stephenson is entitled to receive supplemental health benefits after retirement. Benefits that are available generally to managers are omitted.omitted from the table. All other Named Executive Officers except Mr. Stephens, are currently retirement eligible.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 69 |


Executive Compensation Tables

Financial counseling benefits will be made available to the executive officers for 36 months following retirement. We do not reimburse taxes on personal benefits for executive officers, other than certain non-deductible relocation costs, which along with the tax reimbursement, we make available to nearly all management employees. The supplemental health benefit is in addition to the group health plan and is provided to Mr. Stephenson for life.life based on eligibility provisions that existed before he became CEO. During their employment, officers are subject to an annual deductible on health benefits, co-insurance, and a portion of the premium. Officers who are eligible to receive the supplemental benefit in retirement have no annual deductible or co-insurance, but they must pay larger premiums. In addition, we also provide communications, broadband/TV and related services and products for life;products; however, to the extent the service is provided by AT&T, it is typically provided at little or no incremental cost. These benefits are subject to amendment.

 

Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Personal Benefit

Estimated Amount

(valued at our incremental cost)

Financial counseling

Maximum of $14,000 per year for 36 months
Financial counseling provided in connection with retirementUp to $20,000 total

Estate planning

Up to $10,000 per year for 36 months

Communication benefits

Average of $2,042 annually

Supplemental health insurance premiums

(Mr. Stephenson only)

Approximately $11,184 annually, which is in addition to required contributions from the employee

In the event of the officer’s termination of employment due to death, the officer’s unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock, if any, will vest, and outstanding performance shares will pay out at 100% of target. As a result, if a Named Executive Officer had died at the end of 2015, the amounts of performance shares, restricted stock units, and/or restricted stock, as applicable, that would have vested and been distributed are: Mr. Stephenson—$15,179,868, Mr. Stephens��$4,707,839, Mr. de la Vega—$7,444,156, Mr. Donovan—$6,627,504, and Mr. Stankey—$5,449,374.

In the event of termination of employment due to disability, unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock, if any, will vest; however, restricted stock units will not pay out until their scheduled vesting times. As a result, if such an event had occurred to a Named Executive Officer at the end of 2015, the following amounts of restricted stock would have vested: Mr. de la Vega—$1,994,782 and Mr. Donovan—$2,966,658. Conversely, performance shares will not be accelerated in the event of a termination due to disability but will be paid solely based on the achievement of the pre-determined performance goals.

We pay recoverable premiums on split-dollar life insurance that provides a specified death benefit to beneficiaries of each Named Executive Officer. The benefit is equal to one times salary during his or her employment, except for the Chief Executive Officer who receives two times salary. After retirement, for officers who first participated beginning in 1998, the death benefit remains one times salary until he or she reaches age 66; the benefit is then reduced by 10% each year until age 70, when the benefit becomes one-half of his or her final salary. For officers who participated prior to 1998, including Messrs. Stephenson and Stephens, the post-retirement death benefit is one times salary. In addition, managers who were officers prior to 1998 are entitled to additional one times salary death benefit while employed and during retirement.

In addition to the foregoing, Mr. Stephenson, Mr. Stephens, Mr. Donovan, and Mr. Stankey purchased optional additional split-dollar life insurance coverage equal to two times salary, which is subsidized by the Company. If the policies are not fully funded upon the retirement of the officer, we continue to pay our portion of the premiums until they are fully funded.

70 | www.att.com


 

Personal Benefit

Estimated Amount

(valued at our incremental cost)

Executive Compensation Tables

Financial counseling

Mr. Stephens elected to take his death benefits in the form of a ten-year Company-paid annuity payable after death, using an 11% discount rate based on 185% of the value of the death benefits. The increase in the value of the death benefits is to offset the income taxes that will result from the Company-paid benefit that would not be applicable in the case of insurance payments. This alternative payment method was available only to officers who elected the annuity before 1998. If Mr. Stephens had passed away at the end of 2015, his annual death benefit for ten years would have been $1,053,292.

Basic death benefits payable to Mr. de la Vega under the AT&T plan are reduced by $900,000, which represents the sum of death benefits provided by (1) a BellSouth policy with a face amount of $400,000 that was transferred to Mr. de la Vega in 2007, and (2) two BellSouth policies with a combined face amount of $500,000 owned by Mr. de la Vega. Under the latter policies, the Company and Mr. de la Vega shared the payment of premiums (the final payments were made in 2013), and the policies provide either a death benefit to Mr. de la Vega’s beneficiary(ies) or an accumulated cash value available to Mr. de la Vega. The Company does not recover any of its premium payments under Mr. de la Vega’s policies. Currently, the $900,000 of coverage from BellSouth policies completely offsets any basic death benefit provided by the AT&T plan.

We also provide death benefits in connection with Mr. de la Vega’s BellSouth SERP (described on page 69).

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 
Name Plan (1)  

Executive
Contributions

in Last FY (2)

($)

   

Registrant
Contributions

in Last FY (2)

($)

   

Aggregate
Earnings in

Last FY (2)(3)

($)

   

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

   

Aggregate
Balance at

Last FYE (2)

($)

 

Stephenson

 Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan   521,875     175,155     489,632     924,800     6,739,991  
  

Cash Deferral Plan

   5,002,292          848,475          20,911,710  

Stephens

 Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan   1,604,063     348,143     105,912     2,180,189     2,269,426  

de la Vega

 Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan   1,635,375     363,123     568,029     641,241     8,506,608  
  Cash Deferral Plan   469,375          227,510     89,871     5,541,359  
  BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Income Plan             59,210     33,685     413,915  
  AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan             32,516          773,188  
  AT&T Mobility 2005 Cash Deferral Plan             420,700          10,003,842  

Donovan

 Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan   241,250     74,130     13,103     277,232     326,548  
  Cash Deferral Plan   855,000          122,119          2,986,442  

Stankey

 Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan   56,450     43,730     125,427     224,272     1,688,109  
  Cash Deferral Plan             9,911     131,758     206,273  

Maximum of $14,000 per year for 36 months

Financial counseling provided in connection with retirement

Up to $20,000

Estate planning

Up to $10,000 per year for 36 months

Other (communications)

Average of $2,400 annually

Supplemental health insurance premiums

(Mr. Stephenson only)

Approximately $4,100 annually,

above required contributions from employee

1.Amounts attributed to the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan or to the Cash Deferral Plan also include amounts from their predecessor plans. No further contributions are permitted under the predecessor plans.

In
2.Of the event ofamounts reported in the officer’s termination of employment due to death,contributions and earnings columns and also included in the officer’s unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock, if any, will vest, and outstanding performance shares will pay out at 100% of target. As a result, if a Named Executive Officer had died ataggregate balance column in the end of 2012, performance shares, restricted stock units, and restricted stock would have vested and been distributedtable above, the following amounts are reported as follows:compensation for 2015 in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Stephenson—$14,936,732,1,737,091, Mr. Stephens—$6,159,323,598,456, Mr. de la Vega—$5,167,608,1,276,694, Mr. Donovan—$339,885, and Mr. Stankey—$10,331,913, and Mr. Watts—$4,011,760.

AT&T – Page 70


In101,949. Of the event of termination of employment due to disability, unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock, if any, will vest; however, the restricted stock units will not pay out until their scheduled vesting times. Performance shares granted in 2011 would be paid at 100% of targetamounts reported in the January following termination; however, later granted performance shares will not be accelerated but will be paid solely based on the achievement of the pre-determined performance goals without forfeiture due to such termination (other than for cause). As a result, if such an event had occurred to a Named Executive Officer at the end of 2012,aggregate balance column, the following performance shares, restricted stock units,aggregate amounts were previously reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for 2014 and restricted stock would have vested:2013, combined: Mr. Stephenson—$7,639,562,9,162,797, Mr. Stephens—$4,259,191,1,353,750, Mr. de la Vega—$2,606,457,5,152,256, and Mr. Stankey—$7,770,762, and Mr. Watts—$2,037,230.

We pay recoverable premiums on split-dollar life insurance that provides a specified death benefit to beneficiaries of each Named Executive Officer equal to one times salary during his or her employment. After retirement, the death benefit remains one times salary until he or she reaches age 66; the benefit is then reduced by 10% each year until age 70, when the benefit becomes one-half of his or her final salary. However, Mr. Stephenson receives a basic death benefit of three times salary while employed, which is reduced to two times salary after his retirement; Mr. Stephens receives a death benefit of two times salary while employed and after retirement. Of the Named Executive Officers, only Mr. Stephens is not yet retirement eligible.

In addition to the foregoing, Mr. Stephenson, Mr. Stephens, Mr. Stankey, and Mr. Watts purchase optional additional split-dollar life insurance coverage equal to two times salary, which is subsidized by the Company. If the policies are not fully funded upon the retirement of the officer, we continue to pay our portion of the premiums until they are fully funded.

Basic death benefits payable to Mr. de la Vega under the AT&T plan are reduced by $900,000, which represents the sum of death benefits provided by (1) a BellSouth policy with a face amount of $400,000 that was transferred to Mr. de la Vega in 2007, and (2) two BellSouth policies with a combined face amount of $500,000 owned by Mr. de la Vega. Under the latter policies, the Company and Mr. de la Vega share the payment of premiums, and the policies provide either a death benefit to Mr. de la Vega’s beneficiary(ies) or an accumulated cash value available to Mr. de la Vega. The Company does not recover any of its premium payments under Mr. de la Vega’s policies. Currently, the $900,000 of coverage from BellSouth policies completely offsets any basic death benefit provided by the AT&T plan.

AT&T – Page 71


We also provide death benefits in connection with Mr. de la Vega’s BellSouth SERP (described on pages 69 and 70) and Mr. Watts’ Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan of 1988 (described on page 74).

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

      Name  Plan (1) 

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY (2)

($)

  

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY (2)

($)

  

Aggregate

Earnings in

Last FY (2)(3)

$)

  

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

  

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE (2)

($)

 

Stephenson

  

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

  465,000    155,400    826,120    683,999    5,892,241  
  

Cash Deferral Plan

  3,030,000        136,736        3,515,724  
  

Comp. Deferral Plan
(4-Yr Units)

          27    2,192      

Stephens

  

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

  849,313    190,203    203,892    926,348    1,426,913  

de la Vega

  

Stock Purchase

and Deferral Plan

  357,563    104,993    234,333        1,914,570  
  

Cash Deferral Plan

  1,395,938        150,518        3,728,177  
  

BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Income Plan

          45,860    33,685    352,409  
  

AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan

          29,817        678,008  
  

AT&T Mobility 2005 Cash Deferral Plan

          385,783        8,772,360  

Stankey

  

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

  52,313    40,312    236,659    40,417    1,670,648  
  

Cash Deferral Plan

          13,409        299,912  

Watts

  

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

  114,281    47,426    124,711    164,397    935,663  
  

Cash Deferral Plan

          9,455    425,253    125,745  
   

Sr Mgmt Deferred Comp. Plan of 1988
(4-Yr Units)

          3,689        83,879  

1.4,855.Amounts attributed to the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan or to the Cash Deferral Plan also include amounts from their predecessor plans. No further contributions are permitted under the predecessor plans.

2.
3.Of the amounts reported in the contributions and earnings columns and also included in the aggregate balance column in the table above, the following amounts are reported as compensation for 2012 in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Stephenson—$631,544, Mr. Stephens—$392,328, Mr. de la Vega—$890,177, Mr. Stankey—$93,721, and Mr. Watts—$162,408. Of the amounts reported in the aggregate balance column, the following aggregate amounts were previously reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for 2011 and 2010, combined: Mr. Stephenson—$3,033,878, Mr. Stephens—$647,188, Mr. de la Vega—$2,628,126, Mr. Stankey—$173,411, and Mr. Watts—$159,886.

3.Aggregate Earnings include interest, dividend equivalents, and stock price appreciation/depreciation. The “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” includes only the interest that exceeds the SEC market rate, as shown in footnote 4 to the “Summary Compensation Table”.

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (SPDP)

Under the SPDP and its predecessor plan, mid-level managers and above may annually elect to defer up to 30% of their salary and annual bonus. Officers, including the Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 95% of their short-term award, which is similar to, and paid in lieu of, the annual bonus paid to other management employees. In addition, the Human Resources Committee may approve other contributions to the plan. These contributions are used to purchase through payroll deductions AT&T deferred share units (each representing the right to receive a share of AT&T stock) at fair market value on a tax-deferred basis.

AT&T – Page 72


Participants receive a 20% match in the form of additional deferred share units; however, with respect to short-term awards, officer level participants receive the 20% match only on the purchase of deferred share units that represent no more than their target awards. In addition, the Company provides “makeup” matching contributions in the form of additional deferred share units in order to generally offset the loss of match in the 401(k) plan caused by participation in the SPDP and the CDP, and to provide match on compensation that exceeds Federal compensation limits for 401(k) plans. The makeup match is an 80% match on contributions from the first 6% of salary and bonus (the same rate as used in the Company’s principal 401(k) plan),reduced by the amount of matching contributions the employee is eligible to receive (regardless of actual participation) in the Company’s 401(k) plan. Officer level employees do not receive a makeup match on the contribution of their short-term awards. Deferrals are distributed in AT&T stock at times elected by the participant. For salary deferrals prior to 2011 and bonus deferrals prior to 2012, in lieu of the 20% match, participants received two stock options for each deferred share unit acquired. Each stock option had an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.

Cash Deferral Plan (CDP)

Managers who defer at least 6% of salary in the SPDP may also defer up to 50% (25% in the case of mid-level managers) of salary into the CDP. Similarly, managers that defer 6% of bonuses in the SPDP may also defer bonuses in the CDP, subject to the same deferral limits as for salary; however officer level managers may defer up to 95% of their short-term award into the CDP without a corresponding SPDP deferral. In addition, the Human Resources Committee may approve other contributions to the plan. We pay interest at the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for the preceding September (theMoody’s rate), a common index used by companies. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we include in the “Summary Compensation Table” under “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” any earnings on deferred compensation that exceed a rate determined in accordance with SEC rules. The Moody’s rate, over time, approximates this SEC rate. Deferrals are distributed at times elected by the participant. Similarly, under its predecessor plan, managers could defer salary and incentive compensation to be paid at times selected by the participant. No deferrals were permitted under the prior plan after 2004. Account balances in the prior plan are credited with interest at a rate determined annually by the Company, which will be no less than the prior September Moody’s rate.

Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Certaincolumn of the Named Executive Officers also participated“Summary Compensation Table” includes only the interest that exceeds the SEC market rate, as shown in deferred compensation plans that are now closed to additional contributions and are described below.

AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan

Mr. de la Vega has a balance in the AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan, a nonqualified, executive deferred compensation plan. The plan permitted officers and senior managers to defer between 6% and 50% of their base pay and between 6% and 75% of their annual bonus and long-term compensation awards into the plan. The Company provided a match equal to 80% of 6% of the salary and annual bonus deferred by the participant. The plan also provided an additional match when a participant’s salary and annual bonus exceeded Internal Revenue Code qualified plan limits. Benefits under the plan are unfunded. Account balances earn an interest rate of return based on the Moody’s rate for the prior September. This rate is reset each year. Distributions occur according to employee elections. AT&T Mobility adopted a successor plan, known as the AT&T Mobility 2005 Cash Deferral Plan, having substantially the same terms as the original plan except with respectfootnote 3 to the timing of deferral and distribution elections. No new deferrals were permitted after 2008.

AT&T – Page 73


BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Income Plan

Mr. de la Vega also made contributions from his BellSouth compensation to this nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Under Schedule A of the plan, senior managers were permitted to make up to two annual deferrals of up to 25% of their salary and bonus. Beginning with the 7th year after the deferral, the plan returned the original deferral to the participant in one to three annual installments, depending on the year of the deferral. Mr. de la Vega’s deferrals under Schedule A receive fixed rates of 17.0% and 17.5% for his 1991 and 1993 deferrals, respectively. The balance is paid in 15 annual installments beginning at age 65. Under Schedule B, participants were able to defer up to 10% of their salary and bonus; distributions are made at the election of the participant. Mr. de la Vega’s deferrals under Schedule B receive fixed rates of 11.0% for his 1994 deferral and 10% for his 1995 deferral. No new deferrals were permitted under this plan after 1998.

Senior Management Deferred“Summary Compensation Plan of 1988 and Compensation Deferral PlanTable”.

Eligible managers were permitted to make elections under these plans to defer, over four-year deferral periods, between 6% and 30% of their eligible compensation. No new deferral periods could be started after 1990. Participant contributions may be matched in this plan at the same rate that applied under the 401(k) plan in lieu of match in the 401(k) plan. Account balances are credited with interest during the calendar year at a rate determined annually by the Company, which may not be less than the Moody’s rate for the prior September. Distributions occur according to employee elections. Of the Named Executive Officers, only Mr. Stephenson has a balance in the Compensation Deferral Plan and only Mr. Watts has a balance in the Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan of 1988.

Under the Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan of 1988, after the participant dies, an additional benefit is payable to the surviving spouse for the duration of his or her life in an amount equal to two-thirds of the participant’s standard retirement benefit, beginning once the standard retirement benefit payments have ended or upon the participant’s death, if later. If Mr. Watts had died at the end of 2012, his surviving spouse would have received monthly benefits of $487 beginning in December 2027.

Potential Payments Upon Change in Control

Change in Control

An acquisition in our industry can take a year or more to complete, and during that time it is critical that the Company have continuity of its leadership. If we are in the process of being acquired, our officers may have concerns about their employment with the new company. Our Change in Control Severance Plan offers benefits so that our officers may focus on the Company’s business without the distraction of searching for new employment. The Change in Control Severance Plan covers our officers, including each of the Named Executive Officers. Amounts under this plan payable to Mr. de la Vega would be offset by any payments Mr. de la Vega would receive under his agreement described on page 62, providing for the payment of benefits upon his termination of employment.

Description of Change in Control Severance Plan

The Change in Control Severance Plan offers benefits to an officer who is terminated or otherwise leaves our Company for “good reason” after a change in control. These benefits include a payment equal to 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s most recent salary and target bonus. The Company is not responsible for the payment of excise taxes (or taxes on such payments).

AT&T – Page 74


In the event of a change in control and termination of employment, each covered officer will also be provided, at no cost to him or her, with financial counseling and life and health benefits, including supplemental medical, vision, and dental benefits, substantially similar to those benefits provided prior to termination, for three years after the executive’s employment ends or until the end of the year he or she turns 65, whichever is earlier; provided, however, if the medical benefits cannot be provided on a non-taxable basis without penalty, these benefits would be provided on a taxable basis only for the applicable COBRA continuation period. We believe that these benefits are competitive with the benefits offered by comparable companies. Retirement eligible officers are eligible for certain of these benefits as part of their post-employment benefits (see Other Post-Retirement Benefits following the “Pension Benefits” table for more information). The estimated annual incremental costs of these benefits that would have been provided if the continuing Named Executive Officers had left for “good reason” under the plan at the end of 2012, in excess of any amounts that would have been incurred as post-retirement benefits outside of the applicable plan, are outlined in the table below.

Additional Costs of Potential Benefits Under the Change in Control Severance Plan

 

    Name  

Health Benefits

($)

  

Life Insurance

($)

  

Financial Counseling

($)

 

Stephenson

  12,074  18,612   0  

Stephens

  34,260  13,500   24,000  

de la Vega

  16,742  10,848   0  

Stankey

  24,439  13,182   0  

Watts

  24,439  11,582   0  
AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 71 |


Executive Compensation Tables

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (SPDP)

Under the SPDP and its predecessor plan, mid-level managers and above may annually elect to defer up to 30% of their salary and annual bonus. Officers, including the Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 95% of their short-term award, which is similar to, and paid in lieu of, the annual bonus paid to other management employees. In addition, the Committee may approve other contributions to the plan. These contributions are made through payroll deductions and are used to purchase AT&T deferred share units (each representing the right to receive a share of AT&T stock) at fair market value on a tax-deferred basis. Participants receive a 20% match in the form of additional deferred share units; however, with respect to short-term awards, officer level participants receive the 20% match only on the purchase of deferred share units that represent no more than their target awards. In addition, the Company provides “makeup” matching contributions in the form of additional deferred share units in order to generally offset the loss of match in the 401(k) plan caused by participation in the SPDP and the CDP, and to provide match on compensation that exceeds Federal compensation limits for 401(k) plans. The makeup match is an 80% match on contributions from the first 6% of salary and bonus (the same rate as used in the Company’s principal 401(k) plan),reduced by the amount of matching contributions the employee is eligible to receive (regardless of actual participation) in the Company’s 401(k) plan. (For managers hired after January 1, 2015, the 401(k) match and SPDP makeup match is 100% on contributions from the first 6% of salary.) Officer level employees do not receive a makeup match on the contribution of their short-term awards. Deferrals are distributed in AT&T stock at times elected by the participant. For salary deferrals prior to 2011 and bonus deferrals prior to 2012, in lieu of the 20% match, participants received two stock options for each deferred share unit acquired. Each stock option had an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.

Cash Deferral Plan (CDP)

Managers who defer at least 6% of salary in the SPDP may also defer up to 50% (25% in the case of mid-level managers) of salary into the CDP. Similarly, managers that defer 6% of bonuses in the SPDP may also defer bonuses in the CDP, subject to the same deferral limits as for salary; however officer level managers may defer up to 95% of their short-term award into the CDP without a corresponding SPDP deferral. In addition, the Committee may approve other contributions to the plan. We pay interest at the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for the preceding September (theMoody’s rate), a common index used by companies. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we include in the “Summary Compensation Table” under “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” any earnings on deferred compensation that exceed a rate determined in accordance with SEC rules. Deferrals are distributed at times elected by the participant. Similarly, under its predecessor plan, managers could defer salary and incentive compensation to be paid at times selected by the participant. No deferrals were permitted under the prior plan after 2004. Account balances in the prior plan are credited with interest at a rate determined annually by the Company, which will be no less than the prior September Moody’s rate.

72 | www.att.com


Executive Compensation Tables

Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Certain of the Named Executive Officers also participated in deferred compensation plans that are now closed to additional contributions and are described below.

AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan

Mr. de la Vega has a balance in the AT&T Mobility Cash Deferral Plan, a nonqualified executive deferred compensation plan. The plan permitted officers and senior managers to defer between 6% and 50% of their base pay and between 6% and 75% of their annual bonus and long-term compensation awards into the plan. The Company provided a match equal to 80% of 6% of the salary and annual bonus deferred by the participant. The plan also provided an additional match when a participant’s salary and annual bonus exceeded Internal Revenue Code qualified plan limits. Benefits under the plan are unfunded. Account balances earn interest at a rate that is reset each calendar year based on the Moody’s rate for the prior September. Distributions occur according to employee elections. AT&T Mobility adopted a successor plan, known as the AT&T Mobility 2005 Cash Deferral Plan, having substantially the same terms as the original plan except with respect to the timing of deferral and distribution elections. No new deferrals were permitted after 2008.

BellSouth Nonqualified Deferred Income Plan

Mr. de la Vega also made contributions from his BellSouth compensation to this nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Under Schedule A of the plan, senior managers were permitted to make up to two annual deferrals of up to 25% of their salary and bonus. Beginning with the 7th year after the deferral, the plan returned the original deferral to the participant in one to three annual installments, depending on the year of the deferral. Mr. de la Vega’s deferrals under Schedule A receive fixed rates of 17.0% and 17.5% for his 1991 and 1993 deferrals, respectively. The balance is paid in 15 annual installments beginning at age 65. Under Schedule B, participants were able to defer up to 10% of their salary and bonus; distributions are made at the election of the participant. Mr. de la Vega’s deferrals under Schedule B receive fixed rates of 11.0% for his 1994 deferral and 10% for his 1995 deferral. No new deferrals were permitted under this plan after 1998.

AT&T Severance Policy

The AT&T Severance Policy generally limits severance payments for executive officers to 2.99 times salary and bonus. Under the AT&T Severance Policy, the Company will not provide severance benefits to an executive officer that exceed 2.99 times the officer’s annual base salary, plus target bonus, unless the excess payment receives prior stockholder approval or is ratified by stockholders at a regularly scheduled annual meeting within the following 15 months.

Potential Payments Upon Change in Control

Change in Control

An acquisition in our industry can take a year or more to complete, and during that time it is critical that the Company have continuity of its leadership. If we are in the process of being acquired, our officers may have concerns about their employment with the new company. Our Change in Control Severance Plan offers benefits so that our officers may focus on the Company’s business without the

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 73 |


Executive Compensation Tables

distraction of searching for new employment. The Change in Control Severance Plan covers our officers, including each of the Named Executive Officers. Amounts under this plan payable to Mr. de la Vega would be offset by any payments Mr. de la Vega would receive under his agreement described on pages 65-66, providing for the payment of benefits upon his termination of employment.

Description of Change in Control Severance Plan

The Change in Control Severance Plan provides an officer who is terminated or otherwise leaves our Company for “good reason” after a change in control a payment equal to 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s most recent salary and target bonus. The Company is not responsible for the payment of excise taxes (or taxes on such payments). In 2014, the Company eliminated health, life insurance and financial counseling benefits from the plan.

“Good reason” means, in general, assignment of duties inconsistent with the executive’s title or status; a substantial adverse change in the nature or status of the executive’s responsibilities; a reduction in pay; or failure to pay compensation or continue benefits. For the CEO, we eliminated a provision that defined “good reason” to include a good faith determination by the executive within 90 days of the change in control that he or she is not able to discharge his or her duties effectively.

Under the plan, a change in control occurs if: (a) anyone (other than one of our employee benefit plans) acquires more than 20% of AT&T’s common stock, (b) within a two-year period, the Directors at the beginning of the period (together with any new Directors elected or nominated for election by a two-thirds majority of Directors then in office who were Directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease to constitute a majority of the Board, (c) upon consummation of a merger where AT&T Inc. is one of the merging entities and where persons other than the AT&T stockholders immediately before the merger hold more than 50% of the voting power of the surviving entity, or (d) upon our stockholders’ approval of a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all the Company’s assets.

If a change in control and a subsequent termination of employment of the Named Executive Officers had occurred at the end of 2015 in accordance with the Change in Control Severance Plan, the following estimated severance payments would have been paid in a lump sum:

Potential Change in Control Severance Payments
NameSeverance ($)

Stephenson

21,677,500

Stephens

  7,744,100

de la Vega

  8,267,350

Donovan

  7,011,550

Stankey

  8,297,250

None of the Named Executive Officers hold stock awards that would be subject to automatic vesting in connection with a change in control.

74 | www.att.com


Other Information

Other Information

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

AT&T’s executive officers and Directors are required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to file reports of transactions and holdings in AT&T common stock with the SEC and the NYSE. Based solely on a review of the filed reports and written representations that no other reports are required, AT&T believes that during the preceding year all executive officers and Directors were in compliance with all filing requirements applicable to such executive officers and Directors.

Availability of Corporate Governance Documents

A copy of AT&T’s Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year 2015 may be obtained without charge upon written request to AT&T Stockholder Services, 208 S. Akard, Room 2710.14, Dallas, Texas 75202. AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, and Committee Charters for the following committees may be viewed online at www.att.com and are also available in print to anyone who requests them (contact the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T at the address below): Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Corporate Development and Finance Committee, Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee, and Executive Committee.

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominees

Stockholder proposals intended to be included in the proxy materials for the 2017 Annual Meeting must be received by November 11, 2016. Such proposals should be sent in writing by courier or certified mail to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T at 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 3241, Dallas, Texas 75202.Stockholder proposals that are sent to any other person or location or by any other means may not be received in a timely manner.

Stockholders who intend to submit proposals at an Annual Meeting but whose proposals are not included in the proxy materials for the meeting and stockholders who intend to submit nominations for Directors at an Annual Meeting are required to notify the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T (at the address above) of their proposal or nominations and to provide certain other information not less than 90 days, nor more than 120 days, before the anniversary of the prior Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in accordance with AT&T’s Bylaws. Special notice provisions apply under the Bylaws if the date of the Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or 70 days after the anniversary date.

Householding Information

No more than one annual report and Proxy Statement will be sent to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless AT&T has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders at that address. Stockholders may request a separate copy of the most recent annual report and/or the Proxy Statement by writing the transfer agent at: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, or by calling (800) 351-7221. Stockholders calling from outside the United States may call (781) 575-4729. Requests will be responded to promptly. Stockholders sharing an address who desire to receive multiple copies, or who wish to receive only a single copy, of the annual report and/or the Proxy Statement may write or call the transfer agent at the above address or phone numbers to request a change.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | 75 |


Other Information

Cost of Proxy Solicitation

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by AT&T. Officers, agents and employees of AT&T and its subsidiaries and other solicitors retained by AT&T may, by letter, by telephone or in person, make additional requests for the return of proxies and may receive proxies on behalf of AT&T. Brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares and will be reimbursed for their expenses. AT&T has retained D. F. King & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $23,500, plus expenses.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015, concerning shares of AT&T common stock authorized for issuance under AT&T’s existing equity compensation plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information 
Plan Category  

Number of securities to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(a)

   

Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

(b)

   

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   37,509,360 (1)     $30.07     108,836,269 (2)  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   0     0     0  

Total

   37,509,360 (3)     $30.07     108,836,269 (2)  

1.Includes the issuance of stock in connection with the following stockholder approved plans: (a) 8,872,391 stock options under the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (SPDP), (b) 1,479,047 phantom stock units under the Stock Savings Plan (SSP), 9,265,558 phantom stock units under the SPDP, and 4,356,714 restricted stock units under the 2011 Incentive Plan, and (c) 11,084,427 target number of stock-settled performance shares under the 2011 Incentive Plan. At payout, the target number of performance shares may be reduced to zero or increased by up to 150%. Each phantom stock unit and performance share is settleable in stock on a 1-to-1 basis. The weighted-average exercise price in the table does not include outstanding performance shares or phantom stock units.
The SSP was approved by stockholders in 1994 and then was amended by the Board of Directors in 2000 to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the plan (including shares from the Company match and reinvested dividend equivalents). Stockholder approval was not required for the amendment. To the extent applicable, the amount shown for approved plans in column (a), in addition to the above amounts, includes 2,451,223 phantom stock units (computed on a first-in-first-out basis) that were approved by the Board in 2000. Under the SSP, shares could be purchased with payroll deductions and reinvested dividend equivalents by mid-level and above managers and limited Company partial matching contributions. No new contributions may be made to the plan.
2.Includes 24,031,062 shares that may be issued under the SPDP, 63,921,106 shares that may be issued under the 2011 Incentive Plan, and up to 3,728,286 shares that may be purchased through reinvestment of dividends on phantom shares held in the SSP.
3.Does not include certain stock options issued by companies acquired by AT&T that were converted into options to acquire AT&T stock. As of December 31, 2015, there were 3,761,899 shares of AT&T common stock subject to the converted options, having a weighted-average exercise price of $19.25. Also, does not include 10,572,992 outstanding phantom stock units that were issued by companies acquired by AT&T that are convertible into stock on a 1-to-1 basis, along with an estimated 162,019 shares that may be purchased with reinvested dividend equivalents paid on the outstanding phantom stock units. No further phantom stock units, other than reinvested dividends, may be issued under the assumed plans. The weighted-average exercise price in the table does not include outstanding performance shares or phantom stock units.

76 | www.att.com


Appendix A

APPENDIX A

AT&T Inc.

2016 Incentive Plan

Article 1.      Establishment and Purpose.

1.01Establishment of the Plan. AT&T Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “AT&T”), hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan (the “Plan”), as set forth in this document.

1.02Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of Participants to those of the Company’s shareowners, and by providing Participants with an incentive for outstanding performance.

1.03Effective Date of the Plan. The Plan is effective on May 1, 2016.

Article 2.      Definitions.

2.01Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below and, when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word is capitalized:

(a)“Applicable Law” means the legal requirements relating to the administration of options and share-based or performance-based awards under any applicable laws of the United States, any other country, and any provincial, state, or local subdivision, any applicable stock exchange or automated quotation system rules or regulations, as such laws, rules, regulations and requirements shall be in place from time to time.

(b)“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant or award under this Plan of Stock Options, Restricted Stock (including unrestricted Stock), Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, or Performance Shares.

(c)“Award Agreement” means an agreement which may be entered into by each Participant and the Company, setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to Awards granted to Participants under this Plan.

(d)“Board” or “Board of Directors” means the AT&T Board of Directors.

(e)“Cause” means willful and gross misconduct on the part of an Employee that is materially and demonstrably detrimental to the Company or any Subsidiary as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(f)

“Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if (1) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or a corporation owned directly or indirectly by the shareowners of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities; or (2) during any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-1 |


Appendix A

Directors of the Company and any new Director whose election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s shareowners was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof; or (3) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or the shareowners of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all the Company’s assets.

If a change in control and a subsequent termination of employment of the Named Executive Officers had occurred at the end of 2012 in accordance with the Change in Control Severance Plan, the following estimated severance payments would have been paid in a lump sum:

Potential Change in Control Severance Payments

        NameSeverance ($)

Stephenson

19,734,000

Stephens

6,144,450

de la Vega

7,534,800

Stankey

7,534,800

Watts

6,219,200

 

AT&T – Page 75


In addition, under the 2011 Incentive Plan and its predecessor plan, the 2006 Incentive Plan (Incentive Plans), as applicable, unvested restricted stock units (Mr. Stephens, only) or unvested restricted stock (Mr. Stankey, only) will vest if the grantee’s employment is terminated by the Company within two years following a change in control, or if the grantee terminates employment for good reason. A change in control under the Incentive Plans has substantially the same meaning as that in the Change in Control Severance Plan. “Good reason” for the Incentive Plans
(g)“Code” means within two years after the change in control, the employee’s position or responsibilities are adversely altered, the employee’s salary or target annual bonus is reduced, or the employee is relocated more than 50 miles from his former employment. If the employment of these officers was terminated under these conditions at the end of 2012, the Named Executive Officers would be entitled to the vesting of restricted stock and units (if not already vested) that were valued as of December 31, 2012 as follows: Mr. Stephens—$3,330,447 and Mr. Stankey—$5,164,305.

Performance shares granted under the Incentive Plans do not vest in connection with a change in control or a subsequent termination of employment. After a change in control, the payout of the performance shares is based solely on the achievement of the pre-determined performance goals.

AT&T – Page 76


              Equity Compensation Plan Information              

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2012, concerning shares of AT&T common stock authorized for issuance under AT&T’s existing equity compensation plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information 
            
Plan Category  Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding  options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
   Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance  under
equity compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a))
 
   (a)  (b)   (c) 

Equity compensation

plans approved by

security holders

   40,942,144 (1)  $28.93     111,324,462 (2) 

Equity compensation

plans not approved

by security holders

   426,256(3)  $24.44     0  

Total

   41,368,400 (4)  $28.82     111,324,462  

1.Includes the issuance of stock in connection with the following stockholder approved plans: (a) 12,309,331 stock options under the 1996 Stock and Incentive Plan, 2001 Incentive Plan, and Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (SPDP), (b) 1,915,366 phantom stock units under the Stock Savings Plan (SSP), 6,668,131 phantom stock units under the SPDP, 3,804,235 restricted stock units under the 2006 Incentive Plan, and 1,653,945 restricted stock units under the 2011 Incentive Plan, (c) 6,602,469 target number of stock-settled performance shares under the 2006 Incentive Plan, and (d) 3,390,791 target number of stock-settled performance shares under the 2011 Incentive Plan. At payout, the target number of performance shares may be reduced to zero or increased by up to 150%. Each phantom stock unit and performance share is settleable in stock on a 1-to-1 basis. The weighted-average exercise price in the table does not include outstanding performance shares or phantom stock units.

The SSP was approved by stockholders in 1994 and then was amended by the Board of Directors in 2000 to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the plan (including shares from the Company match and reinvested dividend equivalents) and shares subject to options. Stockholder approval was not required for the amendment. To the extent applicable, the amount shown for approved plans in column (a), in addition to the above amounts, includes 2,844,927 phantom stock units (computed on a first-in-first-out basis) and 1,737,897 stock options that were approved by the Board in 2000. Under the SSP, shares could be purchased with payroll deductions and reinvested dividend equivalents by mid-level and above managers and limited Company partial matching contributions. No new contributions may be made to the plan. In addition, participants received approximately 2 options for each share purchased with employee payroll deductions. The options have a 10-year term and a strike price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.

2.Includes 7,788,776 shares that may be issued under the SPDP, 82,815,070 shares that may be issued under the 2011 Incentive Plan, and up to 4,021,202 shares that may be purchased through reinvestment of dividends on phantom shares held in the SSP.

3.Number of outstanding stock options under the 1995 Management Stock Option Plan (1995 MSOP), which has not been approved by stockholders. The 1995 MSOP provides for grants of stock options to management employees (10-year terms) subject to vesting requirements and shortened exercise terms upon termination of employment. No further options may be issued under this plan.

4.Does not include certain stock options issued by companies acquired by AT&T that were converted into options to acquire AT&T stock. As of December 31, 2012, there were 2,622,363 shares of AT&T common stock subject to the converted options, having a weighted-average exercise price of $20.12. Also, does not include 78,006 outstanding phantom stock units that were issued by companies acquired by AT&T that are convertible into stock on a 1-to-1 basis, along with up to 60,660 shares that may be purchased with reinvested dividend equivalents paid on the outstanding phantom stock units. These units have no exercise price. No further phantom stock units, other than reinvested dividends, may be issued under the assumed plans. The weighted-average exercise price in the table does not include outstanding performance shares or phantom stock units.

AT&T – Page 77


              Other Business              

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

AT&T’s executive officers and Directors are required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to file reports of transactions and holdings in AT&T common stock with the SEC and the NYSE. Based solely on a review of the filed reports and written representations that no other reports are required, AT&T believes that during the preceding year all executive officers and Directors were in compliance with all filing requirements applicable to such executive officers and Directors, except for two reports filed a week late resulting from a company grant of stock awards to Mr. Donovan and Mr. Geisse. The late reports were the result of an administrative error by the Company. In addition, we inadvertently reported de minimis holdings by Mr. McCallister’s spouse two days after the due date.

Availability of Corporate Governance Documents

A copy of AT&T’s Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year 2012 may be obtained without charge upon written request to AT&T Stockholder Services, 208 S. Akard, Room 2710.14, Dallas, Texas 75202. AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, and Committee Charters may be viewed online at www.att.com and are also available in print to anyone who requests them (contact the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T at the address below).

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominees

Stockholder proposals intended to be included in the proxy materials for the 2014 Annual Meeting must be received by November 11, 2013. Such proposals should be sent in writing by courier or certified mail to the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T at 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 3241, Dallas, Texas 75202.Stockholder proposals that are sent to any other person or location or by any other means may not be received in a timely manner.

Stockholders who intend to submit proposals at an Annual Meeting but whose proposals are not included in the proxy materials for the meeting and stockholders who intend to submit nominations for Directors at an Annual Meeting are required to notify the Senior Vice President and Secretary of AT&T (at the address above) of their proposal or nominations and to provide certain other information not less than 90 days, nor more than 120 days, before the anniversary of the prior Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in accordance with AT&T’s Bylaws. Special notice provisions apply under the Bylaws if the date of the Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or 70 days after the anniversary date.

AT&T – Page 78


APPENDIX

Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan


APPENDIX

AT&T INC.

STOCK PURCHASE AND DEFERRAL PLAN

Adopted November 19, 2004

As amended through January 31, 2013

Article 1 – Statement of Purpose

The purpose of the Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan (“Plan”) is to increase stock ownership by, and to provide savings opportunities to, a select group of management employees of AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”) and its Subsidiaries.

Article 2 – Definitions

For the purpose of this Plan, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings indicated, unless the context indicates otherwise:

Annual Bonus. The award designated the “Annual Bonus” by AT&T (including but not limited to an award that may be paid in more frequent installments than annually), together with any individual discretionary award made in connection therewith, or comparable awards, if any, determined by AT&T to be used in lieu of these awards.

Base Compensation. The following types of cash-based compensation paid by an Employer (but not including payments made by a non-Employer, such as state disability payments), before reduction due to any contribution pursuant to this Plan or reduction pursuant to any deferral plan of an Employer, including but not limited to a plan that includes a qualified cash or deferral arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Code:

(a) base salary;

(b) lump sum payments in lieu of a base salary increase; and

(c) Annual Bonus.

Payments by an Employer under a disability plan made in lieu of any compensation described above shall be deemed to be a part of the respective form of compensation it replaces for purposes of this definition. Base Compensation does not include zone allowances or any other geographical differential and shall not include payments made in lieu of unused vacation or other paid days off, and such payments shall not be contributed to this Plan.

Determinations by AT&T (the Committee with respect to Officer Level Employees) of the items that make up Base Compensation shall be final. The Committee may, from time to time, add or subtract types of compensation to or from the definition of “Base Compensation” provided, however, any such addition or subtraction shall be effective only with respect to the next period in which a Participant may make an election to establish a Share Deferral Account. Base Compensation that was payable in a prior Plan Year but paid in a later Plan Year shall not be used to determine Employee Contributions or Matching Contributions in such later Plan Year.

Business Day. Any day during regular business hours that AT&T is open for business.

Appendix – Page A-1


Change in Control. With respect to AT&T’s direct and indirect ownership of an Employer, a “Change in the effective control of a Corporation,” as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(vi)(A)(1), regardless of whether the Employer is a corporation or non corporate entity as permitted by the regulation, and using “50 percent” in lieu of “30 percent” in such regulation. A Change in Control will not apply to AT&T itself.

Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Inc.

Code.References to the Code shall be to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended including regulations promulgated thereunder and successor provisions. Similarly, referencesfrom time to regulations shall include amendments and successor provisions.time.

Committee. The Human Resources Committee
(h)“Committee” means the committee or committees of the Board of Directors given authority to administer the Plan as provided in Article 3.

(i)“Director” means any individual who is a member of the AT&T Inc.Board of Directors.

Disability. Absence
(j)“Disability” means, absence of an Employee from work with an Employer under the relevant Employer’sCompany or Subsidiary long term disability plan.

Eligible Employee.An Employee who:

(a) is a full
(k)“Employee” means any employee of the Company or part time, salariedof one of the Company’s Subsidiaries. “Employment” means the employment of an Employee of AT&T or an Employer in which AT&T has a direct or indirect 100% ownership interest and who is on active duty or Leave of Absence (but only while such Employee is deemed by the Employer toCompany or one of its Subsidiaries. Directors who are not otherwise employed by the Company shall not be an Employee of such Employer);

(b) is, as determined by AT&T, a member of Employer’s “select group of management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and regulations thereunder (“ERISA”), which is deemed to include each Officer Level Employee; and

(c) has an employment status which has been approved by AT&T to be eligible to participate in this Plan or is an Officer Level Employee.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, AT&T (the Committee with respect to Officer Level Employees) may, from time to time, exclude any Employee or group ofconsidered Employees from being deemed an “Eligible Employee” under this Plan.

In the event a court or other governmental authority determines that an individual was improperly excluded from the class of persons who would be permitted to make Employee Contributions during a particular time for any reason, that individual shall not be permitted to make such contributions for purposes of the Plan for the period of time prior to such determination.

Employee. Any person employed by an Employer and paid on an Employer’s payroll system, excluding persons hired for a fixed maximum term and excluding persons who are neither citizens nor permanent residents of the United States, all as determined by AT&T. For purposes of this Plan, a person on Leave of Absence who otherwise would be an Employee shall be deemed to be an Employee.

Employee Contributions. Amounts credited to a Share Deferral Account pursuant to Section 4.1 (Election to Make Contributions) of the Plan.

Employer. AT&T Inc. or any of its Subsidiaries.

Exercise Price. The price per share of Stock purchasable under an Option.

 

Appendix – Page A-2


Fair Market Value or FMV. In valuing Stock or any other item subject to valuation under this Plan, the Committee may use such index or measurement as the Committee may reasonably determine from time to time, and such index or measurement shall be the FMV of such Stock or other item, provided that for purposes of determining the Exercise Price of Stock Options, the Committee shall use a value consistent with the requirements of Section 409A. In the absence of such action by the Committee, FMV
(l)“Exchange Act” means with respect to Stock, the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) of the Stock on the relevant date, or if on such date the Stock is not traded on the NYSE, then the closing price on the immediately preceding date such Stock is so traded.

Leave of Absence. Where a person is absent from employment with an Employer on a leave of absence, military leave, sick leave, or Disability where the leave is given in order to prevent a break in the continuity of term of employment, and permission for such leave is granted (and not revoked) in conformity with the rules of the Employer that employs the individual, as adopted from time to time, and the Employee is reasonably expected to return to service. Except as set forth below, the leave shall not exceed six (6) months for purposes of this Plan, and the Employee shall Terminate Employment upon termination of such leave if the Employee does not return to work prior to or upon expiration of such six (6) month period, unless the individual retains a right to reemployment under law or by contract. A twenty-nine (29) month limitation shall apply in lieu of such six (6) month limitation if the leave is due to the Employee being “disabled” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(4)). A Leave of Absence shall not commence or shall be deemed to cease under the Plan where the Employee has incurred a Termination of Employment.

Officer Level Employee. Any executive officer of AT&T, as that term is used under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended andfrom time to time, or any successor Act thereto.

(m)“Exercise Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option, as determined by the Committee.

(n)“Fair Market Value” means the closing price on the NYSE for a Share on the relevant date, or if such date was not a trading day, the next preceding trading date, all as determined by the Company. A trading day is any day that the Shares are traded on the NYSE. In lieu of the foregoing, the Committee may, from time to time, select any other index or measurement to determine the Fair Market Value of Shares under the Plan, including but not limited to an average determined over a period of trading days.

(o)“Insider” means an Employee thatwho is, on the relevant date, an officer, director, or ten percent (10%) beneficial owner of the Company, as those terms are defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

(p)“NYSE” or “New York Stock Exchange.” If the New York Stock Exchange is no longer the principal exchange on which the stock is listed, then NYSE shall refer to such principal exchange unless otherwise provided by the Disinterested Committee.

A-2 | www.att.com


Appendix A

(q)“Officer Level Employee” means a Participant who is an “officer level”officer level Employee for compensation purposes as shownindicated on the records of AT&T. References to records of AT&T shall include the records of its Subsidiaries.

Options or Stock Options. Options
(r)“Option” means an option to purchase Stock issued pursuant to this Plan.Shares from AT&T.

Participant. An
(s)“Participant” means an Employee or former Employee who participates in thisholds an outstanding Award granted under the Plan.

Plan Year. Each of
(t)“Performance Unit” and “Performance Share” each mean an Award granted to an Employee pursuant to Article 8 herein.

(u)“Retirement” or to “Retire” means the following shall be a Plan Year: the period January 1, 2005, through January 15, 2006; the period January 16, 2006, through December 31, 2006; and, for all later Plan Years, it is defined as the period from January 1 through December 31.

Retirement or Retire.Participant’s Termination of Employment for any reason other than death, Disability, or for Cause, on or after the earlier of the following dates, unlessor as otherwise provided by the Committee: (a)(1) for Officer Level Employees, the date the Participant is at least age 55fifty-five (55) and has five (5) yearscompleted a 5 year Term of Net Credited Service;Employment; provided, however, that individuals who are designated as an Officer on or (b)after October 1, 2015, must have completed a 10-year Term of Employment; or (2) the date the Participant has attained one of the following combinations of age and Net Credited Service:

service, except as otherwise indicated below:

Net Credited Service

Term of Employment  Age

10 years or more

65 or older

20 years or more

55 or older

25 years or more

50 or older

30 years or more

Any age  

10 years or more

65 or older

20 years or more

55 or older

25 years or more

50 or older

30 years or more

Any age

For purposes of this Plan only, Net Credited Service shall be calculated in the same manner as “Pension Eligibility Service” under the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan – Nonbargained Program (“Pension Plan”), as amended from time to time, except that service with an Employer shall be counted as though the Employer

For purposes of this Plan only, Term of Employment shall have the same meaning as in the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan – Nonbargained Program (“Pension Plan”), as that may be amended from time to time, except that service with a Participant’s employer shall be counted as though the employer were a “Participating Company” under the Pension Plan and the Employee was a participant in the Pension Plan.

 

Appendix – Page A-3


(v)Senior Manager. Any EmployeeManager” means a Participant who is a “senior manager”senior manager for compensation purposes as shownindicated on the records of AT&T.

Shares or Share Units. An accounting entry representing
(w)“Severance Termination of Employment” means a Termination of Employment where the right to receive an equivalent number of shares of Stock.

Share Deferral Accountor Account.The Account or Accounts established annually by an election byParticipant receives a Participant to make Employee Contributions to the Plan, with each Account relating to a Plan Year. For each Plan Year after 2008, there shall be (1) a separate Share Deferral Account for Share Units purchased with Employee Contributions of Base Compensation (excluding Annual Bonus) and related Matching Share Units and (2) a separate Share Deferral Account for Share Units purchased with Employee Contributions of Short Term Incentive Award and/or Annual Bonus and any related Matching Share Units. Earnings on Share Units and Matching Share Units shall accrue to the respective Share Deferral Accounts where they are earned.

Short Term Incentive Award. A cash award paid by an Employer (and not by a non-Employer, such as state disability payments) under the Short Term Incentive Plan or any successor plan, together with any individual discretionary award made in connection therewith; an awardseverance payment under a similarseverance plan intended by the Committee to be in lieu of an award under such Short Term Incentive Plan, including, but not limited to, Performance Units granted under the 2006 Incentive Plan or any successor plan. It shall also include any other award that the Committee designates as a Short Term Incentive Award specifically for purposes of this Plan (regardless of the purposeParticipant’s employer or pursuant to an individually negotiated severance agreement.

(x)“Shares” or “Stock” means the shares of the award) provided the deferral election is made in accordance with Section 409A.

Specified Employee. Any Participant who is a “Key Employee” (as defined in Code Section 416(i) without regard to paragraph (5) thereof), as determined by AT&T in accordance with its uniform policy with respect to all arrangements subject to Code Section 409A, based upon the 12-month period ending on each December 31st (such 12-month period is referred to below as the “identification period”). All Participants who are determined to be Key Employees under Code Section 416(i) (without regard to paragraph (5) thereof) during the identification period shall be treated as Key Employees for purposes of the Plan during the 12-month period that begins on the first day of the 4th month following the close of such identification period.

Stock. The common stock of AT&T Inc.the Company.

Subsidiary. Any
(y)“Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, venture or other entity or business within which AT&T wouldholds, directly or indirectly, a fifty percent (50%) or greater ownership interest.

(z)

“Surplus Termination of Employment” means a Termination of Employment as a result of force surplus, technological, operational, organizational and/or structural changes affecting the relevant employer without an offer for comparable employment, or an Employment Termination that occurs as a result of declining a

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-3 |


Appendix A

Company initiated or offered job relocation to a work location that is more than fifty (50) miles from the employee’s work location and that increases the employee’s work commute.

(aa)“Termination of Employment” or a similar reference means the event where the Employee is no longer an Employee of the Company or of any Subsidiary, including but not limited to where the employing company ceases to be considered a single employer under Sections 414(a) and (c)Subsidiary. With respect to any Award that provides “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, using 50%“Termination of Employment” shall mean a “separation from service” as the ownership threshold as provideddefined under Section 409A of the Code.

Article 3.      Administration.

Termination of Employment. References herein to “Termination of Employment,” “Terminate Employment” or a similar reference, shall mean the event where the Employee has a “separation from service,” as defined under Section 409A, with all Employers. For purposes of this Plan, a Termination of Employment with respect to an Employer shall be deemed to also occur when such Employer incurs a Change in Control.

Article 3 –
3.01The Committee. Administration of the Plan

3.1The Committee.

Except shall be as delegated by thisfollows:

(a)With respect to Insiders, the Plan orand Awards hereunder shall be administered by the Human Resources Committee of the Board or such other committee as may be appointed by the Board for this purpose (each of the Human Resources Committee and such other committee is the “Disinterested Committee”), where each Director on such Disinterested Committee is a “Non-Employee Director,” as that term is used in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act (or any successor designation for determining the committee that may administer plans, transactions or awards exempt under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act), as that rule may be modified from time to time.

(b)With respect to persons who are not Insiders, the Plan and Awards hereunder shall be administered by each of the Disinterested Committee and such other committee, if any, to which the Board may delegate such authority (such other Committee shall be the administrator“Non-Insider Committee”), and each such Committee shall have full authority to administer the Plan and all Awards hereunder, except as otherwise provided herein or by the Board. The Disinterested Committee may, from time to time, limit the authority of the Non-Insider Committee in any way. Any Committee may be replaced by the Board at any time.

(c)Except as otherwise indicated from the context, references to the “Committee” in this Plan shall be to either of the Disinterested Committee or the Non-Insider Committee.

3.02Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have complete control over the administration of the Plan and will administershall have the authority in its sole discretion to exercise all of the powers granted to it under the Plan, which shall include but not be limited to the authority to:

(a)construe, interpret construe and apply its provisionsimplement the Plan, grant terms and determinegrant notices, and all questions of administration, interpretationAward Agreements;

(b)prescribe, amend and application ofrescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including without limitation, questionsrules governing its own operations;

(c)make all determinations necessary or advisable in administering the Plan or any Award thereunder;

(d)correct any defect, supply any omission and determinations of eligibility, entitlement to benefitsreconcile any inconsistency in the Plan; and payment of benefits, all in its sole and absolute discretion. The Committee may further establish, adopt or revise such rules and regulations and such additional

A-4 | www.att.com


Appendix A

 

Appendix – Page A-4


(e)with respect to Awards:

(i)grant Awards,

(ii)determine who shall receive Awards,

(iii)determine when Awards shall be granted

(iv)determine the terms and conditions regarding participationof Awards, including, but not limited to, conditioning the exercise, vesting, payout or other terms or conditions of an Award on the achievement of Performance Goals (defined in Article 8), and

(v)determine whether and to the extent the terms and conditions of Awards have been achieved or satisfied.

3.03No Award may be made under the Plan as it may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. after April 30, 2026.

3.04References in this Plan to determinations or other actions by AT&T or the Company, herein, shall mean actions authorized by the Committee, the Chief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board of AT&T, the Senior Executive Vice President of AT&T in charge of Human Resources or their respective successors or duly authorized delegates, in each case in the discretion of such person. person, provided, however, only the Disinterested Committee may take action with respect to Insiders with regard to granting or determining the terms of Awards or other matters that would require the Disinterested Committee to act in order to comply with Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

3.05All determinations and decisions made by the Committee, its delegate or AT&T as applicable,pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders or resolutions of the Board shall be final, conclusive, and binding.binding on all persons, including but not limited to the Company, its stockholders, Employees, Participants, and their estates and beneficiaries.

Article 4.      Shares Subject to the Plan.

3.2Authorized Shares of Stock.

(a) Except
4.01Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided below,in Section 4.03 herein, the number of shares of Stock whichShares available for issuance under the Plan shall not exceed ninety (90) million Shares. The Shares granted under this Plan may be distributed pursuanteither authorized but unissued or reacquired Shares. The Disinterested Committee shall have full discretion to determine the Plan, exclusivemanner in which Shares available for grant are counted in this Plan.

4.02Share Accounting. Without limiting the discretion of Article 8—Options, is 46,000,000. The numberthe Committee under this section, unless otherwise provided by the Disinterested Committee, the following rules will apply for purposes of sharesthe determination of Stock which may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Stock Options is 34,000,000 (together with an equal number of Stock Options). In determining the number of authorized shares remainingShares available for issuance, shares withheldgrant under the Plan or compliance with the foregoing limits:

(a)If an outstanding Award for taxesany reason expires or is terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in a distribution shall not be considered issued and shall not reduce the number of authorized shares. When an Option is exercised, the authorized shares of Stock that may be issuedfull, or if Shares acquired pursuant to an Option exercise shall be reduced byAward subject to forfeiture are forfeited under the numberterms of Options so exercised. To the extent an Option issued under this Plan is canceled, terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason,the relevant Award, the Shares allocable to the terminated portion of such OptionAward or such forfeited Shares shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. Conversions of Stock awards into Share Units and their eventual distribution (excluding the effects of any dividends on such Share Units) shall count only against the limits of the plans from which they originated and

(b)Shares shall not be applied against the limits in this Plan. To the extent Share Units are credited through deferrals of Stock or Employee Contributions where the distribution of which would be deductible by AT&T under Section 162(m) of the Code without regarddeemed to have been issued pursuant to the sizePlan with respect to any portion of the distribution, and such deductible Share Units are available for distribution, such Share Units shall be distributed first.an Award that is settled in cash, other than an Option.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-5 |


(b) In the event the Committee determines that continuing the issuance of Share Units under the Plan or Stock Options under the Plan may causeAppendix A

(c)When an Option is exercised (including but not limited to a Stock-Settled exercise), the number of shares of Stock that are toavailable for issuance under the Plan shall be distributed under this Plan orreduced by the gross number of Stock Options (as determined pursuant to subsection (a), above) to exceedshares for which the number of authorized shares of Stock, thenOption is exercised.

4.03Adjustments in lieu of distributing Stock, the Committee may provide after such determinationAuthorized Plan Shares and only with respect to Share Units that have not theretofore been credited to a Share Deferral Account, that such Share Units may be settled in cash equal to the value of the Stock that would otherwise be distributed based on the FMV of the Stock on the date of the distribution of such Share Unit. The Committee may also provide after such determination and only with respect to Stock Options that have not theretofore been issued that such Stock Options may only be settled on a Net-Settled basis in cash equal to the value of the Stock that would otherwise be distributed based on the FMV of the Stock on the day of exercise.

(c)Outstanding Awards. In the event of aany merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, separation, split-up, liquidation, stockShare combination, Stock split, Stock dividend, stock split, share combination, or other change in the corporate structure of AT&Tthe Company affecting the shares of Stock (including a conversion of Stock into cash or other property), suchShares, an adjustment shall be made toin the number and class of the shares of StockShares which may be delivered under the Plan (including but not limited to individual limits), and in the number and class of and/or price of shares of StockShares subject to outstanding OptionsAwards granted under the Plan, and/or in the number of outstanding Options, Shares of Restricted Stock, and SharePerformance Shares (and Performance Units or suchand other adjustment determined by the Committee, in each caseAwards whose value is based on a number of Shares) constituting outstanding Awards, as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Disinterested Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights.

Article 5.      Eligibility and Participation.

3.3Claims and Appeals.

(a) Claims. A person who believes that he or she is being denied a benefit
5.01Eligibility. All management Employees are eligible to which he or she is entitledreceive Awards under this Plan (hereinafter referred to as a “Claimant”) may file a written request for such benefit with the Executive Compensation Administration Department, setting forth his or her claim. The request must be addressedPlan.

5.02Actual Participation. Subject to the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department at its then principal place of business.

Appendix – Page A-5


(b) Claim Decision. Upon receipt of a claim, the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department shall review the claim and provide the Claimant with a written notice of its decision within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed ninety (90) days, after the claim is received. If the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department determines that special circumstances require an extension of time beyond the initial ninety (90)- day claim review period, the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department shall notify the Claimant in writing within the initial ninety (90)-day period and explain the special circumstances that require the extension and state the date by which the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department expects to render its decision on the claim. If this notice is provided, the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department may take up to an additional ninety (90) days (for a total of one hundred eighty (180) days after receiptprovisions of the claim) to render its decision on the claim.

If the claim is denied by the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department, in whole or in part, the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department shall provide a written decision using language calculated to be understood by the Claimant and setting forth: (i) the specific reason or reasons for such denial; (ii) specific references to pertinent provisions of this Plan, on which such denial is based; (iii) a description of any additional material or information necessary for the Claimant to perfect his or her claim and an explanation of why such material or such information is necessary; (iv) a description of the Plan’s procedures for review of denied claims and the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to submit the claim for review; (v) the time limits for requesting a review of a denied claim under this section and for conducting the review under this section; and (vi) a statement of the Claimant’s right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA if the claim is denied following review under this section.

(c) Request for Review. Within sixty (60) days after the receipt by the Claimant of the written decision on the claim provided for in this section, the Claimant may request in writing that the Committee review the determination of the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department. Such request must be addressed to the Committee at the address for giving notice in this Plan. To assist the Claimant in deciding whether to request a review of a denied claim or in preparing a request for review of a denied claim, a Claimant shall be provided, upon written request to the Committee and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to the claim. The Claimant or his or her duly authorized representative may, but need not, submit a statement of the issues and comments in writing, as well as other documents, records or other information relating to the claim for consideration by the Committee. If the Claimant does not request a review by the Committee of the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department’s decision within such sixty (60)-day period, the Claimant shall be barred and stopped from challenging the determination of the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department.

(d) Review of Decision. Within sixty (60) days after the Committee’s receipt of a request for review, the Administrator will review the decision of the AT&T Executive Compensation Administration Department. If the Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time beyond the initial sixty (60)-day review period, the Committee shall notify the Claimant in writing within the initial sixty (60)-day period and explain the special circumstances that require the extension and state the date by which the Committee expects to render its decision on the review of the claim. If this notice is provided, the Committee may, take upfrom time to an additional sixty (60) days (for a total of one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review) to render its decision on the review of the claim.

During its review of the claim, the Committee shall:

(1) Take into accounttime, select from all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial review of the claim conducted pursuant to this section;

Appendix – Page A-6


(2) Follow reasonable procedures to verify that its benefit determination is made in accordance with the applicable Plan documents; and

(3) Follow reasonable procedures to ensure that the applicable Plan provisions are applied to the Participanteligible Employees, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the claim relates in a manner consistent with how such provisions have been applied to other similarly-situated Participants.

After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Committee will render a decision, written in a manner designed to be understood by the Claimant. If the Committee denies the claim on review, the written decision will include (i) the specific reasons for the decision; (ii) specific references to the pertinent provisionsnature and amount of this Plan on which the decision is based; (iii) a statement that the Claimanteach Award. No Employee is entitled to receive upon requestan Award unless selected by the Committee.

Article 6.      Stock Options.

6.01Grant of Options. Subject to the Committeeterms and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the claim; and (iv) a statementprovisions of the Claimant’s rightPlan, Options may be granted to bring a civil actioneligible Employees at any time and from time to time, and under Section 502(a)such terms and conditions, as shall be determined by the Committee. In addition, the Committee may, from time to time, provide for the payment of ERISA.

dividend equivalents on Options, prospectively and/or retroactively, on such terms and conditions as the Committee may require. The Committee shall serve ashave discretion in determining the final review committeenumber of Shares subject to Options granted to each Employee; provided, however, that no single Employee may receive Options under thethis Plan and shall have sole and complete discretionary authority to administer, interpret, construe and apply the Plan provisions, and determine all questions of administration, interpretation, construction, and applicationfor more than one percent (1%) of the Shares approved for issuance under this Plan including questions and determinations of eligibility, entitlement to benefits and the type, form and amount ofduring any payment of benefits, all in its sole and absolute discretion.calendar year. The Committee shall further havemay not grant Incentive Stock Options, as described in Section 422 of the authorityCode, under this Plan.

6.02Form of Issuance. The Committee may require, as a condition to determine all relevant facts and related issues, and all documents, records and other information relevant to a claim conclusively for all parties, and in accordance withreceiving an Option Award, that the Participant enter into an Option Award Agreement, setting forth the terms and conditions of the documents or instruments governing the Plan. Decisions byAward. In lieu of an Option Award Agreement, the Committee shall be conclusivemay provide the terms and binding on all parties and not subjectconditions of an Option Award in a notice to further review.

In any case, athe Participant, or Beneficiary may have further rights under ERISA. The Plan provisions require that Participants or Beneficiary pursue all claim and appeal rights described in this section before they seek any other legal recourse regarding claims for benefits.

Article 4 – Contributions

4.1Election to Make Contributions.

(a) The Committee shall establish dates and other conditions for participation in the Plan and making contributionsresolution approving the Award, or in such other manner as it deems appropriate. Except asSuch terms and conditions shall include the Exercise Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which an Option pertains (unless otherwise provided by the Committee, each year an Employee who is an Eligible Employee as of September 30 may thereafter make an election on or prior to the last Business Day of the immediately following November (such election shall be cancelled if the Employee is not an Eligible Employee on the last day such an electionOption may be made) to contribute on a pre-tax basis, through payroll deductions, any combination of the following:

(1) From 6% to 30% (in whole percentage increments) of the Participant’s monthly Base Compensation, other than Annual Bonus, during the calendar year (the Plan Year for such contributions) following the calendar year of such election. The Employee Contributions shall be used to acquire Share Units to be credited to the Share Deferral Account for that Plan Year.

(2) Up to 95% (in whole percentage increments or limited to the target amount) of a Short Term Incentive Award, or from 6% to 30% (in whole percentage increments) of Annual Bonus, in each case such contributions shall be made during the second calendar year (which is the Plan Year for such contributions) following the year of such election, except that in 2008 a separate election may be made with respect to contributions to be made in 2009. An Employee may make such an election with respect to the type of Award (Short Term Incentive Award or Annual Bonus) that the Employee is under as of the

Appendix – Page A-7


time the Employee’s eligibility to make such election is determined. If because of a promotion or otherwise, the Employee receives a different type of Award instead of, or in partial or full replacement for, the type of Award subject to the Employee’s election for the relevant Plan Year, the election will apply to the other Award as well, including but not limited to any individual discretionary award related thereto.

(b) The Committee may permit an Eligible Employee to make an electionexercised to purchase Share Unitsone Share), and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.

6.03

Exercise Price. Unless a greater Exercise Price is determined by the Committee, the Exercise Price for each Option Awarded under this Plan shall be equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.03 herein or as otherwise provided

A-6 | www.att.com


Appendix A

herein, the terms of an Option may not be amended to reduce the exercise price nor may Options be cancelled or exchanged for cash, other awards or Options with compensation otheran exercise price that is less than Base Compensation or Short Term Incentive Awardsthe exercise price of the original Options.

6.04Duration of Options. Each Option shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant (which duration may be extended by the Committee); provided, however, that no Option shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary date of its grant. In the event the Committee does not specify the expiration date of an Option, then such Option will expire on the tenth (10th) anniversary date of its grant, except as otherwise provided herein.

6.05Vesting of Options. A grant of Options shall vest at such times and under such terms and conditions as such Committee may permit from time to time, provided that any such election is made in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. In no event shall an acquisition of Share Units pursuant to this paragraph (b) or pursuant to the conversion of a right to receive Stock into Share Units (such as through a distribution of Stock under the 2001 Incentive Plan) result in the crediting of an AT&T Matching Contribution or Options.

(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, no election shall be effective to the extent it would permit an Employee Contribution or distribution to be made that is not in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. To the extent such election related to Employee Contributions that complied with such statute and regulations thereunder, that portion of the election shall remain valid, except as otherwise provided under this Plan.

(d) To the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, AT&T may refuse or terminate, in whole or in part, any election to purchase Share Units in the Plan at any time; provided, however, that only the Committee may take such action with respect to persons who are Officer Level Employees.

(e) In the event the Participant takes a hardship withdrawal pursuant to Treasury Regulation §1.401(k)-1 from a benefit plan qualified under the Code and sponsored by an Employer, any election to make Employee Contributions by such Participant shall be cancelled on a prospective basis, and the Participant shall not be permitted to make a new election with respect to Employee Contributions that would be contributed during the then current and immediately following calendar year.

4.2Purchase of Share Units.

(a) Employee Contributions (as well as any corresponding AT&T Matching Contributions) shall be made pursuant to a proper election, only during the Participant’s lifetime; provided, however, with respect to Employee Contribution elections made prior to 2007, the Employee must remain an Eligible Employee while making any such contributions. In the event of a Change in Control of an Employer, subsequent compensation from the Employer may not be contributed to the Plan. The Employer may continue the then current elections of the participants under a subsequent plan in order to comply with applicable tax laws.

(b) The number of Share Units purchased by a Participant during a calendar month shall be found by dividing the Participant’s Employee Contributions during the month by the FMV of a share of Stock on the last day of such month.

(c) A contribution to the Plan shall be made when the compensation – from which the contribution is to be deducted – is to be paid (“paid,” as used in this Plan, includes amounts contributed to the Plan that would have been paid were it not for an election under this Plan), as determined by the relevant Employer. The Committee may modify or change this paragraph (c) from time to time.

4.3Reinvestment of Dividends.

In the month containing a record date for a cash dividend on Stock, each Share Deferral Account shall be credited with that number of Share Units equal to the declared dividend per share of Stock, multiplied by the number of Share Units held in such Share Deferral Account as of such record date, and dividing the product by the FMV of a share of Stock on the last day of such month.

Appendix – Page A-8


Article 5 – AT&T Matching Contributions

5.1AT&T Match.

(a) Each month AT&T shall credit the Participant’s relevant Share Deferral Account with the number of “Matching Share Units” found by taking eighty percent (80%) of the Participant’s Employee Contributions from Base Compensation made to this Plan and to the Cash Deferral Plan during the month with respect to the first six percent (6%) of the Participant’s monthly Match Eligible Compensation (as defined below) and dividing the resulting figure by the FMV of the Stock on the last day of such month (such resulting amount shall be the “Matching Contribution”). The monthly “Match Eligible Compensation” shall be the sum of:

(1) the monthly Employee Contributions from Base Compensation to this Plan and the Cash Deferral Plan (in the aggregate, “Deferred BC”), plus

(2) the amount of the Participant’s monthly Base Compensation in excess of the Deferred BC (“Non-Deferred BC”) but only to the extent such monthly Non-Deferred BC, when aggregated with the Participant’s total Non-Deferred BC for prior months in such Plan Year, as determined by the relevant Employer, exceeds the limit in effect under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code applicable with respect to such Plan Year.

The foregoing formula shall apply regardless of whether or not the Participant makes contributions to a 401(k) plan.

A Participant may receive Matching Share Units in a Share Deferral Account for a particular form of compensation only if the Participant is then making contributions to the same Share Deferral Account;Committee; provided, however, this condition shall not apply for purposes of determining under Section 5.1(a)(2) whether the limit described therein has been reached.

As provided in the definition of Share Deferral Account, Matching Share Units shall be credited to the respective Share Deferral Account thatunless another vesting period is related to the same form of Employee Contributions (either (1) Base Compensation excluding Annual Bonus or (2) Annual Bonus).

(b) In the sole discretion of the Committee, in the event the Committee reduces the number of Options that AT&T issues for each Share Unit purchased, the Committee may provide for the contribution of a Bonus Matching Contribution on such terms as the Committee determines. Such Bonus Matching Contribution may not exceed 20% of the Participant’s Employee Contributions for the month. The Bonus Matching Contribution shall be subject to such terms and conditions as required by the Committee and, unless otherwise provided by the Committee at or before the grant of an Option,one-third of the Options will vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant; if one Option remains after equally dividing the grant by three, it will vest on the first anniversary of the grant, if two Options remain, then one will vest on each of the first two anniversaries. The Committee shall have the right to accelerate the same distribution requirements as Matching Contributions. Pursuant tovesting of any Option; however, the foregoing authority and until otherwise providedChairman of the Board or the Senior Executive Vice President-Human Resources, or their respective successors, or such other persons designated by the Committee, effective for Share Accounts created pursuantshall have the authority to Employee Contribution elections where such elections are made after January 1, 2010, AT&T shall make Bonus Matching Contributions equal to 20%accelerate the vesting of the Participant’s monthly Employee Contributions from each of Base Compensation and Short Term Incentive Award (not to exceed the target amount of such award, which limit shall be pro ratedOptions for any partial year award). Such Bonus Matching Contribution shall be used to purchase that number of Matching Share Units found by dividing the relevant Bonus Matching Contribution for the month by the FMV of the Stock on the last day of such month.

5.2Distribution of Share Units Acquired with Matching Contributions.

A Participant’s Matching Share Units shall be distributed in a lump sum, in accordance with the Plan’s distribution provisions, in the earlier of: (a) the calendar year following the calendar year of the Termination of Employment of the Participant or (b) the calendar year in which the Participant reaches age 55, in each case only with respect to Matching Share Units relating to Share Deferral Accounts for Plan Years before such distribution calendar year.

Appendix – Page A-9


Matching Share Units acquired as part of a Share Deferral Account that commences in or after the calendar year the Employee reaches age 55 or after the calendar year in which the Employee Terminates Employment will be distributed in the same manner and time as other Share Units in such Share Deferral Account.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section, Matching Share Units acquired in 2008 and later shall be distributed at the same time as other Share Units (including those acquired with Employee Contributions) in the same Share Deferral Account.

Article 6 – Distributions

6.1Distributions of Share Units.

(a) Initial Election with Respect to a Share Deferral Account. At the time the Participant makes an election to make Employee Contributions with respect to a Share Deferral Account, the Participant shall also elect the calendar year the Share Deferral Account shall be distributed, which may be from the first through fifth calendar years after the Plan Year the Account commenced (except as otherwise provided in this Plan with respect to Matching Share Units). For example, if an Account commenced in 2005, the Participant may elect to commence the distribution in any calendar year from and including 2006 to and including 2010. If no timely distribution election is made by the Participant, then the Participant will be deemed to have made an election to have the Share Deferral Account distributed in a single installment in the first calendar year after the calendar year the Account commenced.

(b) Election to Delay a Scheduled Distribution. A Participant may elect to defer a scheduled distribution of a Share Deferral Account for five (5) additional calendar years beyond that previously elected (except as otherwise provided in this Plan with respect to Matching Share Units). Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the election to defer the distribution must be made on or after October 1, and on or before the last Business Day of the next following December, of the calendar year that is the second calendar year preceding the calendar year of the relevant scheduled distribution. To make this election, the Participant must be an Eligible Employee both on the September 30 immediately preceding such election and on the last day such an election may be made. For example, an election to defer a scheduled distribution in 2010 must be made during the period from October 1, 2008, through the last business day of December 2008, and the Participant must be an Eligible Employee both on September 30, 2008, and the last business day of December 2008. An election to defer the distribution of a Share Deferral Account may not be made in the same calendar year that the election to establish the Share Deferral Account is made. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, (1) an election to defer the distribution of a Share Deferral Account must be made at least 12 months prior to the date of the first scheduled payment under the prior distribution election and (2) the election shall not take effect until at least 12 months after the date on which the election is made.

(c) A Participant’s Share Deferral Account shall be distributed to the Participant on March 10 (or as soon thereafter as administratively practicable as determined by AT&T) of the calendar year elected by the Participant for that Account. In the event the distribution is to be made to a “Specified Employee” as a result of the Participant’s Termination of Employment (other than as a result of a Change in Control), the distribution shall not occur until the later of such March 10 or six (6) months after the Termination of Employment, except it shall be distributed upon the Participant’s earlier death in accordance with this Plan.

6.2Death of the Participant.

In the event of the death of a Participant, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, all undistributed Share Deferral Accounts shall be distributed to the Participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the AT&T Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations, as the same may be amended from time to time, within the later of 90 days following such determination or the end of the calendar year in which determination was made.

Appendix – Page A-10


6.3Unforeseeable Emergency Distribution.

If a Participant experiences an “Unforeseeable Emergency,” the Participant may submit a written petition to AT&T (the Committee in the case of Officer Level Employees), to receive a partial or full distribution of his Share Deferral Account(s). In the event that AT&T (the Committee in the case of Officer Level Employees), upon review of the written petition of the Participant, determines in its sole discretion that the Participant has suffered an “Unforeseeable Emergency,” AT&T shall make a distribution to the Participant from the Participant’s Share Deferral Accounts (other than Matching Share Units), on a pro-rata basis, within the later of 90 days following such determination or the end of the calendar year in which determination was made, subject to the following:

(a) “Unforeseeable Emergency” shall mean a severe financial hardship to the Participant resulting from an illness or accident of the Participant, the Participant’s legal spouse, the Participant’s beneficiary, or the Participant’s dependent (as defined in Code Section 152, without regard to Code Section 152(b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B)); loss of the Participant’s property due to casualty; or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant, all as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. Whether a Participant is faced with an Unforeseeable Emergency permitting a distribution is to be determined based on the relevant facts and circumstances of each case, but, in any case, a distribution on account of Unforeseeable Emergency shall not be made to the extent that such emergency is or may be relieved through reimbursement or compensation from insurance or otherwise, by liquidation of the Participant’s assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not cause severe financial hardship, or by cessation of deferrals under the Plan.

(b) The amount of a distribution to be made because of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the FMV of the Participant’s vested Share Deferral Account, calculated as the date on which the amount becomes payable, as determined by AT&T (the Committee in the case of Officer Level Employees) in its sole discretion, and (ii) the amount reasonably necessary, as determined by the AT&T (the Committee in the case of Officer Level Employees) in its sole discretion, to satisfy the emergency need (which may include amounts necessary to pay any Federal, state, local, or foreign income taxes or penalties reasonably anticipated to result from the distribution). Determinations of the amount reasonably necessary to satisfy the emergency need shall take into account any additional compensation that is available if the plan provides for cancellation of a deferral election upon a payment due to an Unforeseeable Emergency. The determination of amounts reasonably necessary to satisfy the Unforeseeable Emergency needwho is not required to, but may, take into account any additional compensation that, due to the Unforeseeable Emergency, is available under another nonqualified deferred compensation plan but has not actually been paid, or that is available due to the Unforeseeable Emergency under another plan that would provide for deferred compensation except due to the applicationan Insider.

6.06Exercise of the effective date provisions under Treasury Regulation §1.409A-6.

(c) Upon such distribution on account of an Unforeseeable Emergency under this Plan, any election to make Employee Contributions by such Participant shall be immediately cancelled, and the Participant shall not be permitted to make a new election with respect to Employee Contributions that would be contributed during the then current and immediately following calendar year.

6.4Ineligible Participant.Options.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan to the contrary, if AT&T receives an opinion from counsel selected by AT&T, or a final determination is made by a Federal, state or local government or agency, acting within its scope of authority, to the effect that an individual’s continued participation in the Plan would violate applicable law, then such person shall not make further contributions to the Plan to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code.

 

Appendix – Page A-11


6.5
Distribution Process.

A Share Deferral Account shall be distributed under this Plan by taking the number of Share Units comprising the Account to be distributed and converting them into an equal number of shares of Stock. (Once distributed, a Share Unit shall be canceled.)

Article 7 – Transition Provisions

7.1Stockholder Approval.

The Plan was approved by Stockholders at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

7.22005 Share Deferral Accounts.

Notwithstanding Article 4 to the contrary, if an Employee is an Eligible Employee on September 30, 2004, the Employee may make an election under Article 4 on or prior to December 15, 2004, with respect to the establishment of a Share Deferral Account for the (i) contribution of Base Compensation and/or Short Term Incentive Awards paid during the period from January 1, 2005, through January 15, 2006, which shall be the Plan Year for such Share Deferral Account; and/or (ii) the conversion of a distribution of Stock that would be made during the same Plan Year pursuant to the 2001 Incentive Plan into an equal number of Share Units, so long as such conversion would not cause the recognition of income for Federal income tax purposes in respect of such distribution of Stock prior to distribution of Share Units under this Plan.

7.32007 Amendments.

(a) Amendments made to the Plan on November 15, 2007, shall be effective January 1, 2008. except for amendments to this Article 7, which shall be effective upon adoption. Any Participants electing prior to November 15, 2007, to make Employee Contributions in 2008 shall have their elections canceled if they do not consent by December 14, 2007, to all prior amendments to this Plan and to the Cash Deferral Plan. Subject to the foregoing consent requirements, all Employee Contribution elections made prior to 2008, including but not limited to elections to contribute Stock that would be distributed under the 2001 Incentive Plan or a successor plan, shall remain in force, subject to all other terms of the amended Plan. In addition, all unvested but not forfeited Matching Share Units shall vest on November 15, 2007. Matching Shares that have been forfeited shall not be reinstated, and no amendment to this Plan shall be interpreted as reinstating such forfeitures.

(b) Not withstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, a Participant who as of December 29, 2006, was eligible for an additional payment pursuant to Section 4A of the BellSouth Corporation Executive Incentive Award Deferral Plan shall not, with respect to the 2008 Plan Year, receive Matching Share Units on Base Compensation that exceeds $230,000.

7.42008 Amendments.

For Plan Years prior to 2009, Participants who, at the time of the determination of their eligibility to participate in an Account, are paid through a “sales plan” involving the use of commissions may elect to contribute up to 40% of Base Compensation. For the 2008 Plan Year, only Salary and Short Term Incentive Awards paid after Termination of Employment may be contributed to the Plan.

Article 8 – Options

8.1Grants.

Options may be issued in definitive form or recorded on the books and records of AT&T for the account of the Participant, at the discretion of AT&T. If AT&T elects not to issue the Options in definitive form, they shall be deemed issued, and the Participants shall have all rights incident thereto as if they were issued on the dates provided herein, without further action on the part of AT&T or the Participant. In addition to the terms herein, all Options shall be subject to such additional provisions and limitations as provided in any Administrative

Appendix – Page A-12


Procedures adopted by the Committee prior to the issuance of such Options. The number of Options issued to a Participant shall be reflected on the Participant’s annual statement of account.

8.2Term of Options.

The Options may only be exercised: (a) after the earlier of (i) the expiration of one (1) year from date of issue or (ii) the Participant’s Termination of Employment, and (b) no later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of their issue; and Options shall be subject to earlier termination as provided herein.

8.3Exercise Price.

The Exercise Price of an

An Option shall be the FMV of the Stock on the date of issuance of the Option, and an Option may not be repriced.

8.4Issuance of Options.

(a) For each Share Deferral Account established by a Participant pursuant to an Employee Contribution election where such election was made prior to January 1, 2010:

(1) on June 15 of the Plan Year for the Share Deferral Account, the Participant shall receive two (2) Options for each Share Unit acquired by the Participant as part of such Share Deferral Account during the immediately preceding January through May period with Employee Contributions of Base Compensation and/or Short Term Incentive Award. A fractional number of Options shall be rounded up to the next whole number.

(2) on the February 15 immediately following the Plan Year for the Share Deferral Account, a Participant shall receive:

(i) two (2) Options for each Share Unit acquired by the Participant as part of such Share Deferral Account during the immediately preceding June through the remainder of the relevant Plan Year with Employee Contributions of Base Compensation and/or Short Term Incentive Award; and

(ii) two (2) Options for each Share Unit acquired prior to such date by the Participant with dividend equivalents that were derived, directly or indirectly (such as dividend equivalents paid on Share Units acquired with dividend equivalents), from Share Units acquired with Employee Contributions as part of such Share Deferral Account.

(b) A fractional number of Options shall be rounded up to the next whole number.

(c) If Stock is not traded on the NYSE on any of the foregoing Option issuance dates, then the Options shall not be issued until the next such day on which Stock is so traded.

(d) If a Participant Terminates Employment other than (i) while Retirement eligible or (ii) because of death or Disability, no further Options shall be issued to or with respect to such Participant. In the event of re-Employment following a Termination of Employment, the preceding sentence shall not apply to those Options resulting from participation in the Plan after such re-Employment until a subsequent Termination of Employment.

(e) No more than 400,000 Options shall be issued to any individual under this Plan during a calendar year. No Share Unit may be counted more than once for the issuance of Options.

(f) The Committee may, in its sole discretion, at any time, increase or lower the number of Options that are to be issued for each Share Unit acquired, not to exceed two (2) Options per Share Unit purchased. However, if the Committee lowers the number of Options, then such change shall only be effective with respect to the next Share Deferral Account a Participant may elect to establish.

Appendix – Page A-13


(g) The Committee may also, at any time and in any manner, limit the number of Options which may be acquired as a result of the Short Term Incentive Award being contributed to the Plan. Further, except as otherwise provided by the Committee, in determining the number of Options to be issued to a Participant with respect to a Participant’s contribution of a Short Term Incentive Award to the Plan and subsequent crediting of Share Units, Options may be issued only with respect to an amount which does not exceed the target amount of such award (or such other portion of the award as may be determined by the Committee). Where a Participant’s election to contribute a Short Term Incentive Award to the Plan becomes applicable to Annual Bonus, the above limitation on options shall apply to the contribution of Annual Bonus as though it were a Short Term Incentive Award.

(h) No options shall be issued to or in respect of a Participant for a particular issuance, unless at least ten (10) Options will be issued to that Participant.

8.5Exercise and Payment of Options.

Options shall be exercised by providing notice to the designated agent selected by AT&Tthe Company (if no such agent has been designated, then to AT&T)the Company), in the manner and form determined by AT&T,the Company, which notice shall be irrevocable, setting forth the exact number of shares of StockShares with respect to which the Option is being exercised and including with such notice payment of the Exercise Price.Price, as applicable. When Options havean Option has been transferred, AT&Tthe Company or its designated agent may require appropriate documentation that the person or persons exercising the Option, if other than the Participant, has the right to exercise the Option. No Option may be exercised with respect to a fraction of a share of Stock.Share.

Exercises
(b)Options granted under the Plan shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, exercises of Options may be effected only on days and during the hours that the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE is open for regular tradingtrading. The Company may change or as otherwise providedlimit the times or limited by AT&T.days Options may be exercised. If an Option expires on a day or at a time when exercises are not permitted, then the Options may be exercised no later than the immediately preceding date and time that the Options were exercisable.

The
6.07Payment of the Exercise Price.

(a)Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Exercise Price shall be paid in full at the time of exercise. No StockShares shall be issued or transferred until full payment has been received therefore.or the next business day thereafter, as determined by AT&T.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-7 |


PaymentAppendix A

(b)The Committee may, from time to time, determine, modify, or limit the method or methods of exercising Options or the manner in which the Exercise Price is to be made:

(a) in cash, or

(b) unlesspaid. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee at any time, and subject to such additional terms and conditions and/in full or modifications as AT&Tin part:

(i)Payment may impose from time to time, and further subject to suspension or termination of this provision by AT&T at any time, by:be made in cash.

(i) electing a Stock-Settled Exercise on or after February 1, 2013. Upon
(ii)An Option may be “stock settled,” which shall mean upon exercise of Options through a Stock-Settled Exercise,an Option, the ParticipantCompany shall receivedeliver that number of shares of Stock found by (1) subtractingtaking the Exercise Price of an Option being exercised (on a per share basis) fromdifference between (A) the FMVFair Market Value of the Stock as of the immediately precedingfirst day that the Stock was traded on the NYSE (2) multiplyingimmediately preceding the differenceexercise date, multiplied by the number of Options being exercised and (3) dividing(B) the result by the same FMV. For example, a Participant exercises 1,000 Options with antotal Exercise Price of $30 (exercises may only occurthe Options being exercised, and dividing such difference by the Fair Market Value of the Stock as of the first day that the Stock was traded on a day when the NYSE is open for regular trading) and the FMV for the immediately preceding trading day was $40. In that case, the Participant would receive his $10,000 profit in the form of 250 shares of Stock, subject to tax withholding and any other costs provided under this Plan.

exercise date.

 

Appendix – Page A-14


or;

(ii) if AT&T
(iii)If the Company has designated a stockbroker to act as AT&T’san agent to process Option exercises, issuance ofan Option may be exercised by issuing an exercise notice to such stockbroker together with instructions to such agent irrevocably instructing the stockbroker:agent (which shall include any broker-dealer engaged by the agent): (A) to immediately sell (which shall include an exercise notice that becomes effective upon execution of a sellsale order) a sufficient portion of the StockShares to be received from the Option exercise to pay the Exercise Price of the Options being exercised and the required tax withholding, and (B) to deliver on the settlement date the portion of the proceeds of the sale equal to the Exercise Price and tax withholding to AT&T.the Company. In the event the stockbrokeragent sells any StockShares on behalf of a Participant, the stockbrokeragent shall be acting solely as the agent of the Participant, and AT&Tthe Company disclaims any responsibility for the actions of the stockbrokeragent in making any such sales. No StockShares shall be issued until the settlement date and until the proceeds (equal to the Exercise Price and tax withholding) are paid to AT&T.the Company.

6.08Termination of Employment. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the following limitations on exercise of Options shall apply upon Termination of Employment:

(a)Termination by Death or Disability. In the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment by reason of death or Disability, all outstanding Options granted to that Participant shall immediately vest as of the date of Termination of Employment and may be exercised, if at all, no more than five (5) years from the date of the Termination of Employment, unless the Options, by their terms, expire earlier.

(b)Termination for Cause. In the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment for Cause, then the Committee may, in its sole discretion, forfeit all outstanding Options held by the Participant to the Company and no additional exercise period shall be allowed, regardless of the vested status of the Options.

(c)Retirement or Other Termination of Employment. In the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment for any reason other than the reasons set forth in (a) or (b), above:

(i)If upon the Participant’s Termination of Employment, the Participant is eligible to Retire, then all outstanding unvested Options granted to that Participant shall immediately vest as of the date of the Participant’s Termination of Employment;

A-8 | www.att.com


Appendix A

 

8.6Restrictions on Exercise and Transfer.

No Option shall

(ii)All outstanding Options which are vested as of the effective date of Termination of Employment may be transferable except: (a) uponexercised, if at all, no more than five (5) years from the date of Termination of Employment if the Participant is eligible to Retire, or three (3) months from the date of the Termination of Employment if the Participant is not eligible to Retire, as the case may be, unless in either case the Options, by their terms, expire earlier; and

(iii)In the event of the death of athe Participant after Termination of Employment, this paragraph (c) shall still apply and not paragraph (a), above.

(d)Options not Vested at Termination. Except as provided in accordance with AT&T’s Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations, as the same may be amended from time to time;paragraphs (a) and (b) in the case of any holder after the Participant’s death, only by will or(c)(i), above, all Options held by the lawsParticipant which are not vested on or before the effective date of descentTermination of Employment shall immediately be forfeited to the Company (and the Shares subject to such forfeited Options shall once again become available for issuance under the Plan).

(e)Other Terms and distribution. Conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish different, or waive, terms and conditions pertaining to the effect of Termination of Employment on Options, whether or not the Options are outstanding, but no such modification shall shorten the terms of Options issued prior to such modification or otherwise be materially adverse to the Participant.

6.09Restrictions on Exercise and Transfer of Options. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee:

(a)During the Participant’s lifetime, the Participant’s Options shall be exercisable only by the Participant or by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. After the death of the Participant, except as otherwise provided by AT&T’s Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations, an Option shall only be exercised by the holder thereof (including, but not limited to, an executor or administrator of a decedent’s estate) or his or her guardian or legal representative. In each such case the

(b)No Option holder shall be consideredtransferable except: (i) in the case of the Participant, only upon the Participant’s death and in accordance with the AT&T Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations; and (ii) in the case of any holder after the Participant’s death, only by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Article 7.      Restricted Stock.

7.01Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to eligible Employees in such amounts and upon such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. In addition to any other terms and conditions imposed by the Committee, vesting of Restricted Stock may be conditioned upon the achievement of Performance Goals in the same manner as provided in Section 8.04, herein, with respect to Performance Shares. No Employee may be awarded, in any calendar year, a number of Shares in the form of Restricted Stock (or Restricted Stock Units) exceeding one percent (1%) of the Shares approved for issuance under this Plan.

7.02

Restricted Stock Agreement. The Committee may require, as a condition to receiving a Restricted Stock Award, that the Participant forenter into a Restricted Stock Award Agreement, setting forth the limited purposeterms and conditions of exercising such Options.the Award. In lieu of a Restricted

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-9 |


Appendix A

 

8.7

Stock Award Agreement, the Committee may provide the terms and conditions of an Award in a notice to the Participant of the Award, on the Stock certificate representing the Restricted Stock, in the resolution approving the Award, or in such other manner as it deems appropriate.

7.03Transferability. Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, and subject to any additional terms in the grant thereof, Shares of Restricted Stock granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until fully vested.

7.04Restrictions.

Termination of Employment.

(a)Not Retirement Eligible.

The Restricted Stock shall be subject to such vesting terms, including the achievement of Performance Goals (as described in Section 8.04), as may be determined by the Committee. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, if a Participant Terminates Employment while not Retirement eligible, a Participant’s Options may be exercised, to the extent then exercisable:

(i)Restricted Stock is subject to any condition to vesting, if such condition or conditions are not satisfied by the time the period for achieving such condition has expired, such Restricted Stock shall be forfeited. The Committee may impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable including but not limited to a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock and/or restrictions under applicable Federal or state securities laws; and may legend the certificates representing Restricted Stock to give appropriate notice of such restrictions. The Committee may also grant Restricted Stock without any terms or conditions in the form of vested Stock Awards.

(b)The Company shall have the right to retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as the Shares are fully vested and all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied.

7.05Removal of Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7 or otherwise provided in the grant terms, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan shall become freely transferable by the Participant after completion of all conditions to vesting, if any. However, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to immediately vest the shares and waive all or part of the restrictions and conditions with regard to all or part of the Shares held by any Participant at any time.

7.06Voting Rights, Dividends and Other Distributions. Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights and, unless otherwise provided in the grant terms, shall receive all dividends and distributions paid with respect to such Shares. The Committee may require that dividends and other distributions, other than regular cash dividends, paid to Participants with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock be subject to the same restrictions and conditions as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid. If any such dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, the Shares shall automatically be subject to the same restrictions and conditions as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid.

7.07

Termination of Employment isDue to Death or Disability. In the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment by reason of death or Disability, then for a periodall restrictions imposed on

A-10 | www.att.com


Appendix A

outstanding Shares of three (3) years fromRestricted Stock held by the Participant shall immediately lapse and the Restricted Stock shall immediately become fully vested as of the date of such Termination of Employment.

7.08Termination of Employment or until the expiration of the stated term of such Option, whichever period is shorter; or

(ii) if such Termination of Employment is for any other reason, then for a period of one (1) year from the date of such Termination of Employment or until the expiration of the stated term of such Option, whichever period is shorter.

(b)Retirement Eligible.Other Reasons. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, in the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment for any reason other than due to Death, Disability, or Surplus Termination of Employment, all Shares of Restricted Stock held by the Participant which are not vested as of the effective date of Termination of Employment immediately shall be forfeited and returned to the Company.

7.09Restricted Stock Units.

(a)In lieu of or in addition to Restricted Stock, the Committee may grant Restricted Stock Units under such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee. Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions under this Plan as Restricted Stock except as otherwise provided in this section 7.09 or as otherwise provided by the Committee. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, the award shall be settled and pay out promptly upon vesting (to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code), and the Participant holding such Restricted Stock Units shall receive, as determined by the Committee, Shares (or cash equal to the Fair Market Value of the number of Shares as of the date the award becomes payable) equal to the number of such Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall not be transferable, shall have no voting rights, and shall not receive dividends, but shall, unless otherwise provided by the Committee, receive dividend equivalents at the time and at the same rate as dividends are paid on Shares with the same record and pay dates.

(b)Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment due to Death or Disability or upon becoming or being Retirement eligible, his or her Restricted Stock Units will vest, and in the case of Death, will pay out promptly, and in other cases, will pay out at the scheduled distribution date. If the Participant dies after Termination of Employment, vested Restricted Stock Units will be promptly paid out.

7.10Surplus Termination of Employment. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, in the event of a Surplus Termination of Employment that occurs prior to the vesting date of a grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, the Participant shall receive a pro-rata distribution as follows: the number of the Participant’s unvested Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall be prorated by multiplying the number of unvested Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units by the number of months in the restriction period during which the Participant worked at least one day divided by the total number of months in the restriction period, and such prorated amount shall be vested but shall not be payable until the scheduled distribution date, or as otherwise provided in the Plan.

Article 8.      Performance Units and Performance Shares.

8.01Grants of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Performance Shares and Performance Units may be granted to eligible Employees at any time and from time to time, as determined by the Committee. The Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of Performance Units and/or Performance Shares Awarded to each Participant and the terms and conditions of each such Award.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-11 |


Appendix A

8.02Value of Performance Shares and Units.

(a)A Performance Share is equivalent in value to a Share. In any calendar year, no individual may be awarded Performance Shares having a potential payout of Shares exceeding one percent (1%) of the Shares approved for issuance under this Plan.

(b)A Performance Unit shall be equal in value to a fixed dollar amount determined by the Committee. In any calendar year, no individual may be Awarded Performance Units having a potential payout equivalent exceeding the Fair Market Value, as of the date of granting the Award, of one percent (1%) of the Shares approved for issuance under this Plan. The number of Shares equivalent to the potential payout of a Performance Unit shall be determined by dividing the maximum cash payout of the Award by the Fair Market Value per Share on the effective date of the grant. The Committee may denominate a Performance Unit Award in dollars instead of Performance Units. A Performance Unit Award may be referred to as a “Key Executive Officer Short Term Award.”

8.03Performance Period. The Performance Period for Performance Shares and Performance Units is the period over which the Performance Goals are measured. The Performance Period is set by the Committee for each Award; however, in no event shall an Award have a Performance Period of less than one year.

8.04Performance Goals.

(a)For each Award of Performance Shares or Performance Units, the Committee shall establish (and may establish for other Awards) performance objectives (“Performance Goals”) for the Company, its Subsidiaries, and/or divisions of any of foregoing, using the criteria and other factors set forth in (b) and (c), below. It may also use other criteria or factors in establishing Performance Goals in addition to or in lieu of the foregoing. A Performance Goal may be stated as an absolute value or as a value determined relative to an index, budget, prior period, similar measures of a peer group of other companies or other standard selected by the Committee. Performance Goals shall include payout tables, formulas or other standards to be used in determining the extent to which the Performance Goals are met, and, if met, the number of Performance Shares and/or Performance Units which would be converted into Stock and/or cash (or the rate of such conversion) and distributed to Participants in accordance with Section 8.6. Unless previously canceled or reduced, Performance Shares and Performance Units which may not be converted because of failure in whole or in part to satisfy the relevant Performance Goals or for any other reason shall be canceled at the time they would otherwise be distributable. When the Committee desires an Award of Performance Shares, Performance Units, Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended, the Committee shall establish or modify the Performance Goals for the respective Award prior to or within 90 days of the beginning of the Performance Period relating to such Performance Goal, and not later than after twenty-five percent (25%) of such period has elapsed. For all other Awards, the Performance Goals must be established or modified before the end of the respective Performance Period.

A-12 | www.att.com


Appendix A

(b)In establishing Performance Goals, Committee is authorized to use, in its sole discretion, any of the following criteria or any combination thereof, including but not limited to the offset against each other of any combination of the following criteria:

(i)Financial performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries, and/or a division of any of the foregoing. Such financial performance may be based on net income, Value Added (after- tax cash operating profit less depreciation and less a capital charge), EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), revenues, sales, expenses, costs, gross margin, operating margin, profit margin, pre-tax profit, market share, volumes of a particular product or service or category thereof, including but not limited to the product’s life cycle (for example, products introduced in the last two years), number of customers or subscribers, number of items in service, including but not limited to every category of access or network connections, return on net assets, return on assets, return on capital, return on invested capital, cash flow, free cash flow, operating cash flow, operating revenues, operating expenses, and/or operating income.

(ii)Service performance of the Company (on a consolidated basis), of one or more of its Subsidiaries, and/or of a division of any of the foregoing. Such service performance may be based upon measured customer perceptions of service quality (which may include measurements of the customer’s likelihood to recommend the Company its products or services, among other things), employee satisfaction, employee retention, product development, completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction, completion of an identified special project, and effectiveness of management.

(iii)The Company’s Stock price, return on stockholders’ equity, total stockholder return (Stock price appreciation plus dividends, assuming the reinvestment of dividends), and/or earnings per Share.

(iv)Impacts of acquisitions, dispositions, or restructurings, on any of the foregoing.

(c)Exclusions and Adjustments to Performance Goals.

(i)If the matters in a specific category below have a collective net impact (whether positive or negative) on net income, after taxes and available and collectible insurance, that exceed $500 million in a calendar year, then such matters (as well as any related effects on cash flow, if applicable) shall be excluded in determining whether or the extent to which the relevant Performance Goals applicable to such year are met:

Categories:

(1) changes in accounting principles;

(2) changes in Federal tax law;

(3) changes in the tax laws of the states;

(4) expenses caused by natural disasters, including but not limited to floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes;

(5) expenses resulting from intentionally caused damage to property of the Company or its Subsidiaries taken as a whole;

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-13 |


Appendix A

(6) non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets, and fixed assets.

(ii)In addition, where matters in a specific category have a collective net impact (whether positive or negative) on net income, after taxes and available and collectible insurance, that exceed $200 million but not $500 million in a calendar year, then such matters (as well as any related effects on cash flow, if applicable) shall also be excluded in determining the achievement of the relevant Performance Goals but only if the combined net effect of matters in all such categories (exceeding $200 million but not $500 million) exceeds $500 million.

(iii)Gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities from pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans (and any associated tax effects) shall be disregarded in determining whether or the extent to which a Performance Goal has been met.

(iv)Unless otherwise provided by the Committee at any time, no such adjustment shall be made for a current or former executive officer to the extent such adjustment would cause an Award to fail to satisfy the performance based exemption of Section 162(m) of the Code.

8.05Dividend Equivalents on Performance Shares.Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a cash payment (“Dividend Equivalent”) in an amount equal to the dividend payable on one Share shall be made to a Participant Terminatesfor each Performance Share held by such Participant on the record date for the dividend. Such Dividend Equivalent, if any, will be payable at the time the relevant AT&T common stock dividend is payable or at such other time as determined by the Committee, and may be modified or terminated by the Committee at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise provided by the Committee, Dividend Equivalents paid with respect to Performance Shares granted to an Officer Level Employee shall only be paid on the number of Performance Shares actually distributed and such payment shall be made when the related Performance Shares are distributed.

8.06Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units and Performance Shares.

(a)As soon as practicable after the applicable Performance Period has ended and all other conditions (other than Committee actions) to conversion and distribution of a Performance Share and/or Performance Unit Award have been satisfied (or, if applicable, at such other time determined by the Committee at or before the establishment of the Performance Goal), the Committee shall determine whether and the extent to which the Performance Goals were met for the applicable Performance Units and Performance Shares. If Performance Goals have been met, then the number of Performance Units and Performance Shares to be converted into Stock and/or cash and distributed to the Participants shall be determined in accordance with the Performance Goals for such Awards, subject to any limits imposed by the Committee.

(b)Payment of Performance Units and Performance Shares shall be made in a single lump sum, as soon as reasonably administratively possible following the determination of the number of Shares or amount of cash to which the Participant is entitled but not later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the applicable Performance Period.

A-14 | www.att.com


Appendix A

(c)Performance Units will be distributed to Participants in the form of cash. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, Performance Shares will be distributed to Participants in the form of fifty percent (50%) Stock and fifty percent (50%) Cash

(d)At any time prior to the distribution of the Performance Shares and/or Performance Units, unless otherwise provided by the Committee or prohibited by this Plan (such as in the case of a Change in Control), the Committee shall have the authority to reduce or eliminate the number of Performance Units or Performance Shares to be converted and distributed, or to cancel any part or all of a grant or award of Performance Units or Performance Shares, or to mandate the form in which the Award shall be paid (i.e., in cash, in Stock or both, in any proportions determined by the Committee).

(e)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, after a Change in Control, the payout of Performance Units and Performance Shares shall be determined exclusively by the attainment of the Performance Goals in effect prior to the Change in Control, and such Performance Goals may not be modified after such Change in Control. In addition, after a Change in Control, other than an adjustment to the awards based on the extent to which the Performance Goals were achieved, AT&T shall not reduce or eliminate the number of Performance Units or Performance Shares or cancel any part or all of a grant or award of Performance Units or Performance Shares.

(f)Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, any election to take a greater amount of cash or Stock with respect to Performance Shares must be made in the calendar year prior to the calendar year in which the Performance Shares are distributed.

(g)For the purpose of converting Performance Shares into cash and distributing the same to the holders thereof (or for determining the amount of cash to be deferred), the value of a Performance Share shall be the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Committee authorizes the payout of Awards. Performance Shares to be distributed in the form of Stock will be converted at the rate of one (1) Share per Performance Share.

8.07Death or Disability. In the event of the Participant’s death during a Performance Period, the Participant shall receive a lump sum payout of the related outstanding Performance Units and Performance Shares calculated as if all unfinished Performance Periods had ended with one hundred percent (100%) of the Performance Goals achieved, valued as of the date of death and payable as soon thereafter as reasonably possible but not later than the 15th day of the third month after the end of the calendar year in which such death occurred. Where the amount or part of Dividend Equivalents is determined by the number of Performance Shares that are paid out or is otherwise determined by a performance measure, and the related Performance Period for the Dividend Equivalents was not completed at death, then the Dividend Equivalents will be calculated as though one hundred percent (100%) of the goals were achieved and paid as soon as reasonably possible. A Termination of Employment due to Disability will not affect a Participant’s Award.

8.08

Retirement, Surplus Termination, Severance Termination, or Other Termination. Unless the Committee determines otherwise at any time, in the event of the Participant’s Termination of Employment during the Performance Period while Retirement eligible, in the event of a Surplus Termination of Employment, Severance Termination of

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-15 |


Appendix A

Employment, and in each case, not due to death or Disability, then upon such Termination, the amount of the Participant’s OptionPerformance Units and number of Performance Shares shall be adjusted; the revised Awards shall be determined by multiplying the amount of the Performance Units and the number of Performance Shares, as applicable, by the number of months the Participant worked at least one day during the respective Performance Period divided by the number of months in the Performance Period, to be paid, if at all, at the same time and under the same terms that such outstanding Performance Units or Performance Shares would otherwise be paid; provided, however, if the Termination of Employment occurs during the Performance Period and is for a reason other than Death, Disability, Surplus Termination of Employment, or Severance Termination of Employment, and while not Retirement eligible, then the related Award shall be cancelled upon such Termination.

8.09Nontransferability. Performance Units and Performance Shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than in accordance with the AT&T Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations.

Article 9.      Beneficiary Designation.

9.01In the event of the death of a Participant, distributions or Awards under this Plan, except for Restricted Stock, shall pass in accordance with the AT&T Rules for Employee Beneficiary Designations, as the same may be exercised,amended from time to time. A Participant’s most recent Beneficiary Designation that is applicable to awards under the 1996 Stock and Incentive Plan, the 2001 Incentive Plan, the 2006 Incentive Plan, or the 2011 Incentive Plan will also apply to distributions or awards under this Plan, except for Restricted Stock, unless and until the Participant provides to the extentcontrary in accordance with the procedures set forth in such Rules.

Article 10.    Employee Matters.

10.01Employment Not Guaranteed. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participant’s Employment at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries.

10.02Participation. No Employee shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.

10.03Loyalty Conditions and Enforcement. This section relates solely to Awards granted to a Participant who is an Officer Level Employee or a Senior Manager as of the date the Award is made.

(a)

Each Award under the Plan is intended to closely align the Participant’s long-term interests with those of the Company and its shareholders, and the conditions set forth in subsections (b) or (d) hereof (collectively, the “Loyalty Conditions”) are intended to protect the Company’s critical need for each Participant’s loyalty to the Company and its shareholders. If any Participant does not comply with a Loyalty Condition, either during employment or within the periods described below following Termination of Employment for any reason, then exercisable: (i)the Participant is acting contrary to the long-term interests of the Company, and there will be a failure of the consideration on which the Participant received any Award or Awards pursuant to the Plan. Accordingly, unless otherwise provided in the Award, as a condition of such Award, the Participant is deemed to agree that he shall not, without obtaining the written consent of AT&T in advance, violate the

A-16 | www.att.com


Appendix A

Loyalty Provisions of this Section 10.3. Unless otherwise expressly provided in an Award Agreement, if the Participant violates a Loyalty Condition, then the Company may terminate any outstanding, unexercised, unexpired, unpaid, or deferred Awards (“Award Termination”), rescind any exercise, payment or delivery pursuant to any Award or Awards (“Rescission”), or recapture any cash or Shares (whether restricted or unrestricted) issued pursuant to any Award or Awards, or proceeds from the Participant’s sale of such Shares (“Recapture”). Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, nothing in this Plan shall be interpreted to prohibit, limit or interfere with a Participant’s right to report possible violations of federal, state or local law or regulation to any governmental or law enforcement agency or entity, including, but not limited to, the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Communications Commission or Congress, or to make other disclosures that are protected under the whistleblower or other provisions of federal, state or local law or regulation. Similarly, a Participant may report such possible violations to anyone in his or her chain of command, the AT&T Legal Department, AT&T Asset Protection, or any other AT&T group responsible for compliance with laws or AT&T policy.

(b)During the Participant’s employment with the Company and any of its Subsidiaries and for a period of five (5)two years from the date of Retirement or (ii) until the expiration of the stated term of such Option, whichever period is shorter.

(c) Re-Employment of a Participant after a Termination of Employment for any reason, a Participant shall havenot, without the Company’s prior written authorization, (i) disclose to anyone outside the Company or use, other than in the Company’s business, any Confidential Information, or (ii) disclose any trade secrets of the Company, as that term is defined under Applicable Law, for as long as such information is not generally known to the Company’s competitors through no effect onfault or negligence of the periods during which Options resulting from the prior Employment may be exercised.Participant.

“Confidential Information” means all information belonging to, or otherwise relating to the business of the Company, which is not generally known, regardless of the manner in which it is stored or conveyed to Participant, and which the Company has taken reasonable measures under the circumstances to protect from unauthorized use or disclosure. Confidential Information includes trade secrets as well as other proprietary knowledge, information, know-how, and non-public intellectual property rights, including unpublished or pending patent applications and all related patent rights, formulae, processes, discoveries, improvements, ideas, conceptions, compilations of data, and data, whether or not patentable or copyrightable and whether or not it has been conceived, originated, discovered, or developed in whole or in part by Participant. For example, Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to, information concerning the Company’s business plans, budgets, operations, products, strategies, marketing, sales, inventions, designs, costs, legal strategies, finances, employees, customers, prospective customers, licensees, or licensors; information received from third parties under confidential conditions; or other valuable financial, commercial, business, technical or marketing information concerning the Company, or any of the products or services made, developed or sold by the Company. Confidential Information does not include information that (i) was generally known to the public at the time of disclosure; (ii) was lawfully received by Participant from a third party; (iii) was known to Participant prior to receipt from the Company; or (iv) was independently developed by Participant or independent third parties; in each of the foregoing circumstances, this exception applies only if such public knowledge or possession by an independent third party was without breach by

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-17 |


Appendix A

Participant or any third party of any obligation of confidentiality or non-use, including but not limited to the obligations and restrictions set forth in this Agreement.

(c)Coincidentally with the exercise, receipt of payment, or delivery of cash or Shares pursuant to an Award, the Company may require that the Participant shall give a certification to the Company in writing if the Option exercise period has been shortened becauseParticipant is not for any reason in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the prior Termination of Employment, it shall not be extended because of the re-Employment.

(d) Notwithstanding any other definition of Termination of Employment under this Plan, for purposes of this Article 8 – Options only,including its Loyalty Conditions. If a Termination of Employment has occurred for any reason, the Participant’s certification shall meanstate the cessationname and address of the Employee being employedParticipant’s then-current employer or any entity for which the Participant performs business services and the Participant’s title, and shall identify any organization or business in which the Participant owns an equity interest of greater than five percent.

(d)If the Company determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that (i) a Participant has violated any of the Loyalty Conditions, or (ii) during his or her employment by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or within two years after the Termination of Employment for any reason, a Participant has engaged in any of the following conduct:

(A)owned, operated or controlled, or participated in the ownership, operation or control of, any business enterprise (including, without limitation, any corporation, partnership, ventureproprietorship or other entityventure) that competes with the Company in which AT&T holds, directlythe Restricted Business (defined below) anywhere in the Restricted Territory (defined below);

(B)become employed as an officer or indirectly,executive by any business enterprise (including, without limitation, any corporation, partnership, proprietorship or other venture) that competes with the Company in the Restricted Business anywhere in the Restricted Territory, if such employment or engagement requires Participant to compete against the Company in the Restricted Business;

(C)solicited any nonclerical employee of the Company with whom the Participant had Contact during his or her employment to terminate employment with the Company; or

(D)committed any breach of Participant’s fiduciary duty or the duty of loyalty, as determined by Applicable Law,

then the Committee may, in its sole and absolute discretion, impose an Award Termination, Rescission, and/or Recapture with respect to any or all of the Participant’s Awards, including any Shares or cash associated therewith, or any proceeds thereof. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Restricted Business” means the business of providing communications or connectivity services, including both wireless and wire-lined telephone, messaging, Internet, data, and related services; the term “Restricted Territory” shall mean the state in which the Participant maintained his or her principal office with the Company on the date the Award was granted; and the term “Contact” means interaction between the Participant and the nonclerical employee during performance of Participant’s job responsibilities on behalf of the Company.

(e)

Within ten days after receiving notice from the Company of any such activity described in subsection (d) above, the Participant shall deliver to the Company

A-18 | www.att.com


Appendix A

the cash or Shares acquired pursuant to any and all Awards, or, if Participant has sold the Shares, the gain realized, or payment received as a 50%result of the rescinded exercise, payment, or greater ownershipdelivery; provided, that if the Participant returns Shares that the Participant purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option (or the gains realized from the sale of such Shares), the Company shall promptly refund the exercise price, without earnings or interest, that the Participant paid for the Shares. Any payment by the Participant to the Company pursuant to this Section shall be made either in cash or by returning to the Company the number of Shares that the Participant received in connection with the rescinded exercise, payment, or delivery. It shall not be a basis for Award Termination, Rescission or Recapture if, after a Termination of Employment, the Participant purchases, as an investment or otherwise, stock or other securities of an organization engaged in the Restricted Business, so long as (i) such stock or other securities are listed upon a recognized securities exchange or traded over the counter, and (ii) such investment does not represent more than a ten percent (10%) equity interest in the organization or business.

(f)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, the Company has sole and absolute discretion not to require Award Termination, Rescission and/or Recapture, and its determination not to require Award Termination, Rescission and/or Recapture with respect to any particular act by a particular Participant or Award shall not in any way reduce or eliminate the Company’s authority to require Award Termination, Rescission and/or Recapture with respect to any other act or Participant or Award. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to impose obligations on the Participant to refrain from engaging in lawful competition with the Company after the Participant’s Termination of Employment that does not violate subsections (b) or (d) of this Section, other than any obligations that are part of any separate agreement between the Company and the Participant or that arise under Applicable Law.

(g)All administrative and discretionary authority given to the Company under this Section shall be exercised by the most senior human resources executive of the Company or such other person or committee (including without limitation the Committee) as the Committee may designate from time to time.

(h)If any provision within this Section is determined to be unenforceable or invalid under any applicable law, such provision will be applied to the maximum extent permitted by Applicable Law, and shall automatically be deemed amended in a manner consistent with its objectives and any limitations required under Applicable Law.

10.04Reimbursement of Company for Unearned or Ill-gotten Gains. The Participant shall repay to the Company any amount received under any Award, and the Company may cancel or forfeit any unpaid or unvested Award, in each case to the extent required under any policy adopted at any time by the Company pursuant to any applicable listing standards established under Section 10D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This section shall not limit the Company’s right to revoke or cancel an award or take other action against a recipient of an award for any other reason, including but not limited to where AT&T ceases to hold such interest in

misconduct.

Article 11.     Amendment and Termination of Plan or Awards.

 

11.01

Appendix – Page A-15Amendment and Termination. At any time and from time to time, the Board or the Disinterested Committee may amend or terminate the Plan. The Board, the Disinterested

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-19 |


the employing company. In addition, the definition of Retirement for purposes of this Article 8 shall use the immediately foregoing definition of Termination of Employment in lieu of any other definition.

Article 9 – Discontinuation, Termination, AmendmentAppendix A

 

9.1

AT&T’s Right to Discontinue Offering Share Units.

The Committee, may at any time discontinue offerings of Share Units under the Plan. Any such discontinuance shall have no effect upon existing Share Units or the termsNon-Insider Committee (subject to Section 3.01) may amend an Award in whole or provisions of this Plan as applicable to such Share Units.

9.2AT&T’s Right to Terminate Plan.

The Committee may terminatein part. Notwithstanding the Plan at any time. Uponforegoing, no termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan contributions shall no longer be madeor any Award (other than Performance Shares or Performance Units) that adversely affects in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan.

After termination of the Plan, Participants shall continue to earn dividend equivalents in the form of Share Units on undistributed Share Units and shall continue to receive all distributions under this Plan at such time as provided in and pursuant to the terms and conditions of Participant’s elections and this Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the termination of the Plan shall be made solely in accordancewithout the written consent of the Participant holding such Award; provided, however, that any such modification made for the purpose of complying with Section 409A of the Code andor due to changes in no event shall causeapplicable law may be made by the accelerated distributionCompany without the consent of any Account unless such terminationParticipant.

11.02Delay in Payment. To the extent required in order to avoid the imposition of any interest and/or additional tax under Section 409A(a)(1)(B) of the Code, any amount that is effected in accordance withconsidered deferred compensation under the Plan or Agreement and that is required to be postponed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.

9.3Amendment.

The Committee may atCode, following the a Participant’s Termination of Employment shall be delayed for six months if a Participant is deemed to be a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(i)(B) of the Code; provided that, if the Participant dies during the postponement period prior to the payment of the postponed amount, the amounts withheld on account of Section 409A shall be paid to the executor or administrator of the decedent’s estate within 60 days following the date of his death. A “Specified Employee” means any time amendParticipant who is a “key employee” (as defined in Code Section 416(i) without regard to paragraph (5) thereof), as determined by AT&T in accordance with its uniform policy with respect to all arrangements subject to Code Section 409A, based upon the twelve (12) month period ending on each December 31st (such twelve (12) month period is referred to below as the “identification period”). All Participants who are determined to be key employees under Code Section 416(i) (without regard to paragraph (5) thereof) during the identification period shall be treated as Specified Employees for purposes of the Plan in wholeduring the twelve (12) month period that begins on the first day of the 4th month following the close of such identification period.

Article 12.     Withholding.

12.01Tax Withholding. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the Company shall deduct or in part includingwithhold an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes (including but not limited to changing the formulas for determining the amount of AT&T Matching Contributions under Article 5 or decreasing the number of OptionsParticipant’s employment tax obligations) required by law to be issued under Article 8; provided, however, that no amendment, including but not limited to an amendment to this section, shall be effective, without the consent of a Participant, to alter, to the material detriment of such Participant, a Share Deferral Account of the Participant, other than as provided elsewhere in this section. For purposes of this section, an alteration to the material detriment of a Participant shall include, but not be limited to, a material reduction in the period of time over which Stock may be distributed to a Participant, any reduction in the Participant’s number of vested Share Units or Options, or an increase in the Exercise Price or decrease in the term of an Option. Any such consent may be in a writing, telecopy, or e-mail or in another electronic format. An election to acquire Share Units with Employee Contributions shall be conclusively deemed to be the consent of the Participant to any and all amendments to the Plan prior to such election, and such consent shall be a condition to making any election with respect to Employee Contributions.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this section of the Plan, the Committee may modify this Planwithheld with respect to any person subject totaxable event arising or as a result of this Plan (“Withholding Taxes”).

12.02Share Withholding.

(a)Unless otherwise provided by the provisions of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) to place additional restrictions on the exercise of any Option or the transfer of any Stock not yet issued under the Plan.

The Plan is established in order to provide deferred compensation to a select group of management and highly compensated employees with in the meaning of Sections 201(2) and 301(a)(3) of ERISA. To the extent legally required, the Code and ERISA shall govern the Plan, and if any provision hereof is in violation of an applicable requirement thereof, the Company reserves the right to retroactively amend the Plan to comply therewith to the extent permitted under the Code and ERISA. The Company also reserves the right to make such other changes as may facilitate implementation of Section 409A of the Code. Provided, however, that in no event shall any such amendments be made in violation of the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Appendix – Page A-16


Article 10 – Miscellaneous

10.1Tax Withholding.

Upon distribution of Stock, including but not limited to, shares of Stock issuedCommittee, upon the exercise of an Option, AT&TOptions, the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, the distribution of Performance Shares in the form of Stock, or any other taxable event hereunder involving the transfer of Stock to a Participant, the Company shall withhold shares of Stock sufficientequal in value to the Withholding Taxes applicable to such transaction using the FMV on the date determined by AT&T to bemethod used to value the Stock for tax purposes, to satisfy the minimum amount of Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld as a result of such distribution. Employment taxes incurred by a Participant on Employee Contributions and on Matching Contributions shall be withheld from the Participant’s regular wages or paid in cash by the Participant as they become due.purposes.

(b)Any fractional shareShare of Stock payable to a Participant shall be withheld as additional Federal withholding, or, at the option of AT&T,the Company, paid in cash to the Participant.

(c)

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, when the method of payment for the Exercise Price is from the sale through an agent appointed by a stockbroker pursuant to Section 8.5, hereof,the Company of the Stock acquired through the Option exercise, then the tax withholding shall

A-20 | www.att.com


Appendix A

be satisfied out of the proceeds. For administrative purposes in determining the amount of taxes due, the sale price of such Stock shall be deemed to be the FMVFair Market Value of the Stock.

10.2Elections and Notices.

(d)If permitted by the Committee, prior to the end of any Performance Period a Participant may elect to have a greater amount of Stock withheld from the distribution of Performance Shares to pay withholding taxes; provided, however, the Committee may prohibit or limit any individual election or all such elections at any time.

(e)Alternatively, or in combination with the foregoing, the Committee may require Withholding Taxes to be paid in cash by the Participant or by the sale of a portion of the Stock being distributed in connection with an Award, or by a combination thereof.

Article 13.     Successors.

13.01All obligations of the Company under the Plan, with respect to Awards granted hereunder, shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

Article 14.     Legal Construction.

14.01Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

14.02Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

14.03Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

14.04Errors. At any time AT&T may correct any error made under the Plan without prejudice to AT&T. Such corrections may include, among other things, changing or revoking an issuance of an Award.

14.05Elections and Notices.

(a)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan, all elections and notices of every kind under this Plan shall be made on forms prepared by AT&T or the General Counsel, Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or their respective delegates or shall be made in such other manner as permitted or required by AT&T or the General Counsel, Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or their respective delegates, including but not limited to elections or notices through electronic means, over the Internet or otherwise. An election shall be deemed made when received by AT&T (or its designated agent, but only in cases where the designated agent has been appointed for the purpose of receiving such election), which may waive any defects in form. Unless made irrevocable by the electing person, each election with regard to making Employee Contributions or distributions of Share Deferral Accounts shall become irrevocable at the close of business on the last day to make such election. AT&T may limit the time an election may be made in advance of any deadline.

AT&T 2016 Proxy Statement | A-21 |


If not otherwise specified by this Plan or AT&T,Appendix A

(b)Where any notice or filing required or permitted to be given to AT&T under the Plan, it shall be delivered to the principal office of AT&T, directed to the attention of the Senior Executive Vice President in chargePresident-Human Resources of Human Resources for AT&T or his or her successor. Such notice shall be deemed given on the date of delivery.

(c)Notice to the Participant shall be deemed given when mailed (or sent by telecopy) to the Participant’s work or home address as shown on the records of AT&T or, at the option of AT&T, to the Participant’s e-mail address as shown on the records of AT&T.

(d)It is the Participant’s responsibility to ensure that the Participant’s addresses are kept up to date on the records of AT&T. In the case of notices affecting multiple Participants, the notices may be given by general distribution at the Participants’ work locations.

By participating in the Plan, each Participant agrees that AT&T may provide any documents required or permitted under the Federal or state securities laws, including but not limited to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by e-mail, by e-mail attachment, or by notice by e-mail of electronic delivery through AT&T’s Internet Web site or by other electronic means.

10.3Unsecured General Creditor.

Participants and their beneficiaries, heirs, successors, and assigns shall have no legal or equitable rights, interest, or claims in any property or assets of any Employer. No assets of any Employer shall be held under any trust for the benefit of Participants, their beneficiaries, heirs, successors, or assigns, or held in any way as collateral security for the fulfilling of the obligations of any Employer under this Plan. Any and all of each

Appendix – Page A-17


Employer’s assets shall be, and remain, the general, unpledged, unrestricted assets of such Employer. The only obligation of an Employer under the Plan shall be merely that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of AT&T to distribute shares of Stock corresponding to Share Units and Options, under the Plan.

10.4Non-Assignability.

Neither a Participant nor any other person shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, pledge, anticipate, mortgage, or otherwise encumber, transfer, hypothecate or convey in advance of actual receipt, shares of Stock corresponding to Share Units under the Plan, if any, or any part thereof, which are, and all rights to which are, expressly declared to be unassignable and non-transferable. No part of the Stock distributable shall, prior to actual distribution, be subject to seizure or sequestration for the payment of any debts, judgments, alimony or separate maintenance owed by a Participant or any other person, nor be transferable by operation of law in the event of a Participant’s or any other person’s bankruptcy or insolvency.

10.5Employment Not Guaranteed.

Nothing contained in this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as a contract of employment or as giving any employee any right to be retained in the employ of an Employer or to serve as a director.

10.6Errors.

At any time AT&T or an Employer may correct any error made under the Plan without prejudice to AT&T or any Employer. Neither AT&T nor any Employer shall be liable for any damages resulting from failure to timely allow any contribution to be made to the Plan or for any damages resulting from the correction of, or a delay in correcting, any error made under the Plan. In no event shall AT&T or any Employer be liable for consequential or incidental damages arising out of a failure to comply with the terms of the Plan.

10.7Captions.

The captions of the articles, sections, and paragraphs of this Plan are for convenience only and shall not control nor affect the meaning or construction of any of its provisions.

10.8Governing Law.

14.06Governing Law. To the extent not preempted by Federal law, the Plan, and all benefitsawards and agreements hereunder, and any and all disputes in connection therewith, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Texas, without regard to conflict or choice of law principles which might otherwise refer the construction, interpretation or enforceability of this Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction.

14.07Venue. Because benefitsawards under the Plan are granted in Texas, records relating to the Plan and benefitsawards thereunder are located in Texas, and the Plan and benefitsawards thereunder are administered in Texas, AT&Texcept as otherwise agreed by the Participant and the Company in a Mandatory Arbitration Agreement, the Company and the Participant to whom an award under this Plan is granted, for themselves and their successors and assigns, irrevocably submit to the exclusive and sole jurisdiction and venue of the state or Federalfederal courts of Texas with respect to any and all disputes arising out of or relating to this Plan, the subject matter of this Plan or any benefitsawards under this Plan, including but not limited to any disputes arising out of or relating to the interpretation and enforceability of any benefitsawards or the terms and conditions of this Plan. To achieve certainty regarding the appropriate forum in which to prosecute and defend actions arising out of or relating to this Plan, and to ensure consistency in application and interpretation of the Governing Law to the Plan, except as otherwise agreed by the Participant and the Company in a Mandatory Arbitration Agreement, the parties agree that that:

(a)sole and exclusive appropriate venue for any such action shall be an appropriate Federalfederal or state court in Dallas County, Texas, and no other,

(b)all claims with respect to any such action shall be heard and determined exclusively in such Texas court, and no other,

(c)such Texas court shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over the subject matter of any dispute relating hereto, and

(d)that the parties waive any and all objections and defenses to bringing any such action before such Texas court, including but not limited to those relating to lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue orforum non conveniens.

 

Appendix – Page A-18


10.9
14.08409A Compliance. Awards under the Plan may be structured to be exempt from or be subject to Section 409A of the Code. To the extent that Awards granted under the Plan are subject to Comply with Section 409A.

In the event any provision of this Plan is held invalid, void, or unenforceable, the same shall not affect, in any respect whatsoever, the validity of any other provision of this Plan. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Plan, each provision in this Plan shall be interpreted to permit the deferral of compensation in accordance with Section 409A of the Code, the Plan will be construed and any provisionadministered in a manner that would conflict with such requirements shall not be valid or enforceable.

10.10Successors and Assigns.

This Plan shall be binding upon AT&T and its successors and assigns.

10.11Loyalty Conditions for Officer Level Employees and Senior Managers.

Each Officer Level Employee or a Senior Manager who elects to make Employee Contributions under Section 4.1 of this Plan shall be subject to the agreements and conditions of this section.

By making an Employee Contribution election under Section 4.1 of this Plan after September 1, 2009, a Participant acknowledges that AT&T would be unwilling to provide for such an election but for the loyalty conditions and covenants set forth in this section, and that the conditions and covenants herein are a material inducement to AT&T’s willingness to sponsorenables the Plan and such Awards to offer Plan benefits forcomply with the Participants. Accordingly, as a condition to making an Employee Contribution election underprovisions of Section 4.1 of this Plan after September 1, 2009, each such electing Participant is deemed to agree that he shall not, without obtaining the written consent409A of the Committee in advance, participate in activities that constitute engaging in competition with AT&T or engaging in conduct disloyal to AT&T, as those terms are defined in this section.

Definitions. For purposes of this section and of the Plan generally:

an “Employer Business” shall mean AT&T Inc. and any of its Subsidiaries, or any business in which they or any affiliate of theirs has a substantial ownership or joint venture interest;

“engaging in competition with AT&T” shall mean, while employed by AT&T or any of its Subsidiaries, or within two (2) years after Participant’s Termination of Employment, engaging by the Participant in any business or activity in all or any portion of the same geographical market where the same or substantially similar business or activity is being carried on by an Employer Business. “Engaging in competition with AT&T” shall not include owning a non-substantial publicly traded interest as a shareholder in a business that competes with an Employer Business. “Engaging in competition with AT&T” shall include representing or providing consulting services to, or being an employee of, any person or entity that is engaged in competition with any Employer Business or that takes a position adverse to any Employer Business.

“engaging in conduct disloyal to AT&T” means, while employed by AT&T or any of its Subsidiaries, or within two (2) years after Participant’s Termination of Employment, (i) soliciting for employment or hire, whether as an employee or as an independent contractor, for any business in competition with an Employer Business, any person employed by AT&T or any of its Subsidiaries during the one (1) year prior to the Participant’s Termination of Employment, whether or not acceptance of such position would constitute a breach of such person’s contractual obligations to AT&T or any of its Subsidiaries; (ii) soliciting, encouraging, or inducing any vendor or supplier with which Participant had business contact on behalf of any Employer Business during the two (2) years prior to the Participant’s Termination of Employment (regardless of the reason for that termination) to terminate, discontinue, renegotiate, reduce, or otherwise cease or modify its relationship with AT&T or any of its Subsidiaries; or (iii) soliciting, encouraging, or inducing any customer or active prospective customer with whom Participant had business contact, whether in person or by other media (“Customer”), on behalf of any Employer Business during the two (2) years prior to the Participant’s Termination of Employment (regardless of the reason for that termination), to terminate, discontinue, renegotiate, reduce, or otherwise cease or modify its relationship with any Employer Business,

Code.

 

Appendix – Page A-19


or to purchase competing goods or services from a business competing with any Employer Business, or accepting or servicing business from such Customer on behalf of himself or any other business. “Engaging in conduct disloyal to AT&T” shall also mean, disclosing Confidential Information to any third party or using Confidential Information, other than for an Employer Business, or failing to return any Confidential Information to the Employer Business following termination of employment.

“Confidential Information” shall mean all information belonging to, or otherwise relating to, an Employer Business, which is not generally known, regardless of the manner in which it is stored or conveyed to Participant, and which the Employer Business has taken reasonable measures under the circumstances to protect from unauthorized use or disclosure. Confidential Information includes trade secrets as well as other proprietary knowledge, information, know-how, and non-public intellectual property rights, including unpublished or pending patent applications and all related patent rights, formulae, processes, discoveries, improvements, ideas, conceptions, compilations of data, and data, whether or not patentable or copyrightable and whether or not it has been conceived, originated, discovered, or developed in whole or in part by Participant. For example, Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to, information concerning the Employer Business’ business plans, budgets, operations, products, strategies, marketing, sales, inventions, designs, costs, legal strategies, finances, employees, customers, prospective customers, licensees, or licensors; information received from third parties under confidential conditions; or other valuable financial, commercial, business, technical or marketing information concerning the Employer Business, or any of the products or services made, developed or sold by the Employer Business. Confidential Information does not include information that (i) was generally known to the public at the time of disclosure; (ii) was lawfully received by Participant from a third party; (iii) was known to Participant prior to receipt from the Employer Business; or (iv) was independently developed by Participant or independent third parties; in each of the foregoing circumstances, this exception applies only if such public knowledge or possession by an independent third party was without breach by Participant or any third party of any obligation of confidentiality or non-use, including but not limited to the obligations and restrictions set forth in this Plan.

Equitable Relief. The parties recognize that any Participant’s breach of any of the covenants in this section will cause irreparable injury to the AT&T, will represent a failure of the consideration under which AT&T (in its capacity as creator and sponsor of the Plan) agreed to provide the Participant with the opportunity to receive Plan benefits, and that monetary damages would not provide AT&T with an adequate or complete remedy that would warrant AT&T’s continued sponsorship of the Plan (including the accrual or granting of Share Units, Matching Share Units and Options) for all Participants. Accordingly, in the event of a Participant’s actual or threatened breach of the covenants in this section, the Committee, in addition to all other rights and acting as a fiduciary under ERISA on behalf of all Participants, shall have a fiduciary duty (in order to assure that AT&T receives fair and promised consideration for its continued Plan sponsorship and funding) to seek an injunction restraining the Participant from breaching the covenants in this Section. AT&T shall pay for any Plan expenses that the Committee incurs hereunder, and shall be entitled to recover from the Participant its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in obtaining such injunctive remedies.

Uniform Enforcement. In recognition of AT&T’s need for nationally uniform standards for the Plan administration, it is an absolute condition in consideration of any Participant’s ability to make Employee Contribution elections under Section 4.1 of this Plan after September 1, 2009, that each and all of the following conditions apply to all such electing Participants:

ERISA shall control all issues and controversies hereunder, and the Committee shall serve for purposes hereof as a “fiduciary” of the Plan and its “named fiduciary” within the meaning of ERISA.

All litigation between the parties relating to this section shall occur in federal court, which shall have exclusive jurisdiction; any such litigation shall be held in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the only remedies available with respect to the Plan shall be those provided under ERISA.

Appendix – Page A-20


LOGO

LOGO
A-22 | www.att.com


LOGO

LOGO


LOGO

     Admission Ticket
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
LOGOAdmission Ticket

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone. Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

LOGO

Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/att

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•    Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone.

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

LOGO     

Vote by Internet

•      Go towww.envisionreports.com/att

•      Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•      Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. LOGO   
Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.x

 

LOGO

 

Annual Meeting Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Card

q To vote by using the proxy card below, fold along the perforation, detach and return the bottom portion in the enclosed envelope.q

 

 A Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees.
  A  Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees. 
1.Nominees:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

+

01 - Randall L. Stephenson

 

1. Nominees:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainLOGO

01 - Randall L. Stephenson

¨¨¨06 - Scott T. Ford¨¨¨10 - John B. McCoy¨¨¨

02 - Gilbert F. Amelio

¨¨¨07 - James P. Kelly¨¨¨11 - Joyce M. Roch騨¨

03 - Reuben V. Anderson

¨¨¨08 - Jon C. Madonna¨¨¨12 - Matthew K. Rose¨¨¨

04 - James H. Blanchard

¨¨¨09 - Michael B. McCallister¨¨¨13 - Laura D’Andrea Tyson¨¨¨

05 - Jaime Chico Pardo

¨

¨

06 - William E. Kennard

¨

¨

¨

11 - Cynthia B. Taylor

¨

¨

¨

02 - Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. ¨  ¨  ¨  07 - Michael B. McCallister¨¨¨12 - Laura D’Andrea Tyson¨¨¨
03 - Richard W. Fisher¨¨¨08 - Beth E. Mooney¨¨¨             

  B Director Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORItems 2 through 4.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
2. Ratification of appointment of independent auditors.
04 - Scott T. Ford¨¨¨09 - Joyce M. Roché ¨  ¨  ¨4. Approve Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan.¨¨¨
3. Advisory approval of executive compensation.¨¨¨
             

  C 
05 - Glenn H. Hutchins¨¨¨10 - Matthew K. Rose¨¨¨  Stockholder Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteAGAINSTItems 5 through 8.

ForAgainstAbstain   ForAgainstAbstain        

��

5. Political contributions report.¨¨¨7. Compensation packages.¨¨¨
 B  Management Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORItems 2 through 4.   
6. Lead batteries report.¨¨¨8. Independent board chairman.¨¨¨

     For  Against  Abstain           For  Against  Abstain  
2. Ratification of appointment of independent auditors.  ¨  ¨  ¨    3. Advisory approval of executive compensation.   ¨  ¨  ¨  
4. Approval of 2016 Incentive Plan.  ¨  ¨  ¨              

 C  Stockholder Proposals —The Board of Directors recommends a voteAGAINSTItems 5 through 7.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain      
5.Political spending report.

 

¨

¨

¨

6. Lobbying report.

¨

¨

¨

7. Independent board chairman.

¨

¨

¨

    LOGO

1UPX

LOGO

002CS40121                    01KDNJ


n1 U P X+
001CSP00A8028YRD
AT&T Inc. 2013 Annual Meeting of StockholdersAdmission Ticket


AT&T Inc. 2016 Annual Meeting of StockholdersAdmission Ticket

Friday, April 29, 2016

Upon arrival, please present this

admission ticket and photo ID

at the registration desk.

Doors open at 8:00 a.m. local time
Meeting begins at 9:00 a.m. local time

Friday, April 26, 2013

Doors open at 8:00 a.m. local time

Meeting begins at 9:00 a.m. local time

Upon arrival, please present this

admission ticket and photo ID

at the registration desk.

Northern Hotel

Grand Ballroom

19 North Broadway

Billings, MT 59101

Directions:

Complimentary parking is available
as indicated on the map.

The meeting will be held in the Grand Ballroom.

LOGO

Little America Hotel & Resort

2800 West Lincolnway

Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009

q   To vote by using the proxy card below, fold along the perforation, detach and return the bottom portion in the enclosed envelope. q

 

Directions to Hotel:

From Airport:Head S on I-25,

take Exit 9 to W. Lincolnway.

From Denver:Head N on I-25,

take Exit 9 to W. Lincolnway.

Complimentary parking is available

at the hotel (see map).

The meeting will be held in

the Grand Ballroom.

LOGO

q  To vote by using the proxy card below, fold along the perforation, detach and return the bottom portion in the enclosed envelope.  q

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting on April 29, 2016.

The undersigned hereby appoints Randall L. Stephenson and John J. Stephens, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all common shares of the undersigned in AT&T Inc. at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2013.29, 2016, and at any adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the proxy statement furnished herewith, in accordance with the directions indicated on the reverse side of this card or provided through the telephone or Internet proxy procedures, and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters

+

The undersigned hereby appoints Randall L. Stephenson and John J. Stephens, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution,
that may properly come before the meeting. If specific voting directions are not given with respect to the matters to be acted upon and the signed card is returned, it will be treated as an instruction to vote all common shares of the undersigned in AT&T Inc. at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and at any adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the proxy statement furnished herewith, in accordance with the directions indicated on the reverse side of this card or provided through the telephone or Internet proxy procedures, and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.If specific voting directions are not given with respect to the matters to be acted upon and the signed card is returned, the proxies will vote such shares (except for shares held in the employee benefit plans noted below) in accordance with the Directors’ recommendations on the matters listed on the reverse side of this card and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.LOGO  

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all nominees,FOR Items 2 - 4, andAGAINST each of the stockholder proposals (Items 5 - 8) listed on the reverse side of this card (eachand at the discretion of which is described in the proxy statement). The Board of Directors knows of noproxies on any other matters that are to be presented atmay properly come before the meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all nominees,FOR Items 2 – 4, andAGAINST each of the stockholder proposals (Items 5 – 7) listed on the reverse side of this card (each of which is described in the proxy statement). The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that are to be presented at the meeting.

Please sign below and return promptly in the enclosed envelope or, if you choose, you can submit your proxy by telephone, through the Internet or mail it to Computershare, PO Box 43115, Providence RI 02940.

This proxy card, when signed and returned, or your telephone or Internet proxy, will also constitute voting instructions to the plan administrator or trustee for shares held on your behalf under any of the following employee benefit plans: the AT&T Savings and Security Plan, the AT&T Puerto Rico Retirement Savings Plan, the AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, the BellSouth Savings and Security Plan, and the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan. Shares in the employee benefit plans, excluding the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan, for which voting instructions are not received will not be voted, subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations. Shares in the DIRECTV 401(k) Savings Plan for which voting instructions are not received, subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations, will be voted by the trustees in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received from other participants in the plan. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees and/or administrators of the employee benefit plans, your voting instructions must be received by April 26, 2015.

Please sign below and return promptly in the enclosed envelope or, if you choose, you can submit your proxy by telephone, through the Internet or mail it to Computershare, PO Box 43115, Providence RI 02940. D 

This proxy card, when signed and returned, or your telephone or Internet proxy, will also constitute voting instructions to the (a) plan administrator for any shares held on your behalf pursuant to The DirectSERVICE Investment Program (dividend reinvestment plan) and (b) plan administrator or trustee for any shares held on your behalf under any of the following employee benefit plans: the AT&T Savings and Security Plan, the AT&T Puerto Rico Retirement Savings Plan, the AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, and the BellSouth Savings and Security Plan. Shares in each of the foregoing employee benefit plans for which voting instructions are not received will not be voted, subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees and/or administrators of the plans, your voting instructions must be received by April 23, 2013.

 

LOGO  Non-Voting Items Items

Change of Address— Please print new address below.

 

LOGOAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

 

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

//
 E   Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
          /          /              

n 

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A – E ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

+

 

LOGOIF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - E ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.LOGO